Summary: Returning the list of sub-expressions is not right and can cause assertion failures elsewhere in the frontend.
Reviewed By: dulmarod
Differential Revision: D7813493
fbshipit-source-id: 33ac9c1
Summary:
When looking at large CFGs, at least in `xdot`, it's often difficult to find
the procedure you're looking for. Sorting the proc names puts them in
alphabetical order, which makes searching one procedure easier.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D7758521
fbshipit-source-id: 8e9997f
Summary: Currently when we look for already abduced expression and find an assertion [exp|->strexp:typexp], we use typexp rather than strexp.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D7617193
fbshipit-source-id: c089720
Summary:
This information is already available in the trace, and can contain absolute
paths to system includes (or infer's own clang runtime), which confuses the
diff analysis.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D7534609
fbshipit-source-id: 5bd8f8b
Summary:
If an aggregate `a` has a field `f` whose type has a constructor (e.g., `std::string`), we translate creating a local aggregate `A { "hi" }` as `string(&(a.f), "hi")`.
This diff makes sure that we recognize this as initializing `a`.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D7404624
fbshipit-source-id: 0ba90a7
Summary:
Show where the invalidation occurred in the trace.
Should make things easier to understand.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D7312182
fbshipit-source-id: 44ba9cc
Summary: It adds an issue type, `BUFFER_OVERRUN_U5`, for alarms involving unknown values, i.e., when the trace set includes an unknown function call.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D7178841
fbshipit-source-id: bfe857b
Summary:
Aggregate initialization (e.g., `S s{1, 2}`) doesn't invoke a contructor.
Our frontend translates aggregation initialization as assigning to each field in the struct.
To avoid the appearance of the struct being uninitialized, count any assignment to a field of an aggregate struct as initializing the struct.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D7189671
fbshipit-source-id: ace02fc
Summary:
Show some `SymAssign`s (corresponding to parameters) in the trace.
Depends on D7194448
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D7194479
fbshipit-source-id: 0deff6c
Summary: It simply resizes the target structure instead of allocating new heap memories and copying values.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D7179353
fbshipit-source-id: 9c20f64
Summary: If a `Closure` expression `e` captures variable `x`, consider `e` as borrowing from `x`. When the closure is invoked via `operator()`, check that the borrow is still valid.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D7071839
fbshipit-source-id: d923a6a
Summary: It collects array accesses from all sub expressions in commands.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D7165098
fbshipit-source-id: 584dc80
Summary: It does not only malloc a new heap memory, but also copy its contents.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D7152194
fbshipit-source-id: 58cba5e
Summary: This is to make sure than the analysis produces the same results independently from the order in which the members of a call cycle are analyzed.
Reviewed By: sblackshear, mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D6881971
fbshipit-source-id: 23872e1
Summary:
Fairly simple approach here:
- If the RHS of an assignment is a frontend-generated temporary variable, assume it transfers ownership to the LHS variable
- If the RHS of an assignment is a program variable, assume that the LHS variable is borrowing from it.
- If we try to access a variable that has borrowed from a variable that is now invalid, complain.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D7069947
fbshipit-source-id: 99b8ee2
Summary:
At function calls, it copies a subset of heap memory that is newly
allocated by callees and is reachable from the return value.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D7081425
fbshipit-source-id: 1ce777a
Summary:
Before D7100561, the frontend translated capture-by-ref and capture-by-value in the same way.
Now we can tell the difference and report bugs in the capture-by-value case.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D7102214
fbshipit-source-id: e9d3ac7
Summary:
The `may_last_field` boolean value in the `decl_sym_val` function presents that the location *may* (not *must*) be a flexible array member.
By the modular analysis nature, it is impossible to determine whether a given argument is a flexible array member or not---because of lack of calling context. For example, there are two function calls of `foo` below: (2) passes a flexible array member as an argument and (1) passes a non-flexible array, however it is hard to notice when analyzing the `foo` function.
```
struct T {
int c[1];
};
struct S {
struct T a;
struct T b;
};
void foo(struct T x) { ... }
void goo () {
struct S* x = (struct S*)malloc(sizeof(struct S) + 10 * sizeof(int));
foo(&(x->a)); // (1)
foo(&(x->b)); // (2)
}
```
We assume that any given arguments may stem from the last field of struct, i.e., flexible array member. (This is why `decl_sym_val` is called with `may_last_field:true` at the first time.) With some tests, we noticed that the assumption does not harm the analysis precision, because whether regarding a parameter as a flexible array member or not is about using a symbolic array size instead of a constant array size written in the type during the analysis of callee. Therefore still it can raise correct alarms if the actual parameter is given in its caller.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D7081295
fbshipit-source-id: a4d57a0
Summary:
Switch to the current stable branch for clang.
update-submodule: facebook-clang-plugins
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D7067890
fbshipit-source-id: aedff90
Jules Villard
Dino Distefano
Sam Blackshear
Dulma Churchill
Ezgi Çiçek
Daiva Naudziuniene
Mehdi Bouaziz
Sungkeun Cho
Jeremy Dubreil