Summary:
Currently detection and propagation of consequences of newly added
equality constraints is implemented using some operations that
traverse the entire representation of the equality relation. This
implementation strategy makes it relatively easy and robust to ensure
that the consequences of constraints are treated in a sound and
complete way. It does have the drawback that adding a constraint
involves work that is proportional (nonlinearly even) to the number of
all constraints. This can become a performance bottleneck.
This diff reimplements the core operations using an additional data
structure that essentially tracks the "super-term" relation between
terms, which can be used to look up the existing constraints that
might be involved in deriving new consequences when adding
equalities. This means that adding new equalities no longer takes time
proportional to the size of the entire equality context
representation, but only to the number of existing constraints that
might interact with the new constraint. Also, rewriting terms
into canonical form no longer takes time proportional to size of the
whole context, but only performs table lookups on the subterms of the
term to canonize.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D25883705
fbshipit-source-id: b3f266533
Summary:
The current implementation of Context.elim crudely removes oriented
equations from terms involving the given variables. This is easy to
use in a way that violates the representation invariants of Context,
as well as destroys completeness. This diff resolves this by making
Context.elim remove the desired variables by rearranging the existing
equality classes, in particular promoting a new representative term
when the existing representative is to be removed. Also, since this
basic approach is incomplete for interpreted terms, they are detected
and not removed. As a result, the interface changes to return the set
of variables that have been removed.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D25756573
fbshipit-source-id: 0eead9281
Summary:
These are not simply handled by `@deriving` since:
- These types are recursive and so some fields need to be ignored
- Some are uniquely identified by one of their fields
- Some fields are mutable, but set only during construction, and need
to be considered by compare, equal, hash, but ppx_hash refuses.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D24989064
fbshipit-source-id: 7f8d699e5
Summary:
When exceptions are used due to the lack of goto, use `raise_notrace`
instead of `raise` to avoid the overhead of populating the backtrace.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D24630525
fbshipit-source-id: c5051d9c4
Summary:
Change the type of `fold` functions to enable them to compose
better. The guiding reasoning behind using types such as:
```
val fold : 'a t -> 's -> f:('a -> 's -> 's) -> 's
```
is:
1. The function argument should be labeled. This is so that it can be
reordered relative to the others, since it is often a multi-line
`fun` expression.
2. The function argument should come last. This enables its
arguments (which are often polymorphic) to benefit from type-based
disambiguation information determined by the types of the other
arguments at the call sites.
3. The function argument's type should produce an
accumulator-transformer when partially-applied. That is,
`f x : 's -> 's`. This composes well with other functions designed
to produce transformers/endofunctions when partially applied, and
in particular improves the common case of composing folds into
"state-passing style" code.
4. The fold function itself should produce an accumulator-transformer
when partially applied. So `'a t -> 's -> f:_ -> 's` rather than
`'s -> 'a t -> f:_ -> 's` or `'a t -> init:'s -> f:_ -> 's` etc.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D24306063
fbshipit-source-id: 13bd8bbee
Summary:
The changes in set_intf.ml dictate the rest. The previous API
minimized changes when changing the backing implementation. But that
API is hostile toward composition, partial application, and
state-passing style code.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D24306089
fbshipit-source-id: 00a09f486
Summary:
Represent And and Or formulas as pairs of sets of formulas. One set is
interpreted as positive and the other as negative. This results in
normalization with respect to associativity, commutativity, and unit
laws. This does not normalize distributivity laws, e.g. formulas are
not expanded to disjunctive-normal form or conjunctive-normal
form. Additionally, "zero" laws P ∧ ¬P iff ⊥ and P ∨ ¬P iff ⊤ are
cheaply detected and normalized. Note that formulas are already in
negation-normal form.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D24306072
fbshipit-source-id: e52265a44
Summary:
The treatment of comparison and exceptions in Core/Core_kernel/Base
makes them questionable as the default. This diff changes nonstdlib so
that Core is no longer opened in the global namespace, and makes a few
changes to handle the resulting minor API changes. This leads to a
lighter-touch nonstdlib, which makes a few definitions of its own, and
selects and extends modules from several libraries, including base,
core_kernel, containers, iter.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D24306090
fbshipit-source-id: 42c91bd1b
Summary:
The form of the Base containers interface, in particular the way
comparison functions are passed using Comparators, is slower than
standard functors.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D24306082
fbshipit-source-id: abf3e0293
Josh Berdine