Summary:
Added a simple Erlang project to be used as a test for Rebar3
integration, in the following commits. Also, updated the copyright
linter to understand Erlang.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis, mmarescotti
Differential Revision: D28096899
fbshipit-source-id: 94f15c277
Summary:
A previous change made pulse look into value histories for causes of
invalidation in case the access trace of a value already contained the
reason why that value is invalid, in order to save printing the
invalidation trace in addition to the access trace. It also made
reporting more accurate for null dereference as the source of null was
often better identified (in cases where several values are null or
zero).
But, the history is also relevant to the bug type and the error message.
Make these take histories into account too.
Also fix a bug where we didn't look inside the sub-histories contained
within function calls when looking for an invalidation along the
history.
Reviewed By: da319
Differential Revision: D28254334
fbshipit-source-id: 5ca00ee54
Summary:
There's already all the ingredients to treat function pointers pretty
well, even when stored inside (const) globals.
In OpenSSL they use something like the added tests but the globals are
not const... This may need tweaking via an option, eg to inline all
global initializers, or filtered by global names/file names. Or just
use the existing --pulse-model-{alloc,release}-pattern options.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D28221651
fbshipit-source-id: 5399f1141
Summary:
When garbage-collecting addresses we would also remove their attributes.
But even though the addresses are no longer allocated in the heap, they
might show up in the formula and so we need to remember facts about
them.
This forces us to detect leaks closer to the point where addresses are
deleted from the heap, in AbductiveDomain.ml. This is a nice refactoring
in itself: doing so fixes some other FNs where we sometimes missed leak
detection on dead addresses.
This also makes it unecessary to simplify InstanceOf eagerly when
variables get out of scope.
Some new {folly,std}::optionals false positives that either are similar to existing ones or involve unmodelled smart pointers.
Reviewed By: da319
Differential Revision: D28126103
fbshipit-source-id: e3a903282
Summary: This is a warning not a critical issue/error. Let's downgrade it to Warning to reflect that.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D28220415
fbshipit-source-id: b2d8f040c
Summary:
Building on the infra in the previous commits, "fix" all the call sites
that introduce invalidations to make sure they also update the
corresponding histories. This is only possible to do when the access
leading to the invalidation can be recorded. Right now the only place
that's untraceable is the model of `free`/`delete`, because it happens
to be the only place where we invalidate an address without knowing
where it comes from (`free(v)`: what was v's access path? we could track
this in the future).
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D28118764
fbshipit-source-id: de67f449e
Summary: Not tracking values for global constants might cause nullptr_dereference false positives. In particular, if the code has multiple checks and uses a global constant by its name in one check and its value in another check (see added test case), we are not able prune infeasible paths. This diff addresses such false positives by inlining initializers of global constants when they are being used. An assumption is that most the time the initialization of global constants would not have side effects.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D25994898
fbshipit-source-id: 26360c4de
Summary:
Implements the translation of most clang atomic builtins to SIL, including those used in `stdatomic.h`. It does not attempt to model the atomicity of the operations, since I don't know of any way Infer can represent that. I didn't bother implementing the rarely used min/max builtins, so they're left as `BuiltinDecl` calls.
This is my first major OCaml project, so any feedback is appreciated!
Also, CONTRIBUTING.md says to update the [facebook-clang-plugins](https://github.com/facebook/facebook-clang-plugins) submodule, but it doesn't seem to be a submodule anymore, and the code has diverged from that repo. Should I still make a PR over there?
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/infer/pull/1434
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D28118300
Pulled By: jvillard
fbshipit-source-id: 121c4ad25
Summary:
Warn if either an object or a key is nil for NSMutableDictionary setObject:forKey:.
Next steps: introduce new special issue type and model more collections
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D28189382
fbshipit-source-id: 1697829ee
Summary:
Function calls that accept blocks as arguments may have additional arguments for the captured variables of the block. Cost models for these functions only considered the case where the block arguments didn't capture variables. This diff extends the model so that we handle captured variable case.
This fixes some FNs in the analysis.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D28183071
fbshipit-source-id: 6a045e80e
Summary:
Losing attributes is a bug, not sure when it would matter. There's a
TODO there that's still valid.
Reviewed By: da319
Differential Revision: D28125940
fbshipit-source-id: 923ceedb8
Summary: Cleaner + makes it easier to change details of the implementation.
Reviewed By: da319
Differential Revision: D28125725
fbshipit-source-id: ac9258908
Summary:
In main() all latent issues are manifest issues as the only parameters
are user-controlled.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D28121535
fbshipit-source-id: eab54d5bc
Summary: I should have listened to skcho on D28002725 (7207e05682). Needed for the next diff.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D28121203
fbshipit-source-id: 96c01b141
Summary:
On big analyses, we routinely observe analyses nesting levels of the
order of ~5k (i.e. 5342> on the interactive taskar). This call depth
is meaningless given the size of the codebase we analyze.
Instead, I believe this is due to the fact that Ondemand does not
properly snapshot/restore the nesting level when starting an analysis,
and more importantly when abandoning parts of it. This commit
fixes that oversight.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/infer/pull/1431
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D28118297
Pulled By: jvillard
fbshipit-source-id: 0faf28f84
Summary:
the mapping for computing 'leq' relation in isomorphic graphs was sometimes mixed with opposite mappings due to typos in the code.
Please see [CONTRIBUTING.md](./CONTRIBUTING.md) for how to set up your development environment and run tests.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/infer/pull/1424
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D28118324
Pulled By: jvillard
fbshipit-source-id: 56e813bd1
Summary: Some code generation mechanisms produce code under `buck-out/gen/<hash>`. This diff allows handling such sources by producing deterministic capture DBs via omitting the hash.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D27501193
fbshipit-source-id: 3c2ac92a9
Summary:
As explained in the previous diff: when the access trace goes through
the invalidation step there is no need to print the invalidation trace
at all.
Note: only a few sources of invalidation are handled at the moment. The
following diffs gradually fix the other sources of invalidation.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D28098335
fbshipit-source-id: 5a5e6481e
Summary:
The eventual goal is to stop having separate sections of the trace
("invalidation part" + "access part") when the "access part" already
goes through the invalidation step. For this, it needs to record when a
value is made invalid along the path.
This is also important for assignements to NULL/0/nullptr/nil: right now
the way we record that 0 is not a valid address is via an attribute
attached to the abstract value that corresponds to 0. This makes traces
inconsistent sometimes: 0 can appear in many places in the same function
and we won't necessarily pick the correct one. In other words, attaching
traces to *values* is fragile, as the same value can be produced in many
ways. On the other hand, histories are stored at the point of access, eg
x->f, so have a much better chance of being correct. See added test:
right now its traces is completely wrong and makes the 0 in `if
(utf16StringLen == 0)` the source of the NULL value instead of the
return of `malloc()`!
This diff makes the traces slightly more verbose for now but this is
fixed in a following diff as the traces that got longer are those that
don't actually need an "invalidation" trace.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D28098337
fbshipit-source-id: e17929259
Summary:
See added test: pulse sometimes insisted that an issue was latent even
though the condition that made it latent could not be influenced (hence
could the issue could never become manifest) by callers because it was
unrelated to the pre, i.e. it came from a mutation inside the function.
In these cases, we want to report the issue straight away instead of
keeping it latent.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D28002725
fbshipit-source-id: ce9e6f190
Summary:
This diff adds semantics for temporary boolean variables to keep config values.
* It extended value domain to have `TempBool` that is basically a pair of `ConfigChecks.t`; one is a
set of config values checked when the temporary variable is true, and the other is that when the
temporary variable is false.
* It assigns the `TempBool` value when `temp=1` or `temp=0`.
* It uses the `TempBool` value when pruning condition expression.
For example, when there is an `if` statement of
```
return (config && b);
```
it is translated in SIL,
```
if (config) {
if (b) {
temp = 1; // (1)
} else {
temp = 0; // (2)
}
} else {
temp = 0; // (3)
}
return temp;
```
then we can say
* When `temp` is true, i.e. at (1), it is gated by `config`
* When `temp` is false, i.e. at (2) and (3), we are not sure about the the gatedness; at (2) it is gated by `config` but at (3) it is gated by `!config`.
So, we record such information as a `TempBool.t` value.
Next, when we use the return value at its caller,
```
if (ret) {
// then branch
} else {
// else branch
}
```
We can say "then branch" part is gated by `config`, but we are not sure if "else branch" part is gated, by using the `TempBool.t` value of `ret`.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D28056490
fbshipit-source-id: e90d8afd3
Summary: Small refactor as this function belongs more in Pvar than Var.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D28091618
fbshipit-source-id: 259bd82d5
Summary: To be fair that doesn't seem to matter at all, with no test affected.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D28091608
fbshipit-source-id: 172bd2ff1
Summary:
Just moving stuff around.
This is possibly useful for making Pvar depend on ProcAttributes for
other things, eg checking if a pvar is captured by a procedure (which
would be awkward to have in the API of ProcAttributes and not Pvar).
Overall it forced me to move a few other things around in a way that I
feel makes more sense anyway.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D28091497
fbshipit-source-id: 367a1f17c
Summary:
Before returning a summary, restore formals to their initial values.
This gets rid of a false latent because the value in the path condition
is now garbage-collected.
Added a test for the tricky case of structs passed as values.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D28001229
fbshipit-source-id: 23dda5b43
Summary:
This diff adds semantics for long-typed config values.
* It extended branch types to keep condition expressions passed,
* then used it to in the prune semantics.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D28055936
fbshipit-source-id: 0d12930cf
Summary:
This diff introduces [ISys.file_exists] that is similar to [Sys.file_exists_exn], but returns
[false] when the result is known, instead of raising an exception.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D28059863
fbshipit-source-id: d54851cfb
Summary: This diff adds an abstract semantics for returning config values at function calls.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D28055544
fbshipit-source-id: 5fe51c538
Summary:
This looks a bit better as it makes it easier to ignore parts of the
arguments in models, which happens all the time. Also easier to add more
to the record in the future, which is the real reason.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D27997695
fbshipit-source-id: a7c680025
Summary:
This diff avoids dereference of C struct, in its frontend and its semantics of Pulse. In SIL, C
struct is not first-class value, thus dereferencing on it does not make sense.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D27953258
fbshipit-source-id: 348d56338
Summary: This diff copies each field values inside setter/getter of ObjC.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D27940521
fbshipit-source-id: 9977cae75
Summary:
This diff does refactoring for the following diff.
* Define Mangled.return_param and Mangled.is_return_param and use it instead of
Ident.name_return_param.
* Share common code from objc_setter and objc_getter
* Move struct_copy to CStructUtils.ml
Reviewed By: da319
Differential Revision: D27940125
fbshipit-source-id: 84eb3109b
Summary:
Looking at the recent silent analysis results, it seems that we report many direct unknown library calls (often cheap)... However, if these were called inside some other callee we wouldn't report them because their costs would be assumed to be constant by the cost analysis.
This is a bit awkward. We should either report all unknown calls or suppress them altogether.
Since we have too many reports per day and not a good way to determine whether an unknown library call is cheap/expensive, let's take option 2.
Then, we would be only relying on two things to determine whether to report/not:
- instantiated cost's degree > 1
- explicitly known to be expensive (i.e. modeled in ConfigImpact, like string append)
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D27909003
fbshipit-source-id: 0391d226d
Summary:
This is mostly useful to avoid duplicating error states, which are
propagated unchanged through both branches of, say, conditionals, and
can end up duplicated if the join is not careful:
```
{[Abort(Error 1), Abort(Error 2), Continue σ']}
if (..) { .. } else { .. }
{JOIN([Abort(Error 1), Abort(Error 2), Continue σ_then],
[Abort(Error 1), Abort(Error 2), Continue σ_else])}
{[Abort(Error 1), Abort(Error 2), Continue σ_then, Continue σ_else]}
```
Whereas before this diff we got
```
{[Abort(Error 1), Abort(Error 2), Continue σ_then, Abort(Error 1), Abort(Error 2), Continue σ_else]}
```
Detect states that do not change simply using `phys_equal` as they
should literally not change. Refactor the code to be able to re-use the
same logic in the stronger join used in widening, that compares states
using the domain's `leq` relation to establish implication.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D27908529
fbshipit-source-id: b461165da
Summary:
When a block value is passed via more than one-depth of function calls, it is not analyzed correctly
because current inlining mechanism (specializing objc block parameters) of the frontend works for
only one-depth of block passing. This diff gives up analyzing initialized-ness of captured
variables in ObjC to avoid FPs.
Reviewed By: da319
Differential Revision: D27885395
fbshipit-source-id: fc6b4663c
Radu Grigore
Daiva Naudziuniene
Jules Villard
Sungkeun Cho
Ezgi Çiçek
kmh11
Boris Yakobowski
Yoonseok Ko
Nikos Gorogiannis
Matteo Marescotti
Martin Trojer