Summary: Handling the utility functions for asserting that we're on background thread.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D5863435
fbshipit-source-id: 3ad95b5
Summary:
Previously, we just tracked a boolean representing whether we were possibly on the main thread (true) or definitely not on the main thread (false).
In order to start supporting `Thread.start`, `Runnable.run`, etc., we'll need something more expressive.
This diff introduces a lattice:
```
Any
/ \
Main Background
\ /
Unknown
```
as the new threads domain. The initial value is `Unknown`, and we introduce `Main` in situations where we would have introduced `true` before.
This (mostly) preserves behavior: the main difference is that before code like
```
if (*) {
assertMainThread()
} else {
x.f = ...
}
```
would have recorded that the access to `x.f` was on the main thread, whereas now we'll say that it's on an unknown thread.
Reviewed By: peterogithub
Differential Revision: D5860256
fbshipit-source-id: efee330
Summary:
It's useful to be able to disable de-duplication on the command line with `--no-filtering`.
Gate de-duplication with `Config.filtering` and move the de-duplication tests to a new directory under the build systems tests.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D5865329
fbshipit-source-id: 5094f5b
Summary:
Since D5381239, infer is careful not to delete directories that do not "look
like" results directories on startup, in case the user passed, eg, `-o /`.
In our repo, lots of results dir are created by build/test of infer, and when
the version of infer changes and the expected contents of results directories
change then it might start refusing to delete the results directories created
with another version of infer.
Add an option to force infer to delete the results directory no matter how
dodgy it looks, and use it in our repo by adding the option in every
.inferconfig.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D5870984
fbshipit-source-id: 09412de
Summary:
We previously lumped ownership predicates in with all other predicates. That limited us to a flat ownership domain.
This diff separates out the ownership predicates so we can have a richer lattice of predicates with each access path.
This lets us be more precise; for example, we can now show that
```
needToOwnBothParams(Obj o1, Obj o2) {
Obj alias;
if (*) { alias = o1; } else { alias = o2; }
alias.f = ... // both o1 and o2 need to be owned for this to be safe
}
void ownBothParamsOk() {
needToOwnBothParams(new Obj(), new Obj()); // ok, would have complained before
}
```
is safe.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D5589898
fbshipit-source-id: 9606a46
Summary:
Works the same way as read/write races on fields, except that are more relaxed (er, unsound) in deciding whether two containers may alias.
This is needed to avoid reporting a ton of FP's; full explanation in comments.
Reviewed By: da319
Differential Revision: D5493404
fbshipit-source-id: 0a5d8b1
Summary:
The way we represented container writes before was pretty hacky: just use a dummy field for the name of the method that performs the container write.
This diff introduces a new access kind for container writes that is much more structured.
This will make it easier to soundly handle aliasing between containers and support container reads in the near future.
Reviewed By: da319
Differential Revision: D5465747
fbshipit-source-id: e021ec2
Summary: We get the wrong answer on most of them for now, but that is expected
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D5429242
fbshipit-source-id: 4899079
Summary: We had a model for `Pools.SimplePool`, but were missing models for `Pools.Pool`. Since `SimplePool` and `SynchronizedPool` both extend `Pool`, modeling it should cover all of the cases.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D5236280
fbshipit-source-id: 9bbdb25
Summary:
Read/write race errors should always show one trace for a read and one trace for a write.
We forget to pass the conflicting writes to the reporting function in one case, which prevented us from showing a well-formed trace.
Fixed it by making the `conflicts` parameter non-optional
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D5209332
fbshipit-source-id: 05da01a
Summary: Using Conjunction for thread join has known false negatives. Finer grained recording of threading information fixes this.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D5111161
fbshipit-source-id: aab483c
Summary:
First step to be able to enable and disable the checkers to run in the following form:
> infer -a checkers --checker1 --checker2 --checker3 -- ...
and have a predefined list of checkers that are run by default with:
> infer -a checkers -- ...
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D5007377
fbshipit-source-id: d7339ef
Summary:
Before we understood ownership, we needed this to avoid a mountain of Builder-related FP's.
Now that we have fairly sophisticated understanding of ownership, we can kill this hack.
Reviewed By: jaegs
Differential Revision: D4940238
fbshipit-source-id: 8d86e57
Summary: Sawja assigns them on multiple control-flow paths, so they're not SSA.
Reviewed By: peterogithub
Differential Revision: D4896745
fbshipit-source-id: c805216
Summary:
There are false positives in the current analysis due to the
use of conjunction in the treatment of threaded. Changing conjunction to disjunction
removes these false positives. Some new false negatives arise, but all the old tests pass.
This is a stopgap towards a better solution being planned.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D4883280
fbshipit-source-id: c2a7e6e
Summary: This should make the reports much easier to understand. We can generalize to reporting a stack trace for all of the writes in the future if we wish.
Reviewed By: peterogithub
Differential Revision: D4845641
fbshipit-source-id: 589fdbc
Summary: If two public methods touch the same state and only one is marked `ThreadSafe`, it's reasonable to report unsafe accesses on both of them.
Reviewed By: peterogithub
Differential Revision: D4785038
fbshipit-source-id: 5a80da4
Summary:
*Unless* the unprotected write runs on the main thread and the read doesn't.
Otherwise, we'll already report on the unprotected write, and we don't want to duplicate.
Reviewed By: peterogithub
Differential Revision: D4798357
fbshipit-source-id: 5de06a0
Summary:
No new functionality here; mostly `FN_` tests documenting our current limitations.
Will start chipping away at the false negatives in follow-up diffs.
Reviewed By: peterogithub
Differential Revision: D4780013
fbshipit-source-id: 7a0c821
Summary: Bringing the logic back to where it was before the big refactoring of the reporting logic.
Reviewed By: peterogithub
Differential Revision: D4774541
fbshipit-source-id: afeaaf8
Summary:
Move all of the reporting on top of the aggregation functionality.
This lets us delete lots of code
Reviewed By: peterogithub
Differential Revision: D4772223
fbshipit-source-id: 47cc51a
Summary:
This was the one type of races we were not yet reporting (besides ones that use the wrong synchronization :)).
Wrote new utility function to aggregate all accesses by the memory they access.
This makes it easy to say which accesses we should report and what their conflicts are.
Eventually, we can simplify the reporting of other kinds of unsafe accesses using this structure.
Reviewed By: peterogithub
Differential Revision: D4770542
fbshipit-source-id: 96d948e
Summary:
For collections whose type does not express that the collection is thread-safe (e.g., `Collections.syncrhonizedMap` and friends).
If you annotate a field holding one of these collections, we won't warn when you mutate the collection.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D4763565
fbshipit-source-id: 58b487a
Summary:
If I read off the main thread and write on the main we
could have a race. (Writes off main are already reported.)
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D4746138
fbshipit-source-id: 8b6e9c5
Sam Blackshear
Jules Villard
Kyriakos Nikolaos Gkorogiannis
Peter O'Hearn
Jeremy Dubreil