Summary:
This diff avoids dereference of C struct, in its frontend and its semantics of Pulse. In SIL, C
struct is not first-class value, thus dereferencing on it does not make sense.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D27953258
fbshipit-source-id: 348d56338
Summary:
Whenever an equality "t = v" (t an arbitrary term, v a variable) is
added (or "v = t"), remember the "t -> v" mapping after canonicalising t
and v. Use this to detect when two variables are equal to the same term:
`t = v` and `t = v'` now yields `v = v'` to be added to the equality
relation of variables. This increases the precision of the arithmetic
engine.
Interestingly, the impact on most code I've tried is:
1. mostly same perfs as before, if a bit slower (could be within noise)
2. slightly more (latent) bugs reported in absolute numbers
I would have expected it to be more expensive and yield fewer bugs (as
fewer false positives), but there could be second-order effects at play
here where we get more coverage. We definitely get more latent issues
due to dereferencing pointers after testing nullness, as can be seen in
the unit tests as well, which may alone explain (2).
There's some complexity when adding term equalities where the term
is linear, as we also need to add it to `linear_eqs` but `term_eqs` and
`linear_eqs` are interested in slightly different normal forms.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D27331336
fbshipit-source-id: 7314e127a
Summary: Model ` std::__optional_storage_base::has_value` as this is what we see in clang AST when translating `std::optional::has_value` for libc++. For libstdc++, we get `std::optional::has_value` as expected.
Reviewed By: skcho, jvillard
Differential Revision: D25585543
fbshipit-source-id: b8d9d2902
Summary:
Skipping the analysis of `std::vector::empty()` caused false positives: in the case where `std::vector::empty()` was called several times ("returning" different values each time), we were not able to prune infeasible paths.
Model `std::vector::empty()` as returning the same value every time it is called.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D23904704
fbshipit-source-id: 52e8a2451
Summary: Model `folly::Optional::get_pointer` which returns an address to a value if exists or `nullptr` if empty.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D24935677
fbshipit-source-id: 9d990fe07
Summary: We recently introduced a more precise model for constructing an optional from a value by making a shallow copy. However, this introduced Use After Delete false positives. For now, we go back to a less precise model by creating a fresh value. A proper model would be to either make a deep copy or call the copy constructor for a value. We will address this in the following diff.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D24826749
fbshipit-source-id: 3e5e4edeb
Summary: `folly::Optional::value()` returns a reference, hence an error was shown when the actual value was being accessed. Since `value()` throws an exception in case of `folly::none`, we want to show the error message at the call site of `value()`. We do this by dereferencing the result of `value()` in the model.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D24702875
fbshipit-source-id: ca9f30349
Summary:
Before we were creating a fresh internal value when we were constructing `folly::Optional`. This diff models `folly::Optional` constructor more precisely by copying the given value.
There was also a missing dereference in the model of `value_or`
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D24621016
fbshipit-source-id: c86d3c157
Summary: Model `folly::Optional::value_or(default)` to return value if not-empty and `default` if empty.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D24539456
fbshipit-source-id: cc9e176cc
Summary:
We need to check if `folly::Optional` is not `folly::none` if we want to retrieve the value, otherwise a runtime exception is thrown:
```
folly::Optional<int> foo{folly::none};
return foo.value(); // bad
```
```
folly::Optional<int> foo{folly::none};
if (foo) {
return foo.value(); // ok
}
```
This diff adds a new issue type that reports if we try to access `folly::Optional` value when it is known to be `folly::none`.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D22053352
fbshipit-source-id: 32cb00a99
Sungkeun Cho
Jules Villard
Daiva Naudziuniene