Summary:
Currenlty the cost issue is printed at the first node of a function, which is usually the first
statment of the function. This may give a wrong impression that the cost of the statement is
changed.
This diff re-locate where to print issues with heuristics. Going backward from the first node
lines, it looks up a line satisfying,
1. A line should start with <fname> or should include " <fname>".
2. The <fname> found in 1 should be followed by a space, '<', '(', or end of line.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D20766876
fbshipit-source-id: b4fee3180
Summary:
This diff avoids that null-retuned path's abstract value ruins that of non-null-returned path.
What this diff does is: when joining two abstract states, one is null-return-path and the other is
non-null-return-path (`return obj;`), it keeps the method calls of `obj` from the
non-null-return-path.
While this design is unsound, I think it should work in practice.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D19348313
fbshipit-source-id: cf5d0f3ff
Summary:
Old versions of sawja/javalib got the line numbers slightly wrong. The workaround was to do a regexp search in the source file for the right line.
My understanding is that this is no longer necessary. This diff removes it.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D19033415
fbshipit-source-id: 2da19d66d
Summary: It is confusing to report missing props at the the beginning of the method (especially when there are many components created or when the method has many lines). Let's report them at create methods to better contextualize. Also, make the missing prop bold.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D19141135
fbshipit-source-id: a23d2e7c9
Summary:
We do not have the create method in the trace which makes it difficult to understand
- inter-procedural issues where create and prop setting are in different methods
- there are multiple create-build chains in a method
Let's add the create to the beginning of the trace. Moreover, let's simplify the prop printing to make traces easier to understand.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D19020213
fbshipit-source-id: 7f8a5d4ec
Summary:
In order to handle the example added:
changed domain of `MethodCalled`
from `CreatedLocation -> (IsBuildCalled X IsChecked X Set(MethodCall))`
to `(CreatedLocation X IsBuildCalled) -> (IsChecked X Set(MethodCall))`
This avoids joining of two method calls where one is build-called and the other is not, e.g.,
```
if(b) {
o.build();
} else {
// no build call
}
```
changed domain of `NewDomain`
from `Created X MethodCalled`
to `(Created X MethodCalled) X (Created X MethodCalled)`
One is for no returned memory and the other is returned memory. This keeps precision some join
points of branches, e.g.,
```
if(b) {
return;
} else {
// no return
}
```
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D18909768
fbshipit-source-id: c39d1a1ef
Summary:
This reverts commit 4fd6165d190bab32544f9f040b777565432c15b2.
We don't need to check for reporting each node anymore. It suffices to just check per function.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D18883833
fbshipit-source-id: 2591b3af3
Summary:
Making `MethodCalled` an inverted map from created location to method calls results in not being able to track a builder that is created in two different branches of a conditional with different types. Instead, we can make `MethodCalled` simply a map and also change `Created` to be a map from access paths to a set of created locations.
To deal with the case of setting a prop only in one branch, we need to ensure that whenever we call a create method, we add a binding to `MethodCalled` with an empty list of methods so that its intersection with a non-empty one is empty.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D18883097
fbshipit-source-id: b3464ca20
Summary: As long as the types match, it should be possible to call build on two components that are created at different locations.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D18881740
fbshipit-source-id: 356f9e168
Sungkeun Cho
Nikos Gorogiannis
Ezgi Çiçek