pghs975uc
/
infer_clone
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity
You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
Branches Tags
${ item.name }
Create tag ${ searchTerm }
Create branch ${ searchTerm }
from '31a6b92902'
${ noResults }
infer_clone/infer/tests/codetoanalyze/c/performance/issues.exp

191 lines
30 KiB
Raw Blame History Escape

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters!

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters that may be confused with others in your current locale. If your use case is intentional and legitimate, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to highlight these characters.

codetoanalyze/c/performance/break.c, break_constant, 0, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 8 + 5 ⋅ p + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, p)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/break.c, break_loop, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 5 ⋅ p + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, p)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/break.c, break_loop, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 5 ⋅ p + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, p)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/break.c, break_loop, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 5 ⋅ p + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, p)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/break.c, break_loop, 7, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 6 + 5 ⋅ p + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, p)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/break.c, break_loop_with_t, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 5 ⋅ p + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, p)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/break.c, break_loop_with_t, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 5 ⋅ p + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, p)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/break.c, break_loop_with_t, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 5 ⋅ p + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, p)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/break.c, break_loop_with_t, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 5 + 5 ⋅ p + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, p)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, compound_while, 3, CONDITION_ALWAYS_TRUE, no_bucket, WARNING, [Here]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, compound_while, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 6 + 3 ⋅ m + 4 ⋅ (1+max(0, m)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, compound_while, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 6 + 3 ⋅ m + 4 ⋅ (1+max(0, m)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, compound_while, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 6 + 3 ⋅ m + 4 ⋅ (1+max(0, m)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, compound_while, 6, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 8 + 3 ⋅ m + 4 ⋅ (1+max(0, m)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, nested_while_and_or, 3, CONDITION_ALWAYS_TRUE, no_bucket, WARNING, [Here]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, nested_while_and_or, 3, CONDITION_ALWAYS_TRUE, no_bucket, WARNING, [Here]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, nested_while_and_or, 4, CONDITION_ALWAYS_TRUE, no_bucket, WARNING, [Here]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, nested_while_and_or, 4, CONDITION_ALWAYS_TRUE, no_bucket, WARNING, [Here]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, simplified_simulated_while_with_and, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 604, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, simplified_simulated_while_with_and, 5, CONDITION_ALWAYS_TRUE, no_bucket, WARNING, [Here]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, simplified_simulated_while_with_and, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 605, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, simplified_simulated_while_with_and, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 604, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, simplified_simulated_while_with_and, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 604, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, simplified_simulated_while_with_and, 8, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 606, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, simulated_nested_loop_with_and, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3530, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, simulated_nested_loop_with_and, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3530, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, simulated_nested_loop_with_and, 6, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3530, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, simulated_nested_loop_with_and, 7, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([0, +oo] + 1):signed32]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, simulated_nested_loop_with_and, 8, CONDITION_ALWAYS_TRUE, no_bucket, WARNING, [Here]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, simulated_nested_loop_with_and, 8, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3530, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, simulated_nested_loop_with_and, 8, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3530, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, simulated_nested_loop_with_and, 12, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3532, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, simulated_while_shortcut, 5, CONDITION_ALWAYS_FALSE, no_bucket, WARNING, [Here]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, simulated_while_with_and, 4, CONDITION_ALWAYS_TRUE, no_bucket, WARNING, [Here]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, simulated_while_with_and, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 5 + 3 ⋅ p + 4 ⋅ (1+max(0, p)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, simulated_while_with_and, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 5 + 3 ⋅ p + 4 ⋅ (1+max(0, p)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, simulated_while_with_and, 10, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 5 + 3 ⋅ p + 4 ⋅ (1+max(0, p)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, simulated_while_with_and, 13, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 7 + 3 ⋅ p + 4 ⋅ (1+max(0, p)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, while_and_or, 0, INFINITE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, []
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, while_and_or, 2, CONDITION_ALWAYS_TRUE, no_bucket, WARNING, [Here]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, while_and_or, 3, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([0, +oo] + 1):signed32]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test.c, alias_OK, 5, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [Binary operation: ([-oo, +oo] + 1):signed32]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test.c, call_while_upto20_minus100_bad, 0, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 726, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test.c, loop0_bad, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1104, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test.c, loop0_bad, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1104, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test.c, loop0_bad, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1106, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test.c, loop1_bad, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1207, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test.c, loop1_bad, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1207, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test.c, loop1_bad, 6, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1209, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test.c, loop2_bad, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 10 ⋅ k + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, k)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test.c, loop2_bad, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 10 ⋅ k + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, k)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test.c, loop2_bad, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 5 + 10 ⋅ k + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, k)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test.c, main_bad, 8, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 214, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test.c, while_upto20_bad, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + 6 ⋅ (-m + 20), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test.c, while_upto20_bad, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + 6 ⋅ (-m + 20), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test.c, while_upto20_bad, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 4 + 6 ⋅ (-m + 20), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, if_bad_loop, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 235, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, if_bad_loop, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 235, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, if_bad_loop, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 235, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, if_bad_loop, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 235, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, if_bad_loop, 4, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([3, +oo] + 1):signed32]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, if_bad_loop, 6, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 235, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, if_bad_loop, 7, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 235, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, if_bad_loop, 8, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 235, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, if_bad_loop, 12, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 237, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, loop_despite_inferbo, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1307, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, loop_despite_inferbo, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1307, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, loop_despite_inferbo, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1307, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, loop_despite_inferbo, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1307, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, loop_despite_inferbo, 9, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1309, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, loop_no_dep1, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 609, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, loop_no_dep1, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 609, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, loop_no_dep1, 4, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([0, +oo] + 1):signed32]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, loop_no_dep1, 6, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 611, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, loop_no_dep2, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 614, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, loop_no_dep2, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 614, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, loop_no_dep2, 4, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([0, +oo] + 1):signed32]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, loop_no_dep2, 6, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 616, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, nested_loop, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2551, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, nested_loop, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2551, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, nested_loop, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2551, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, nested_loop, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2551, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, nested_loop, 6, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2551, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, nested_loop, 9, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2553, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, real_while, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 217, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, real_while, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 217, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, real_while, 4, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Assignment,<RHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([0, +oo] + [0, 29]):signed32]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, real_while, 7, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 219, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, simulated_nested_loop, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2530, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, simulated_nested_loop, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2530, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, simulated_nested_loop, 6, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2530, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, simulated_nested_loop, 7, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([0, +oo] + 1):signed32]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, simulated_nested_loop, 8, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2530, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, simulated_nested_loop, 11, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2532, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, simulated_nested_loop_cond_in_goto, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3535, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, simulated_nested_loop_cond_in_goto, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3535, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, simulated_nested_loop_cond_in_goto, 6, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3535, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, simulated_nested_loop_cond_in_goto, 7, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3535, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, simulated_nested_loop_cond_in_goto, 9, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3535, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, simulated_nested_loop_cond_in_goto, 11, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3535, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, simulated_nested_loop_cond_in_goto, 12, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3535, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, simulated_nested_loop_cond_in_goto, 18, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3537, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, simulated_nested_loop_more_expensive, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2535, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, simulated_nested_loop_more_expensive, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2535, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, simulated_nested_loop_more_expensive, 6, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2535, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, simulated_nested_loop_more_expensive, 8, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2535, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, simulated_nested_loop_more_expensive, 11, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2535, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, simulated_nested_loop_more_expensive, 14, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2537, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, simulated_while, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 217, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, simulated_while, 10, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 217, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, simulated_while, 10, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Assignment,<RHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([0, +oo] + [0, 29]):signed32]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, simulated_while, 14, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 219, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, two_loops, 5, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([3, +oo] + 1):signed32]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, two_loops, 7, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 551, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, two_loops, 8, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 551, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, two_loops, 10, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 553, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/instantiate.c, do_2K_times_Bad, 0, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 16007, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/instantiate.c, do_half_m2_times, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 6 ⋅ (m - 1) × m + 8 ⋅ m + 2 ⋅ m × (max(1, m)) + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, m)), degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/instantiate.c, do_half_m2_times, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 6 ⋅ (m - 1) × m + 8 ⋅ m + 2 ⋅ m × (max(1, m)) + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, m)), degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/instantiate.c, do_m2_times, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 8 ⋅ m + 6 ⋅ m² + 2 ⋅ m × (1+max(0, m)) + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, m)), degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/instantiate.c, do_m2_times, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 8 ⋅ m + 6 ⋅ m² + 2 ⋅ m × (1+max(0, m)) + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, m)), degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/instantiate.c, do_n_times, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 6 ⋅ n + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, n)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/instantiate.c, do_n_times, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 6 ⋅ n + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, n)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/invariant.c, do_k_times, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 6 + 3 ⋅ n + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, n)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/invariant.c, do_k_times, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 6 + 3 ⋅ n + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, n)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/invariant.c, do_k_times_array, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 6 + 6 ⋅ n + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, n)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/invariant.c, do_k_times_array, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 6 + 6 ⋅ n + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, n)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/invariant.c, do_n_m_times_nested, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 9 + 6 ⋅ n + 3 ⋅ n × m + 2 ⋅ n × (1+max(0, m)) + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, n)), degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/invariant.c, do_n_m_times_nested, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 9 + 6 ⋅ n + 3 ⋅ n × m + 2 ⋅ n × (1+max(0, m)) + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, n)), degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/invariant.c, do_n_m_times_nested, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 9 + 6 ⋅ n + 3 ⋅ n × m + 2 ⋅ n × (1+max(0, m)) + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, n)), degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/invariant.c, do_n_m_times_nested, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 9 + 6 ⋅ n + 3 ⋅ n × m + 2 ⋅ n × (1+max(0, m)) + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, n)), degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/invariant.c, do_n_m_times_nested, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 9 + 6 ⋅ n + 3 ⋅ n × m + 2 ⋅ n × (1+max(0, m)) + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, n)), degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/invariant.c, two_loops_nested_invariant, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 8 + 24 ⋅ p + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, p)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/invariant.c, two_loops_nested_invariant, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 8 + 24 ⋅ p + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, p)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/invariant.c, two_loops_nested_invariant, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 8 + 24 ⋅ p + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, p)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/invariant.c, two_loops_nested_invariant, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 8 + 24 ⋅ p + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, p)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/invariant.c, two_loops_nested_invariant, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 8 + 24 ⋅ p + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, p)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/invariant.c, while_infinite_FN, 2, CONDITION_ALWAYS_TRUE, no_bucket, WARNING, [Here]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/jump_inside_loop.c, jump_inside_loop, 7, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2004, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/jump_inside_loop.c, jump_inside_loop, 9, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2004, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/jump_inside_loop.c, jump_inside_loop, 11, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2006, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/loops.c, do_while_independent_of_p, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 227, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/loops.c, do_while_independent_of_p, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 227, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/loops.c, do_while_independent_of_p, 6, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 227, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/loops.c, do_while_independent_of_p, 7, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 227, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/loops.c, do_while_independent_of_p, 7, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 228, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/loops.c, if_in_loop, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 379, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/loops.c, if_in_loop, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 379, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/loops.c, if_in_loop, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 379, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/loops.c, if_in_loop, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 379, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/loops.c, if_in_loop, 5, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([0, +oo] + 1):signed32]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/loops.c, if_in_loop, 7, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 379, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/loops.c, if_in_loop, 8, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 379, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/loops.c, if_in_loop, 9, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 379, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/loops.c, if_in_loop, 13, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 381, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/loops.c, if_out_loop, 7, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 612, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/loops.c, if_out_loop, 8, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 612, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/loops.c, if_out_loop, 11, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 617, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/loops.c, larger_state_FN, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1006, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/loops.c, larger_state_FN, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1006, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/loops.c, larger_state_FN, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1006, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/loops.c, larger_state_FN, 7, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1006, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/loops.c, loop_use_global_vars, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 4 ⋅ x + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, x)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/loops.c, loop_use_global_vars, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 4 ⋅ x + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, x)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/loops.c, loop_use_global_vars, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 4 + 4 ⋅ x + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, x)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/purity.c, loop, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 7006, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/purity.c, loop, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 7006, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/purity.c, loop, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 7006, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/purity.c, loop, 6, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 7008, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/switch_continue.c, test_switch, 3, CONDITION_ALWAYS_TRUE, no_bucket, WARNING, [Here]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/switch_continue.c, test_switch, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 602, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/switch_continue.c, test_switch, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 602, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/switch_continue.c, test_switch, 11, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 602, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/switch_continue.c, test_switch, 17, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 602, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/switch_continue.c, test_switch, 19, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 602, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/switch_continue.c, unroll_loop_FP, 0, INFINITE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, []
codetoanalyze/c/performance/switch_continue.c, unroll_loop_FP, 6, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([0, +oo] + 1):signed32]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/switch_continue.c, unroll_loop_FP, 9, CONDITION_ALWAYS_TRUE, no_bucket, WARNING, [Here]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/two_loops_symbolic.c, two_loops_symb, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 5 + 6 ⋅ m + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, m)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/two_loops_symbolic.c, two_loops_symb, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 5 + 6 ⋅ m + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, m)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/two_loops_symbolic.c, two_loops_symb, 6, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 7 + 6 ⋅ m + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, m)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/two_loops_symbolic.c, two_loops_symb, 6, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 8 + 12 ⋅ m + 4 ⋅ (1+max(0, m)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/two_loops_symbolic.c, two_loops_symb, 7, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 8 + 12 ⋅ m + 4 ⋅ (1+max(0, m)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/two_loops_symbolic.c, two_loops_symb, 9, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 10 + 12 ⋅ m + 4 ⋅ (1+max(0, m)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/two_loops_symbolic.c, two_loops_symb_diff, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 5 + 6 ⋅ m + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, m)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/two_loops_symbolic.c, two_loops_symb_diff, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 5 + 6 ⋅ m + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, m)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/two_loops_symbolic.c, two_loops_symb_diff, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 7 + 6 ⋅ m + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, m)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/two_loops_symbolic.c, two_loops_symb_diff, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 8 + 6 ⋅ k + 6 ⋅ m + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, k)) + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, m)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/two_loops_symbolic.c, two_loops_symb_diff, 6, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 8 + 6 ⋅ k + 6 ⋅ m + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, k)) + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, m)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/two_loops_symbolic.c, two_loops_symb_diff, 8, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 10 + 6 ⋅ k + 6 ⋅ m + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, k)) + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, m)), degree = 1]
Reference in new issue View Git Blame Copy Permalink