Summary: Atoms of the form `identifier = footprint var` naturally occurs with the angelic analysis mode. So it is not clear to me why we should drop those.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D5654754
fbshipit-source-id: 9dd2eb5
Summary:
This is a check for when an unavailable class is being allocated.
This diff also adds a check for the context to remove false positives: If the class is not available but the method calls are wrapped in a check whether the class is available, then don't report.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D5631191
fbshipit-source-id: 2082dfe
Summary:
Previous version was hard to understand because it was doing many things within same code. New version has different code for Arrays, Structs and others.
There is some copy-paste, but it's easier to follow code (open to suggestions though)
Reviewed By: dulmarod
Differential Revision: D5547999
fbshipit-source-id: 77ecb24
Summary: Those are not particularly relevant for the biabduction analysis. It would be easy to have a dedicated checker for this if we happen to need one day.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D5530834
fbshipit-source-id: 316e60f
Summary:
Bumps facebook-clang-plugins to a version that outputs sizeof() info in bytes and not bits.
update-submodule: facebook-clang-plugins
Reviewed By: akotulski
Differential Revision: D5526747
fbshipit-source-id: 6019542
Summary: The `--failures-allowed` was doing for the Clang frontend what `--keep-doing` was doing for the backend. This revision merges the two options to simplify the Infer CLI and our tests.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D5474347
fbshipit-source-id: 09bcea4
Summary: Using a dedicated abstract domain, like Quandary does, is more suitable for taint analysis.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D5473794
fbshipit-source-id: c917417
Summary:
Both `stringWithUTF8String` and `stringWithString` implements copy semantics that copies the content of their parameter into a newly allocated buffer. We modeled this as pointer assignment in the past, which means that once we write
```
NSString* foo() {
char buf[...];
...
return [NSString stringWithUTF8String:buf];
}
```
We are going to get a spurious stack variable address escape report because local pointer `buf` is assigned to the newly created string and the string gets returned.
This diff tries to address the issue by heap-allocating a buffer and `memcpy` the contents in `stringWithUTF8String` and `stringWithString`. But this change will create another problem: the allocated buffer will be reported as leaked by the backend, while in reality those buffers won't actually be leaked as they are allocated in a region that will be periodically autoreleased. To suppress spurious memory leak FPs, I added another attribute `Awont_leak` that will suppress the leakage report on any expressions that get tagged with it.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D5403084
fbshipit-source-id: df6de7f
Summary: CFG nodes were not connected and some instructions ended up in wrong place. Fix those issues
Reviewed By: dulmarod
Differential Revision: D5406720
fbshipit-source-id: 2a70e1a
Summary:
This diff tries to achieve the followings: if we have the following C++ codes:
```
bool foo(int x, int y) {
return &x == &y;
}
```
We want the C++ frontend to emit Sil as if the input is written as
```
bool foo(int x, int y) {
if (&x == &y) return 1; else return 0;
}
```
This matches the behavior of our Java frontend.
The reason why we prefer an explicit branch is that it will force the backend to eagerly produce two different specs for `foo`. Without the explicit branch, for the above example the backend would produce one spec with `return = (&x == &y)` as the post condition, which is not ideal because (1) we don't want local variables to escape to the function summary, and (2) with the knowledge that no two local variables may alias each other, the backend could actually determines that `&x == &y` is always false, emitting a more precise postcondition `return = 0`. This is not possible if we do not eagerly resolve the comparison expression.
Reviewed By: akotulski
Differential Revision: D5260745
fbshipit-source-id: 6bbbf99