Summary:
1. `noexcept` was missing from `unique_ptr` constructors leading to compilation errors in some edge cases
2. In case `unique_ptr` specified custom deleter with custom `deleter::pointer`, there could be compilation errors due to invalid cast from `deleter::pointer` to `void*`. Add extra overload of `model_set` to prevent this issue
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D5147071
fbshipit-source-id: 2586701
Summary:
Some classes may have deleted new operator for them. To fix it, run global `new` operator instead
```
struct X {
void* operator new(size_t) = delete;
};
X *p = new X; // compilation error
X *p = ::new X; // no compilation error
```
This change is following same strategy standard headers follow.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D4500977
fbshipit-source-id: 20babfa
Summary: Our C++ model magic didn't work when instantiating smart pointers with volatile types. Fix it
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D4313271
fbshipit-source-id: 55ffb98
Summary:
1. models no longer need access to private fields (shared_ptr needed that)
2. create macro for __attribute__((deprecated("__infer_replace_with_deref_first_arg"))) and use it in models
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D3791113
fbshipit-source-id: 532dd33
Summary:
Follow strategy that was done to `std::shared_ptr` model and translate
`std::unique_ptr<T>` as raw pointer `T*`.
As a bonus, model `operator[]` of array overload as dereference
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D3785031
fbshipit-source-id: 2c5b0a4
Summary:
So far infer had very fragile mechanism to detect smart pointers. It was looking for "std" and "(shared|unique)_ptr" inside name string.
This is easy to trick (like mystd::shared_ptr) and not something we want.
Instead, inside models create models inside infer_std_model namespace. Then just "export" that model into std namespace
via `using shared_ptr = infer_std_model<T>;`
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D3703827
fbshipit-source-id: 9640fc2
Summary:stdlibc++ headers didn't like the fact that hash<unique_ptr> didn't have defined operator() directly.
Do that and provide empty body. Keep inheritance in case it helps compilation to succeed.
Reviewed By: dulmarod
Differential Revision: D3207721
fb-gh-sync-id: 8c950da
fbshipit-source-id: 8c950da
Summary:public
Conversion constructor of unique_ptr should be explicit. Fix it.
Reviewed By: cristianoc
Differential Revision: D3075661
fb-gh-sync-id: e911d8c
shipit-source-id: e911d8c
Summary:public
Create a model of std::unique_ptr in similar fashion to what was done to std::shared_ptr.
For now, we are modeling it as container of raw pointer (no ownership concept).
This time unique_ptr is not derived from std__unique_ptr (unlike shared_ptr, it was easier to not do that) and so we need to provide implementations for all non-member functions per C++ reference:
http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/memory/unique_ptr
Reviewed By: dulmarod
Differential Revision: D3048209
fb-gh-sync-id: a9a6455
shipit-source-id: a9a6455
Andrzej Kotulski