Summary:
This is part of work aimed to reduce usage of language-agnostics modules
in Java-specific parts of nullsafe.
As usual, in this diff we don't convert everything and take some
shorthands.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D23054169
fbshipit-source-id: 70913ddfd
Summary:
- "visibility" (whether an issue to report is something to show the user
or something that is only used for debugging or for detecting other
issues) is an intrinsic property of an issue type and thus belongs in
`IssueType.t`.
- "severity" (warning/error/...) is something that each issue should
have a default for ("a memory leak is by default an ERROR", a
"condition always true is by default a warning"), but can also be
overriden at run-time. Right now only nullsafe uses that capability:
when in "strict mode", some warnings become errors. We can imagine
extending this to other issue types, or even providing config flags to
turn warnings into errors, like compilers often have.
To guess the default severity (since it's dynamic it can be hard to know
for sure!), I tried to find places where it was reported as the source
of truth, but also later diffs test these defaults against our tests (by
removing most of the dynamic changes in severity).
With this diff there are 3 places where severity is set:
1. The default severity in IssueType.t: this is unused for now.
2. The severity from `Exceptions.recognize_exception`: this is
semi-statically determined and, if set, takes precedence over number 3 (which looks wrong to me!)
3. The severity passed to `Errlog.log_issue` when we actually add an
issue to the error log: this is used only when (2) is unset.
The next diffs will make 1 the default, delete 2, and make 3 optional
but override 1 when passed.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D21904538
fbshipit-source-id: a674b42d8
Summary:
As artempyanykh pointed out, exposing trust list might encourage clients to
start writing business logic manipulating with trust lists outside of
NullsafeMode module, which we don't like to happen.
Reviewed By: artempyanykh
Differential Revision: D21230973
fbshipit-source-id: 39bd0b0d8
Summary:
In the previous diff we changed the semantics of nested classes w.r.t.
to Nullsafe.
Let's make it clear if users will attempt to misuse it.
Reviewed By: artempyanykh
Differential Revision: D21230717
fbshipit-source-id: 0ecc0dd06
Summary:
1. Most of trust list operations are abstract anyway, we don't actually
rely on the fact that this is list
2. Inside NullsafeMode.ml, we effectively need set operations, which is both more
idiomatic to express and Ocaml and faster
3. This will simplify implementation of the next diff which introduces
mode intersect operation
Reviewed By: artempyanykh
Differential Revision: D21207207
fbshipit-source-id: 0c1fc4426
Summary:
Lets move the logic dealing with non-java classes outside of this module
so we can modify it easier in the next diff.
Reviewed By: artempyanykh
Differential Revision: D21204822
fbshipit-source-id: 67b5937bc
Summary:
This diff is a step forward to the state when the list of type violations is
independent of the mode (and we use mode solely to decide re: whether to
report or not).
This fixes a case when we incorrectly defined possible promo mode (see
the test payload)
Reviewed By: artempyanykh
Differential Revision: D20948897
fbshipit-source-id: 616b96f96
Summary:
Previously, we learned to detect if Default mode class can be made
Nullsafe(LOCAL).
Lets generalize it and calculate the precise mode.
NOTE 1: We don't distinct shades of "Trust some". We also don't
recommend trust some and recommend "Trust all" instead.
NOTE 2: As you can see from the test payload (see ModePromotions.java),
the precise calculation is not working as expected. This is due to a bug
in nullsafe implementation/design. See follow up diffs that will fix
this test.
Reviewed By: artempyanykh
Differential Revision: D20941345
fbshipit-source-id: 2255359ba
Summary:
1. It is convenient to stick with the policy "ERROR if and only if it is
enforced". Among other, it makes CI integration much easier to implement
(enforcemend, UI and messaging is decided based on severity).
2. Since Nullsafe annotation is an idiomatic way to indicate classes
with enforced nullability checking, we want it to be the only way to
enforce issues.
3. This means we decrease the priority of GraphQL violation issues.
(In practice they were not enforced so we have plenty of violations in
codebase to reflect reality). The proper way dealing with GraphQL will
be detecting such issues as a special issue type and prioritizing fixing
and Nullsafe-ifying corresponding classes.
4. Among other, we downgrade severity of field overannotated to advice
to keep it consistent with condition redundant.
Reviewed By: artempyanykh
Differential Revision: D20141420
fbshipit-source-id: e2f12835a
Summary:
Now when typechecking a class `A` marked with `Nullsafe(LOCAL)`,
classes from trusted list are properly recognized and nullability of
method params and return value are refined to `LocallyCheckedNonnull`
in a context of class `A`.
NOTE: refininng nullability when **accessing fields** on trusted classes
is **not implemented yet**, because the whole business of handling fields
in nullsafe is somewhat convoluted. This should not be a huge issue
though, since in Java fields are commonly accessed via getters any
way.
Reviewed By: mityal
Differential Revision: D20056158
fbshipit-source-id: 496433d90
Summary:
Add support for nullsafe mode with `trust=all` and `trust=none` a case
with a specific trust list is not supported yet and needs to be
implemented separately.
Tests introduce one unexpected
`ERADICATE_INCONSISTENT_SUBCLASS_PARAMETER_ANNOTATION` issue which
complains about `this` having incorrect nullability; it is a bug and
needs to be fixed separately.
Reviewed By: mityal
Differential Revision: D19662708
fbshipit-source-id: 3bc1e3952
Summary:
Refactor all occurences of `is_strict_mode` to use `NullsafeMode`
instead. This will allow introducing _local_ typechecking modes for
nullsafe in the follow up patches.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D19639883
fbshipit-source-id: bdf535b66
markma
Mitya Lyubarskiy
Jules Villard
Artem Pianykh