Summary:
Now that we have two similar functions, it becomes confusing, because `Pp.to_string` and `Pp.string_of_pp` can seem to do the same stuff, while in reality they do the opposite.
Well, it is still bit confusing, because the proper names would be
`Pp.pp_of_to_string` and `Pp.to_string_of_pp`, but I think this high
level order names are not necessary given that in most cases they will
be used as concrete functions.
I think `Pp.of_string` captures such usages better than `to_string` used to do: you need to pp stuff,
but you have a string (or, technically, a function that returns a string), so you pretty print OF that string, aren't you?
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D18245876
fbshipit-source-id: fd4b6ab68
Mitya Lyubarskiy
0c3e568fa4