Summary:
The model is the same as `com.google.common.base.Preconditions`.
We could imagine a more generic ways of dealing with `x.y.Z.checkNotNull()` but this would work for now.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D6341869
fbshipit-source-id: 5b6e507
Summary: Infer can then detect the resource leak when resources are stored into a container
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D5887702
fbshipit-source-id: 6106cfb
Summary: Model the `remove(...)` and the `clear()` method of `HashMap`.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D5887674
fbshipit-source-id: c3f40ee
Summary: This is to prevent test failures to happen whenchanging the code a little.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D5815349
fbshipit-source-id: 8516102
Summary: Using a dedicated abstract domain, like Quandary does, is more suitable for taint analysis.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D5473794
fbshipit-source-id: c917417
Summary: This fixes a couple of false positives as objects of BufferedReader don't need to be closed if the wrapped reader resource gets closed correctly.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D5106596
fbshipit-source-id: 725fb80
Summary: Useful to have Eradicate and Biabduction agree on how to inform that the analysis that some objects are not null.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D5075127
fbshipit-source-id: 9e56981
Summary:
The Java models for resources are way to complex. The main issue I am facing with these models is that small changes in the analysis can affect the generation of the models in some weird ways. For instance, I get different specs for some of the models between my devserver and my devvm, which seems to be mostly related with the backend treatment of `instanceof`.
The objective here is to simplify the models as much as possible in order to:
1) make debugging regressions easier
2) get simpler specs and less modeled methods shipped in `models.jar`
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D4536115
fbshipit-source-id: 577183a
Summary: The diff remove the no-op model for `Cursor.close()` by the frontend-based `Closeable` as resources mechanism where every call of the form `object.close()` removes the file attribute on `object` when `object` is of type `Closeable`.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D4519386
fbshipit-source-id: 83633d4
Summary: Those should be treated angelically during the analysis with the same end results
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D4518930
fbshipit-source-id: ee5bae8
Summary: Not clear why we need to disable this case and in which case is Infer creating too many disjunctions.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D4509394
fbshipit-source-id: fbc106d
Summary: Need to upgrade in order to specify some taint properties on a more recent `WebView` API.
Reviewed By: cristianoc
Differential Revision: D4382590
fbshipit-source-id: 0925742
Summary: Use the lazy dynamic dispatch by default in prod for the Java analysis
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D4356872
fbshipit-source-id: 491e92e
Summary:
The way interfaces are dealt with led to a false positive,
where tryLock() works OK for a Lock but not for a ReentrantLock.
The solution is just to provide the model.
While I am at it I am adding some more standard tests for Lock and ReentrantLock, which were not present.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D4204551
fbshipit-source-id: 9b6de28
Summary: The Infer builtins can be used in the e2e tests, but those tests should not depend on the Infer models to avoid cyclic dependencies. This diff separates the models and the Infer builtins in two directories so that the test can depend on the builtins without depending on the models
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D3929478
fbshipit-source-id: 7d0ab79
Summary:public
The code:
DataInputStream in = new DataInputStream(new BufferedInputStream(new FileInputStream(file)));
creates a resource with `FileInputStream()` and wraps it twice as a field of `BufferedInputStream` and then as a field of `DataInputStream`. Then calling:
in.close();
needs to go down the wrappers hierachy: `DataInputStream.close()` -> `FilterInputStream.close()` which then calls `BufferedInputStream.close()` -> `FilterInputStream.close()` -> `FileInputStream.close()`.
Going down the wrapper was not working before because `FilterInputStream.close()` was only going further when the type of field `in` was `FileInputStream` wheras it should also continue when the type of the field is any subtype of `FilterInputStream`, e.g. `DataInputStream` and `BufferedInputStream` like in the test example. This diff fixes this last aspect.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D3174822
fb-gh-sync-id: 3adbb7e
fbshipit-source-id: 3adbb7e
Summary:
public
This model does not seem to bring anything anymore. Useless because ...
Reviewed By: cristianoc
Differential Revision: D2920118
fb-gh-sync-id: 7f708d7
shipit-source-id: 7f708d7
Summary:
public
Lines other than the first of multi-line comments in non-ocaml files
were flush right instead of aligned.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D2739752
fb-gh-sync-id: c85f56e
Summary:
public
The case when a resource leaks is reported because the the resource was not closed on the execution branch created by the preconditions checks are not very interesting in practice because the exceptions thrown, either `NullPointerException` or `IllegalStateException` are very rarely caught anyway. So the legimate use of preconditions checks is creating spurious resource leak reports.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D2707227
fb-gh-sync-id: 6aece73
Jeremy Dubreil
Sam Blackshear
Peter O'Hearn
Lázaro Clapp Jiménez Labora
Jules Villard
Josh Berdine