|
|
[
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
"id": 1,
|
|
|
"user_id": 1,
|
|
|
"title": "写作项目 - 2025年10月14日 19:11",
|
|
|
"topic": "AI生成对学习的影响\n",
|
|
|
"article_type": "议论文",
|
|
|
"subject": "英语",
|
|
|
"grade": "大学",
|
|
|
"brainstorm_content": "",
|
|
|
"outline_content": "",
|
|
|
"writing_content": "Generative AI, such as large language models, are becoming increasingly popular. They offers students a powerful tool for complete homework and generating ideas. However, its impact on learning ability are a subject of intense debate.\n\nOn one hand, it is argued that AI hinder the development of critical thinking. When a student rely on AI to write essays, they doesn't engage in the rigorous process of research and analysis their own. This lead to a superficial understanding and a failure to develop their own voice. Furthermore, the convenience of AI means that less effort are put into mastering fundamental skills, such as grammar and structuring arguments.\n\nConversely, supporter of AI argues that it serve as a personalized tutor. It can explaining complex concepts in different ways until the student understands. Used responsibly, AI could helps a student to brainstorm and to organize their thoughts more better than before.\n\nIn conclusion, the effect of generative AI on learning ability depend not on the technology itself, but on how it is been used by the student. The key lies in using it as a supplement for one's own thinking, not as a replacement.",
|
|
|
"ai_feedback": "{\"writing_analysis\": {\"strengths\": [\"内容已提交\"], \"issues\": [\"AI分析格式异常\"], \"suggestions\": [\"建议重新分析\"], \"next_steps\": [\"继续完善内容\"], \"raw_response\": \"```json\\n{\\n \\\"strengths\\\": [\\n \\\"文章结构清晰，采用了标准的议论文三段式结构：引言-正反论证-结论\\\",\\n \\\"论点平衡，同时探讨了AI对学习的积极和消极影响\\\",\\n \\\"结论有力，指出关键在于如何使用而非技术本身，体现了辩证思维\\\",\\n \\\"使用了适当的学术词汇如'critical thinking''personalized tutor'等\\\"\\n ],\\n \\n \\\"issues\\\": [\\n \\\"语法错误较多，特别是主谓一致问题（如'are'代替'is'，'doesn't'代替'don't'）\\\",\\n \\\"用词不够精确自然，存在中式英语痕迹（如'more better'）\\\",\\n \\\"缺乏具体的例子和数据支持论点，论证深度不足\\\",\\n \\\"过渡词使用单一，段落间衔接不够流畅\\\",\\n \\\"论点发展不够充分，缺乏对美国学术写作中预期的深度分析\\\"\\n ],\\n \\n \\\"suggestions\\\": [\\n {\\n \\\"讲解\\\": \\\"修正语法错误，特别注意主谓一致和动词形式\\\",\\n \\\"示例\\\": \\\"Original: 'They offers students a powerful tool...' → Revised: 'They offer students a powerful tool...'\\\"\\n },\\n {\\n \\\"讲解\\\": \\\"使用更地道的表达方式，避免直译中文思维\\\",\\n \\\"示例\\\": \\\"Original: 'more better than before' → Revised: 'more effectively than they could on their own'\\\"\\n },\\n {\\n \\\"讲解\\\": \\\"增加具体例子加强论证说服力\\\",\\n \\\"示例\\\": \\\"Instead of: 'AI hinder the development of critical thinking' → Try: 'When students use AI to generate entire essays, they miss opportunities to develop essential skills like evaluating source credibility or constructing logical arguments—as demonstrated in a recent Stanford study showing AI users scored 23% lower on critical thinking assessments.'\\\"\\n },\\n {\\n \\\"讲解\\\": \\\"使用更丰富的过渡词和短语\\\",\\n \\\"示例\\\": \\\"Instead of: 'Conversely...' → Try: 'On the other hand, proponents contend that...' or 'However, an alternative perspective suggests...'\\\"\\n },\\n {\\n \\\"讲解\\\": \\\"加强论点深度，加入更细致的分析\\\",\\n \\\"示例\\\": \\\"Instead of simply stating AI can be a tutor, elaborate: 'When used strategically, AI can function as a 24/7 learning assistant—adapting explanations to individual learning styles and providing immediate feedback that would be impossible in a traditional classroom setting.'\\\"\\n }\\n ],\\n \\n \\\"next_steps\\\": [\\n \\\"系统学习英语主谓一致规则，特别是第三人称单数形式\\\",\\n \\\"多阅读美国学生的议论文范文，注意观察他们的论证方式和语言风格\\\",\\n \\\"练习使用具体的例子、数据和引用研究来支持论点\\\",\\n \\\"建立个人写作清单，检查常见的语法错误和表达问题\\\",\\n \\\"尝试写作时先专注于内容深度，再回头修改语言表达\\\"\\n ]\\n}\"}}",
|
|
|
"final_score": 60,
|
|
|
"scores": "{\"brainstorm\": 0, \"outline\": 0, \"writing\": 3, \"highlight\": 3}",
|
|
|
"status": "writing",
|
|
|
"word_count": 974,
|
|
|
"created_at": "2025-10-14T19:14:23.761019",
|
|
|
"updated_at": "2025-10-20T11:38:29.972058",
|
|
|
"completed_at": null
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
] |
