|
|
[
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
"id": 1,
|
|
|
"user_id": 1,
|
|
|
"title": "写作项目 - 2025年10月14日 19:11",
|
|
|
"topic": "AI生成对学习的影响\n",
|
|
|
"article_type": "议论文",
|
|
|
"subject": "英语",
|
|
|
"grade": "大学",
|
|
|
"brainstorm_content": "Date Page The Power of small Actions We often the impact underestimate of that of only believing grand small actions change However gestures create history have deeds that shows minor profound can simple A consequences",
|
|
|
"outline_content": "",
|
|
|
"writing_content": "Generative AI, such as large language models, are becoming increasingly popular. They offers students a powerful tool for complete homework and generating ideas. However, its impact on learning ability are a subject of intense debate.\n\nOn one hand, it is argued that AI hinder the development of critical thinking. When a student rely on AI to write essays, they doesn't engage in the rigorous process of research and analysis their own. This lead to a superficial understanding and a failure to develop their own voice. Furthermore, the convenience of AI means that less effort are put into mastering fundamental skills, such as grammar and structuring arguments.\nDate Page The Power of small Actions We often the impact underestimate of that of only believing grand small actions change However gestures creafe history have deeds that shows minor profound can simple A conse quences.",
|
|
|
"ai_feedback": "{\"writing_analysis\": {\"strengths\": [\"能够识别AI对学习的潜在负面影响，特别是批判性思维和基础技能方面，显示出对主题的基本理解\", \"尝试从不同角度展开讨论，体现了初步的论证意识\", \"使用了一些学术写作的基本元素，如'On one hand'这样的过渡词\"], \"issues\": [\"缺乏明确的中心论点(thesis statement)，文章方向不清晰\", \"段落缺乏有力的主题句(topic sentence)，论证结构松散\", \"语法错误较多，特别是主谓一致问题(如'are'代替'is'，'doesn't'代替'don't')\", \"论证深度不足，缺乏具体例证和深入分析\", \"语言表达不够地道，有些表达显得生硬或不自然\"], \"suggestions\": [{\"讲解\": \"在开头段落加入清晰的中心论点\", \"示例\": \"While generative AI offers unprecedented convenience for students, its overreliance ultimately undermines the very cognitive skills essential for meaningful learning—critical analysis, original thought, and academic integrity.\"}, {\"讲解\": \"为每个主体段落添加有力的主题句\", \"示例\": \"Perhaps the most significant concern is how AI dependency stunts the growth of critical thinking abilities that form the bedrock of genuine education.\"}, {\"讲解\": \"使用更自然的过渡词和表达方式\", \"示例\": \"Moreover, the instant gratification provided by AI tools creates a dangerous disincentive for developing foundational writing competencies.\"}, {\"讲解\": \"添加具体例证增强说服力\", \"示例\": \"For instance, when a student uses AI to generate a history paper instead of wrestling with primary sources, they miss the opportunity to develop their own historical interpretation and analytical voice—skills that simply cannot be outsourced to an algorithm.\"}, {\"讲解\": \"修正语法错误，使用更地道的表达\", \"示例\": \"This reliance leads to superficial understanding and prevents students from developing their unique academic voice, ultimately creating a generation of passive consumers rather than active creators of knowledge.\"}], \"next_steps\": [\"阅读几篇优秀的美国大学生议论文范文，注意观察其论点陈述和段落结构\", \"练习写作清晰的主题句，确保每个段落都有明确的中心思想\", \"重点复习英语主谓一致和时态等基础语法规则\", \"在论证中添加具体事例、数据或引用，增强说服力\", \"多使用美国学术写作中常见的过渡词和表达方式，如'furthermore', 'conversely', 'in light of this'等\"]}}",
|
|
|
"final_score": 60,
|
|
|
"scores": "{\"brainstorm\": 0, \"outline\": 0, \"writing\": 3, \"highlight\": 3}",
|
|
|
"status": "writing",
|
|
|
"word_count": 743,
|
|
|
"created_at": "2025-10-14T19:14:23.761019",
|
|
|
"updated_at": "2025-11-19T11:28:52.668310",
|
|
|
"completed_at": null
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
"id": 2,
|
|
|
"user_id": 1,
|
|
|
"title": "写作项目 - 2025年11月02日 16:35",
|
|
|
"topic": "The Role of Failure in Personal Growth (2024 National)",
|
|
|
"article_type": "议论文",
|
|
|
"subject": "英语",
|
|
|
"grade": "高中",
|
|
|
"brainstorm_content": "",
|
|
|
"outline_content": "",
|
|
|
"writing_content": "",
|
|
|
"ai_feedback": "",
|
|
|
"final_score": 0,
|
|
|
"scores": "",
|
|
|
"status": "writing",
|
|
|
"word_count": 0,
|
|
|
"created_at": "2025-11-02T16:36:39.799848",
|
|
|
"updated_at": "2025-11-13T16:00:57.253704",
|
|
|
"completed_at": null
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
"id": 3,
|
|
|
"user_id": 2,
|
|
|
"title": "写作项目 - 2025年11月17日 11:08",
|
|
|
"topic": "论生成式AI对学生的影响",
|
|
|
"article_type": "议论文",
|
|
|
"subject": "英语",
|
|
|
"grade": "大学",
|
|
|
"brainstorm_content": "",
|
|
|
"outline_content": "",
|
|
|
"writing_content": "The advent of generative artificial intelligence, capable of producing original text, code, and multimedia content, has ignitedrr a global debate, particularly concerning its profound influence on students. This technological paradigm shift presents a dual-edged sword, offering unprecedented opportunities for learning while simultaneously posing significant challenges to academic integrity and critical thinking.\nOn the one hand, the benefits of generative AI in education are substantial. It can function as a tireless personal tutor, providing instant explanations, generating practice problems, and offering feedback on written work. This democratizes access to customized learning support, potentially bridging educational gaps. For research, AI tools can efficiently summarize vast amounts of literature, suggest novel perspectives, and assist in structuring complex ideas, thereby enhancing productivity and fostering creativity. Students can leverage these tools to brainstorm project ideas, debug code, or even simulate historical dialogues, making learning more interactive and engaging.\nOn the other hand, the pervasive use of generative AI raises serious concerns. The most immediate threat is to academic honesty. The ease with which students can generate essays, solve take-home assignments, or complete coding tasks tempts many towards plagiarism and intellectual laziness, undermining the very purpose of education. Furthermore, over-reliance on AI for problem-solving risks atrophy of critical cognitive skills. If AI consistently provides pre-packaged answers, students may fail to develop the essential abilities to analyze information critically, construct logical arguments, and learn through the process of trial and error. This could lead to a generation skilled at managing AI outputs but deficient in foundational knowledge and independent thought.\nTherefore, a balanced and proactive approach is crucial. Educational institutions must update academic integrity policies to clearly address the ethical use of AI, emphasizing its role as a supplement rather than a substitute for learning. The focus of pedagogy should shift from rote memorization and formulaic assignments to cultivating higher-order thinking skills—evaluation, creation, and synthesis—that AI cannot easily replicate. Simultaneously, integrating AI literacy into the curriculum is imperative, teaching students not only how to use these tools effectively but also to understand their limitations, biases, and the ethical implications of their use.\nIn conclusion, generative AI is an transformative force in education that cannot be ignored. Its impact on students is multifaceted, holding the promise of personalized learning and enhanced creativity, yet shadowed by risks to academic integrity and intellectual development. The ultimate outcome will not be determined by the technology itself, but by how the educational ecosystem guides its integration, ensuring it serves as a scaffold for building deeper understanding rather than a crutch that hinders genuine intellectual growth.",
|
|
|
"ai_feedback": "{\"writing_analysis\": {\"strengths\": [\"论点清晰明确，文章结构完整，遵循了'引言-正方-反方-解决方案-结论'的经典议论文结构\", \"使用了恰当的学术词汇和表达，如'paradigm shift'、'democratizes access'、'cognitive skills'等\", \"论证平衡，既讨论了AI的积极影响，也分析了其潜在风险\", \"结论有力，强调了教育系统在引导AI应用中的关键作用\", \"过渡词使用得当，如'on the one hand'、'on the other hand'、'therefore'等\"], \"issues\": [\"部分表达略显正式和刻板，缺乏美国学生写作中的自然流畅感\", \"某些句子结构过于复杂，影响了阅读的流畅性\", \"个别词汇选择不够精准或存在拼写错误\", \"论证深度可以进一步加强，特别是具体例证方面\", \"语调在某些部分过于学术化，缺乏个人声音的表达\"], \"suggestions\": [{\"explanation\": \"简化复杂句式，使表达更加直接自然\", \"example\": \"Instead of: 'The advent of generative artificial intelligence, capable of producing original text, code, and multimedia content, has ignited a global debate...' Try: 'Generative AI is changing education in big ways. It can create original content, from essays to code, and this has started important conversations about how it affects students.'\"}, {\"explanation\": \"修正拼写错误和使用更地道的表达\", \"example\": \"Instead of: 'generative AI is an transformative force' (incorrect article) Try: 'generative AI is a transformative force' or 'generative AI represents a transformative force'\"}, {\"explanation\": \"增加具体例证和个人观察，使论证更有说服力\", \"example\": \"Instead of: 'It can function as a tireless personal tutor...' Try: 'I've seen classmates use ChatGPT to get instant help with homework questions at 2 AM - it's like having a tutor available 24/7. But I've also noticed some students starting to depend on it too much.'\"}, {\"explanation\": \"使用更自然的过渡和连接词\", \"example\": \"Instead of: 'On the one hand... On the other hand... Therefore...' Try mixing: 'There's no denying the benefits... At the same time, we can't ignore the risks... So what's the solution? I believe...'\"}, {\"explanation\": \"在保持学术性的同时加入更多个人声音\", \"example\": \"Instead of: 'This could lead to a generation skilled at managing AI outputs but deficient in foundational knowledge.' Try: 'I worry we might become a generation that's great at using AI tools but has forgotten how to think for ourselves.'\"}], \"next_steps\": [\"多阅读美国大学水平的议论文和学术文章，注意观察其语言风格和论证方式\", \"练习将复杂观点用更简洁直接的语言表达\", \"在写作中尝试加入个人经历或观察，使论证更具真实感\", \"注意修正基本的语法和用词错误，特别是冠词和介词的使用\", \"练习使用多样的句式结构，避免过多使用模板化的表达方式\"]}}",
|
|
|
"final_score": 70,
|
|
|
"scores": "{\"brainstorm\": 0, \"outline\": 0, \"writing\": 4, \"highlight\": 3}",
|
|
|
"status": "writing",
|
|
|
"word_count": 2658,
|
|
|
"created_at": "2025-11-17T11:08:27.032891",
|
|
|
"updated_at": "2025-11-19T20:04:04.088053",
|
|
|
"completed_at": null
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
"id": 4,
|
|
|
"user_id": 5,
|
|
|
"title": "写作项目 - 2025年11月19日 14:03",
|
|
|
"topic": "健身对大学生的影响",
|
|
|
"article_type": "议论文",
|
|
|
"subject": "英语",
|
|
|
"grade": "大学",
|
|
|
"brainstorm_content": "",
|
|
|
"outline_content": "",
|
|
|
"writing_content": "",
|
|
|
"ai_feedback": "",
|
|
|
"final_score": 0,
|
|
|
"scores": "",
|
|
|
"status": "writing",
|
|
|
"word_count": 0,
|
|
|
"created_at": "2025-11-19T14:03:50.553140",
|
|
|
"updated_at": "2025-11-19T14:08:51.749151",
|
|
|
"completed_at": null
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
] |
