prompt=f"""As an experienced American English writing instructor, please analyze this {ctx_info['article_type']} and identify basic vocabulary that can be upgraded to more sophisticated alternatives.
"writing_content":"Generative AI, such as large language models, are becoming increasingly popular. They offers students a powerful tool for complete homework and generating ideas. However, its impact on learning ability are a subject of intense debate.\n\nOn one hand, it is argued that AI hinder the development of critical thinking. When a student rely on AI to write essays, they doesn't engage in the rigorous process of research and analysis their own. This lead to a superficial understanding and a failure to develop their own voice. Furthermore, the convenience of AI means that less effort are put into mastering fundamental skills, such as grammar and structuring arguments.",
"ai_feedback":"{\"writing_analysis\": {\"strengths\": [\"能够识别AI对学习的潜在负面影响，特别是批判性思维和基础技能方面，显示出对主题的基本理解\", \"尝试从不同角度展开讨论，体现了初步的论证意识\", \"使用了一些学术写作的基本元素，如'On one hand'这样的过渡词\"], \"issues\": [\"缺乏明确的中心论点(thesis statement)，文章方向不清晰\", \"段落缺乏有力的主题句(topic sentence)，论证结构松散\", \"语法错误较多，特别是主谓一致问题(如'are'代替'is'，'doesn't'代替'don't')\", \"论证深度不足，缺乏具体例证和深入分析\", \"语言表达不够地道，有些表达显得生硬或不自然\"], \"suggestions\": [{\"讲解\": \"在开头段落加入清晰的中心论点\", \"示例\": \"While generative AI offers unprecedented convenience for students, its overreliance ultimately undermines the very cognitive skills essential for meaningful learning—critical analysis, original thought, and academic integrity.\"}, {\"讲解\": \"为每个主体段落添加有力的主题句\", \"示例\": \"Perhaps the most significant concern is how AI dependency stunts the growth of critical thinking abilities that form the bedrock of genuine education.\"}, {\"讲解\": \"使用更自然的过渡词和表达方式\", \"示例\": \"Moreover, the instant gratification provided by AI tools creates a dangerous disincentive for developing foundational writing competencies.\"}, {\"讲解\": \"添加具体例证增强说服力\", \"示例\": \"For instance, when a student uses AI to generate a history paper instead of wrestling with primary sources, they miss the opportunity to develop their own historical interpretation and analytical voice—skills that simply cannot be outsourced to an algorithm.\"}, {\"讲解\": \"修正语法错误，使用更地道的表达\", \"示例\": \"This reliance leads to superficial understanding and prevents students from developing their unique academic voice, ultimately creating a generation of passive consumers rather than active creators of knowledge.\"}], \"next_steps\": [\"阅读几篇优秀的美国大学生议论文范文，注意观察其论点陈述和段落结构\", \"练习写作清晰的主题句，确保每个段落都有明确的中心思想\", \"重点复习英语主谓一致和时态等基础语法规则\", \"在论证中添加具体事例、数据或引用，增强说服力\", \"多使用美国学术写作中常见的过渡词和表达方式，如'furthermore', 'conversely', 'in light of this'等\"]}}",
"ai_feedback":"{\"writing_analysis\": {\"strengths\": [\"文章结构清晰，采用了标准的议论文框架：引入话题-正反论证-总结观点\", \"能够从正反两个角度分析AI对学习的影响，体现了辩证思维\", \"结论段明确提出了核心观点，强调使用方式而非技术本身决定影响\", \"使用了适当的学术词汇如'critical thinking''personalized tutor'等\"], \"issues\": [\"语法错误较多，特别是主谓一致问题（如'are becoming''it offers''they doesn't'等）\", \"论点发展不够深入，缺乏具体例证和数据支持\", \"过渡词使用单一，缺乏美国学术写作中常见的递进、转折等复杂过渡\", \"部分表达不够地道，存在中式英语痕迹（如'more better than before'）\", \"论点之间的逻辑衔接可以更紧密，缺乏对反论的深入反驳\"], \"suggestions\": [{\"讲解\": \"修正主谓一致等基础语法错误，确保语言准确性\", \"示例\": \"Generative AI, such as large language models, is becoming increasingly popular. It offers students a powerful tool for completing homework and generating ideas. However, its impact on learning ability is a subject of intense debate.\"}, {\"讲解\": \"在主题句后添加具体例证，增强说服力\", \"示例\": \"When students rely exclusively on AI to write essays, they bypass the rigorous process of research and analysis. For instance, instead of wrestling with primary sources to form original arguments, they might simply paraphrase AI-generated content, resulting in a superficial understanding and failure to develop their own academic voice.\"}, {\"讲解\": \"使用更丰富的过渡词和逻辑连接词\", \"示例\": \"While critics emphasize the risks of over-reliance, proponents counter that AI, when used judiciously, can serve as a personalized tutor. Specifically, it can adapt explanations to individual learning styles, breaking down complex concepts until the student achieves genuine comprehension.\"}, {\"讲解\": \"改进结论段，使其更具深度和号召力\", \"示例\": \"Ultimately, the educational impact of generative AI depends less on the technology itself and more on the intentionality behind its use. The key lies in leveraging it as a supplement to—not a replacement for—authentic intellectual engagement, ensuring that technology enhances rather than diminishes our cognitive development.\"}, {\"讲解\": \"使用更地道的学术表达方式\", \"示例\": \"Furthermore, the convenience of AI may reduce the effort students invest in mastering fundamental skills. This could potentially undermine their long-term academic growth, as proficiency in grammar and logical argumentation requires consistent practice and refinement.\"}], \"next_steps\": [\"系统学习英语主谓一致、时态等基础语法规则\", \"阅读美国学生的议论文范文，观察其论证结构和语言风格\", \"练习使用具体的例子、数据或研究结果来支持抽象论点\", \"积累学术写作常用的过渡词和表达方式\", \"完成写作后多次修改，重点关注逻辑流畅性和语言地道性\", \"尝试在正反论证后加入综合分析的段落，展现更高层次的批判性思维\"]}}",
