Summary:
Currenlty the cost issue is printed at the first node of a function, which is usually the first
statment of the function. This may give a wrong impression that the cost of the statement is
changed.
This diff re-locate where to print issues with heuristics. Going backward from the first node
lines, it looks up a line satisfying,
1. A line should start with <fname> or should include " <fname>".
2. The <fname> found in 1 should be followed by a space, '<', '(', or end of line.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D20766876
fbshipit-source-id: b4fee3180
Summary:
`JavaSplitName` is used to represent Java types (in `Procname` in particular). The type itself is a pair of string (an optional package qualifier) and a "type name" (the quotes are there because it may contain array qualifiers).
For example `java.lang.Object[][]` should be represented as
```
{package=Some "java.lang"; typename="Object[][]"}
```
The constructor `make` was misused to construct instead types such as
```
{package=None; typename="java.lang.Object[][]"}`
```
This is evident when we print the return type of a `Procname` non-verbosely (the default), but we still see the package qualifier.
Obviously this is not just a pretty-printing bug, the values were themselves wrong.
The fix is to use the `of_string` constructor which will parse the package and separate it correctly. Another bug (in response to this one) had to be fixed in `Procname.is_vararg` to maintain behaviour in Nullsafe and Quandary.
Reviewed By: mityal
Differential Revision: D20394146
fbshipit-source-id: 4633902eb
Summary:
Old versions of sawja/javalib got the line numbers slightly wrong. The workaround was to do a regexp search in the source file for the right line.
My understanding is that this is no longer necessary. This diff removes it.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D19033415
fbshipit-source-id: 2da19d66d
Summary: In SIL, Java's array member is a pointer to an array, while C++'s is the array itself. This diff differentiate them in evaluating abstract locations.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek, mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D14021451
fbshipit-source-id: 00f14fe3b
Summary:
This will allow to get the numerical results for Cost, Hoisting, Purity without the Inferbo issues.
For now, I still forced Inferbo issues for Cost and Purity to avoid lots of changes in tests, that will go away soon.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek, skcho
Differential Revision: D13826741
fbshipit-source-id: 796d1a50d
Ezgi Çiçek
Sungkeun Cho
Nikos Gorogiannis
Mehdi Bouaziz