Summary:
Namely `enumerateObjectsUsingBlock` which takes a collection and a block as an arg and the iterates over the collection and applies the block to each element of the collection.
This is a common way to iterate over Objc collections, so let's add a model for it.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D24604590
fbshipit-source-id: 1ceeb4b40
Summary: This diff fixes on-demand symbolic value generation of a class that inherits NSEnumerator.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D24504955
fbshipit-source-id: bcb20e8aa
Summary:
This diff replaces overridden method calls in ObjC when possible, ie the first parameter of the
method has a sub-class type of the method's class. For example,
when `MyEnumerator` is a sub-class of `NSEnumerator` and there is overridden `nextObject`,
```
[my_enumerator nextObject]
```
in Sil, it was translated to like
```
NSEnumerator.nextObject(my_enumerator : MyEnumerator*)
```
and the analyzer missed the overridden method. This diff replaces the function call to
```
MyEnumerator.nextObject(my_enumerator : MyEnumerator*)
```
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D24477290
fbshipit-source-id: 6842a76f8
Summary:
This diff revises `nextObject` model to handle multiple symbolic enumerators. Instead joining the
symbolic offsets of them, which sometimes introduces top, it sums the offsets. This is a sound &
conservative semantics since they are all non-negative integers.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D24474513
fbshipit-source-id: 6707aa907
Summary:
This diff revises memory model of enumerator in ObjC to enable passing it as a parameter.
The cost checker was not able to analyze a function precisely when it gets an enumerator as a
parameter because the offset of an enumerator was available only when the analyzer knew the correct
relation between the enumerator and an array.
This diff simplifies the enumerator to have a similar value with `array->elements`, so its offset can
be taken without the relation between enumerator and array to get them.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D24446574
fbshipit-source-id: 27cdc051e
Summary:
The problem: current enumerator semantics does not work on symbolic enumerator that is given as a
parameter.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D24017059
fbshipit-source-id: 378e75bb0
Summary:
This diff reports paths under the xcode isysroot as relative in tests.
This was a problem when another machine that has a different isysroot
directory is running the test.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D23729222
fbshipit-source-id: 4e9681f65
Summary:
This diff finishes the migration from the specialization of methods that take blocks as arguments. Here we delete all the old code and change the way we model dispatch functions so that the tests pass.
- Remove the code for specializing the methods in biabduction.
- Remove the call flags `cf_with_block_parameters` that was only used in this algorithm.
- Removes models for dispatch functions.
- Adds models for dispatch functions as program transformation only in biabduction. To be added in other checkers in the future.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D23345342
fbshipit-source-id: b5e8542ce
Summary:
In the previous diffs, we implement enumerator in order to estimate the cost of for-each loop in ObjC, but when we have FP case when enumerator is used not in for-each loop. For example, the following code has top cost before the fix.
```
void nsarray_enumerator_linear_FP(NSArray* array) {
id obj;
NSInteger sum = 0;
NSEnumerator* enumerator = [array objectEnumerator];
while (obj = [enumerator nextObject]) {
sum += (NSInteger)obj;
}
}
```
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D23294895
fbshipit-source-id: 50c7b359f
Summary:
Fix the FP when iterating through constant collection.
facebook
This fix is a hack for now.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek, skcho
Differential Revision: D23241338
fbshipit-source-id: e2e0c05f8
Summary:
As title.
This diff is co-authored by SungKeun Cho and me.
facebook
This diff is co-authored by skcho and me.
Original comments from skcho
"For the record:
1. Rory and I tried to write models for ObjC iterator.
2. We could not use Java's iterator semantics: In Java's, `hasNext` returns the size of collection, rather than a boolean, and which is used as a control variable. On the other hand, in ObjC, it calls only `nextObject`, not calling `hasNext`, and the return value of which is being checked as `null`.
3. We added an artificial field `objc_iterator_offset` to keep the index of the iterator, and the models added in this diff are handling that integer value.
A problem is that `array.objc_iterator_offset` is not included in the control variables, since the condition of the loop is `nextObject() != null` that does not include the iterator offset. We need to make `array.objc_iterator_offset` as a control variable, by changing the part collecting control variables.
"
Reviewed By: ezgicicek, skcho
Differential Revision: D22944278
fbshipit-source-id: 7e71b79c1
Summary:
When implementing iterator, we find out that because some semantics of inferbo is Java-specific, we cannot simply use Java's `Collection` model for `NSCollection`.
So this diff writing `NSCollection` model separately.
This diff also extracts the common parts of `NSCollection` and `Collection` into `AbstractCollection` to combine the duplicate the parts.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D22975159
fbshipit-source-id: daed3f99f
Summary: Create test for the most common unmodeled function in inferbo that acts as control variable.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D22331168
fbshipit-source-id: 1913682db
Summary:
Add objc test for ```NSArray``` and ```NSMutableArray```.
```NSMutableArray``` is a subclass of ```NSArray```.
For documentation of ```NSArray```, https://developer.apple.com/documentation/foundation/nsarray?language=objc
For documentation of ```NSMutableArray```, https://developer.apple.com/documentation/foundation/nsmutablearray?language=objc
The underlying mechanism for ```NSMutableArray``` is quite complicated. It changes the underlying data structure during runtime, so it is possible to have say O(log n) complexity for accessing element in array. (See here https://opensource.apple.com/source/CF/CF-855.11/CFArray.h) However, this is unlikely to happen if the engineer does not abuse the usage of the class ```NSMutableArray``` according to at least two ios engineers. So here the complexity is set to match the normal expectation of the complexity.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D22041277
fbshipit-source-id: c27f43167
Ezgi Çiçek
Sungkeun Cho
Qianyi Shu
Dulma Churchill