You can not select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
2788 lines
106 KiB
2788 lines
106 KiB
(*
|
|
* Copyright (c) 2009 - 2013 Monoidics ltd.
|
|
* Copyright (c) 2013 - present Facebook, Inc.
|
|
* All rights reserved.
|
|
*
|
|
* This source code is licensed under the BSD style license found in the
|
|
* LICENSE file in the root directory of this source tree. An additional grant
|
|
* of patent rights can be found in the PATENTS file in the same directory.
|
|
*)
|
|
|
|
open! IStd
|
|
|
|
(** Functions for Propositions (i.e., Symbolic Heaps) *)
|
|
|
|
module L = Logging
|
|
module F = Format
|
|
|
|
let decrease_indent_when_exception thunk =
|
|
try thunk () with exn when SymOp.exn_not_failure exn ->
|
|
reraise_after exn ~f:(fun () -> L.d_decrease_indent 1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
let compute_max_from_nonempty_int_list l = uw (List.max_elt ~cmp:IntLit.compare_value l)
|
|
|
|
let compute_min_from_nonempty_int_list l = uw (List.min_elt ~cmp:IntLit.compare_value l)
|
|
|
|
let rec list_rev_acc acc = function [] -> acc | x :: l -> list_rev_acc (x :: acc) l
|
|
|
|
let rec remove_redundancy have_same_key acc = function
|
|
| [] ->
|
|
List.rev acc
|
|
| [x] ->
|
|
List.rev (x :: acc)
|
|
| x :: (y :: l' as l) ->
|
|
if have_same_key x y then remove_redundancy have_same_key acc (x :: l')
|
|
else remove_redundancy have_same_key (x :: acc) l
|
|
|
|
|
|
let rec is_java_class tenv (typ: Typ.t) =
|
|
match typ.desc with
|
|
| Tstruct name ->
|
|
Typ.Name.Java.is_class name
|
|
| Tarray (inner_typ, _, _) | Tptr (inner_typ, _) ->
|
|
is_java_class tenv inner_typ
|
|
| _ ->
|
|
false
|
|
|
|
|
|
(** Negate an atom *)
|
|
let atom_negate tenv = function
|
|
| Sil.Aeq (Exp.BinOp (Binop.Le, e1, e2), Exp.Const Const.Cint i) when IntLit.isone i ->
|
|
Prop.mk_inequality tenv (Exp.lt e2 e1)
|
|
| Sil.Aeq (Exp.BinOp (Binop.Lt, e1, e2), Exp.Const Const.Cint i) when IntLit.isone i ->
|
|
Prop.mk_inequality tenv (Exp.le e2 e1)
|
|
| Sil.Aeq (e1, e2) ->
|
|
Sil.Aneq (e1, e2)
|
|
| Sil.Aneq (e1, e2) ->
|
|
Sil.Aeq (e1, e2)
|
|
| Sil.Apred (a, es) ->
|
|
Sil.Anpred (a, es)
|
|
| Sil.Anpred (a, es) ->
|
|
Sil.Apred (a, es)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(** {2 Ordinary Theorem Proving} *)
|
|
|
|
let ( ++ ) = IntLit.add
|
|
|
|
let ( -- ) = IntLit.sub
|
|
|
|
(** Reasoning about constraints of the form x-y <= n *)
|
|
|
|
module DiffConstr : sig
|
|
type t
|
|
|
|
val to_leq : t -> Exp.t * Exp.t
|
|
|
|
val to_lt : t -> Exp.t * Exp.t
|
|
|
|
val to_triple : t -> Exp.t * Exp.t * IntLit.t
|
|
|
|
val from_leq : t list -> Exp.t * Exp.t -> t list
|
|
|
|
val from_lt : t list -> Exp.t * Exp.t -> t list
|
|
|
|
val saturate : t list -> bool * t list
|
|
end = struct
|
|
type t = Exp.t * Exp.t * IntLit.t [@@deriving compare]
|
|
|
|
let equal = [%compare.equal : t]
|
|
|
|
let to_leq (e1, e2, n) = (Exp.BinOp (Binop.MinusA, e1, e2), Exp.int n)
|
|
|
|
let to_lt (e1, e2, n) =
|
|
(Exp.int (IntLit.zero -- n -- IntLit.one), Exp.BinOp (Binop.MinusA, e2, e1))
|
|
|
|
|
|
let to_triple entry = entry
|
|
|
|
let from_leq acc (e1, e2) =
|
|
match (e1, e2) with
|
|
| ( Exp.BinOp (Binop.MinusA, (Exp.Var id11 as e11), (Exp.Var id12 as e12))
|
|
, Exp.Const Const.Cint n )
|
|
when not (Ident.equal id11 id12) -> (
|
|
match IntLit.to_signed n with
|
|
| None ->
|
|
acc (* ignore: constraint algorithm only terminates on signed integers *)
|
|
| Some n' ->
|
|
(e11, e12, n') :: acc )
|
|
| _ ->
|
|
acc
|
|
|
|
|
|
let from_lt acc (e1, e2) =
|
|
match (e1, e2) with
|
|
| Exp.Const Const.Cint n, Exp.BinOp (Binop.MinusA, (Exp.Var id21 as e21), (Exp.Var id22 as e22))
|
|
when not (Ident.equal id21 id22) -> (
|
|
match IntLit.to_signed n with
|
|
| None ->
|
|
acc (* ignore: constraint algorithm only terminates on signed integers *)
|
|
| Some n' ->
|
|
let m = IntLit.zero -- n' -- IntLit.one in
|
|
(e22, e21, m) :: acc )
|
|
| _ ->
|
|
acc
|
|
|
|
|
|
let rec generate ((e1, e2, n) as constr) acc = function
|
|
| [] ->
|
|
(false, acc)
|
|
| (f1, f2, m) :: rest ->
|
|
let equal_e2_f1 = Exp.equal e2 f1 in
|
|
let equal_e1_f2 = Exp.equal e1 f2 in
|
|
if equal_e2_f1 && equal_e1_f2 && IntLit.lt (n ++ m) IntLit.zero then (true, [])
|
|
(* constraints are inconsistent *)
|
|
else if equal_e2_f1 && equal_e1_f2 then generate constr acc rest
|
|
else if equal_e2_f1 then
|
|
let constr_new = (e1, f2, n ++ m) in
|
|
generate constr (constr_new :: acc) rest
|
|
else if equal_e1_f2 then
|
|
let constr_new = (f1, e2, m ++ n) in
|
|
generate constr (constr_new :: acc) rest
|
|
else generate constr acc rest
|
|
|
|
|
|
let sort_then_remove_redundancy constraints =
|
|
let constraints_sorted = List.sort ~cmp:compare constraints in
|
|
let have_same_key (e1, e2, _) (f1, f2, _) =
|
|
[%compare.equal : Exp.t * Exp.t] (e1, e2) (f1, f2)
|
|
in
|
|
remove_redundancy have_same_key [] constraints_sorted
|
|
|
|
|
|
let remove_redundancy constraints =
|
|
let constraints' = sort_then_remove_redundancy constraints in
|
|
List.filter ~f:(fun entry -> List.exists ~f:(equal entry) constraints') constraints
|
|
|
|
|
|
let rec combine acc_todos acc_seen constraints_new constraints_old =
|
|
match (constraints_new, constraints_old) with
|
|
| [], [] ->
|
|
(List.rev acc_todos, List.rev acc_seen)
|
|
| [], _ ->
|
|
(List.rev acc_todos, list_rev_acc constraints_old acc_seen)
|
|
| _, [] ->
|
|
(list_rev_acc constraints_new acc_todos, list_rev_acc constraints_new acc_seen)
|
|
| constr :: rest, constr' :: rest' ->
|
|
let e1, e2, n = constr in
|
|
let f1, f2, m = constr' in
|
|
let c1 = [%compare : Exp.t * Exp.t] (e1, e2) (f1, f2) in
|
|
if Int.equal c1 0 && IntLit.lt n m then combine acc_todos acc_seen constraints_new rest'
|
|
else if Int.equal c1 0 then combine acc_todos acc_seen rest constraints_old
|
|
else if c1 < 0 then combine (constr :: acc_todos) (constr :: acc_seen) rest constraints_old
|
|
else combine acc_todos (constr' :: acc_seen) constraints_new rest'
|
|
|
|
|
|
let rec _saturate seen todos =
|
|
(* seen is a superset of todos. "seen" is sorted and doesn't have redundancy. *)
|
|
match todos with
|
|
| [] ->
|
|
(false, seen)
|
|
| constr :: rest ->
|
|
let inconsistent, constraints_new = generate constr [] seen in
|
|
if inconsistent then (true, [])
|
|
else
|
|
let constraints_new' = sort_then_remove_redundancy constraints_new in
|
|
let todos_new, seen_new = combine [] [] constraints_new' seen in
|
|
(* Important to use queue here. Otherwise, might diverge *)
|
|
let rest_new = remove_redundancy (rest @ todos_new) in
|
|
let seen_new' = sort_then_remove_redundancy seen_new in
|
|
_saturate seen_new' rest_new
|
|
|
|
|
|
let saturate constraints =
|
|
let constraints_cleaned = sort_then_remove_redundancy constraints in
|
|
_saturate constraints_cleaned constraints_cleaned
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
(** Return true if the two types have sizes which can be compared *)
|
|
let type_size_comparable t1 t2 =
|
|
match (t1.Typ.desc, t2.Typ.desc) with Typ.Tint _, Typ.Tint _ -> true | _ -> false
|
|
|
|
|
|
(** Compare the size of comparable types *)
|
|
let type_size_compare t1 t2 =
|
|
let ik_compare ik1 ik2 =
|
|
let ik_size = function
|
|
| Typ.IChar | Typ.ISChar | Typ.IUChar | Typ.IBool ->
|
|
1
|
|
| Typ.IShort | Typ.IUShort ->
|
|
2
|
|
| Typ.IInt | Typ.IUInt ->
|
|
3
|
|
| Typ.ILong | Typ.IULong ->
|
|
4
|
|
| Typ.ILongLong | Typ.IULongLong ->
|
|
5
|
|
| Typ.I128 | Typ.IU128 ->
|
|
6
|
|
in
|
|
let n1 = ik_size ik1 in
|
|
let n2 = ik_size ik2 in
|
|
n1 - n2
|
|
in
|
|
match (t1.Typ.desc, t2.Typ.desc) with
|
|
| Typ.Tint ik1, Typ.Tint ik2 ->
|
|
Some (ik_compare ik1 ik2)
|
|
| _ ->
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
|
|
(** Check <= on the size of comparable types *)
|
|
let check_type_size_leq t1 t2 =
|
|
match type_size_compare t1 t2 with None -> false | Some n -> n <= 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
(** Check < on the size of comparable types *)
|
|
let check_type_size_lt t1 t2 = match type_size_compare t1 t2 with None -> false | Some n -> n < 0
|
|
|
|
(** Reasoning about inequalities *)
|
|
module Inequalities : sig
|
|
(** type for inequalities (and implied disequalities) *)
|
|
type t
|
|
|
|
val from_prop : Tenv.t -> Prop.normal Prop.t -> t
|
|
(** Extract inequalities and disequalities from [prop] *)
|
|
|
|
val check_ne : t -> Exp.t -> Exp.t -> bool
|
|
(** Check [t |- e1!=e2]. Result [false] means "don't know". *)
|
|
|
|
val check_le : t -> Exp.t -> Exp.t -> bool
|
|
(** Check [t |- e1<=e2]. Result [false] means "don't know". *)
|
|
|
|
val check_lt : t -> Exp.t -> Exp.t -> bool
|
|
(** Check [t |- e1<e2]. Result [false] means "don't know". *)
|
|
|
|
val compute_upper_bound : t -> Exp.t -> IntLit.t option
|
|
(** Find a IntLit.t n such that [t |- e<=n] if possible. *)
|
|
|
|
val compute_lower_bound : t -> Exp.t -> IntLit.t option
|
|
(** Find a IntLit.t n such that [t |- n<e] if possible. *)
|
|
|
|
val inconsistent : t -> bool
|
|
(** Return [true] if a simple inconsistency is detected *)
|
|
(*
|
|
(** Extract inequalities and disequalities from [pi] *)
|
|
val from_pi : Sil.atom list -> t
|
|
|
|
(** Extract inequalities and disequalities from [sigma] *)
|
|
val from_sigma : Sil.hpred list -> t
|
|
|
|
(** Join two sets of inequalities *)
|
|
val join : t -> t -> t
|
|
|
|
(** Pretty print inequalities and disequalities *)
|
|
val pp : printenv -> Format.formatter -> t -> unit
|
|
|
|
(** Pretty print <= *)
|
|
val d_leqs : t -> unit
|
|
|
|
(** Pretty print < *)
|
|
val d_lts : t -> unit
|
|
|
|
(** Pretty print <> *)
|
|
val d_neqs : t -> unit
|
|
*)
|
|
end = struct
|
|
type t =
|
|
{ mutable leqs: (Exp.t * Exp.t) list (** le fasts [e1 <= e2] *)
|
|
; mutable lts: (Exp.t * Exp.t) list (** lt facts [e1 < e2] *)
|
|
; mutable neqs: (Exp.t * Exp.t) list (** ne facts [e1 != e2] *) }
|
|
|
|
let inconsistent_ineq = {leqs= [(Exp.one, Exp.zero)]; lts= []; neqs= []}
|
|
|
|
let leq_compare (e1, e2) (f1, f2) =
|
|
let c1 = Exp.compare e1 f1 in
|
|
if c1 <> 0 then c1 else Exp.compare e2 f2
|
|
|
|
|
|
let lt_compare (e1, e2) (f1, f2) =
|
|
let c2 = Exp.compare e2 f2 in
|
|
if c2 <> 0 then c2 else -Exp.compare e1 f1
|
|
|
|
|
|
let leqs_sort_then_remove_redundancy leqs =
|
|
let leqs_sorted = List.sort ~cmp:leq_compare leqs in
|
|
let have_same_key leq1 leq2 =
|
|
match (leq1, leq2) with
|
|
| (e1, Exp.Const Const.Cint n1), (e2, Exp.Const Const.Cint n2) ->
|
|
Exp.equal e1 e2 && IntLit.leq n1 n2
|
|
| _, _ ->
|
|
false
|
|
in
|
|
remove_redundancy have_same_key [] leqs_sorted
|
|
|
|
|
|
let lts_sort_then_remove_redundancy lts =
|
|
let lts_sorted = List.sort ~cmp:lt_compare lts in
|
|
let have_same_key lt1 lt2 =
|
|
match (lt1, lt2) with
|
|
| (Exp.Const Const.Cint n1, e1), (Exp.Const Const.Cint n2, e2) ->
|
|
Exp.equal e1 e2 && IntLit.geq n1 n2
|
|
| _, _ ->
|
|
false
|
|
in
|
|
remove_redundancy have_same_key [] lts_sorted
|
|
|
|
|
|
let saturate {leqs; lts; neqs} =
|
|
let diff_constraints1 =
|
|
List.fold ~f:DiffConstr.from_lt ~init:(List.fold ~f:DiffConstr.from_leq ~init:[] leqs) lts
|
|
in
|
|
let inconsistent, diff_constraints2 = DiffConstr.saturate diff_constraints1 in
|
|
if inconsistent then inconsistent_ineq
|
|
else
|
|
let umap_add umap e new_upper =
|
|
try
|
|
let old_upper = Exp.Map.find e umap in
|
|
if IntLit.leq old_upper new_upper then umap else Exp.Map.add e new_upper umap
|
|
with Not_found -> Exp.Map.add e new_upper umap
|
|
in
|
|
let lmap_add lmap e new_lower =
|
|
try
|
|
let old_lower = Exp.Map.find e lmap in
|
|
if IntLit.geq old_lower new_lower then lmap else Exp.Map.add e new_lower lmap
|
|
with Not_found -> Exp.Map.add e new_lower lmap
|
|
in
|
|
let rec umap_create_from_leqs umap = function
|
|
| [] ->
|
|
umap
|
|
| (e1, Exp.Const Const.Cint upper1) :: leqs_rest ->
|
|
let umap' = umap_add umap e1 upper1 in
|
|
umap_create_from_leqs umap' leqs_rest
|
|
| _ :: leqs_rest ->
|
|
umap_create_from_leqs umap leqs_rest
|
|
in
|
|
let rec lmap_create_from_lts lmap = function
|
|
| [] ->
|
|
lmap
|
|
| (Exp.Const Const.Cint lower1, e1) :: lts_rest ->
|
|
let lmap' = lmap_add lmap e1 lower1 in
|
|
lmap_create_from_lts lmap' lts_rest
|
|
| _ :: lts_rest ->
|
|
lmap_create_from_lts lmap lts_rest
|
|
in
|
|
let rec umap_improve_by_difference_constraints umap = function
|
|
| [] ->
|
|
umap
|
|
| constr :: constrs_rest ->
|
|
try
|
|
let e1, e2, n = DiffConstr.to_triple constr (* e1 - e2 <= n *) in
|
|
let upper2 = Exp.Map.find e2 umap in
|
|
let new_upper1 = upper2 ++ n in
|
|
let new_umap = umap_add umap e1 new_upper1 in
|
|
umap_improve_by_difference_constraints new_umap constrs_rest
|
|
with Not_found -> umap_improve_by_difference_constraints umap constrs_rest
|
|
in
|
|
let rec lmap_improve_by_difference_constraints lmap = function
|
|
| [] ->
|
|
lmap
|
|
| constr :: constrs_rest ->
|
|
(* e2 - e1 > -n-1 *)
|
|
try
|
|
let e1, e2, n = DiffConstr.to_triple constr (* e2 - e1 > -n-1 *) in
|
|
let lower1 = Exp.Map.find e1 lmap in
|
|
let new_lower2 = lower1 -- n -- IntLit.one in
|
|
let new_lmap = lmap_add lmap e2 new_lower2 in
|
|
lmap_improve_by_difference_constraints new_lmap constrs_rest
|
|
with Not_found -> lmap_improve_by_difference_constraints lmap constrs_rest
|
|
in
|
|
let leqs_res =
|
|
let umap = umap_create_from_leqs Exp.Map.empty leqs in
|
|
let umap' = umap_improve_by_difference_constraints umap diff_constraints2 in
|
|
let leqs' =
|
|
Exp.Map.fold (fun e upper acc_leqs -> (e, Exp.int upper) :: acc_leqs) umap' []
|
|
in
|
|
let leqs'' = List.map ~f:DiffConstr.to_leq diff_constraints2 @ leqs' in
|
|
leqs_sort_then_remove_redundancy leqs''
|
|
in
|
|
let lts_res =
|
|
let lmap = lmap_create_from_lts Exp.Map.empty lts in
|
|
let lmap' = lmap_improve_by_difference_constraints lmap diff_constraints2 in
|
|
let lts' = Exp.Map.fold (fun e lower acc_lts -> (Exp.int lower, e) :: acc_lts) lmap' [] in
|
|
let lts'' = List.map ~f:DiffConstr.to_lt diff_constraints2 @ lts' in
|
|
lts_sort_then_remove_redundancy lts''
|
|
in
|
|
{leqs= leqs_res; lts= lts_res; neqs}
|
|
|
|
|
|
(** Extract inequalities and disequalities from [pi] *)
|
|
let from_pi pi =
|
|
let leqs = ref [] in
|
|
(* <= facts *)
|
|
let lts = ref [] in
|
|
(* < facts *)
|
|
let neqs = ref [] in
|
|
(* != facts *)
|
|
let process_atom = function
|
|
| Sil.Aneq (e1, e2) ->
|
|
(* != *)
|
|
neqs := (e1, e2) :: !neqs
|
|
| Sil.Aeq (Exp.BinOp (Binop.Le, e1, e2), Exp.Const Const.Cint i) when IntLit.isone i ->
|
|
leqs := (e1, e2) :: !leqs (* <= *)
|
|
| Sil.Aeq (Exp.BinOp (Binop.Lt, e1, e2), Exp.Const Const.Cint i) when IntLit.isone i ->
|
|
lts := (e1, e2) :: !lts (* < *)
|
|
| Sil.Aeq _ | Sil.Apred _ | Anpred _ ->
|
|
()
|
|
in
|
|
List.iter ~f:process_atom pi ;
|
|
saturate {leqs= !leqs; lts= !lts; neqs= !neqs}
|
|
|
|
|
|
let from_sigma tenv sigma =
|
|
let lookup = Tenv.lookup tenv in
|
|
let leqs = ref [] in
|
|
let lts = ref [] in
|
|
let add_lt_minus1_e e = lts := (Exp.minus_one, e) :: !lts in
|
|
let type_opt_is_unsigned = function
|
|
| Some {Typ.desc= Tint ik} ->
|
|
Typ.ikind_is_unsigned ik
|
|
| _ ->
|
|
false
|
|
in
|
|
let type_of_texp = function Exp.Sizeof {typ} -> Some typ | _ -> None in
|
|
let texp_is_unsigned texp = type_opt_is_unsigned @@ type_of_texp texp in
|
|
let strexp_lt_minus1 = function Sil.Eexp (e, _) -> add_lt_minus1_e e | _ -> () in
|
|
let rec strexp_extract = function
|
|
| Sil.Eexp (e, _), t ->
|
|
if type_opt_is_unsigned t then add_lt_minus1_e e
|
|
| Sil.Estruct (fsel, _), t ->
|
|
let get_field_type f =
|
|
Option.bind t ~f:(fun t' ->
|
|
Option.map ~f:fst @@ Typ.Struct.get_field_type_and_annotation ~lookup f t' )
|
|
in
|
|
List.iter ~f:(fun (f, se) -> strexp_extract (se, get_field_type f)) fsel
|
|
| Sil.Earray (len, isel, _), t ->
|
|
let elt_t = match t with Some {Typ.desc= Tarray (t, _, _)} -> Some t | _ -> None in
|
|
add_lt_minus1_e len ;
|
|
List.iter
|
|
~f:(fun (idx, se) ->
|
|
add_lt_minus1_e idx ;
|
|
strexp_extract (se, elt_t))
|
|
isel
|
|
in
|
|
let hpred_extract = function
|
|
| Sil.Hpointsto (_, se, texp) ->
|
|
if texp_is_unsigned texp then strexp_lt_minus1 se ;
|
|
strexp_extract (se, type_of_texp texp)
|
|
| Sil.Hlseg _ | Sil.Hdllseg _ ->
|
|
()
|
|
in
|
|
List.iter ~f:hpred_extract sigma ;
|
|
saturate {leqs= !leqs; lts= !lts; neqs= []}
|
|
|
|
|
|
let join ineq1 ineq2 =
|
|
let leqs_new = ineq1.leqs @ ineq2.leqs in
|
|
let lts_new = ineq1.lts @ ineq2.lts in
|
|
let neqs_new = ineq1.neqs @ ineq2.neqs in
|
|
saturate {leqs= leqs_new; lts= lts_new; neqs= neqs_new}
|
|
|
|
|
|
let from_prop tenv prop =
|
|
let sigma = prop.Prop.sigma in
|
|
let pi = prop.Prop.pi in
|
|
let ineq_sigma = from_sigma tenv sigma in
|
|
let ineq_pi = from_pi pi in
|
|
saturate (join ineq_sigma ineq_pi)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(** Return true if the two pairs of expressions are equal *)
|
|
let exp_pair_eq (e1, e2) (f1, f2) = Exp.equal e1 f1 && Exp.equal e2 f2
|
|
|
|
(** Check [t |- e1<=e2]. Result [false] means "don't know". *)
|
|
let check_le {leqs; lts; neqs= _} e1 e2 =
|
|
(* L.d_str "check_le "; Sil.d_exp e1; L.d_str " "; Sil.d_exp e2; L.d_ln (); *)
|
|
match (e1, e2) with
|
|
| Exp.Const Const.Cint n1, Exp.Const Const.Cint n2 ->
|
|
IntLit.leq n1 n2
|
|
| ( Exp.BinOp (Binop.MinusA, Exp.Sizeof {nbytes= Some nb1}, Exp.Sizeof {nbytes= Some nb2})
|
|
, Exp.Const Const.Cint n2 ) ->
|
|
(* [ sizeof(t1) - sizeof(t2) <= n2 ] *)
|
|
IntLit.(leq (sub (of_int nb1) (of_int nb2)) n2)
|
|
| Exp.BinOp (Binop.MinusA, Exp.Sizeof {typ= t1}, Exp.Sizeof {typ= t2}), Exp.Const Const.Cint n2
|
|
when IntLit.isminusone n2 && type_size_comparable t1 t2 ->
|
|
(* [ sizeof(t1) - sizeof(t2) <= -1 ] *)
|
|
check_type_size_lt t1 t2
|
|
| e, Exp.Const Const.Cint n ->
|
|
(* [e <= n' <= n |- e <= n] *)
|
|
List.exists
|
|
~f:(function
|
|
| e', Exp.Const Const.Cint n' -> Exp.equal e e' && IntLit.leq n' n | _, _ -> false)
|
|
leqs
|
|
| Exp.Const Const.Cint n, e ->
|
|
(* [ n-1 <= n' < e |- n <= e] *)
|
|
List.exists
|
|
~f:(function
|
|
| Exp.Const Const.Cint n', e' ->
|
|
Exp.equal e e' && IntLit.leq (n -- IntLit.one) n'
|
|
| _, _ ->
|
|
false)
|
|
lts
|
|
| _ ->
|
|
Exp.equal e1 e2
|
|
|
|
|
|
(** Check [prop |- e1<e2]. Result [false] means "don't know". *)
|
|
let check_lt {leqs; lts; neqs= _} e1 e2 =
|
|
(* L.d_str "check_lt "; Sil.d_exp e1; L.d_str " "; Sil.d_exp e2; L.d_ln (); *)
|
|
match (e1, e2) with
|
|
| Exp.Const Const.Cint n1, Exp.Const Const.Cint n2 ->
|
|
IntLit.lt n1 n2
|
|
| Exp.Const Const.Cint n, e ->
|
|
(* [n <= n' < e |- n < e] *)
|
|
List.exists
|
|
~f:(function
|
|
| Exp.Const Const.Cint n', e' -> Exp.equal e e' && IntLit.leq n n' | _, _ -> false)
|
|
lts
|
|
| e, Exp.Const Const.Cint n ->
|
|
(* [e <= n' <= n-1 |- e < n] *)
|
|
List.exists
|
|
~f:(function
|
|
| e', Exp.Const Const.Cint n' ->
|
|
Exp.equal e e' && IntLit.leq n' (n -- IntLit.one)
|
|
| _, _ ->
|
|
false)
|
|
leqs
|
|
| _ ->
|
|
false
|
|
|
|
|
|
(** Check [prop |- e1!=e2]. Result [false] means "don't know". *)
|
|
let check_ne ineq _e1 _e2 =
|
|
let e1, e2 = if Exp.compare _e1 _e2 <= 0 then (_e1, _e2) else (_e2, _e1) in
|
|
List.exists ~f:(exp_pair_eq (e1, e2)) ineq.neqs || check_lt ineq e1 e2 || check_lt ineq e2 e1
|
|
|
|
|
|
(** Find a IntLit.t n such that [t |- e<=n] if possible. *)
|
|
let compute_upper_bound {leqs; lts= _; neqs= _} e1 =
|
|
match e1 with
|
|
| Exp.Const Const.Cint n1 ->
|
|
Some n1
|
|
| _ ->
|
|
let e_upper_list =
|
|
List.filter
|
|
~f:(function e', Exp.Const Const.Cint _ -> Exp.equal e1 e' | _, _ -> false)
|
|
leqs
|
|
in
|
|
let upper_list =
|
|
List.map ~f:(function _, Exp.Const Const.Cint n -> n | _ -> assert false) e_upper_list
|
|
in
|
|
if List.is_empty upper_list then None
|
|
else Some (compute_min_from_nonempty_int_list upper_list)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(** Find a IntLit.t n such that [t |- n < e] if possible. *)
|
|
let compute_lower_bound {leqs= _; lts; neqs= _} e1 =
|
|
match e1 with
|
|
| Exp.Const Const.Cint n1 ->
|
|
Some (n1 -- IntLit.one)
|
|
| Exp.Sizeof {nbytes= Some n1} ->
|
|
Some (IntLit.of_int n1 -- IntLit.one)
|
|
| Exp.Sizeof _ ->
|
|
Some IntLit.zero
|
|
| _ ->
|
|
let e_lower_list =
|
|
List.filter
|
|
~f:(function Exp.Const Const.Cint _, e' -> Exp.equal e1 e' | _, _ -> false)
|
|
lts
|
|
in
|
|
let lower_list =
|
|
List.map ~f:(function Exp.Const Const.Cint n, _ -> n | _ -> assert false) e_lower_list
|
|
in
|
|
if List.is_empty lower_list then None
|
|
else Some (compute_max_from_nonempty_int_list lower_list)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(** Return [true] if a simple inconsistency is detected *)
|
|
let inconsistent ({leqs; lts; neqs} as ineq) =
|
|
let inconsistent_neq (e1, e2) = check_le ineq e1 e2 && check_le ineq e2 e1 in
|
|
let inconsistent_leq (e1, e2) = check_lt ineq e2 e1 in
|
|
let inconsistent_lt (e1, e2) = check_le ineq e2 e1 in
|
|
List.exists ~f:inconsistent_neq neqs || List.exists ~f:inconsistent_leq leqs
|
|
|| List.exists ~f:inconsistent_lt lts
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*
|
|
(** Pretty print inequalities and disequalities *)
|
|
let pp pe fmt { leqs = leqs; lts = lts; neqs = neqs } =
|
|
let pp_leq fmt (e1, e2) = F.fprintf fmt "%a<=%a" (Sil.pp_exp pe) e1 (Sil.pp_exp pe) e2 in
|
|
let pp_lt fmt (e1, e2) = F.fprintf fmt "%a<%a" (Sil.pp_exp pe) e1 (Sil.pp_exp pe) e2 in
|
|
let pp_neq fmt (e1, e2) = F.fprintf fmt "%a!=%a" (Sil.pp_exp pe) e1 (Sil.pp_exp pe) e2 in
|
|
Format.fprintf fmt "%a %a %a" (pp_seq pp_leq) leqs (pp_seq pp_lt) lts (pp_seq pp_neq) neqs
|
|
|
|
let d_leqs { leqs = leqs; lts = lts; neqs = neqs } =
|
|
let elist = List.map ~f:(fun (e1, e2) -> Exp.BinOp(Binop.Le, e1, e2)) leqs in
|
|
Sil.d_exp_list elist
|
|
|
|
let d_lts { leqs = leqs; lts = lts; neqs = neqs } =
|
|
let elist = List.map ~f:(fun (e1, e2) -> Exp.BinOp(Binop.Lt, e1, e2)) lts in
|
|
Sil.d_exp_list elist
|
|
|
|
let d_neqs { leqs = leqs; lts = lts; neqs = neqs } =
|
|
let elist = List.map ~f:(fun (e1, e2) -> Exp.BinOp(Binop.Ne, e1, e2)) lts in
|
|
Sil.d_exp_list elist
|
|
*)
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
(* End of module Inequalities *)
|
|
|
|
(** Check [prop |- e1=e2]. Result [false] means "don't know". *)
|
|
let check_equal tenv prop e1_0 e2_0 =
|
|
let n_e1 = Prop.exp_normalize_prop ~destructive:true tenv prop e1_0 in
|
|
let n_e2 = Prop.exp_normalize_prop ~destructive:true tenv prop e2_0 in
|
|
let check_equal () = Exp.equal n_e1 n_e2 in
|
|
let check_equal_const () =
|
|
match (n_e1, n_e2) with
|
|
| Exp.BinOp (Binop.PlusA, e1, Exp.Const Const.Cint d), e2
|
|
| e2, Exp.BinOp (Binop.PlusA, e1, Exp.Const Const.Cint d) ->
|
|
if Exp.equal e1 e2 then IntLit.iszero d else false
|
|
| Exp.Const c1, Exp.Lindex (Exp.Const c2, Exp.Const Const.Cint i) when IntLit.iszero i ->
|
|
Const.equal c1 c2
|
|
| Exp.Lindex (Exp.Const c1, Exp.Const Const.Cint i), Exp.Const c2 when IntLit.iszero i ->
|
|
Const.equal c1 c2
|
|
| _, _ ->
|
|
false
|
|
in
|
|
let check_equal_pi () =
|
|
let eq = Sil.Aeq (n_e1, n_e2) in
|
|
let n_eq = Prop.atom_normalize_prop tenv prop eq in
|
|
let pi = prop.Prop.pi in
|
|
List.exists ~f:(Sil.equal_atom n_eq) pi
|
|
in
|
|
check_equal () || check_equal_const () || check_equal_pi ()
|
|
|
|
|
|
(** Check [ |- e=0]. Result [false] means "don't know". *)
|
|
let check_zero tenv e = check_equal tenv Prop.prop_emp e Exp.zero
|
|
|
|
(** [is_root prop base_exp exp] checks whether [base_exp =
|
|
exp.offlist] for some list of offsets [offlist]. If so, it returns
|
|
[Some(offlist)]. Otherwise, it returns [None]. Assumes that
|
|
[base_exp] points to the beginning of a structure, not the middle.
|
|
*)
|
|
let is_root tenv prop base_exp exp =
|
|
let rec f offlist_past e =
|
|
match e with
|
|
| Exp.Var _
|
|
| Exp.Const _
|
|
| Exp.UnOp _
|
|
| Exp.BinOp _
|
|
| Exp.Exn _
|
|
| Exp.Closure _
|
|
| Exp.Lvar _
|
|
| Exp.Sizeof _ ->
|
|
if check_equal tenv prop base_exp e then Some offlist_past else None
|
|
| Exp.Cast (_, sub_exp) ->
|
|
f offlist_past sub_exp
|
|
| Exp.Lfield (sub_exp, fldname, typ) ->
|
|
f (Sil.Off_fld (fldname, typ) :: offlist_past) sub_exp
|
|
| Exp.Lindex (sub_exp, e) ->
|
|
f (Sil.Off_index e :: offlist_past) sub_exp
|
|
in
|
|
f [] exp
|
|
|
|
|
|
(** Get upper and lower bounds of an expression, if any *)
|
|
let get_bounds tenv prop e0 =
|
|
let e_norm = Prop.exp_normalize_prop ~destructive:true tenv prop e0 in
|
|
let e_root, off =
|
|
match e_norm with
|
|
| Exp.BinOp (Binop.PlusA, e, Exp.Const Const.Cint n1) ->
|
|
(e, IntLit.neg n1)
|
|
| Exp.BinOp (Binop.MinusA, e, Exp.Const Const.Cint n1) ->
|
|
(e, n1)
|
|
| _ ->
|
|
(e_norm, IntLit.zero)
|
|
in
|
|
let ineq = Inequalities.from_prop tenv prop in
|
|
let upper_opt = Inequalities.compute_upper_bound ineq e_root in
|
|
let lower_opt = Inequalities.compute_lower_bound ineq e_root in
|
|
let ( +++ ) n_opt k = match n_opt with None -> None | Some n -> Some (n ++ k) in
|
|
(upper_opt +++ off, lower_opt +++ off)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(** Check whether [prop |- e1!=e2]. *)
|
|
let check_disequal tenv prop e1 e2 =
|
|
let spatial_part = prop.Prop.sigma in
|
|
let n_e1 = Prop.exp_normalize_prop ~destructive:true tenv prop e1 in
|
|
let n_e2 = Prop.exp_normalize_prop ~destructive:true tenv prop e2 in
|
|
let rec check_expr_disequal ce1 ce2 =
|
|
match (ce1, ce2) with
|
|
| Exp.Const c1, Exp.Const c2 ->
|
|
Const.kind_equal c1 c2 && not (Const.equal c1 c2)
|
|
| Exp.Const c1, Exp.Lindex (Exp.Const c2, Exp.Const Const.Cint d) ->
|
|
if IntLit.iszero d then not (Const.equal c1 c2) (* offset=0 is no offset *)
|
|
else Const.equal c1 c2
|
|
(* same base, different offsets *)
|
|
| ( Exp.BinOp (Binop.PlusA, e1, Exp.Const Const.Cint d1)
|
|
, Exp.BinOp (Binop.PlusA, e2, Exp.Const Const.Cint d2) ) ->
|
|
if Exp.equal e1 e2 then IntLit.neq d1 d2 else false
|
|
| Exp.BinOp (Binop.PlusA, e1, Exp.Const Const.Cint d), e2
|
|
| e2, Exp.BinOp (Binop.PlusA, e1, Exp.Const Const.Cint d) ->
|
|
if Exp.equal e1 e2 then not (IntLit.iszero d) else false
|
|
| Exp.Lindex (Exp.Const c1, Exp.Const Const.Cint d), Exp.Const c2 ->
|
|
if IntLit.iszero d then not (Const.equal c1 c2) else Const.equal c1 c2
|
|
| Exp.Lindex (Exp.Const c1, Exp.Const d1), Exp.Lindex (Exp.Const c2, Exp.Const d2) ->
|
|
Const.equal c1 c2 && not (Const.equal d1 d2)
|
|
| Exp.Const Const.Cint n, Exp.BinOp (Binop.Mult, Exp.Sizeof _, e21)
|
|
| Exp.Const Const.Cint n, Exp.BinOp (Binop.Mult, e21, Sizeof _)
|
|
| Exp.BinOp (Binop.Mult, Exp.Sizeof _, e21), Exp.Const Const.Cint n
|
|
| Exp.BinOp (Binop.Mult, e21, Exp.Sizeof _), Exp.Const Const.Cint n ->
|
|
IntLit.iszero n && not (Exp.is_zero e21)
|
|
| Exp.Lvar pv0, Exp.Lvar pv1 ->
|
|
(* Addresses of any two local vars must be different *)
|
|
not (Pvar.equal pv0 pv1)
|
|
| Exp.Lvar pv, Exp.Var id | Exp.Var id, Exp.Lvar pv ->
|
|
(* Address of any non-global var must be different from the value of any footprint var *)
|
|
not (Pvar.is_global pv) && Ident.is_footprint id
|
|
| Exp.Lvar _, Exp.Const Const.Cint _ | Exp.Const Const.Cint _, Exp.Lvar _ ->
|
|
(* Comparing pointer with nonzero integer is undefined behavior in ISO C++ *)
|
|
(* Assume they are not equal *)
|
|
true
|
|
| Exp.UnOp (op1, e1, _), Exp.UnOp (op2, e2, _) ->
|
|
if Unop.equal op1 op2 then check_expr_disequal e1 e2 else false
|
|
| Exp.Lfield (e1, f1, _), Exp.Lfield (e2, f2, _) ->
|
|
if Typ.Fieldname.equal f1 f2 then check_expr_disequal e1 e2 else false
|
|
| Exp.Exn e1, Exp.Exn e2 ->
|
|
check_expr_disequal e1 e2
|
|
| _, _ ->
|
|
false
|
|
in
|
|
let ineq = lazy (Inequalities.from_prop tenv prop) in
|
|
let check_pi_implies_disequal e1 e2 = Inequalities.check_ne (Lazy.force ineq) e1 e2 in
|
|
let neq_spatial_part () =
|
|
let rec f sigma_irrelevant e = function
|
|
| [] ->
|
|
None
|
|
| (Sil.Hpointsto (base, _, _) as hpred) :: sigma_rest -> (
|
|
match is_root tenv prop base e with
|
|
| None ->
|
|
let sigma_irrelevant' = hpred :: sigma_irrelevant in
|
|
f sigma_irrelevant' e sigma_rest
|
|
| Some _ ->
|
|
let sigma_irrelevant' = List.rev_append sigma_irrelevant sigma_rest in
|
|
Some (true, sigma_irrelevant') )
|
|
| (Sil.Hlseg (k, _, e1, e2, _) as hpred) :: sigma_rest -> (
|
|
match is_root tenv prop e1 e with
|
|
| None ->
|
|
let sigma_irrelevant' = hpred :: sigma_irrelevant in
|
|
f sigma_irrelevant' e sigma_rest
|
|
| Some _ ->
|
|
if Sil.equal_lseg_kind k Sil.Lseg_NE || check_pi_implies_disequal e1 e2 then
|
|
let sigma_irrelevant' = List.rev_append sigma_irrelevant sigma_rest in
|
|
Some (true, sigma_irrelevant')
|
|
else if Exp.equal e2 Exp.zero then
|
|
let sigma_irrelevant' = List.rev_append sigma_irrelevant sigma_rest in
|
|
Some (false, sigma_irrelevant')
|
|
else
|
|
let sigma_rest' = List.rev_append sigma_irrelevant sigma_rest in
|
|
f [] e2 sigma_rest' )
|
|
| (Sil.Hdllseg (Sil.Lseg_NE, _, iF, _, _, iB, _)) :: sigma_rest ->
|
|
if is_root tenv prop iF e <> None || is_root tenv prop iB e <> None then
|
|
let sigma_irrelevant' = List.rev_append sigma_irrelevant sigma_rest in
|
|
Some (true, sigma_irrelevant')
|
|
else
|
|
let sigma_irrelevant' = List.rev_append sigma_irrelevant sigma_rest in
|
|
Some (false, sigma_irrelevant')
|
|
| (Sil.Hdllseg (Sil.Lseg_PE, _, iF, _, oF, _, _) as hpred) :: sigma_rest ->
|
|
match is_root tenv prop iF e with
|
|
| None ->
|
|
let sigma_irrelevant' = hpred :: sigma_irrelevant in
|
|
f sigma_irrelevant' e sigma_rest
|
|
| Some _ ->
|
|
if check_pi_implies_disequal iF oF then
|
|
let sigma_irrelevant' = List.rev_append sigma_irrelevant sigma_rest in
|
|
Some (true, sigma_irrelevant')
|
|
else if Exp.equal oF Exp.zero then
|
|
let sigma_irrelevant' = List.rev_append sigma_irrelevant sigma_rest in
|
|
Some (false, sigma_irrelevant')
|
|
else
|
|
let sigma_rest' = List.rev_append sigma_irrelevant sigma_rest in
|
|
f [] oF sigma_rest'
|
|
in
|
|
let f_null_check sigma_irrelevant e sigma_rest =
|
|
if not (Exp.equal e Exp.zero) then f sigma_irrelevant e sigma_rest
|
|
else
|
|
let sigma_irrelevant' = List.rev_append sigma_irrelevant sigma_rest in
|
|
Some (false, sigma_irrelevant')
|
|
in
|
|
match f_null_check [] n_e1 spatial_part with
|
|
| None ->
|
|
false
|
|
| Some (e1_allocated, spatial_part_leftover) ->
|
|
match f_null_check [] n_e2 spatial_part_leftover with
|
|
| None ->
|
|
false
|
|
| Some ((e2_allocated: bool), _) ->
|
|
e1_allocated || e2_allocated
|
|
in
|
|
let check_disequal_expr () = check_expr_disequal n_e1 n_e2 in
|
|
let neq_pure_part () = check_pi_implies_disequal n_e1 n_e2 in
|
|
check_disequal_expr () || neq_pure_part () || neq_spatial_part ()
|
|
|
|
|
|
(** Check [prop |- e1<=e2], to be called from normalized atom *)
|
|
let check_le_normalized tenv prop e1 e2 =
|
|
(* L.d_str "check_le_normalized "; Sil.d_exp e1; L.d_str " "; Sil.d_exp e2; L.d_ln (); *)
|
|
let eL, eR, off =
|
|
match (e1, e2) with
|
|
| Exp.BinOp (Binop.MinusA, f1, f2), Exp.Const Const.Cint n ->
|
|
if Exp.equal f1 f2 then (Exp.zero, Exp.zero, n) else (f1, f2, n)
|
|
| _ ->
|
|
(e1, e2, IntLit.zero)
|
|
in
|
|
let ineq = Inequalities.from_prop tenv prop in
|
|
let upper_lower_check () =
|
|
let upperL_opt = Inequalities.compute_upper_bound ineq eL in
|
|
let lowerR_opt = Inequalities.compute_lower_bound ineq eR in
|
|
match (upperL_opt, lowerR_opt) with
|
|
| None, _ | _, None ->
|
|
false
|
|
| Some upper1, Some lower2 ->
|
|
IntLit.leq upper1 (lower2 ++ IntLit.one ++ off)
|
|
in
|
|
upper_lower_check () || Inequalities.check_le ineq e1 e2 || check_equal tenv prop e1 e2
|
|
|
|
|
|
(** Check [prop |- e1<e2], to be called from normalized atom *)
|
|
let check_lt_normalized tenv prop e1 e2 =
|
|
(* L.d_str "check_lt_normalized "; Sil.d_exp e1; L.d_str " "; Sil.d_exp e2; L.d_ln (); *)
|
|
let ineq = Inequalities.from_prop tenv prop in
|
|
let upper_lower_check () =
|
|
let upper1_opt = Inequalities.compute_upper_bound ineq e1 in
|
|
let lower2_opt = Inequalities.compute_lower_bound ineq e2 in
|
|
match (upper1_opt, lower2_opt) with
|
|
| None, _ | _, None ->
|
|
false
|
|
| Some upper1, Some lower2 ->
|
|
IntLit.leq upper1 lower2
|
|
in
|
|
upper_lower_check () || Inequalities.check_lt ineq e1 e2
|
|
|
|
|
|
(** Given an atom and a proposition returns a unique identifier.
|
|
We use this to distinguish among different queries. *)
|
|
let get_smt_key a p =
|
|
let tmp_filename = Filename.temp_file "smt_query" ".cns" in
|
|
let outc_tmp = Out_channel.create tmp_filename in
|
|
let fmt_tmp = F.formatter_of_out_channel outc_tmp in
|
|
let () = F.fprintf fmt_tmp "%a%a" (Sil.pp_atom Pp.text) a (Prop.pp_prop Pp.text) p in
|
|
Out_channel.close outc_tmp ;
|
|
Digest.to_hex (Digest.file tmp_filename)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(** Check whether [prop |- a]. False means dont know. *)
|
|
let check_atom tenv prop a0 =
|
|
let a = Prop.atom_normalize_prop tenv prop a0 in
|
|
let prop_no_fp = Prop.set prop ~pi_fp:[] ~sigma_fp:[] in
|
|
( if Config.smt_output then
|
|
let key = get_smt_key a prop_no_fp in
|
|
let key_filename =
|
|
let source = (State.get_loc ()).file in
|
|
DB.Results_dir.path_to_filename (DB.Results_dir.Abs_source_dir source) [key ^ ".cns"]
|
|
in
|
|
let outc = Out_channel.create (DB.filename_to_string key_filename) in
|
|
let fmt = F.formatter_of_out_channel outc in
|
|
L.d_str ("ID: " ^ key) ;
|
|
L.d_ln () ;
|
|
L.d_str "CHECK_ATOM_BOUND: " ;
|
|
Sil.d_atom a ;
|
|
L.d_ln () ;
|
|
L.d_str "WHERE:" ;
|
|
L.d_ln () ;
|
|
Prop.d_prop prop_no_fp ;
|
|
L.d_ln () ;
|
|
L.d_ln () ;
|
|
F.fprintf fmt "ID: %s @\nCHECK_ATOM_BOUND: %a@\nWHERE:@\n%a" key (Sil.pp_atom Pp.text) a
|
|
(Prop.pp_prop Pp.text) prop_no_fp ;
|
|
Out_channel.close outc ) ;
|
|
match a with
|
|
| Sil.Aeq (Exp.BinOp (Binop.Le, e1, e2), Exp.Const Const.Cint i) when IntLit.isone i ->
|
|
check_le_normalized tenv prop e1 e2
|
|
| Sil.Aeq (Exp.BinOp (Binop.Lt, e1, e2), Exp.Const Const.Cint i) when IntLit.isone i ->
|
|
check_lt_normalized tenv prop e1 e2
|
|
| Sil.Aeq (e1, e2) ->
|
|
check_equal tenv prop e1 e2
|
|
| Sil.Aneq (e1, e2) ->
|
|
check_disequal tenv prop e1 e2
|
|
| Sil.Apred _ | Anpred _ ->
|
|
List.exists ~f:(Sil.equal_atom a) prop.Prop.pi
|
|
|
|
|
|
(** Check [prop |- e1<=e2]. Result [false] means "don't know". *)
|
|
let check_le tenv prop e1 e2 =
|
|
let e1_le_e2 = Exp.BinOp (Binop.Le, e1, e2) in
|
|
check_atom tenv prop (Prop.mk_inequality tenv e1_le_e2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(** Check whether [prop |- allocated(e)]. *)
|
|
let check_allocatedness tenv prop e =
|
|
let n_e = Prop.exp_normalize_prop ~destructive:true tenv prop e in
|
|
let spatial_part = prop.Prop.sigma in
|
|
let f = function
|
|
| Sil.Hpointsto (base, _, _) ->
|
|
is_root tenv prop base n_e <> None
|
|
| Sil.Hlseg (k, _, e1, e2, _) ->
|
|
if Sil.equal_lseg_kind k Sil.Lseg_NE || check_disequal tenv prop e1 e2 then
|
|
is_root tenv prop e1 n_e <> None
|
|
else false
|
|
| Sil.Hdllseg (k, _, iF, oB, oF, iB, _) ->
|
|
if Sil.equal_lseg_kind k Sil.Lseg_NE || check_disequal tenv prop iF oF
|
|
|| check_disequal tenv prop iB oB
|
|
then is_root tenv prop iF n_e <> None || is_root tenv prop iB n_e <> None
|
|
else false
|
|
in
|
|
List.exists ~f spatial_part
|
|
|
|
|
|
(** Compute an upper bound of an expression *)
|
|
let compute_upper_bound_of_exp tenv p e =
|
|
let ineq = Inequalities.from_prop tenv p in
|
|
Inequalities.compute_upper_bound ineq e
|
|
|
|
|
|
(** Check if two hpreds have the same allocated lhs *)
|
|
let check_inconsistency_two_hpreds tenv prop =
|
|
let sigma = prop.Prop.sigma in
|
|
let rec f e sigma_seen = function
|
|
| [] ->
|
|
false
|
|
| (Sil.Hpointsto (e1, _, _) as hpred) :: sigma_rest
|
|
| (Sil.Hlseg (Sil.Lseg_NE, _, e1, _, _) as hpred) :: sigma_rest ->
|
|
if Exp.equal e1 e then true else f e (hpred :: sigma_seen) sigma_rest
|
|
| (Sil.Hdllseg (Sil.Lseg_NE, _, iF, _, _, iB, _) as hpred) :: sigma_rest ->
|
|
if Exp.equal iF e || Exp.equal iB e then true else f e (hpred :: sigma_seen) sigma_rest
|
|
| (Sil.Hlseg (Sil.Lseg_PE, _, e1, Exp.Const Const.Cint i, _) as hpred) :: sigma_rest
|
|
when IntLit.iszero i ->
|
|
if Exp.equal e1 e then true else f e (hpred :: sigma_seen) sigma_rest
|
|
| (Sil.Hlseg (Sil.Lseg_PE, _, e1, e2, _) as hpred) :: sigma_rest ->
|
|
if Exp.equal e1 e then
|
|
let prop' = Prop.normalize tenv (Prop.from_sigma (sigma_seen @ sigma_rest)) in
|
|
let prop_new = Prop.conjoin_eq tenv e1 e2 prop' in
|
|
let sigma_new = prop_new.Prop.sigma in
|
|
let e_new = Prop.exp_normalize_prop ~destructive:true tenv prop_new e in
|
|
f e_new [] sigma_new
|
|
else f e (hpred :: sigma_seen) sigma_rest
|
|
| (Sil.Hdllseg (Sil.Lseg_PE, _, e1, _, Exp.Const Const.Cint i, _, _) as hpred) :: sigma_rest
|
|
when IntLit.iszero i ->
|
|
if Exp.equal e1 e then true else f e (hpred :: sigma_seen) sigma_rest
|
|
| (Sil.Hdllseg (Sil.Lseg_PE, _, e1, _, e3, _, _) as hpred) :: sigma_rest ->
|
|
if Exp.equal e1 e then
|
|
let prop' = Prop.normalize tenv (Prop.from_sigma (sigma_seen @ sigma_rest)) in
|
|
let prop_new = Prop.conjoin_eq tenv e1 e3 prop' in
|
|
let sigma_new = prop_new.Prop.sigma in
|
|
let e_new = Prop.exp_normalize_prop ~destructive:true tenv prop_new e in
|
|
f e_new [] sigma_new
|
|
else f e (hpred :: sigma_seen) sigma_rest
|
|
in
|
|
let rec check sigma_seen = function
|
|
| [] ->
|
|
false
|
|
| (Sil.Hpointsto (e1, _, _) as hpred) :: sigma_rest
|
|
| (Sil.Hlseg (Sil.Lseg_NE, _, e1, _, _) as hpred) :: sigma_rest ->
|
|
if f e1 [] (sigma_seen @ sigma_rest) then true else check (hpred :: sigma_seen) sigma_rest
|
|
| (Sil.Hdllseg (Sil.Lseg_NE, _, iF, _, _, iB, _) as hpred) :: sigma_rest ->
|
|
if f iF [] (sigma_seen @ sigma_rest) || f iB [] (sigma_seen @ sigma_rest) then true
|
|
else check (hpred :: sigma_seen) sigma_rest
|
|
| (Sil.Hlseg (Sil.Lseg_PE, _, _, _, _) as hpred) :: sigma_rest
|
|
| (Sil.Hdllseg (Sil.Lseg_PE, _, _, _, _, _, _) as hpred) :: sigma_rest ->
|
|
check (hpred :: sigma_seen) sigma_rest
|
|
in
|
|
check [] sigma
|
|
|
|
|
|
(** Inconsistency checking ignoring footprint. *)
|
|
let check_inconsistency_base tenv prop =
|
|
let pi = prop.Prop.pi in
|
|
let sigma = prop.Prop.sigma in
|
|
let inconsistent_ptsto _ = check_allocatedness tenv prop Exp.zero in
|
|
let inconsistent_this_self_var () =
|
|
match State.get_prop_tenv_pdesc () with
|
|
| None ->
|
|
false
|
|
| Some (_, _, pdesc) ->
|
|
let procedure_attr = Procdesc.get_attributes pdesc in
|
|
let language = Typ.Procname.get_language (Procdesc.get_proc_name pdesc) in
|
|
let is_java_this pvar = Config.equal_language language Config.Java && Pvar.is_this pvar in
|
|
let is_objc_instance_self pvar =
|
|
Config.equal_language language Config.Clang
|
|
&& Mangled.equal (Pvar.get_name pvar) (Mangled.from_string "self")
|
|
&& procedure_attr.ProcAttributes.is_objc_instance_method
|
|
in
|
|
let is_cpp_this pvar =
|
|
Config.equal_language language Config.Clang && Pvar.is_this pvar
|
|
&& procedure_attr.ProcAttributes.is_cpp_instance_method
|
|
in
|
|
let do_hpred = function
|
|
| Sil.Hpointsto (Exp.Lvar pv, Sil.Eexp (e, _), _) ->
|
|
Exp.equal e Exp.zero && Pvar.is_seed pv
|
|
&& (is_java_this pv || is_cpp_this pv || is_objc_instance_self pv)
|
|
| _ ->
|
|
false
|
|
in
|
|
List.exists ~f:do_hpred sigma
|
|
in
|
|
let inconsistent_atom = function
|
|
| Sil.Aeq (e1, e2) -> (
|
|
match (e1, e2) with
|
|
| Exp.Const c1, Exp.Const c2 ->
|
|
not (Const.equal c1 c2)
|
|
| _ ->
|
|
check_disequal tenv prop e1 e2 )
|
|
| Sil.Aneq (e1, e2) -> (
|
|
match (e1, e2) with Exp.Const c1, Exp.Const c2 -> Const.equal c1 c2 | _ -> Exp.equal e1 e2 )
|
|
| Sil.Apred _ | Anpred _ ->
|
|
false
|
|
in
|
|
let inconsistent_inequalities () =
|
|
let ineq = Inequalities.from_prop tenv prop in
|
|
(*
|
|
L.d_strln "Inequalities:";
|
|
L.d_strln "Prop: "; Prop.d_prop prop; L.d_ln ();
|
|
L.d_str "leqs: "; Inequalities.d_leqs ineq; L.d_ln ();
|
|
L.d_str "lts: "; Inequalities.d_lts ineq; L.d_ln ();
|
|
L.d_str "neqs: "; Inequalities.d_neqs ineq; L.d_ln ();
|
|
*)
|
|
Inequalities.inconsistent ineq
|
|
in
|
|
inconsistent_ptsto () || check_inconsistency_two_hpreds tenv prop
|
|
|| List.exists ~f:inconsistent_atom pi || inconsistent_inequalities ()
|
|
|| inconsistent_this_self_var ()
|
|
|
|
|
|
(** Inconsistency checking. *)
|
|
let check_inconsistency tenv prop =
|
|
check_inconsistency_base tenv prop
|
|
|| check_inconsistency_base tenv (Prop.normalize tenv (Prop.extract_footprint prop))
|
|
|
|
|
|
(** Inconsistency checking for the pi part ignoring footprint. *)
|
|
let check_inconsistency_pi tenv pi =
|
|
check_inconsistency_base tenv (Prop.normalize tenv (Prop.from_pi pi))
|
|
|
|
|
|
(** {2 Abduction prover} *)
|
|
|
|
type subst2 = Sil.exp_subst * Sil.exp_subst
|
|
|
|
type exc_body =
|
|
| EXC_FALSE
|
|
| EXC_FALSE_HPRED of Sil.hpred
|
|
| EXC_FALSE_EXPS of Exp.t * Exp.t
|
|
| EXC_FALSE_SEXPS of Sil.strexp * Sil.strexp
|
|
| EXC_FALSE_ATOM of Sil.atom
|
|
| EXC_FALSE_SIGMA of Sil.hpred list
|
|
|
|
exception IMPL_EXC of string * subst2 * exc_body
|
|
|
|
exception MISSING_EXC of string
|
|
|
|
type check = Bounds_check | Class_cast_check of Exp.t * Exp.t * Exp.t
|
|
|
|
let d_typings typings =
|
|
let d_elem (exp, texp) = Sil.d_exp exp ; L.d_str ": " ; Sil.d_texp_full texp ; L.d_str " " in
|
|
List.iter ~f:d_elem typings
|
|
|
|
|
|
(** Module to encapsulate operations on the internal state of the prover *)
|
|
module ProverState : sig
|
|
val reset : Prop.normal Prop.t -> Prop.exposed Prop.t -> unit
|
|
|
|
val checks : check list ref
|
|
|
|
(** type for array bounds checks *)
|
|
type bounds_check =
|
|
| BClen_imply of Exp.t * Exp.t * Exp.t list (** coming from array_len_imply *)
|
|
| BCfrom_pre of Sil.atom (** coming implicitly from preconditions *)
|
|
|
|
val add_bounds_check : bounds_check -> unit
|
|
|
|
val add_frame_fld : Sil.hpred -> unit
|
|
|
|
val add_frame_typ : Exp.t * Exp.t -> unit
|
|
|
|
val add_missing_fld : Sil.hpred -> unit
|
|
|
|
val add_missing_pi : Sil.atom -> unit
|
|
|
|
val add_missing_sigma : Sil.hpred list -> unit
|
|
|
|
val add_missing_typ : Exp.t * Exp.t -> unit
|
|
|
|
val atom_is_array_bounds_check : Sil.atom -> bool
|
|
(** check if atom in pre is a bounds check *)
|
|
|
|
val get_bounds_checks : unit -> bounds_check list
|
|
|
|
val get_frame_fld : unit -> Sil.hpred list
|
|
|
|
val get_frame_typ : unit -> (Exp.t * Exp.t) list
|
|
|
|
val get_missing_fld : unit -> Sil.hpred list
|
|
|
|
val get_missing_pi : unit -> Sil.atom list
|
|
|
|
val get_missing_sigma : unit -> Sil.hpred list
|
|
|
|
val get_missing_typ : unit -> (Exp.t * Exp.t) list
|
|
|
|
val d_implication : Sil.subst * Sil.subst -> 'a Prop.t * 'b Prop.t -> unit
|
|
|
|
val d_implication_error : string * (Sil.subst * Sil.subst) * exc_body -> unit
|
|
end = struct
|
|
type bounds_check = BClen_imply of Exp.t * Exp.t * Exp.t list | BCfrom_pre of Sil.atom
|
|
|
|
let implication_lhs = ref Prop.prop_emp
|
|
|
|
let implication_rhs = ref (Prop.expose Prop.prop_emp)
|
|
|
|
let fav_in_array_len = ref (Sil.fav_new ())
|
|
|
|
(* free variables in array len position *)
|
|
let bounds_checks = ref []
|
|
|
|
(* delayed bounds check for arrays *)
|
|
let frame_fld = ref []
|
|
|
|
let missing_fld = ref []
|
|
|
|
let missing_pi = ref []
|
|
|
|
let missing_sigma = ref []
|
|
|
|
let frame_typ = ref []
|
|
|
|
let missing_typ = ref []
|
|
|
|
let checks = ref []
|
|
|
|
(** free vars in array len position in current strexp part of prop *)
|
|
let prop_fav_len prop =
|
|
let fav = Sil.fav_new () in
|
|
let do_hpred = function
|
|
| Sil.Hpointsto (_, Sil.Earray ((Exp.Var _ as len), _, _), _) ->
|
|
Sil.exp_fav_add fav len
|
|
| _ ->
|
|
()
|
|
in
|
|
List.iter ~f:do_hpred prop.Prop.sigma ;
|
|
fav
|
|
|
|
|
|
let reset lhs rhs =
|
|
checks := [] ;
|
|
implication_lhs := lhs ;
|
|
implication_rhs := rhs ;
|
|
fav_in_array_len := prop_fav_len rhs ;
|
|
bounds_checks := [] ;
|
|
frame_fld := [] ;
|
|
frame_typ := [] ;
|
|
missing_fld := [] ;
|
|
missing_pi := [] ;
|
|
missing_sigma := [] ;
|
|
missing_typ := []
|
|
|
|
|
|
let add_bounds_check bounds_check = bounds_checks := bounds_check :: !bounds_checks
|
|
|
|
let add_frame_fld hpred = frame_fld := hpred :: !frame_fld
|
|
|
|
let add_missing_fld hpred = missing_fld := hpred :: !missing_fld
|
|
|
|
let add_frame_typ typing = frame_typ := typing :: !frame_typ
|
|
|
|
let add_missing_typ typing = missing_typ := typing :: !missing_typ
|
|
|
|
let add_missing_pi a = missing_pi := a :: !missing_pi
|
|
|
|
let add_missing_sigma sigma = missing_sigma := sigma @ !missing_sigma
|
|
|
|
(** atom considered array bounds check if it contains vars present in array length position in the
|
|
pre *)
|
|
let atom_is_array_bounds_check atom =
|
|
let fav_a = Sil.atom_fav atom in
|
|
Prop.atom_is_inequality atom && Sil.fav_exists fav_a (fun a -> Sil.fav_mem !fav_in_array_len a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
let get_bounds_checks () = !bounds_checks
|
|
|
|
let get_frame_fld () = !frame_fld
|
|
|
|
let get_frame_typ () = !frame_typ
|
|
|
|
let get_missing_fld () = !missing_fld
|
|
|
|
let get_missing_pi () = !missing_pi
|
|
|
|
let get_missing_sigma () = !missing_sigma
|
|
|
|
let get_missing_typ () = !missing_typ
|
|
|
|
let _d_missing sub =
|
|
L.d_strln "SUB: " ;
|
|
L.d_increase_indent 1 ;
|
|
Prop.d_sub sub ;
|
|
L.d_decrease_indent 1 ;
|
|
if !missing_pi <> [] && !missing_sigma <> [] then (
|
|
L.d_ln () ;
|
|
Prop.d_pi !missing_pi ;
|
|
L.d_str "*" ;
|
|
L.d_ln () ;
|
|
Prop.d_sigma !missing_sigma )
|
|
else if !missing_pi <> [] then (
|
|
L.d_ln () ;
|
|
Prop.d_pi !missing_pi )
|
|
else if !missing_sigma <> [] then (
|
|
L.d_ln () ;
|
|
Prop.d_sigma !missing_sigma ) ;
|
|
if !missing_fld <> [] then (
|
|
L.d_ln () ;
|
|
L.d_strln "MISSING FLD: " ;
|
|
L.d_increase_indent 1 ;
|
|
Prop.d_sigma !missing_fld ;
|
|
L.d_decrease_indent 1 ) ;
|
|
if !missing_typ <> [] then (
|
|
L.d_ln () ;
|
|
L.d_strln "MISSING TYPING: " ;
|
|
L.d_increase_indent 1 ;
|
|
d_typings !missing_typ ;
|
|
L.d_decrease_indent 1 )
|
|
|
|
|
|
let d_missing sub =
|
|
(* optional print of missing: if print something, prepend with newline *)
|
|
if !missing_pi <> [] || !missing_sigma <> [] || !missing_fld <> [] || !missing_typ <> []
|
|
|| not (Sil.is_sub_empty sub)
|
|
then ( L.d_ln () ; L.d_str "[" ; _d_missing sub ; L.d_str "]" )
|
|
|
|
|
|
let d_frame_fld () =
|
|
(* optional print of frame fld: if print something, prepend with newline *)
|
|
if !frame_fld <> [] then (
|
|
L.d_ln () ;
|
|
L.d_strln "[FRAME FLD:" ;
|
|
L.d_increase_indent 1 ;
|
|
Prop.d_sigma !frame_fld ;
|
|
L.d_str "]" ;
|
|
L.d_decrease_indent 1 )
|
|
|
|
|
|
let d_frame_typ () =
|
|
(* optional print of frame typ: if print something, prepend with newline *)
|
|
if !frame_typ <> [] then (
|
|
L.d_ln () ;
|
|
L.d_strln "[FRAME TYPING:" ;
|
|
L.d_increase_indent 1 ;
|
|
d_typings !frame_typ ;
|
|
L.d_str "]" ;
|
|
L.d_decrease_indent 1 )
|
|
|
|
|
|
(** Dump an implication *)
|
|
let d_implication (sub1, sub2) (p1, p2) =
|
|
let p1, p2 = (Prop.prop_sub sub1 p1, Prop.prop_sub sub2 p2) in
|
|
L.d_strln "SUB:" ;
|
|
L.d_increase_indent 1 ;
|
|
Prop.d_sub sub1 ;
|
|
L.d_decrease_indent 1 ;
|
|
L.d_ln () ;
|
|
Prop.d_prop p1 ;
|
|
d_missing sub2 ;
|
|
L.d_ln () ;
|
|
L.d_strln "|-" ;
|
|
Prop.d_prop p2 ;
|
|
d_frame_fld () ;
|
|
d_frame_typ ()
|
|
|
|
|
|
let d_implication_error (s, subs, body) =
|
|
let p1, p2 = (!implication_lhs, !implication_rhs) in
|
|
let d_inner () =
|
|
match body with
|
|
| EXC_FALSE ->
|
|
()
|
|
| EXC_FALSE_HPRED hpred ->
|
|
L.d_str " on " ; Sil.d_hpred hpred
|
|
| EXC_FALSE_EXPS (e1, e2) ->
|
|
L.d_str " on " ; Sil.d_exp e1 ; L.d_str "," ; Sil.d_exp e2
|
|
| EXC_FALSE_SEXPS (se1, se2) ->
|
|
L.d_str " on " ; Sil.d_sexp se1 ; L.d_str "," ; Sil.d_sexp se2
|
|
| EXC_FALSE_ATOM a ->
|
|
L.d_str " on " ; Sil.d_atom a
|
|
| EXC_FALSE_SIGMA sigma ->
|
|
L.d_str " on " ; Prop.d_sigma sigma
|
|
in
|
|
L.d_ln () ;
|
|
L.d_strln "$$$$$$$ Implication" ;
|
|
d_implication subs (p1, p2) ;
|
|
L.d_ln () ;
|
|
L.d_str ("$$$$$$ error: " ^ s) ;
|
|
d_inner () ;
|
|
L.d_strln " returning FALSE" ;
|
|
L.d_ln ()
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
let d_impl (s1, s2) = ProverState.d_implication (`Exp s1, `Exp s2)
|
|
|
|
let d_impl_err (arg1, (s1, s2), arg3) =
|
|
ProverState.d_implication_error (arg1, (`Exp s1, `Exp s2), arg3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(** extend a substitution *)
|
|
let extend_sub sub v e =
|
|
let new_exp_sub = Sil.exp_subst_of_list [(v, e)] in
|
|
let new_sub = `Exp new_exp_sub in
|
|
Sil.sub_join new_exp_sub (Sil.sub_range_map (Sil.exp_sub new_sub) sub)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(** Extend [sub1] and [sub2] to witnesses that each instance of
|
|
[e1[sub1]] is an instance of [e2[sub2]]. Raise IMPL_FALSE if not
|
|
possible. *)
|
|
let exp_imply tenv calc_missing (subs: subst2) e1_in e2_in : subst2 =
|
|
let e1 = Prop.exp_normalize_noabs tenv (`Exp (fst subs)) e1_in in
|
|
let e2 = Prop.exp_normalize_noabs tenv (`Exp (snd subs)) e2_in in
|
|
let var_imply (subs: subst2) v1 v2 : subst2 =
|
|
match (Ident.is_primed v1, Ident.is_primed v2) with
|
|
| false, false ->
|
|
if Ident.equal v1 v2 then subs
|
|
else if calc_missing && Ident.is_footprint v1 && Ident.is_footprint v2 then
|
|
let () = ProverState.add_missing_pi (Sil.Aeq (e1_in, e2_in)) in
|
|
subs
|
|
else raise (IMPL_EXC ("exps", subs, EXC_FALSE_EXPS (e1, e2)))
|
|
| true, false ->
|
|
raise (IMPL_EXC ("exps", subs, EXC_FALSE_EXPS (e1, e2)))
|
|
| false, true ->
|
|
let sub2' = extend_sub (snd subs) v2 (Sil.exp_sub (`Exp (fst subs)) (Exp.Var v1)) in
|
|
(fst subs, sub2')
|
|
| true, true ->
|
|
let v1' = Ident.create_fresh Ident.knormal in
|
|
let sub1' = extend_sub (fst subs) v1 (Exp.Var v1') in
|
|
let sub2' = extend_sub (snd subs) v2 (Exp.Var v1') in
|
|
(sub1', sub2')
|
|
in
|
|
let rec do_imply subs e1 e2 : subst2 =
|
|
L.d_str "do_imply " ;
|
|
Sil.d_exp e1 ;
|
|
L.d_str " " ;
|
|
Sil.d_exp e2 ;
|
|
L.d_ln () ;
|
|
match (e1, e2) with
|
|
| Exp.Var v1, Exp.Var v2 ->
|
|
var_imply subs v1 v2
|
|
| Exp.BinOp ((PlusA | PlusPI | MinusA | MinusPI), Exp.Var v1, e2), Exp.Var v2
|
|
when Ident.equal v1 v2 ->
|
|
do_imply subs e2 Exp.zero
|
|
| Exp.BinOp ((PlusA | PlusPI), e2, Exp.Var v1), Exp.Var v2 when Ident.equal v1 v2 ->
|
|
do_imply subs e2 Exp.zero
|
|
| e1, Exp.Var v2 ->
|
|
let occurs_check v e =
|
|
(* check whether [v] occurs in normalized [e] *)
|
|
if Sil.fav_mem (Sil.exp_fav e) v
|
|
&& Sil.fav_mem
|
|
(Sil.exp_fav (Prop.exp_normalize_prop ~destructive:true tenv Prop.prop_emp e))
|
|
v
|
|
then raise (IMPL_EXC ("occurs check", subs, EXC_FALSE_EXPS (e1, e2)))
|
|
in
|
|
if Ident.is_primed v2 then
|
|
let () = occurs_check v2 e1 in
|
|
let sub2' = extend_sub (snd subs) v2 e1 in
|
|
(fst subs, sub2')
|
|
else raise (IMPL_EXC ("expressions not equal", subs, EXC_FALSE_EXPS (e1, e2)))
|
|
| e1, Exp.BinOp (Binop.PlusA, (Exp.Var v2 as e2), e2')
|
|
when Ident.is_primed v2 || Ident.is_footprint v2 ->
|
|
(* here e2' could also be a variable that we could try to substitute (as in the next match
|
|
case), but we ignore that to avoid backtracking *)
|
|
let e' = Exp.BinOp (Binop.MinusA, e1, e2') in
|
|
do_imply subs (Prop.exp_normalize_noabs tenv Sil.sub_empty e') e2
|
|
| e1, Exp.BinOp (Binop.PlusA, e2, (Exp.Var v2 as e2'))
|
|
when Ident.is_primed v2 || Ident.is_footprint v2 ->
|
|
(* symmetric of above case *)
|
|
let e' = Exp.BinOp (Binop.MinusA, e1, e2') in
|
|
do_imply subs (Prop.exp_normalize_noabs tenv Sil.sub_empty e') e2
|
|
| Exp.Var id, Exp.Lvar pv when Ident.is_footprint id && Pvar.is_local pv ->
|
|
(* Footprint var could never be the same as local address *)
|
|
raise (IMPL_EXC ("expression not equal", subs, EXC_FALSE_EXPS (e1, e2)))
|
|
| Exp.Var _, e2 ->
|
|
if calc_missing then
|
|
let () = ProverState.add_missing_pi (Sil.Aeq (e1_in, e2_in)) in
|
|
subs
|
|
else raise (IMPL_EXC ("expressions not equal", subs, EXC_FALSE_EXPS (e1, e2)))
|
|
| Exp.Lvar pv1, Exp.Const _ when Pvar.is_global pv1 ->
|
|
if calc_missing then
|
|
let () = ProverState.add_missing_pi (Sil.Aeq (e1_in, e2_in)) in
|
|
subs
|
|
else raise (IMPL_EXC ("expressions not equal", subs, EXC_FALSE_EXPS (e1, e2)))
|
|
| Exp.Lvar v1, Exp.Lvar v2 ->
|
|
if Pvar.equal v1 v2 then subs
|
|
else raise (IMPL_EXC ("expressions not equal", subs, EXC_FALSE_EXPS (e1, e2)))
|
|
| Exp.Const c1, Exp.Const c2 ->
|
|
if Const.equal c1 c2 then subs
|
|
else raise (IMPL_EXC ("constants not equal", subs, EXC_FALSE_EXPS (e1, e2)))
|
|
| Exp.Const Const.Cint _, Exp.BinOp (Binop.PlusPI, _, _) ->
|
|
raise
|
|
(IMPL_EXC ("pointer+index cannot evaluate to a constant", subs, EXC_FALSE_EXPS (e1, e2)))
|
|
| Exp.Const Const.Cint n1, Exp.BinOp (Binop.PlusA, f1, Exp.Const Const.Cint n2) ->
|
|
do_imply subs (Exp.int (n1 -- n2)) f1
|
|
| Exp.BinOp (op1, e1, f1), Exp.BinOp (op2, e2, f2) when Binop.equal op1 op2 ->
|
|
do_imply (do_imply subs e1 e2) f1 f2
|
|
| Exp.BinOp (Binop.PlusA, Exp.Var v1, e1), e2 ->
|
|
do_imply subs (Exp.Var v1) (Exp.BinOp (Binop.MinusA, e2, e1))
|
|
| Exp.BinOp (Binop.PlusPI, Exp.Lvar pv1, e1), e2 ->
|
|
do_imply subs (Exp.Lvar pv1) (Exp.BinOp (Binop.MinusA, e2, e1))
|
|
| ( Exp.Sizeof {typ= t1; dynamic_length= None; subtype= st1}
|
|
, Exp.Sizeof {typ= t2; dynamic_length= None; subtype= st2} )
|
|
when Typ.equal t1 t2 && Subtype.equal_modulo_flag st1 st2 ->
|
|
subs
|
|
| ( Exp.Sizeof {typ= t1; dynamic_length= Some d1; subtype= st1}
|
|
, Exp.Sizeof {typ= t2; dynamic_length= Some d2; subtype= st2} )
|
|
when Typ.equal t1 t2 && Exp.equal d1 d2 && Subtype.equal_modulo_flag st1 st2 ->
|
|
subs
|
|
| e', Exp.Const Const.Cint n
|
|
when IntLit.iszero n && check_disequal tenv Prop.prop_emp e' Exp.zero ->
|
|
raise (IMPL_EXC ("expressions not equal", subs, EXC_FALSE_EXPS (e1, e2)))
|
|
| Exp.Const Const.Cint n, e'
|
|
when IntLit.iszero n && check_disequal tenv Prop.prop_emp e' Exp.zero ->
|
|
raise (IMPL_EXC ("expressions not equal", subs, EXC_FALSE_EXPS (e1, e2)))
|
|
| e1, Exp.Const _ ->
|
|
raise (IMPL_EXC ("lhs not constant", subs, EXC_FALSE_EXPS (e1, e2)))
|
|
| Exp.Lfield (e1, fd1, _), Exp.Lfield (e2, fd2, _) when Typ.Fieldname.equal fd1 fd2 ->
|
|
do_imply subs e1 e2
|
|
| Exp.Lindex (e1, f1), Exp.Lindex (e2, f2) ->
|
|
do_imply (do_imply subs e1 e2) f1 f2
|
|
| Exp.Exn e1, Exp.Exn e2 ->
|
|
do_imply subs e1 e2
|
|
| _ ->
|
|
d_impl_err ("exp_imply not implemented", subs, EXC_FALSE_EXPS (e1, e2)) ;
|
|
raise (Exceptions.Abduction_case_not_implemented __POS__)
|
|
in
|
|
do_imply subs e1 e2
|
|
|
|
|
|
(** Convert a path (from lhs of a |-> to a field name present only in
|
|
the rhs) into an id. If the lhs was a footprint var, the id is a
|
|
new footprint var. Othewise it is a var with the path in the name
|
|
and stamp - 1 *)
|
|
let path_to_id path =
|
|
let rec f = function
|
|
| Exp.Var id ->
|
|
if Ident.is_footprint id then None
|
|
else Some (Ident.name_to_string (Ident.get_name id) ^ string_of_int (Ident.get_stamp id))
|
|
| Exp.Lfield (e, fld, _) -> (
|
|
match f e with None -> None | Some s -> Some (s ^ "_" ^ Typ.Fieldname.to_string fld) )
|
|
| Exp.Lindex (e, ind) -> (
|
|
match f e with None -> None | Some s -> Some (s ^ "_" ^ Exp.to_string ind) )
|
|
| Exp.Lvar _ ->
|
|
Some (Exp.to_string path)
|
|
| Exp.Const Const.Cstr s ->
|
|
Some ("_const_str_" ^ s)
|
|
| Exp.Const Const.Cclass c ->
|
|
Some ("_const_class_" ^ Ident.name_to_string c)
|
|
| Exp.Const _ ->
|
|
None
|
|
| _ ->
|
|
L.d_str "path_to_id undefined on " ;
|
|
Sil.d_exp path ;
|
|
L.d_ln () ;
|
|
assert false
|
|
(* None *)
|
|
in
|
|
if !Config.footprint then Ident.create_fresh Ident.kfootprint
|
|
else
|
|
match f path with None -> Ident.create_fresh Ident.kfootprint | Some s -> Ident.create_path s
|
|
|
|
|
|
(** Implication for the length of arrays *)
|
|
let array_len_imply tenv calc_missing subs len1 len2 indices2 =
|
|
match (len1, len2) with
|
|
| _, Exp.Var _
|
|
| _, Exp.BinOp (Binop.PlusA, Exp.Var _, _)
|
|
| _, Exp.BinOp (Binop.PlusA, _, Exp.Var _)
|
|
| Exp.BinOp (Binop.Mult, _, _), _ -> (
|
|
try exp_imply tenv calc_missing subs len1 len2 with IMPL_EXC (s, subs', x) ->
|
|
raise (IMPL_EXC ("array len:" ^ s, subs', x)) )
|
|
| _ ->
|
|
ProverState.add_bounds_check (ProverState.BClen_imply (len1, len2, indices2)) ;
|
|
subs
|
|
|
|
|
|
(** Extend [sub1] and [sub2] to witnesses that each instance of
|
|
[se1[sub1]] is an instance of [se2[sub2]]. Raise IMPL_FALSE if not
|
|
possible. *)
|
|
let rec sexp_imply tenv source calc_index_frame calc_missing subs se1 se2 typ2
|
|
: subst2 * Sil.strexp option * Sil.strexp option =
|
|
(* L.d_str "sexp_imply "; Sil.d_sexp se1; L.d_str " "; Sil.d_sexp se2;
|
|
L.d_str " : "; Typ.d_full typ2; L.d_ln(); *)
|
|
match (se1, se2) with
|
|
| Sil.Eexp (e1, _), Sil.Eexp (e2, _) ->
|
|
(exp_imply tenv calc_missing subs e1 e2, None, None)
|
|
| Sil.Estruct (fsel1, inst1), Sil.Estruct (fsel2, _) ->
|
|
let subs', fld_frame, fld_missing =
|
|
struct_imply tenv source calc_missing subs fsel1 fsel2 typ2
|
|
in
|
|
let fld_frame_opt =
|
|
if fld_frame <> [] then Some (Sil.Estruct (fld_frame, inst1)) else None
|
|
in
|
|
let fld_missing_opt =
|
|
if fld_missing <> [] then Some (Sil.Estruct (fld_missing, inst1)) else None
|
|
in
|
|
(subs', fld_frame_opt, fld_missing_opt)
|
|
| Sil.Estruct _, Sil.Eexp (e2, _)
|
|
-> (
|
|
let e2' = Sil.exp_sub (`Exp (snd subs)) e2 in
|
|
match e2' with
|
|
| Exp.Var id2 when Ident.is_primed id2 ->
|
|
let id2' = Ident.create_fresh Ident.knormal in
|
|
let sub2' = extend_sub (snd subs) id2 (Exp.Var id2') in
|
|
((fst subs, sub2'), None, None)
|
|
| _ ->
|
|
d_impl_err ("sexp_imply not implemented", subs, EXC_FALSE_SEXPS (se1, se2)) ;
|
|
raise (Exceptions.Abduction_case_not_implemented __POS__) )
|
|
| Sil.Earray (len1, esel1, inst1), Sil.Earray (len2, esel2, _) ->
|
|
let indices2 = List.map ~f:fst esel2 in
|
|
let subs' = array_len_imply tenv calc_missing subs len1 len2 indices2 in
|
|
let subs'', index_frame, index_missing =
|
|
array_imply tenv source calc_index_frame calc_missing subs' esel1 esel2 typ2
|
|
in
|
|
let index_frame_opt =
|
|
if index_frame <> [] then Some (Sil.Earray (len1, index_frame, inst1)) else None
|
|
in
|
|
let index_missing_opt =
|
|
if index_missing <> [] && !Config.footprint then
|
|
Some (Sil.Earray (len1, index_missing, inst1))
|
|
else None
|
|
in
|
|
(subs'', index_frame_opt, index_missing_opt)
|
|
| Sil.Eexp (_, inst), Sil.Estruct (fsel, inst') ->
|
|
d_impl_err
|
|
( "WARNING: function call with parameters of struct type, treating as unknown"
|
|
, subs
|
|
, EXC_FALSE_SEXPS (se1, se2) ) ;
|
|
let fsel' =
|
|
let g (f, _) = (f, Sil.Eexp (Exp.Var (Ident.create_fresh Ident.knormal), inst)) in
|
|
List.map ~f:g fsel
|
|
in
|
|
sexp_imply tenv source calc_index_frame calc_missing subs (Sil.Estruct (fsel', inst')) se2
|
|
typ2
|
|
| Sil.Eexp _, Sil.Earray (len, _, inst) | Sil.Estruct _, Sil.Earray (len, _, inst) ->
|
|
let se1' = Sil.Earray (len, [(Exp.zero, se1)], inst) in
|
|
sexp_imply tenv source calc_index_frame calc_missing subs se1' se2 typ2
|
|
| Sil.Earray (len, _, _), Sil.Eexp (_, inst) ->
|
|
let se2' = Sil.Earray (len, [(Exp.zero, se2)], inst) in
|
|
let typ2' = Typ.mk (Tarray (typ2, None, None)) in
|
|
(* In the sexp_imply, struct_imply, array_imply, and sexp_imply_nolhs functions, the typ2
|
|
argument is only used by eventually passing its value to Typ.Struct.fld, Exp.Lfield,
|
|
Typ.Struct.fld, or Typ.array_elem. None of these are sensitive to the length field
|
|
of Tarray, so forgetting the length of typ2' here is not a problem. Not one of those
|
|
functions use typ.quals either *)
|
|
sexp_imply tenv source true calc_missing subs se1 se2' typ2'
|
|
(* calculate index_frame because the rhs is a singleton array *)
|
|
| _ ->
|
|
d_impl_err ("sexp_imply not implemented", subs, EXC_FALSE_SEXPS (se1, se2)) ;
|
|
raise (Exceptions.Abduction_case_not_implemented __POS__)
|
|
|
|
|
|
and struct_imply tenv source calc_missing subs fsel1 fsel2 typ2
|
|
: subst2 * (Typ.Fieldname.t * Sil.strexp) list * (Typ.Fieldname.t * Sil.strexp) list =
|
|
let lookup = Tenv.lookup tenv in
|
|
match (fsel1, fsel2) with
|
|
| _, [] ->
|
|
(subs, fsel1, [])
|
|
| (f1, se1) :: fsel1', (f2, se2) :: fsel2' -> (
|
|
match Typ.Fieldname.compare f1 f2 with
|
|
| 0 ->
|
|
let typ' = Typ.Struct.fld_typ ~lookup ~default:(Typ.mk Tvoid) f2 typ2 in
|
|
let subs', se_frame, se_missing =
|
|
sexp_imply tenv (Exp.Lfield (source, f2, typ2)) false calc_missing subs se1 se2 typ'
|
|
in
|
|
let subs'', fld_frame, fld_missing =
|
|
struct_imply tenv source calc_missing subs' fsel1' fsel2' typ2
|
|
in
|
|
let fld_frame' =
|
|
match se_frame with None -> fld_frame | Some se -> (f1, se) :: fld_frame
|
|
in
|
|
let fld_missing' =
|
|
match se_missing with None -> fld_missing | Some se -> (f1, se) :: fld_missing
|
|
in
|
|
(subs'', fld_frame', fld_missing')
|
|
| n when n < 0 ->
|
|
let subs', fld_frame, fld_missing =
|
|
struct_imply tenv source calc_missing subs fsel1' fsel2 typ2
|
|
in
|
|
(subs', (f1, se1) :: fld_frame, fld_missing)
|
|
| _ ->
|
|
let typ' = Typ.Struct.fld_typ ~lookup ~default:(Typ.mk Tvoid) f2 typ2 in
|
|
let subs' =
|
|
sexp_imply_nolhs tenv (Exp.Lfield (source, f2, typ2)) calc_missing subs se2 typ'
|
|
in
|
|
let subs', fld_frame, fld_missing =
|
|
struct_imply tenv source calc_missing subs' fsel1 fsel2' typ2
|
|
in
|
|
let fld_missing' = (f2, se2) :: fld_missing in
|
|
(subs', fld_frame, fld_missing') )
|
|
| [], (f2, se2) :: fsel2' ->
|
|
let typ' = Typ.Struct.fld_typ ~lookup ~default:(Typ.mk Tvoid) f2 typ2 in
|
|
let subs' =
|
|
sexp_imply_nolhs tenv (Exp.Lfield (source, f2, typ2)) calc_missing subs se2 typ'
|
|
in
|
|
let subs'', fld_frame, fld_missing =
|
|
struct_imply tenv source calc_missing subs' [] fsel2' typ2
|
|
in
|
|
(subs'', fld_frame, (f2, se2) :: fld_missing)
|
|
|
|
|
|
and array_imply tenv source calc_index_frame calc_missing subs esel1 esel2 typ2
|
|
: subst2 * (Exp.t * Sil.strexp) list * (Exp.t * Sil.strexp) list =
|
|
let typ_elem = Typ.array_elem (Some (Typ.mk Tvoid)) typ2 in
|
|
match (esel1, esel2) with
|
|
| _, [] ->
|
|
(subs, esel1, [])
|
|
| (e1, se1) :: esel1', (e2, se2) :: esel2' ->
|
|
let e1n = Prop.exp_normalize_noabs tenv (`Exp (fst subs)) e1 in
|
|
let e2n = Prop.exp_normalize_noabs tenv (`Exp (snd subs)) e2 in
|
|
let n = Exp.compare e1n e2n in
|
|
if n < 0 then array_imply tenv source calc_index_frame calc_missing subs esel1' esel2 typ2
|
|
else if n > 0 then
|
|
array_imply tenv source calc_index_frame calc_missing subs esel1 esel2' typ2
|
|
else
|
|
(* n=0 *)
|
|
let subs', _, _ =
|
|
sexp_imply tenv (Exp.Lindex (source, e1)) false calc_missing subs se1 se2 typ_elem
|
|
in
|
|
array_imply tenv source calc_index_frame calc_missing subs' esel1' esel2' typ2
|
|
| [], (e2, se2) :: esel2' ->
|
|
let subs' = sexp_imply_nolhs tenv (Exp.Lindex (source, e2)) calc_missing subs se2 typ_elem in
|
|
let subs'', index_frame, index_missing =
|
|
array_imply tenv source calc_index_frame calc_missing subs' [] esel2' typ2
|
|
in
|
|
let index_missing' = (e2, se2) :: index_missing in
|
|
(subs'', index_frame, index_missing')
|
|
|
|
|
|
and sexp_imply_nolhs tenv source calc_missing (subs: subst2) se2 typ2 =
|
|
match se2 with
|
|
| Sil.Eexp (_e2, _)
|
|
-> (
|
|
let e2 = Sil.exp_sub (`Exp (snd subs)) _e2 in
|
|
match e2 with
|
|
| Exp.Var v2 when Ident.is_primed v2 ->
|
|
let v2' = path_to_id source in
|
|
(* L.d_str "called path_to_id on "; Sil.d_exp e2; *)
|
|
(* L.d_str " returns "; Sil.d_exp (Exp.Var v2'); L.d_ln (); *)
|
|
let sub2' = extend_sub (snd subs) v2 (Exp.Var v2') in
|
|
(fst subs, sub2')
|
|
| Exp.Var _ ->
|
|
if calc_missing then subs
|
|
else raise (IMPL_EXC ("exp only in rhs is not a primed var", subs, EXC_FALSE))
|
|
| Exp.Const _ when calc_missing ->
|
|
let id = path_to_id source in
|
|
ProverState.add_missing_pi (Sil.Aeq (Exp.Var id, _e2)) ;
|
|
subs
|
|
| _ ->
|
|
raise (IMPL_EXC ("exp only in rhs is not a primed var", subs, EXC_FALSE)) )
|
|
| Sil.Estruct (fsel2, _) ->
|
|
(fun (x, _, _) -> x) (struct_imply tenv source calc_missing subs [] fsel2 typ2)
|
|
| Sil.Earray (_, esel2, _) ->
|
|
(fun (x, _, _) -> x) (array_imply tenv source false calc_missing subs [] esel2 typ2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
let rec exp_list_imply tenv calc_missing subs l1 l2 =
|
|
match (l1, l2) with
|
|
| [], [] ->
|
|
subs
|
|
| e1 :: l1, e2 :: l2 ->
|
|
exp_list_imply tenv calc_missing (exp_imply tenv calc_missing subs e1 e2) l1 l2
|
|
| _ ->
|
|
assert false
|
|
|
|
|
|
let filter_ne_lhs sub e0 = function
|
|
| Sil.Hpointsto (e, _, _) ->
|
|
if Exp.equal e0 (Sil.exp_sub sub e) then Some () else None
|
|
| Sil.Hlseg (Sil.Lseg_NE, _, e, _, _) ->
|
|
if Exp.equal e0 (Sil.exp_sub sub e) then Some () else None
|
|
| Sil.Hdllseg (Sil.Lseg_NE, _, e, _, _, e', _) ->
|
|
if Exp.equal e0 (Sil.exp_sub sub e) || Exp.equal e0 (Sil.exp_sub sub e') then Some ()
|
|
else None
|
|
| _ ->
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
|
|
let filter_hpred sub hpred2 hpred1 =
|
|
match (Sil.hpred_sub (`Exp sub) hpred1, hpred2) with
|
|
| Sil.Hlseg (Sil.Lseg_NE, hpara1, e1, f1, el1), Sil.Hlseg (Sil.Lseg_PE, _, _, _, _) ->
|
|
if Sil.equal_hpred (Sil.Hlseg (Sil.Lseg_PE, hpara1, e1, f1, el1)) hpred2 then Some false
|
|
else None
|
|
| Sil.Hlseg (Sil.Lseg_PE, hpara1, e1, f1, el1), Sil.Hlseg (Sil.Lseg_NE, _, _, _, _) ->
|
|
if Sil.equal_hpred (Sil.Hlseg (Sil.Lseg_NE, hpara1, e1, f1, el1)) hpred2 then Some true
|
|
else None
|
|
(* return missing disequality *)
|
|
| Sil.Hpointsto (e1, _, _), Sil.Hlseg (_, _, e2, _, _) ->
|
|
if Exp.equal e1 e2 then Some false else None
|
|
| hpred1, hpred2 ->
|
|
if Sil.equal_hpred hpred1 hpred2 then Some false else None
|
|
|
|
|
|
let hpred_has_primed_lhs sub hpred =
|
|
let rec find_primed e =
|
|
match e with
|
|
| Exp.Lfield (e, _, _) ->
|
|
find_primed e
|
|
| Exp.Lindex (e, _) ->
|
|
find_primed e
|
|
| Exp.BinOp (Binop.PlusPI, e1, _) ->
|
|
find_primed e1
|
|
| _ ->
|
|
Sil.fav_exists (Sil.exp_fav e) Ident.is_primed
|
|
in
|
|
let exp_has_primed e = find_primed (Sil.exp_sub sub e) in
|
|
match hpred with
|
|
| Sil.Hpointsto (e, _, _) ->
|
|
exp_has_primed e
|
|
| Sil.Hlseg (_, _, e, _, _) ->
|
|
exp_has_primed e
|
|
| Sil.Hdllseg (_, _, iF, _, _, iB, _) ->
|
|
exp_has_primed iF && exp_has_primed iB
|
|
|
|
|
|
let move_primed_lhs_from_front subs sigma =
|
|
match sigma with
|
|
| [] ->
|
|
sigma
|
|
| hpred :: _ ->
|
|
if hpred_has_primed_lhs (`Exp (snd subs)) hpred then
|
|
let sigma_primed, sigma_unprimed =
|
|
List.partition_tf ~f:(hpred_has_primed_lhs (`Exp (snd subs))) sigma
|
|
in
|
|
match sigma_unprimed with
|
|
| [] ->
|
|
raise
|
|
(IMPL_EXC ("every hpred has primed lhs, cannot proceed", subs, EXC_FALSE_SIGMA sigma))
|
|
| _ :: _ ->
|
|
sigma_unprimed @ sigma_primed
|
|
else sigma
|
|
|
|
|
|
(** [expand_hpred_pointer calc_index_frame hpred] expands [hpred] if it is a |-> whose lhs is a Lfield or Lindex or ptr+off.
|
|
Return [(changed, calc_index_frame', hpred')] where [changed] indicates whether the predicate has changed. *)
|
|
let expand_hpred_pointer =
|
|
let count = ref 0 in
|
|
fun tenv calc_index_frame hpred ->
|
|
let rec expand changed calc_index_frame hpred =
|
|
match hpred with
|
|
| Sil.Hpointsto (Lfield (adr_base, fld, adr_typ), cnt, cnt_texp) ->
|
|
let cnt_texp' =
|
|
match
|
|
match adr_typ.desc with
|
|
| Tstruct name -> (
|
|
match Tenv.lookup tenv name with
|
|
| Some _ ->
|
|
(* type of struct at adr_base is known *)
|
|
Some
|
|
(Exp.Sizeof
|
|
{typ= adr_typ; nbytes= None; dynamic_length= None; subtype= Subtype.exact})
|
|
| None ->
|
|
None )
|
|
| _ ->
|
|
None
|
|
with
|
|
| Some se ->
|
|
se
|
|
| None ->
|
|
match cnt_texp with
|
|
| Sizeof ({typ= cnt_typ} as sizeof_data) ->
|
|
(* type of struct at adr_base is unknown (typically Tvoid), but
|
|
type of contents is known, so construct struct type for single fld:cnt_typ *)
|
|
let name = Typ.Name.C.from_string ("counterfeit" ^ string_of_int !count) in
|
|
incr count ;
|
|
let fields = [(fld, cnt_typ, Annot.Item.empty)] in
|
|
ignore (Tenv.mk_struct tenv ~fields name) ;
|
|
Exp.Sizeof {sizeof_data with typ= Typ.mk (Tstruct name)}
|
|
| _ ->
|
|
(* type of struct at adr_base and of contents are both unknown: give up *)
|
|
L.(die InternalError)
|
|
"expand_hpred_pointer: Unexpected non-sizeof type in Lfield"
|
|
in
|
|
let hpred' =
|
|
Sil.Hpointsto (adr_base, Estruct ([(fld, cnt)], Sil.inst_none), cnt_texp')
|
|
in
|
|
expand true true hpred'
|
|
| Sil.Hpointsto (Exp.Lindex (e, ind), se, t) ->
|
|
let t' =
|
|
match t with
|
|
| Exp.Sizeof ({typ= t_} as sizeof_data) ->
|
|
Exp.Sizeof {sizeof_data with typ= Typ.mk (Tarray (t_, None, None))}
|
|
| _ ->
|
|
L.(die InternalError) "expand_hpred_pointer: Unexpected non-sizeof type in Lindex"
|
|
in
|
|
let len =
|
|
match t' with
|
|
| Exp.Sizeof {dynamic_length= Some len} ->
|
|
len
|
|
| _ ->
|
|
Exp.get_undefined false
|
|
in
|
|
let hpred' = Sil.Hpointsto (e, Sil.Earray (len, [(ind, se)], Sil.inst_none), t') in
|
|
expand true true hpred'
|
|
| Sil.Hpointsto (Exp.BinOp (Binop.PlusPI, e1, e2), Sil.Earray (len, esel, inst), t) ->
|
|
let shift_exp e = Exp.BinOp (Binop.PlusA, e, e2) in
|
|
let len' = shift_exp len in
|
|
let esel' = List.map ~f:(fun (e, se) -> (shift_exp e, se)) esel in
|
|
let hpred' = Sil.Hpointsto (e1, Sil.Earray (len', esel', inst), t) in
|
|
expand true calc_index_frame hpred'
|
|
| _ ->
|
|
(changed, calc_index_frame, hpred)
|
|
in
|
|
expand false calc_index_frame hpred
|
|
|
|
|
|
module Subtyping_check = struct
|
|
(** check that t1 and t2 are the same primitive type *)
|
|
let check_subtype_basic_type t1 t2 =
|
|
match t2.Typ.desc with
|
|
| Typ.Tint Typ.IInt
|
|
| Typ.Tint Typ.IBool
|
|
| Typ.Tint Typ.IChar
|
|
| Typ.Tfloat Typ.FDouble
|
|
| Typ.Tfloat Typ.FFloat
|
|
| Typ.Tint Typ.ILong
|
|
| Typ.Tint Typ.IShort ->
|
|
Typ.equal t1 t2
|
|
| _ ->
|
|
false
|
|
|
|
|
|
(** check if t1 is a subtype of t2, in Java *)
|
|
let rec check_subtype_java tenv (t1: Typ.t) (t2: Typ.t) =
|
|
match (t1.Typ.desc, t2.Typ.desc) with
|
|
| Tstruct (JavaClass _ as cn1), Tstruct (JavaClass _ as cn2) ->
|
|
Subtype.is_known_subtype tenv cn1 cn2
|
|
| Tarray (dom_type1, _, _), Tarray (dom_type2, _, _) ->
|
|
check_subtype_java tenv dom_type1 dom_type2
|
|
| Tptr (dom_type1, _), Tptr (dom_type2, _) ->
|
|
check_subtype_java tenv dom_type1 dom_type2
|
|
| Tarray _, Tstruct (JavaClass _ as cn2) ->
|
|
Typ.Name.equal cn2 Typ.Name.Java.java_io_serializable
|
|
|| Typ.Name.equal cn2 Typ.Name.Java.java_lang_cloneable
|
|
|| Typ.Name.equal cn2 Typ.Name.Java.java_lang_object
|
|
| _ ->
|
|
check_subtype_basic_type t1 t2
|
|
|
|
|
|
(** check if t1 is a subtype of t2 *)
|
|
let check_subtype tenv t1 t2 =
|
|
if is_java_class tenv t1 then check_subtype_java tenv t1 t2
|
|
else
|
|
match (Typ.name t1, Typ.name t2) with
|
|
| Some cn1, Some cn2 ->
|
|
Subtype.is_known_subtype tenv cn1 cn2
|
|
| _ ->
|
|
false
|
|
|
|
|
|
let rec case_analysis_type tenv ((t1: Typ.t), st1) ((t2: Typ.t), st2) =
|
|
match (t1.desc, t2.desc) with
|
|
| Tstruct (JavaClass _ as cn1), Tstruct (JavaClass _ as cn2) ->
|
|
Subtype.case_analysis tenv (cn1, st1) (cn2, st2)
|
|
| Tstruct (JavaClass _ as cn1), Tarray _
|
|
when ( Typ.Name.equal cn1 Typ.Name.Java.java_io_serializable
|
|
|| Typ.Name.equal cn1 Typ.Name.Java.java_lang_cloneable
|
|
|| Typ.Name.equal cn1 Typ.Name.Java.java_lang_object )
|
|
&& st1 <> Subtype.exact ->
|
|
(Some st1, None)
|
|
| Tstruct cn1, Tstruct cn2
|
|
(* cn1 <: cn2 or cn2 <: cn1 is implied in Java when we get two types compared *)
|
|
(* that get through the type system, but not in C++ because of multiple inheritance, *)
|
|
(* and not in ObjC because of being weakly typed, *)
|
|
(* and the algorithm will only work correctly if this is the case *)
|
|
when Subtype.is_known_subtype tenv cn1 cn2 || Subtype.is_known_subtype tenv cn2 cn1 ->
|
|
Subtype.case_analysis tenv (cn1, st1) (cn2, st2)
|
|
| Tarray (dom_type1, _, _), Tarray (dom_type2, _, _) ->
|
|
case_analysis_type tenv (dom_type1, st1) (dom_type2, st2)
|
|
| Tptr (dom_type1, _), Tptr (dom_type2, _) ->
|
|
case_analysis_type tenv (dom_type1, st1) (dom_type2, st2)
|
|
| _ when check_subtype_basic_type t1 t2 ->
|
|
(Some st1, None)
|
|
| _ ->
|
|
(* The case analysis did not succeed *)
|
|
(None, Some st1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(** perform case analysis on [texp1 <: texp2], and return the updated types in the true and false
|
|
case, if they are possible *)
|
|
let subtype_case_analysis tenv texp1 texp2 =
|
|
match (texp1, texp2) with
|
|
| Exp.Sizeof sizeof1, Exp.Sizeof sizeof2 ->
|
|
let pos_opt, neg_opt =
|
|
case_analysis_type tenv (sizeof1.typ, sizeof1.subtype) (sizeof2.typ, sizeof2.subtype)
|
|
in
|
|
let pos_type_opt =
|
|
match pos_opt with
|
|
| None ->
|
|
None
|
|
| Some subtype ->
|
|
if check_subtype tenv sizeof1.typ sizeof2.typ then
|
|
Some (Exp.Sizeof {sizeof1 with subtype})
|
|
else Some (Exp.Sizeof {sizeof2 with subtype})
|
|
in
|
|
let neg_type_opt =
|
|
match neg_opt with
|
|
| None ->
|
|
None
|
|
| Some subtype ->
|
|
Some (Exp.Sizeof {sizeof1 with subtype})
|
|
in
|
|
(pos_type_opt, neg_type_opt)
|
|
| _ ->
|
|
(* don't know, consider both possibilities *)
|
|
(Some texp1, Some texp1)
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
let cast_exception tenv texp1 texp2 e1 subs =
|
|
let _ =
|
|
match (texp1, texp2) with
|
|
| Exp.Sizeof {typ= t1}, Exp.Sizeof {typ= t2; subtype= st2} ->
|
|
if Config.developer_mode
|
|
|| Subtype.is_cast st2 && not (Subtyping_check.check_subtype tenv t1 t2)
|
|
then ProverState.checks := Class_cast_check (texp1, texp2, e1) :: !ProverState.checks
|
|
| _ ->
|
|
()
|
|
in
|
|
raise (IMPL_EXC ("class cast exception", subs, EXC_FALSE))
|
|
|
|
|
|
(** get all methods that override [supertype].[pname] in [tenv].
|
|
Note: supertype should be a type T rather than a pointer to type T
|
|
Note: [pname] wil never be included in the returned result *)
|
|
let get_overrides_of tenv supertype pname =
|
|
let typ_has_method pname (typ: Typ.t) =
|
|
match typ.desc with
|
|
| Tstruct name -> (
|
|
match Tenv.lookup tenv name with
|
|
| Some {methods} ->
|
|
List.exists ~f:(fun m -> Typ.Procname.equal pname m) methods
|
|
| None ->
|
|
false )
|
|
| _ ->
|
|
false
|
|
in
|
|
let gather_overrides tname _ overrides_acc =
|
|
let typ = Typ.mk (Tstruct tname) in
|
|
(* TODO shouldn't really create type here...*)
|
|
(* get all types in the type environment that are non-reflexive subtypes of [supertype] *)
|
|
if not (Typ.equal typ supertype) && Subtyping_check.check_subtype tenv typ supertype then
|
|
(* only select the ones that implement [pname] as overrides *)
|
|
let resolved_pname = Typ.Procname.replace_class pname tname in
|
|
if typ_has_method resolved_pname typ then (typ, resolved_pname) :: overrides_acc
|
|
else overrides_acc
|
|
else overrides_acc
|
|
in
|
|
Tenv.fold gather_overrides tenv []
|
|
|
|
|
|
(** Check the equality of two types ignoring flags in the subtyping components *)
|
|
let texp_equal_modulo_subtype_flag texp1 texp2 =
|
|
match (texp1, texp2) with
|
|
| ( Exp.Sizeof {typ= t1; dynamic_length= len1; subtype= st1}
|
|
, Exp.Sizeof {typ= t2; dynamic_length= len2; subtype= st2} ) ->
|
|
[%compare.equal : Typ.t * Exp.t option] (t1, len1) (t2, len2)
|
|
&& Subtype.equal_modulo_flag st1 st2
|
|
| _ ->
|
|
Exp.equal texp1 texp2
|
|
|
|
|
|
(** check implication between type expressions *)
|
|
let texp_imply tenv subs texp1 texp2 e1 calc_missing =
|
|
(* check whether the types could be subject to dynamic cast: *)
|
|
(* classes and arrays in Java, and just classes in C++ and ObjC *)
|
|
let types_subject_to_dynamic_cast =
|
|
match (texp1, texp2) with
|
|
| Exp.Sizeof {typ= typ1}, Exp.Sizeof {typ= typ2} -> (
|
|
match (typ1.desc, typ2.desc) with
|
|
| (Tstruct _ | Tarray _), (Tstruct _ | Tarray _) ->
|
|
is_java_class tenv typ1 || Typ.is_cpp_class typ1 && Typ.is_cpp_class typ2
|
|
|| Typ.is_objc_class typ1 && Typ.is_objc_class typ2
|
|
| _ ->
|
|
false )
|
|
| _ ->
|
|
false
|
|
in
|
|
if types_subject_to_dynamic_cast then
|
|
let pos_type_opt, neg_type_opt = Subtyping_check.subtype_case_analysis tenv texp1 texp2 in
|
|
let has_changed =
|
|
match pos_type_opt with
|
|
| Some texp1' ->
|
|
not (texp_equal_modulo_subtype_flag texp1' texp1)
|
|
| None ->
|
|
false
|
|
in
|
|
if calc_missing then
|
|
(* footprint *)
|
|
match pos_type_opt with
|
|
| None ->
|
|
cast_exception tenv texp1 texp2 e1 subs
|
|
| Some _ ->
|
|
if has_changed then (None, pos_type_opt) (* missing *) else (pos_type_opt, None)
|
|
(* frame *)
|
|
else
|
|
(* re-execution *)
|
|
match neg_type_opt with
|
|
| Some _ ->
|
|
cast_exception tenv texp1 texp2 e1 subs
|
|
| None ->
|
|
if has_changed then cast_exception tenv texp1 texp2 e1 subs (* missing *)
|
|
else (pos_type_opt, None) (* frame *)
|
|
else (None, None)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(** pre-process implication between a non-array and an array: the non-array is turned into an array
|
|
of length given by its type only active in type_size mode *)
|
|
let sexp_imply_preprocess se1 texp1 se2 =
|
|
match (se1, texp1, se2) with
|
|
| Sil.Eexp (_, inst), Exp.Sizeof _, Sil.Earray _ when Config.type_size ->
|
|
let se1' = Sil.Earray (texp1, [(Exp.zero, se1)], inst) in
|
|
L.d_strln_color Orange "sexp_imply_preprocess" ;
|
|
L.d_str " se1: " ;
|
|
Sil.d_sexp se1 ;
|
|
L.d_ln () ;
|
|
L.d_str " se1': " ;
|
|
Sil.d_sexp se1' ;
|
|
L.d_ln () ;
|
|
se1'
|
|
| _ ->
|
|
se1
|
|
|
|
|
|
(** handle parameter subtype: when the type of a callee variable in the caller is a strict subtype
|
|
of the one in the callee, add a type frame and type missing *)
|
|
let handle_parameter_subtype tenv prop1 sigma2 subs (e1, se1, texp1) (se2, texp2) =
|
|
let is_callee = match e1 with Exp.Lvar pv -> Pvar.is_callee pv | _ -> false in
|
|
let is_allocated_lhs e =
|
|
let filter = function Sil.Hpointsto (e', _, _) -> Exp.equal e' e | _ -> false in
|
|
List.exists ~f:filter prop1.Prop.sigma
|
|
in
|
|
let type_rhs e =
|
|
let sub_opt = ref None in
|
|
let filter = function
|
|
| Sil.Hpointsto (e', _, Exp.Sizeof sizeof_data) when Exp.equal e' e ->
|
|
sub_opt := Some sizeof_data ;
|
|
true
|
|
| _ ->
|
|
false
|
|
in
|
|
if List.exists ~f:filter sigma2 then !sub_opt else None
|
|
in
|
|
let add_subtype () =
|
|
match (texp1, texp2, se1, se2) with
|
|
| ( Exp.Sizeof {typ= {desc= Tptr (t1, _)}; dynamic_length= None}
|
|
, Exp.Sizeof {typ= {desc= Tptr (t2, _)}; dynamic_length= None}
|
|
, Sil.Eexp (e1', _)
|
|
, Sil.Eexp (e2', _) )
|
|
when not (is_allocated_lhs e1') -> (
|
|
match type_rhs e2' with
|
|
| Some sizeof_data2
|
|
-> (
|
|
if not (Typ.equal t1 t2) && Subtyping_check.check_subtype tenv t1 t2 then
|
|
let pos_type_opt, _ =
|
|
Subtyping_check.subtype_case_analysis tenv
|
|
(Exp.Sizeof {typ= t1; nbytes= None; dynamic_length= None; subtype= Subtype.subtypes})
|
|
(Exp.Sizeof sizeof_data2)
|
|
in
|
|
match pos_type_opt with
|
|
| Some t1_noptr ->
|
|
ProverState.add_frame_typ (e1', t1_noptr) ;
|
|
ProverState.add_missing_typ (e2', t1_noptr)
|
|
| None ->
|
|
cast_exception tenv texp1 texp2 e1 subs )
|
|
| None ->
|
|
() )
|
|
| _ ->
|
|
()
|
|
in
|
|
if is_callee && !Config.footprint then add_subtype ()
|
|
|
|
|
|
let rec hpred_imply tenv calc_index_frame calc_missing subs prop1 sigma2 hpred2
|
|
: subst2 * Prop.normal Prop.t =
|
|
match hpred2 with
|
|
| Sil.Hpointsto (_e2, se2, texp2)
|
|
-> (
|
|
let e2 = Sil.exp_sub (`Exp (snd subs)) _e2 in
|
|
let _ =
|
|
match e2 with
|
|
| Exp.Lvar _ ->
|
|
()
|
|
| Exp.Var v ->
|
|
if Ident.is_primed v then (
|
|
d_impl_err ("rhs |-> not implemented", subs, EXC_FALSE_HPRED hpred2) ;
|
|
raise (Exceptions.Abduction_case_not_implemented __POS__) )
|
|
| _ ->
|
|
()
|
|
in
|
|
match Prop.prop_iter_create prop1 with
|
|
| None ->
|
|
raise (IMPL_EXC ("lhs is empty", subs, EXC_FALSE))
|
|
| Some iter1 ->
|
|
match Prop.prop_iter_find iter1 (filter_ne_lhs (`Exp (fst subs)) e2) with
|
|
| None ->
|
|
raise (IMPL_EXC ("lhs does not have e|->", subs, EXC_FALSE_HPRED hpred2))
|
|
| Some iter1' ->
|
|
match Prop.prop_iter_current tenv iter1' with
|
|
| Sil.Hpointsto (e1, se1, texp1), _ -> (
|
|
try
|
|
let typ2 = Exp.texp_to_typ (Some (Typ.mk Tvoid)) texp2 in
|
|
let typing_frame, typing_missing =
|
|
texp_imply tenv subs texp1 texp2 e1 calc_missing
|
|
in
|
|
let se1' = sexp_imply_preprocess se1 texp1 se2 in
|
|
let subs', fld_frame, fld_missing =
|
|
sexp_imply tenv e1 calc_index_frame calc_missing subs se1' se2 typ2
|
|
in
|
|
if calc_missing then (
|
|
handle_parameter_subtype tenv prop1 sigma2 subs (e1, se1, texp1) (se2, texp2) ;
|
|
( match fld_missing with
|
|
| Some fld_missing ->
|
|
ProverState.add_missing_fld (Sil.Hpointsto (_e2, fld_missing, texp1))
|
|
| None ->
|
|
() ) ;
|
|
( match fld_frame with
|
|
| Some fld_frame ->
|
|
ProverState.add_frame_fld (Sil.Hpointsto (e1, fld_frame, texp1))
|
|
| None ->
|
|
() ) ;
|
|
( match typing_missing with
|
|
| Some t_missing ->
|
|
ProverState.add_missing_typ (_e2, t_missing)
|
|
| None ->
|
|
() ) ;
|
|
match typing_frame with
|
|
| Some t_frame ->
|
|
ProverState.add_frame_typ (e1, t_frame)
|
|
| None ->
|
|
() ) ;
|
|
let prop1' = Prop.prop_iter_remove_curr_then_to_prop tenv iter1' in
|
|
(subs', prop1')
|
|
with IMPL_EXC (s, _, _) when calc_missing -> raise (MISSING_EXC s) )
|
|
| Sil.Hlseg (Sil.Lseg_NE, para1, e1, f1, elist1), _ ->
|
|
(* Unroll lseg *)
|
|
let n' = Exp.Var (Ident.create_fresh Ident.kprimed) in
|
|
let _, para_inst1 = Sil.hpara_instantiate para1 e1 n' elist1 in
|
|
let hpred_list1 = para_inst1 @ [Prop.mk_lseg tenv Sil.Lseg_PE para1 n' f1 elist1] in
|
|
let iter1'' = Prop.prop_iter_update_current_by_list iter1' hpred_list1 in
|
|
L.d_increase_indent 1 ;
|
|
let res =
|
|
decrease_indent_when_exception (fun () ->
|
|
hpred_imply tenv calc_index_frame calc_missing subs
|
|
(Prop.prop_iter_to_prop tenv iter1'')
|
|
sigma2 hpred2 )
|
|
in
|
|
L.d_decrease_indent 1 ; res
|
|
| Sil.Hdllseg (Sil.Lseg_NE, para1, iF1, oB1, oF1, iB1, elist1), _
|
|
when Exp.equal (Sil.exp_sub (`Exp (fst subs)) iF1) e2 ->
|
|
(* Unroll dllseg forward *)
|
|
let n' = Exp.Var (Ident.create_fresh Ident.kprimed) in
|
|
let _, para_inst1 = Sil.hpara_dll_instantiate para1 iF1 oB1 n' elist1 in
|
|
let hpred_list1 =
|
|
para_inst1 @ [Prop.mk_dllseg tenv Sil.Lseg_PE para1 n' iF1 oF1 iB1 elist1]
|
|
in
|
|
let iter1'' = Prop.prop_iter_update_current_by_list iter1' hpred_list1 in
|
|
L.d_increase_indent 1 ;
|
|
let res =
|
|
decrease_indent_when_exception (fun () ->
|
|
hpred_imply tenv calc_index_frame calc_missing subs
|
|
(Prop.prop_iter_to_prop tenv iter1'')
|
|
sigma2 hpred2 )
|
|
in
|
|
L.d_decrease_indent 1 ; res
|
|
| Sil.Hdllseg (Sil.Lseg_NE, para1, iF1, oB1, oF1, iB1, elist1), _
|
|
when Exp.equal (Sil.exp_sub (`Exp (fst subs)) iB1) e2 ->
|
|
(* Unroll dllseg backward *)
|
|
let n' = Exp.Var (Ident.create_fresh Ident.kprimed) in
|
|
let _, para_inst1 = Sil.hpara_dll_instantiate para1 iB1 n' oF1 elist1 in
|
|
let hpred_list1 =
|
|
para_inst1 @ [Prop.mk_dllseg tenv Sil.Lseg_PE para1 iF1 oB1 iB1 n' elist1]
|
|
in
|
|
let iter1'' = Prop.prop_iter_update_current_by_list iter1' hpred_list1 in
|
|
L.d_increase_indent 1 ;
|
|
let res =
|
|
decrease_indent_when_exception (fun () ->
|
|
hpred_imply tenv calc_index_frame calc_missing subs
|
|
(Prop.prop_iter_to_prop tenv iter1'')
|
|
sigma2 hpred2 )
|
|
in
|
|
L.d_decrease_indent 1 ; res
|
|
| _ ->
|
|
assert false )
|
|
| Sil.Hlseg (k, para2, _e2, _f2, _elist2)
|
|
-> (
|
|
(* for now ignore implications between PE and NE *)
|
|
let e2, f2 = (Sil.exp_sub (`Exp (snd subs)) _e2, Sil.exp_sub (`Exp (snd subs)) _f2) in
|
|
let _ =
|
|
match e2 with
|
|
| Exp.Lvar _ ->
|
|
()
|
|
| Exp.Var v ->
|
|
if Ident.is_primed v then (
|
|
d_impl_err ("rhs |-> not implemented", subs, EXC_FALSE_HPRED hpred2) ;
|
|
raise (Exceptions.Abduction_case_not_implemented __POS__) )
|
|
| _ ->
|
|
()
|
|
in
|
|
if Exp.equal e2 f2 && Sil.equal_lseg_kind k Sil.Lseg_PE then (subs, prop1)
|
|
else
|
|
match Prop.prop_iter_create prop1 with
|
|
| None ->
|
|
raise (IMPL_EXC ("lhs is empty", subs, EXC_FALSE))
|
|
| Some iter1 ->
|
|
match
|
|
Prop.prop_iter_find iter1
|
|
(filter_hpred (fst subs) (Sil.hpred_sub (`Exp (snd subs)) hpred2))
|
|
with
|
|
| None ->
|
|
let elist2 = List.map ~f:(fun e -> Sil.exp_sub (`Exp (snd subs)) e) _elist2 in
|
|
let _, para_inst2 = Sil.hpara_instantiate para2 e2 f2 elist2 in
|
|
L.d_increase_indent 1 ;
|
|
let res =
|
|
decrease_indent_when_exception (fun () ->
|
|
sigma_imply tenv calc_index_frame false subs prop1 para_inst2 )
|
|
in
|
|
(* calc_missing is false as we're checking an instantiation of the original list *)
|
|
L.d_decrease_indent 1 ; res
|
|
| Some iter1' ->
|
|
let elist2 = List.map ~f:(fun e -> Sil.exp_sub (`Exp (snd subs)) e) _elist2 in
|
|
(* force instantiation of existentials *)
|
|
let subs' = exp_list_imply tenv calc_missing subs (f2 :: elist2) (f2 :: elist2) in
|
|
let prop1' = Prop.prop_iter_remove_curr_then_to_prop tenv iter1' in
|
|
let hpred1 =
|
|
match Prop.prop_iter_current tenv iter1' with hpred1, b ->
|
|
if b then ProverState.add_missing_pi (Sil.Aneq (_e2, _f2)) ;
|
|
(* for PE |- NE *)
|
|
hpred1
|
|
in
|
|
match hpred1 with
|
|
| Sil.Hlseg _ ->
|
|
(subs', prop1')
|
|
| Sil.Hpointsto _ ->
|
|
(* unroll rhs list and try again *)
|
|
let n' = Exp.Var (Ident.create_fresh Ident.kprimed) in
|
|
let _, para_inst2 = Sil.hpara_instantiate para2 _e2 n' elist2 in
|
|
let hpred_list2 =
|
|
para_inst2 @ [Prop.mk_lseg tenv Sil.Lseg_PE para2 n' _f2 _elist2]
|
|
in
|
|
L.d_increase_indent 1 ;
|
|
let res =
|
|
decrease_indent_when_exception (fun () ->
|
|
try sigma_imply tenv calc_index_frame calc_missing subs prop1 hpred_list2
|
|
with exn when SymOp.exn_not_failure exn ->
|
|
L.d_strln_color Red "backtracking lseg: trying rhs of length exactly 1" ;
|
|
let _, para_inst3 = Sil.hpara_instantiate para2 _e2 _f2 elist2 in
|
|
sigma_imply tenv calc_index_frame calc_missing subs prop1 para_inst3 )
|
|
in
|
|
L.d_decrease_indent 1 ; res
|
|
| Sil.Hdllseg _ ->
|
|
assert false )
|
|
| Sil.Hdllseg (Sil.Lseg_PE, _, _, _, _, _, _) ->
|
|
d_impl_err ("rhs dllsegPE not implemented", subs, EXC_FALSE_HPRED hpred2) ;
|
|
raise (Exceptions.Abduction_case_not_implemented __POS__)
|
|
| Sil.Hdllseg (_, para2, iF2, oB2, oF2, iB2, elist2) ->
|
|
(* for now ignore implications between PE and NE *)
|
|
let iF2, oF2 = (Sil.exp_sub (`Exp (snd subs)) iF2, Sil.exp_sub (`Exp (snd subs)) oF2) in
|
|
let iB2, oB2 = (Sil.exp_sub (`Exp (snd subs)) iB2, Sil.exp_sub (`Exp (snd subs)) oB2) in
|
|
let _ =
|
|
match oF2 with
|
|
| Exp.Lvar _ ->
|
|
()
|
|
| Exp.Var v ->
|
|
if Ident.is_primed v then (
|
|
d_impl_err ("rhs dllseg not implemented", subs, EXC_FALSE_HPRED hpred2) ;
|
|
raise (Exceptions.Abduction_case_not_implemented __POS__) )
|
|
| _ ->
|
|
()
|
|
in
|
|
let _ =
|
|
match oB2 with
|
|
| Exp.Lvar _ ->
|
|
()
|
|
| Exp.Var v ->
|
|
if Ident.is_primed v then (
|
|
d_impl_err ("rhs dllseg not implemented", subs, EXC_FALSE_HPRED hpred2) ;
|
|
raise (Exceptions.Abduction_case_not_implemented __POS__) )
|
|
| _ ->
|
|
()
|
|
in
|
|
match Prop.prop_iter_create prop1 with
|
|
| None ->
|
|
raise (IMPL_EXC ("lhs is empty", subs, EXC_FALSE))
|
|
| Some iter1 ->
|
|
match
|
|
Prop.prop_iter_find iter1
|
|
(filter_hpred (fst subs) (Sil.hpred_sub (`Exp (snd subs)) hpred2))
|
|
with
|
|
| None ->
|
|
let elist2 = List.map ~f:(fun e -> Sil.exp_sub (`Exp (snd subs)) e) elist2 in
|
|
let _, para_inst2 =
|
|
if Exp.equal iF2 iB2 then Sil.hpara_dll_instantiate para2 iF2 oB2 oF2 elist2
|
|
else assert false
|
|
(* Only base case of rhs list considered for now *)
|
|
in
|
|
L.d_increase_indent 1 ;
|
|
let res =
|
|
decrease_indent_when_exception (fun () ->
|
|
sigma_imply tenv calc_index_frame false subs prop1 para_inst2 )
|
|
in
|
|
(* calc_missing is false as we're checking an instantiation of the original list *)
|
|
L.d_decrease_indent 1 ; res
|
|
| Some iter1' ->
|
|
(* Only consider implications between identical listsegs for now *)
|
|
let elist2 = List.map ~f:(fun e -> Sil.exp_sub (`Exp (snd subs)) e) elist2 in
|
|
(* force instantiation of existentials *)
|
|
let subs' =
|
|
exp_list_imply tenv calc_missing subs (iF2 :: oB2 :: oF2 :: iB2 :: elist2)
|
|
(iF2 :: oB2 :: oF2 :: iB2 :: elist2)
|
|
in
|
|
let prop1' = Prop.prop_iter_remove_curr_then_to_prop tenv iter1' in
|
|
(subs', prop1')
|
|
|
|
|
|
(** Check that [sigma1] implies [sigma2] and return two substitution
|
|
instantiations for the primed variables of [sigma1] and [sigma2]
|
|
and a frame. Raise IMPL_FALSE if the implication cannot be
|
|
proven. *)
|
|
and sigma_imply tenv calc_index_frame calc_missing subs prop1 sigma2 : subst2 * Prop.normal Prop.t =
|
|
let is_constant_string_class subs = function
|
|
(* if the hpred represents a constant string, return the string *)
|
|
| Sil.Hpointsto (_e2, _, _)
|
|
-> (
|
|
let e2 = Sil.exp_sub (`Exp (snd subs)) _e2 in
|
|
match e2 with
|
|
| Exp.Const Const.Cstr s ->
|
|
Some (s, true)
|
|
| Exp.Const Const.Cclass c ->
|
|
Some (Ident.name_to_string c, false)
|
|
| _ ->
|
|
None )
|
|
| _ ->
|
|
None
|
|
in
|
|
let mk_constant_string_hpred s =
|
|
(* create an hpred from a constant string *)
|
|
let len = IntLit.of_int (1 + String.length s) in
|
|
let root = Exp.Const (Const.Cstr s) in
|
|
let sexp =
|
|
let index = Exp.int (IntLit.of_int (String.length s)) in
|
|
match !Config.curr_language with
|
|
| Config.Clang ->
|
|
Sil.Earray (Exp.int len, [(index, Sil.Eexp (Exp.zero, Sil.inst_none))], Sil.inst_none)
|
|
| Config.Java ->
|
|
let mk_fld_sexp s =
|
|
let fld = Typ.Fieldname.Java.from_string s in
|
|
let se = Sil.Eexp (Exp.Var (Ident.create_fresh Ident.kprimed), Sil.Inone) in
|
|
(fld, se)
|
|
in
|
|
let fields =
|
|
[ "java.lang.String.count"
|
|
; "java.lang.String.hash"
|
|
; "java.lang.String.offset"
|
|
; "java.lang.String.value" ]
|
|
in
|
|
Sil.Estruct (List.map ~f:mk_fld_sexp fields, Sil.inst_none)
|
|
| Config.Python ->
|
|
L.die InternalError "mk_constant_string_hpred not implemented for Python"
|
|
in
|
|
let const_string_texp =
|
|
match !Config.curr_language with
|
|
| Config.Clang ->
|
|
Exp.Sizeof
|
|
{ typ= Typ.mk (Tarray (Typ.mk (Tint Typ.IChar), Some len, Some (IntLit.of_int 1)))
|
|
; nbytes= None
|
|
; dynamic_length= None
|
|
; subtype= Subtype.exact }
|
|
| Config.Java ->
|
|
let object_type = Typ.Name.Java.from_string "java.lang.String" in
|
|
Exp.Sizeof
|
|
{ typ= Typ.mk (Tstruct object_type)
|
|
; nbytes= None
|
|
; dynamic_length= None
|
|
; subtype= Subtype.exact }
|
|
| Config.Python ->
|
|
L.die InternalError "const_string_texp not implemented for Python"
|
|
in
|
|
Sil.Hpointsto (root, sexp, const_string_texp)
|
|
in
|
|
let mk_constant_class_hpred s =
|
|
(* create an hpred from a constant class *)
|
|
let root = Exp.Const (Const.Cclass (Ident.string_to_name s)) in
|
|
let sexp =
|
|
(* TODO: add appropriate fields *)
|
|
Sil.Estruct
|
|
( [ ( Typ.Fieldname.Java.from_string "java.lang.Class.name"
|
|
, Sil.Eexp (Exp.Const (Const.Cstr s), Sil.Inone) ) ]
|
|
, Sil.inst_none )
|
|
in
|
|
let class_texp =
|
|
let class_type = Typ.Name.Java.from_string "java.lang.Class" in
|
|
Exp.Sizeof
|
|
{ typ= Typ.mk (Tstruct class_type)
|
|
; nbytes= None
|
|
; dynamic_length= None
|
|
; subtype= Subtype.exact }
|
|
in
|
|
Sil.Hpointsto (root, sexp, class_texp)
|
|
in
|
|
try
|
|
match move_primed_lhs_from_front subs sigma2 with
|
|
| [] ->
|
|
L.d_strln "Final Implication" ;
|
|
d_impl subs (prop1, Prop.prop_emp) ;
|
|
(subs, prop1)
|
|
| hpred2 :: sigma2' ->
|
|
L.d_strln "Current Implication" ;
|
|
d_impl subs (prop1, Prop.normalize tenv (Prop.from_sigma (hpred2 :: sigma2'))) ;
|
|
L.d_ln () ;
|
|
L.d_ln () ;
|
|
let normal_case hpred2' =
|
|
let subs', prop1' =
|
|
try
|
|
L.d_increase_indent 1 ;
|
|
let res =
|
|
decrease_indent_when_exception (fun () ->
|
|
hpred_imply tenv calc_index_frame calc_missing subs prop1 sigma2 hpred2' )
|
|
in
|
|
L.d_decrease_indent 1 ; res
|
|
with IMPL_EXC _ when calc_missing ->
|
|
match is_constant_string_class subs hpred2' with
|
|
| Some (s, is_string) ->
|
|
(* allocate constant string hpred1', do implication, then add hpred1' as missing *)
|
|
let hpred1' =
|
|
if is_string then mk_constant_string_hpred s else mk_constant_class_hpred s
|
|
in
|
|
let prop1' =
|
|
Prop.normalize tenv (Prop.set prop1 ~sigma:(hpred1' :: prop1.Prop.sigma))
|
|
in
|
|
let subs', frame_prop =
|
|
hpred_imply tenv calc_index_frame calc_missing subs prop1' sigma2 hpred2'
|
|
in
|
|
(* ProverState.add_missing_sigma [hpred1']; *)
|
|
(subs', frame_prop)
|
|
| None ->
|
|
let subs' =
|
|
match hpred2' with
|
|
| Sil.Hpointsto (e2, se2, te2) ->
|
|
let typ2 = Exp.texp_to_typ (Some (Typ.mk Tvoid)) te2 in
|
|
sexp_imply_nolhs tenv e2 calc_missing subs se2 typ2
|
|
| _ ->
|
|
subs
|
|
in
|
|
ProverState.add_missing_sigma [hpred2'] ;
|
|
(subs', prop1)
|
|
in
|
|
L.d_increase_indent 1 ;
|
|
let res =
|
|
decrease_indent_when_exception (fun () ->
|
|
sigma_imply tenv calc_index_frame calc_missing subs' prop1' sigma2' )
|
|
in
|
|
L.d_decrease_indent 1 ; res
|
|
in
|
|
match hpred2 with
|
|
| Sil.Hpointsto (_e2, se2, t) ->
|
|
let changed, calc_index_frame', hpred2' =
|
|
expand_hpred_pointer tenv calc_index_frame
|
|
(Sil.Hpointsto (Prop.exp_normalize_noabs tenv (`Exp (snd subs)) _e2, se2, t))
|
|
in
|
|
if changed then
|
|
sigma_imply tenv calc_index_frame' calc_missing subs prop1 (hpred2' :: sigma2')
|
|
(* calc_index_frame=true *)
|
|
else normal_case hpred2'
|
|
| _ ->
|
|
normal_case hpred2
|
|
with IMPL_EXC (s, _, _) when calc_missing ->
|
|
L.d_strln ("Adding rhs as missing: " ^ s) ;
|
|
ProverState.add_missing_sigma sigma2 ;
|
|
(subs, prop1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
let prepare_prop_for_implication tenv (_, sub2) pi1 sigma1 =
|
|
let pi1' = Prop.pi_sub (`Exp sub2) (ProverState.get_missing_pi ()) @ pi1 in
|
|
let sigma1' = Prop.sigma_sub (`Exp sub2) (ProverState.get_missing_sigma ()) @ sigma1 in
|
|
let ep = Prop.set Prop.prop_emp ~sub:sub2 ~sigma:sigma1' ~pi:pi1' in
|
|
Prop.normalize tenv ep
|
|
|
|
|
|
let imply_pi tenv calc_missing (sub1, sub2) prop pi2 =
|
|
let do_atom a =
|
|
let a' = Sil.atom_sub (`Exp sub2) a in
|
|
try
|
|
if not (check_atom tenv prop a') then
|
|
raise (IMPL_EXC ("rhs atom missing in lhs", (sub1, sub2), EXC_FALSE_ATOM a'))
|
|
with IMPL_EXC _ when calc_missing ->
|
|
L.d_str "imply_pi: adding missing atom " ;
|
|
Sil.d_atom a ;
|
|
L.d_ln () ;
|
|
ProverState.add_missing_pi a
|
|
in
|
|
List.iter ~f:do_atom pi2
|
|
|
|
|
|
let imply_atom tenv calc_missing (sub1, sub2) prop a =
|
|
imply_pi tenv calc_missing (sub1, sub2) prop [a]
|
|
|
|
|
|
(** Check pure implications before looking at the spatial part. Add
|
|
necessary instantiations for equalities and check that instantiations
|
|
are possible for disequalities. *)
|
|
let rec pre_check_pure_implication tenv calc_missing (subs: subst2) pi1 pi2 =
|
|
match pi2 with
|
|
| [] ->
|
|
subs
|
|
| (Sil.Aeq (e2_in, f2_in) as a) :: pi2' when not (Prop.atom_is_inequality a)
|
|
-> (
|
|
let e2, f2 = (Sil.exp_sub (`Exp (snd subs)) e2_in, Sil.exp_sub (`Exp (snd subs)) f2_in) in
|
|
if Exp.equal e2 f2 then pre_check_pure_implication tenv calc_missing subs pi1 pi2'
|
|
else
|
|
match (e2, f2) with
|
|
| Exp.Var v2, f2 when Ident.is_primed v2 (* && not (Sil.mem_sub v2 (snd subs)) *) ->
|
|
(* The commented-out condition should always hold. *)
|
|
let sub2' = extend_sub (snd subs) v2 f2 in
|
|
pre_check_pure_implication tenv calc_missing (fst subs, sub2') pi1 pi2'
|
|
| e2, Exp.Var v2 when Ident.is_primed v2 (* && not (Sil.mem_sub v2 (snd subs)) *) ->
|
|
(* The commented-out condition should always hold. *)
|
|
let sub2' = extend_sub (snd subs) v2 e2 in
|
|
pre_check_pure_implication tenv calc_missing (fst subs, sub2') pi1 pi2'
|
|
| _ ->
|
|
let pi1' = Prop.pi_sub (`Exp (fst subs)) pi1 in
|
|
let prop_for_impl = prepare_prop_for_implication tenv subs pi1' [] in
|
|
imply_atom tenv calc_missing subs prop_for_impl (Sil.Aeq (e2_in, f2_in)) ;
|
|
pre_check_pure_implication tenv calc_missing subs pi1 pi2' )
|
|
| (Sil.Aneq (e, _) | Apred (_, e :: _) | Anpred (_, e :: _)) :: _
|
|
when not calc_missing && match e with Var v -> not (Ident.is_primed v) | _ -> true ->
|
|
raise
|
|
(IMPL_EXC
|
|
( "ineq e2=f2 in rhs with e2 not primed var"
|
|
, (Sil.exp_sub_empty, Sil.exp_sub_empty)
|
|
, EXC_FALSE ))
|
|
| (Sil.Aeq _ | Aneq _ | Apred _ | Anpred _) :: pi2' ->
|
|
pre_check_pure_implication tenv calc_missing subs pi1 pi2'
|
|
|
|
|
|
(** Perform the array bound checks delayed (to instantiate variables) by the prover.
|
|
If there is a provable violation of the array bounds, set the prover status to Bounds_check
|
|
and make the proof fail. *)
|
|
let check_array_bounds tenv (sub1, sub2) prop =
|
|
let check_failed atom =
|
|
ProverState.checks := Bounds_check :: !ProverState.checks ;
|
|
L.d_str_color Red "bounds_check failed: provable atom: " ;
|
|
Sil.d_atom atom ;
|
|
L.d_ln () ;
|
|
if not Config.bound_error_allowed_in_procedure_call then
|
|
raise (IMPL_EXC ("bounds check", (sub1, sub2), EXC_FALSE))
|
|
in
|
|
let fail_if_le e' e'' =
|
|
let lt_ineq = Prop.mk_inequality tenv (Exp.BinOp (Binop.Le, e', e'')) in
|
|
if check_atom tenv prop lt_ineq then check_failed lt_ineq
|
|
in
|
|
let check_bound = function
|
|
| ProverState.BClen_imply (len1_, len2_, _indices2) ->
|
|
let len1 = Sil.exp_sub (`Exp sub1) len1_ in
|
|
let len2 = Sil.exp_sub (`Exp sub2) len2_ in
|
|
(* L.d_strln_color Orange "check_bound ";
|
|
Sil.d_exp len1; L.d_str " "; Sil.d_exp len2; L.d_ln(); *)
|
|
let indices_to_check =
|
|
match len2 with _ -> [Exp.BinOp (Binop.PlusA, len2, Exp.minus_one)]
|
|
(* only check len *)
|
|
in
|
|
List.iter ~f:(fail_if_le len1) indices_to_check
|
|
| ProverState.BCfrom_pre _atom ->
|
|
let atom_neg = atom_negate tenv (Sil.atom_sub (`Exp sub2) _atom) in
|
|
(* L.d_strln_color Orange "BCFrom_pre"; Sil.d_atom atom_neg; L.d_ln (); *)
|
|
if check_atom tenv prop atom_neg then check_failed atom_neg
|
|
in
|
|
List.iter ~f:check_bound (ProverState.get_bounds_checks ())
|
|
|
|
|
|
(** [check_implication_base] returns true if [prop1|-prop2],
|
|
ignoring the footprint part of the props *)
|
|
let check_implication_base pname tenv check_frame_empty calc_missing prop1 prop2 =
|
|
try
|
|
ProverState.reset prop1 prop2 ;
|
|
let filter (id, e) = Ident.is_normal id && Sil.fav_for_all (Sil.exp_fav e) Ident.is_normal in
|
|
let sub1_base = Sil.sub_filter_pair ~f:filter prop1.Prop.sub in
|
|
let pi1, pi2 = (Prop.get_pure prop1, Prop.get_pure prop2) in
|
|
let sigma1, sigma2 = (prop1.Prop.sigma, prop2.Prop.sigma) in
|
|
let subs = pre_check_pure_implication tenv calc_missing (prop1.Prop.sub, sub1_base) pi1 pi2 in
|
|
let pi2_bcheck, pi2_nobcheck =
|
|
(* find bounds checks implicit in pi2 *)
|
|
List.partition_tf ~f:ProverState.atom_is_array_bounds_check pi2
|
|
in
|
|
List.iter ~f:(fun a -> ProverState.add_bounds_check (ProverState.BCfrom_pre a)) pi2_bcheck ;
|
|
L.d_strln "pre_check_pure_implication" ;
|
|
L.d_strln "pi1:" ;
|
|
L.d_increase_indent 1 ;
|
|
Prop.d_pi pi1 ;
|
|
L.d_decrease_indent 1 ;
|
|
L.d_ln () ;
|
|
L.d_strln "pi2:" ;
|
|
L.d_increase_indent 1 ;
|
|
Prop.d_pi pi2 ;
|
|
L.d_decrease_indent 1 ;
|
|
L.d_ln () ;
|
|
if pi2_bcheck <> [] then ( L.d_str "pi2 bounds checks: " ; Prop.d_pi pi2_bcheck ; L.d_ln () ) ;
|
|
L.d_strln "returns" ;
|
|
L.d_strln "sub1: " ;
|
|
L.d_increase_indent 1 ;
|
|
Prop.d_sub (`Exp (fst subs)) ;
|
|
L.d_decrease_indent 1 ;
|
|
L.d_ln () ;
|
|
L.d_strln "sub2: " ;
|
|
L.d_increase_indent 1 ;
|
|
Prop.d_sub (`Exp (snd subs)) ;
|
|
L.d_decrease_indent 1 ;
|
|
L.d_ln () ;
|
|
let (sub1, sub2), frame_prop = sigma_imply tenv false calc_missing subs prop1 sigma2 in
|
|
let pi1' = Prop.pi_sub (`Exp sub1) pi1 in
|
|
let sigma1' = Prop.sigma_sub (`Exp sub1) sigma1 in
|
|
L.d_ln () ;
|
|
let prop_for_impl = prepare_prop_for_implication tenv (sub1, sub2) pi1' sigma1' in
|
|
(* only deal with pi2 without bound checks *)
|
|
imply_pi tenv calc_missing (sub1, sub2) prop_for_impl pi2_nobcheck ;
|
|
(* handle implicit bound checks, plus those from array_len_imply *)
|
|
check_array_bounds tenv (sub1, sub2) prop_for_impl ;
|
|
L.d_strln "Result of Abduction" ;
|
|
L.d_increase_indent 1 ;
|
|
d_impl (sub1, sub2) (prop1, prop2) ;
|
|
L.d_decrease_indent 1 ;
|
|
L.d_ln () ;
|
|
L.d_strln "returning TRUE" ;
|
|
let frame = frame_prop.Prop.sigma in
|
|
if check_frame_empty && frame <> [] then raise (IMPL_EXC ("frame not empty", subs, EXC_FALSE)) ;
|
|
Some ((sub1, sub2), frame)
|
|
with
|
|
| IMPL_EXC (s, subs, body) ->
|
|
d_impl_err (s, subs, body) ;
|
|
None
|
|
| MISSING_EXC s ->
|
|
L.d_strln ("WARNING: footprint failed to find MISSING because: " ^ s) ;
|
|
None
|
|
| Exceptions.Abduction_case_not_implemented _ as exn ->
|
|
Reporting.log_error_deprecated pname exn ;
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
|
|
type implication_result =
|
|
| ImplOK of
|
|
( check list
|
|
* Sil.exp_subst
|
|
* Sil.exp_subst
|
|
* Sil.hpred list
|
|
* Sil.atom list
|
|
* Sil.hpred list
|
|
* Sil.hpred list
|
|
* Sil.hpred list
|
|
* (Exp.t * Exp.t) list
|
|
* (Exp.t * Exp.t) list )
|
|
| ImplFail of check list
|
|
|
|
(** [check_implication_for_footprint p1 p2] returns
|
|
[Some(sub, frame, missing)] if [sub(p1 * missing) |- sub(p2 * frame)]
|
|
where [sub] is a substitution which instantiates the
|
|
primed vars of [p1] and [p2], which are assumed to be disjoint. *)
|
|
let check_implication_for_footprint pname tenv p1 (p2: Prop.exposed Prop.t) =
|
|
let check_frame_empty = false in
|
|
let calc_missing = true in
|
|
match check_implication_base pname tenv check_frame_empty calc_missing p1 p2 with
|
|
| Some ((sub1, sub2), frame) ->
|
|
ImplOK
|
|
( !ProverState.checks
|
|
, sub1
|
|
, sub2
|
|
, frame
|
|
, ProverState.get_missing_pi ()
|
|
, ProverState.get_missing_sigma ()
|
|
, ProverState.get_frame_fld ()
|
|
, ProverState.get_missing_fld ()
|
|
, ProverState.get_frame_typ ()
|
|
, ProverState.get_missing_typ () )
|
|
| None ->
|
|
ImplFail !ProverState.checks
|
|
|
|
|
|
(** [check_implication p1 p2] returns true if [p1|-p2] *)
|
|
let check_implication pname tenv p1 p2 =
|
|
let check p1 p2 =
|
|
let check_frame_empty = true in
|
|
let calc_missing = false in
|
|
match check_implication_base pname tenv check_frame_empty calc_missing p1 p2 with
|
|
| Some _ ->
|
|
true
|
|
| None ->
|
|
false
|
|
in
|
|
check p1 p2
|
|
&&
|
|
if !Config.footprint then
|
|
check (Prop.normalize tenv (Prop.extract_footprint p1)) (Prop.extract_footprint p2)
|
|
else true
|
|
|
|
|
|
(** {2 Cover: miminum set of pi's whose disjunction is equivalent to true} *)
|
|
|
|
(** check if the pi's in [cases] cover true *)
|
|
let is_cover tenv cases =
|
|
let cnt = ref 0 in
|
|
(* counter for timeout checks, as this function can take exponential time *)
|
|
let check () =
|
|
incr cnt ;
|
|
if Int.equal (!cnt mod 100) 0 then SymOp.check_wallclock_alarm ()
|
|
in
|
|
let rec _is_cover acc_pi cases =
|
|
check () ;
|
|
match cases with
|
|
| [] ->
|
|
check_inconsistency_pi tenv acc_pi
|
|
| (pi, _) :: cases' ->
|
|
List.for_all ~f:(fun a -> _is_cover (atom_negate tenv a :: acc_pi) cases') pi
|
|
in
|
|
_is_cover [] cases
|
|
|
|
|
|
exception NO_COVER
|
|
|
|
(** Find miminum set of pi's in [cases] whose disjunction covers true *)
|
|
let find_minimum_pure_cover tenv cases =
|
|
let cases =
|
|
let compare (pi1, _) (pi2, _) = Int.compare (List.length pi1) (List.length pi2) in
|
|
List.sort ~cmp:compare cases
|
|
in
|
|
let rec grow seen todo =
|
|
match todo with
|
|
| [] ->
|
|
raise NO_COVER
|
|
| (pi, x) :: todo' ->
|
|
if is_cover tenv ((pi, x) :: seen) then (pi, x) :: seen else grow ((pi, x) :: seen) todo'
|
|
in
|
|
let rec _shrink seen todo =
|
|
match todo with
|
|
| [] ->
|
|
seen
|
|
| (pi, x) :: todo' ->
|
|
if is_cover tenv (seen @ todo') then _shrink seen todo'
|
|
else _shrink ((pi, x) :: seen) todo'
|
|
in
|
|
let shrink cases = if List.length cases > 2 then _shrink [] cases else cases in
|
|
try Some (shrink (grow [] cases)) with NO_COVER -> None
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*
|
|
(** Check [prop |- e1<e2]. Result [false] means "don't know". *)
|
|
let check_lt prop e1 e2 =
|
|
let e1_lt_e2 = Exp.BinOp (Binop.Lt, e1, e2) in
|
|
check_atom prop (Prop.mk_inequality e1_lt_e2)
|
|
|
|
let filter_ptsto_lhs sub e0 = function
|
|
| Sil.Hpointsto (e, _, _) -> if Exp.equal e0 (Sil.exp_sub sub e) then Some () else None
|
|
| _ -> None
|
|
*)
|