Summary:
In the previous diffs, we implement enumerator in order to estimate the cost of for-each loop in ObjC, but when we have FP case when enumerator is used not in for-each loop. For example, the following code has top cost before the fix.
```
void nsarray_enumerator_linear_FP(NSArray* array) {
id obj;
NSInteger sum = 0;
NSEnumerator* enumerator = [array objectEnumerator];
while (obj = [enumerator nextObject]) {
sum += (NSInteger)obj;
}
}
```
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D23294895
fbshipit-source-id: 50c7b359f
Summary:
Fix the FP when iterating through constant collection.
facebook
This fix is a hack for now.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek, skcho
Differential Revision: D23241338
fbshipit-source-id: e2e0c05f8
Summary:
As title.
This diff is co-authored by SungKeun Cho and me.
facebook
This diff is co-authored by skcho and me.
Original comments from skcho
"For the record:
1. Rory and I tried to write models for ObjC iterator.
2. We could not use Java's iterator semantics: In Java's, `hasNext` returns the size of collection, rather than a boolean, and which is used as a control variable. On the other hand, in ObjC, it calls only `nextObject`, not calling `hasNext`, and the return value of which is being checked as `null`.
3. We added an artificial field `objc_iterator_offset` to keep the index of the iterator, and the models added in this diff are handling that integer value.
A problem is that `array.objc_iterator_offset` is not included in the control variables, since the condition of the loop is `nextObject() != null` that does not include the iterator offset. We need to make `array.objc_iterator_offset` as a control variable, by changing the part collecting control variables.
"
Reviewed By: ezgicicek, skcho
Differential Revision: D22944278
fbshipit-source-id: 7e71b79c1
Summary:
When implementing iterator, we find out that because some semantics of inferbo is Java-specific, we cannot simply use Java's `Collection` model for `NSCollection`.
So this diff writing `NSCollection` model separately.
This diff also extracts the common parts of `NSCollection` and `Collection` into `AbstractCollection` to combine the duplicate the parts.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D22975159
fbshipit-source-id: daed3f99f
Summary: Before, `NSCollection` are modelled like array, but this will have issue when we want to say add object to array. This diff changes `NSCollection`'s model to use Java's Collection model.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D22840079
fbshipit-source-id: b944b743b
Summary: Implement `alloc` and implement initialisation method that uses the return value of `alloc`, i.e. `NSString.init`.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D22840080
fbshipit-source-id: 47a7523e3
Summary:
We check for supertypes in Java. Why not ObjC?
Would be good to get dulmarod's input here.
Reviewed By: roro47
Differential Revision: D22817126
fbshipit-source-id: 52c1c3f3c
Summary:
This diff adds translation of `arrayWithObjects:count:`. In the previous implementation it was
translated as if it was `arrayWithObjects:`, but their function parameters are different.
In this diff, it translates an array literal `NSArray* a = @ [ 2, 3 ];` to
```
n$1=NSNumber.numberWithInt:(2:int)
n$2=NSNumber.numberWithInt:(3:int)
temp[0]:objc_object*=n$1
temp[1]:objc_object*=n$2
n$3=NSArray.arrayWithObjects:count:(temp:objc_object* const [2*8],2:int)
a:NSArray*=n$3
```
where `temp` is an additional local variable declared as array.
See,
https://developer.apple.com/documentation/foundation/nsarray/1460145-arraywithobjectshttps://developer.apple.com/documentation/foundation/nsarray/1460096-arraywithobjects?language=objc
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D22631305
fbshipit-source-id: 5be0a55d4
Summary:
This will allow all the analyses to be able to call closures without any special treatment: we transform the call to variables that point to closures into normal function calls. We treat only ObjC blocks at the moment, with C++ lambdas to be done as a next step.
We aimed to achieve certain results in Pulse (see tests: avoid memory leaks and NPEs FPs) while also keeping the biabduction analysis working as before.
We also checked that for the examples analyzed Pulse behaves like the correct semantics of ObjC programs with blocks.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D22547333
fbshipit-source-id: efe56ed51
Summary: Add cost model for most common `NSString` functions in cost analysis
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D22433005
fbshipit-source-id: 2f57bbda9
Summary: If a node is unreachable and the cost of the node is Top, we were giving Top cost :( Let's fix it.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D22548269
fbshipit-source-id: d79743669
Summary:
As title
Model `NSString` as `JavaString`.
Since `NSArray` does not contain information about its type of element, we do not use associate string with collection as in Java and C++. In Java, String model is implemented using java collection, and for C++, string model is implemented using vector.
So instead, we use existing `JavaString` model.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D22431949
fbshipit-source-id: 7cdde1ad7
Summary: This diff prevents printing line numbers of loop in the trace description, which helps to keep the same descriptions even when the line number of a function is changed in tests.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D22375584
fbshipit-source-id: 676d1a7cc
Summary: Create test for the most common unmodeled function in inferbo that acts as control variable.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D22331168
fbshipit-source-id: 1913682db
Summary: Add objc test for customized class and blocks. Mostly sanity test.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D22043918
fbshipit-source-id: 917deeea7
Summary:
Move the implementation of implicit getters and setters from the biabduction to the clang frontend so these methods are accessible to all the checkers.
*Background*: In Objective-C when properties are created in the interface of a class, the compiler creates automatically the instance variable for it and also the getter and setter in the implementation of the class. In the frontend we collect the information about which method is the implicit getter and setter of which instance variable (we get the method declaration but not the implementation), and here we add the implicit implementation.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D22187238
fbshipit-source-id: 76e0508ed
Summary:
Add objc test for ```NSArray``` and ```NSMutableArray```.
```NSMutableArray``` is a subclass of ```NSArray```.
For documentation of ```NSArray```, https://developer.apple.com/documentation/foundation/nsarray?language=objc
For documentation of ```NSMutableArray```, https://developer.apple.com/documentation/foundation/nsmutablearray?language=objc
The underlying mechanism for ```NSMutableArray``` is quite complicated. It changes the underlying data structure during runtime, so it is possible to have say O(log n) complexity for accessing element in array. (See here https://opensource.apple.com/source/CF/CF-855.11/CFArray.h) However, this is unlikely to happen if the engineer does not abuse the usage of the class ```NSMutableArray``` according to at least two ios engineers. So here the complexity is set to match the normal expectation of the complexity.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D22041277
fbshipit-source-id: c27f43167
Summary:
Add objc test case for ```NSInteger``` and ```NSString```.
The test cases are adapted from java test case: ```IntTest.java```, ```StringBuilder.java```, and ```StringTest.java```.
Inspection of the record will be done later.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D21994620
fbshipit-source-id: 0c1d7b34e
Summary: We do not use an arbitrary threshold to test cost results anymore but instead rely on `cost-issues` which do not have any trace attached. This diff adds traces to `costs-report.json` so that we can test cost issues with traces.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D21858846
fbshipit-source-id: e73321a92
Summary:
In order to test cost analysis results, currently we rely on having an arbitrary cost threshold (200) and report issues that exceed this cost. For instance, a cost of 201 is considered expensive and reported as `EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME` issue in cost tests.
This means, if we change the cost analysis in a slight way that results in some constant cost increase under 200, we wouldn't able to detect it. I find this unsatisfactory and somewhat hacky.
This diff adds the ability to write the result of `costs-report.json` into a separate `cost-issues.exp` and then compare the actual costs (not only than relying on this arbitrary threshold reporting mechanism).
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D21816312
fbshipit-source-id: 93b531928
Ezgi Çiçek
Qianyi Shu
Sungkeun Cho
Dulma Churchill