Summary:
**Existing heuristic**: If we have a call `foo(n)` that has no model and summary for `foo`, we underestimate its cost as constant[1].
However, if we have a model for `foo` (e.g.with modeled cost O(n)) but applying the model to arguments causes the cost to be Top (e.g if `n` has Top size), then we could have Top-poisoning where all the callers up the call chain will have Top costs [2].
To prevent these unintended Top-poisioning when adding models, this diff applies *the same heuristic* to modeled calls with Top cost and gives them constant cost. This way, when adding models, we wouldn't be introducing more Tops than if we were to have no models in the first place.
[1] This is problematic in itself and causes many FPs at diff time, but otherwise we would be getting Tops everywhere and would not be able to give any meaningful cost. E.g. for fblite, if we were to give unknown calls Top cost, #procedures with Top cost increases form 5% to 38% and #procedures with linear cost reduces by 99.75%.
[2] This was observed for `containsValue` for Instagram where %Tops increased by 88% :(
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D26174644
fbshipit-source-id: 232354923
Ezgi Çiçek
90974b92e4