Summary:
Labels inside switch statements were causing havoc (see test), and the translation of switch statements in general could be improved to handle more cases.
It turns out that `case` (and `default`) statements are more or less fancy labels into the code. In other words, if you erase all the `case XXX:` and `default:` strings in the `switch` statement you get the real structure of the program, and `switch` just jumps straight to the first `case` directives (and to the second if the first one is not satisfied, etc. until all `case`/`default` have been considered).
This suggests an alternative implementation: translate the body of the `switch` and simply record the list of switch cases inside that body, along with where they point to. Then post-process this list to construct the control flow of the `switch`, which points into the control-flow of the `body`. In order not to modify every function in `CTrans` to propagate the current list of cases, I created an ugly `ref` inside `SwitchCase` instead (but it cannot be directly accessed and it's guaranteed to be well-parenthesised wrt nested switches by the `SwitchCase` API so it's not too bad).
[unrelated] Also make translation failures output more information about what exactly in the source code is causing the crash, and the ancestors in the AST that lead to the crash site.
Reviewed By: martinoluca
Differential Revision: D8011046
fbshipit-source-id: 8455090
Summary:
This diff:
- translates C++ `catch` blocks
- adds an exceptional control-flow edge from the end of a `try` block to the beginning of a `catch` block
This obviously doesn't reflect the way exceptions actually work, but I think it is better than what we have now. For one thing, we'll see/translate code inside `catch` blocks, which were opaque before. If Clang analyses don't want this behavior, they can simply use `ProcCfg.Normal` (which, up until this diff, behaved identically to `ProcCfg.Exceptional`.
In the future, we can extend `trans_state` to track blocks that might throw an exception, and have each of these blocks transition to `catch` instead.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D7814521
fbshipit-source-id: 67b86a6
Summary:
Before we were computing the size of an abstract state (`range`) using the `NonNegativeBound` domain but it wasn't able to express product of symbolic values.
This diff introduces a domain for that.
The range of an interval is still computed in `NonNegativeBound` but then the product is done in `TopLiftedPolynomial` so all costs end up being of that type.
The //symbols// of a polynomial are `NonNegativeBound` (so the polynomial only represent non-negative values, perfect for a cost), which handles substitution correctly, i.e. it gives zero instead of negative values.
Reviewed By: ddino
Differential Revision: D7397229
fbshipit-source-id: 6868bb7
Summary:
The annotation UiThread can, and is, used on classes as opposed to just methods, so extend the modelling to account for this.
Also, consider the annotation hereditary.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D7910762
fbshipit-source-id: 0df2c81
Summary:
Previously, the type of `trans_result` contained a list of SIL expressions.
However, most of the time we expect to get exactly one, and getting a different
number is a soft(!) error, usually returning `-1`.
This splits `trans_result` into `control`, which contains the information
needed for temporary computation (hence when we don't necessarily know the
return value yet), and a new version of `trans_result` that includes `control`,
the previous `exps` list but replaced by a single `return` expression instead,
and a couple other values that made sense to move out of `control`. This allows
some flexibility in the frontend compared to enforcing exactly one return
expression always: if they are not known yet we stick to `control` instead (see
eg `compute_controls_to_parent`).
This creates more garbage temporary identifiers, however they do not show up in
the final cfg. Instead, we see that temporary IDs are now often not
consecutive...
The most painful complication is in the treatment of `DeclRefExpr`, which was
actually returning *two* expressions: the method name and the `this` object.
Now the method name is a separate (optional) field in `trans_result`.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D7881088
fbshipit-source-id: 41ad3b5
Summary:
This is an attempt to make things more consistent, and maybe save some work
from the `Format` module in case flambda doesn't have our backs.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D7775496
fbshipit-source-id: 59a6314
Summary: Without the class name, it is not always clear from the error message where the method expecing non-null parameters defined.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D7919492
fbshipit-source-id: 044fb83
Summary:
Make the starvation checker enabled by default.
Add a deadlock issue type, distinct to starvation, which will be kept for UI thread starvation.
Add checks so that checker will do nothing on non-Java code.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz, ddino
Differential Revision: D7908381
fbshipit-source-id: 889f373
Summary: Calling Future.get from UI thread, or under a lock the UI thread may try to take has been associated with ANRs.
Reviewed By: ddino
Differential Revision: D7859296
fbshipit-source-id: b87bd94
Summary: std::lock allows for locking multiple lockable objects, while avoiding deadlock. This will fix some FPs in C++.
Reviewed By: da319
Differential Revision: D7844198
fbshipit-source-id: 2b7140a
Summary: We were wrongly using the underapproximation of `min` rather than the overapproximation
Reviewed By: ddino
Differential Revision: D7844267
fbshipit-source-id: c9d9247
Summary:
This simplifies the frontends and backends in most cases. Before this diff,
returning `void` could be modelled either with a `None` return, or a dummy
return variable with type `Tvoid`. Now it's always the latter.
Reviewed By: sblackshear, dulmarod
Differential Revision: D7832938
fbshipit-source-id: 0a403d1
Summary:
The abstract interpreter tried to handle exceptional control-flow by propagating the *pre* of a block that threw an exception rather than the *post*.
This was a half-measure that isn't correct when an exception-throwing instruction isn't in the middle of a block.
The handling of exceptions wasn't actually used anywhere and was leading to further hacks in `ProcCfg`, so let's get rid of it.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz, jvillard
Differential Revision: D7843872
fbshipit-source-id: 2a4a815
Jules Villard
Sam Blackshear
Ezgi Çiçek
Daiva Naudziuniene
Dulma Churchill
Mehdi Bouaziz
Nikos Gorogiannis
Oliver Castillo
Brandon Kieft
Jeremy Dubreil
Dino Distefano