|
|
[
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
"id": 1,
|
|
|
"user_id": 1,
|
|
|
"title": "写作项目 - 2025年10月14日 19:11",
|
|
|
"topic": "AI生成对学习的影响\n",
|
|
|
"article_type": "议论文",
|
|
|
"subject": "英语",
|
|
|
"grade": "大学",
|
|
|
"brainstorm_content": "Date Page The Power of small Actions We often the impact underestimate of that of only believing grand small actions change However gestures create history have deeds that shows minor profound can simple A consequences",
|
|
|
"outline_content": "",
|
|
|
"writing_content": "Generative AI, such as large language models, are becoming increasingly popular. They offers students a powerful tool for complete homework and generating ideas. However, its impact on learning ability are a subject of intense debate.\n\nOn one hand, it is argued that AI hinder the development of critical thinking. When a student rely on AI to write essays, they doesn't engage in the rigorous process of research and analysis their own. This lead to a superficial understanding and a failure to develop their own voice. Furthermore, the convenience of AI means that less effort are put into mastering fundamental skills, such as grammar and structuring arguments.\nDate Page The Power of small Actions We often the impact underestimate of that of only believing grand small actions change However gestures creafe history have deeds that shows minor profound can simple A conse quences.",
|
|
|
"ai_feedback": "{\"writing_analysis\": {\"strengths\": [\"能够识别AI对学习的潜在负面影响，特别是批判性思维和基础技能方面，显示出对主题的基本理解\", \"尝试从不同角度展开讨论，体现了初步的论证意识\", \"使用了一些学术写作的基本元素，如'On one hand'这样的过渡词\"], \"issues\": [\"缺乏明确的中心论点(thesis statement)，文章方向不清晰\", \"段落缺乏有力的主题句(topic sentence)，论证结构松散\", \"语法错误较多，特别是主谓一致问题(如'are'代替'is'，'doesn't'代替'don't')\", \"论证深度不足，缺乏具体例证和深入分析\", \"语言表达不够地道，有些表达显得生硬或不自然\"], \"suggestions\": [{\"讲解\": \"在开头段落加入清晰的中心论点\", \"示例\": \"While generative AI offers unprecedented convenience for students, its overreliance ultimately undermines the very cognitive skills essential for meaningful learning—critical analysis, original thought, and academic integrity.\"}, {\"讲解\": \"为每个主体段落添加有力的主题句\", \"示例\": \"Perhaps the most significant concern is how AI dependency stunts the growth of critical thinking abilities that form the bedrock of genuine education.\"}, {\"讲解\": \"使用更自然的过渡词和表达方式\", \"示例\": \"Moreover, the instant gratification provided by AI tools creates a dangerous disincentive for developing foundational writing competencies.\"}, {\"讲解\": \"添加具体例证增强说服力\", \"示例\": \"For instance, when a student uses AI to generate a history paper instead of wrestling with primary sources, they miss the opportunity to develop their own historical interpretation and analytical voice—skills that simply cannot be outsourced to an algorithm.\"}, {\"讲解\": \"修正语法错误，使用更地道的表达\", \"示例\": \"This reliance leads to superficial understanding and prevents students from developing their unique academic voice, ultimately creating a generation of passive consumers rather than active creators of knowledge.\"}], \"next_steps\": [\"阅读几篇优秀的美国大学生议论文范文，注意观察其论点陈述和段落结构\", \"练习写作清晰的主题句，确保每个段落都有明确的中心思想\", \"重点复习英语主谓一致和时态等基础语法规则\", \"在论证中添加具体事例、数据或引用，增强说服力\", \"多使用美国学术写作中常见的过渡词和表达方式，如'furthermore', 'conversely', 'in light of this'等\"]}}",
|
|
|
"final_score": 60,
|
|
|
"scores": "{\"brainstorm\": 0, \"outline\": 0, \"writing\": 3, \"highlight\": 3}",
|
|
|
"status": "writing",
|
|
|
"word_count": 743,
|
|
|
"created_at": "2025-10-14T19:14:23.761019",
|
|
|
"updated_at": "2025-11-19T11:28:52.668310",
|
|
|
"completed_at": null
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
"id": 2,
|
|
|
"user_id": 1,
|
|
|
"title": "写作项目 - 2025年11月02日 16:35",
|
|
|
"topic": "The Role of Failure in Personal Growth (2024 National)",
|
|
|
"article_type": "议论文",
|
|
|
"subject": "英语",
|
|
|
"grade": "高中",
|
|
|
"brainstorm_content": "",
|
|
|
"outline_content": "",
|
|
|
"writing_content": "",
|
|
|
"ai_feedback": "",
|
|
|
"final_score": 0,
|
|
|
"scores": "",
|
|
|
"status": "writing",
|
|
|
"word_count": 0,
|
|
|
"created_at": "2025-11-02T16:36:39.799848",
|
|
|
"updated_at": "2025-11-13T16:00:57.253704",
|
|
|
"completed_at": null
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
"id": 3,
|
|
|
"user_id": 2,
|
|
|
"title": "写作项目 - 2025年11月17日 11:08",
|
|
|
"topic": "论生成式AI对学生的影响",
|
|
|
"article_type": "议论文",
|
|
|
"subject": "英语",
|
|
|
"grade": "大学",
|
|
|
"brainstorm_content": "",
|
|
|
"outline_content": "",
|
|
|
"writing_content": "The advent of generative artificial intelligence, capable of producing original text, code, and multimedia content, has ignitedrr a global debate, particularly concerning its profound influence on students. This technological paradigm shift presents a dual-edged sword, offering unprecedented opportunities for learning while simultaneously posing significant challenges to academic integrity and critical thinking.\nOn the one hand, the benefits of generative AI in education are substantial. It can function as a tireless personal tutor, providing instant explanations, generating practice problems, and offering feedback on written work. This democratizes access to customized learning support, potentially bridging educational gaps. For research, AI tools can efficiently summarize vast amounts of literature, suggest novel perspectives, and assist in structuring complex ideas, thereby enhancing productivity and fostering creativity. Students can leverage these tools to brainstorm project ideas, debug code, or even simulate historical dialogues, making learning more interactive and engaging.\n",
|
|
|
"ai_feedback": "{\"writing_analysis\": {\"strengths\": [\"主题句清晰明确：首段明确提出了生成式AI对学生影响的双重性（dual-edged sword），为全文奠定了清晰的论证框架。\", \"词汇运用恰当：使用了如'paradigm shift'、'democratizes access'、'fostering creativity'等学术性词汇，符合大学英语写作水平。\", \"结构基本合理：采用了'On the one hand'的对比结构，段落内部有具体的功能举例（如个人导师、研究助手）。\", \"观点平衡：同时提到了机遇（学习支持、创造力）与挑战（学术诚信、批判性思维），体现了辩证思考。\"], \"issues\": [\"论点发展不够深入：第二段仅罗列了AI的功能（如总结文献、生成问题），但缺乏具体案例或数据支撑，论证略显表面。\", \"过渡生硬：'On the one hand'之后直接进入好处论述，但缺少与首段'challenges'的自然衔接，段落间逻辑推进感不足。\", \"语言表达稍显正式：部分措辞如'thereby enhancing productivity'偏向报告式书面语，缺乏美国学生写作中常见的自然流畅感。\", \"批判性思维体现不足：对'challenges'仅在第一段提及，正文段未展开分析，削弱了论证的深度和平衡性。\", \"细节和例证缺失：未引用任何现实场景、研究或学生经历，使得论证抽象，说服力有限。\"], \"suggestions\": [{\"explanation\": \"在主题句后增加具体例证或场景描述，使论证更生动、有说服力。美国学生写作常通过个人经历或研究案例来支撑观点。\", \"example\": \"For instance, a student struggling with calculus can use an AI tutor like Khanmigo to get step-by-step explanations at midnight—something no human tutor could consistently provide. In my own experience, using ChatGPT to brainstorm debate points helped me uncover perspectives I'd never considered, making my arguments more nuanced.\"}, {\"explanation\": \"改进段落过渡，使用更自然的连接词或逻辑引导句，体现论证的层层推进。避免机械化的'on one hand/on the other hand'结构。\", \"example\": \"Despite these concerns, the immediate benefits of AI in education are hard to ignore. Many students are already leveraging tools like Gemini or Claude not just as shortcuts, but as collaborative partners that enhance their learning process. For example, in research writing...\"}, {\"explanation\": \"调整语气，增加一些口语化表达或设问，使学术写作更亲切、有对话感。美国学生写作在严谨中常带有个性化表达。\", \"example\": \"Let's be real: generative AI is changing the game for students. It's like having a 24/7 study buddy who can explain quantum physics in plain English or help untangle a messy essay draft. But is this always a good thing? The answer isn't simple.\"}, {\"explanation\": \"在论述好处时，可预埋或呼应潜在问题，体现批判性思维。例如，在提到AI提高研究效率时，指出可能导致的表面理解风险。\", \"example\": \"While AI can summarize a dozen articles in seconds, this convenience comes with a caveat: students might skip the deep reading required for true critical analysis. Relying solely on AI summaries is like eating only the frosting instead of the whole cake—you miss the substance.\"}, {\"explanation\": \"优化句式结构，混合使用短句、长句和从句，增强节奏感。避免过多使用被动语态和抽象名词短语。\", \"example\": \"AI doesn't just give answers; it shapes how we learn. Think about it: when an AI generates practice problems tailored to your weak spots, you're not just memorizing—you're engaging. But this engagement can become passive if we let the tool do all the heavy lifting.\"}], \"next_steps\": [\"补充论证的另一方面：在后续段落中详细探讨AI带来的挑战（如学术诚信、思维惰性），并给出平衡的解决方案。\", \"增加研究或数据引用：引用一项关于学生使用AI的调查或教育研究，提升论证的权威性（例如：'A 2023 Stanford study found that...'）。\", \"融入反论点与反驳：预想读者可能质疑的观点（如'AI导致抄袭'），并进行反驳或细化，展示深度思考。\", \"强化个人声音：在分析中加入个人立场或观察，使用'I argue that...'或'From my perspective...'等表达，使文章更有独特性。\", \"编辑语言流畅度：朗读段落，调整生硬的衔接词，确保句子之间逻辑自然流动，避免机械列举。\"]}}",
|
|
|
"final_score": 70,
|
|
|
"scores": "{\"brainstorm\": 0, \"outline\": 0, \"writing\": 4, \"highlight\": 3}",
|
|
|
"status": "writing",
|
|
|
"word_count": 957,
|
|
|
"created_at": "2025-11-17T11:08:27.032891",
|
|
|
"updated_at": "2025-12-03T16:46:35.946730",
|
|
|
"completed_at": null
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
"id": 4,
|
|
|
"user_id": 5,
|
|
|
"title": "写作项目 - 2025年11月19日 14:03",
|
|
|
"topic": "健身对大学生的影响",
|
|
|
"article_type": "议论文",
|
|
|
"subject": "英语",
|
|
|
"grade": "大学",
|
|
|
"brainstorm_content": "",
|
|
|
"outline_content": "",
|
|
|
"writing_content": "",
|
|
|
"ai_feedback": "",
|
|
|
"final_score": 0,
|
|
|
"scores": "",
|
|
|
"status": "writing",
|
|
|
"word_count": 0,
|
|
|
"created_at": "2025-11-19T14:03:50.553140",
|
|
|
"updated_at": "2025-11-19T14:08:51.749151",
|
|
|
"completed_at": null
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
"id": 5,
|
|
|
"user_id": 6,
|
|
|
"title": "写作项目 - 2025年11月25日 14:58",
|
|
|
"topic": "在信息过载时代，我们是否比古人拥有更深刻的智慧？",
|
|
|
"article_type": "议论文",
|
|
|
"subject": "语文",
|
|
|
"grade": "大学",
|
|
|
"brainstorm_content": "",
|
|
|
"outline_content": "",
|
|
|
"writing_content": "",
|
|
|
"ai_feedback": "",
|
|
|
"final_score": 0,
|
|
|
"scores": "",
|
|
|
"status": "writing",
|
|
|
"word_count": 0,
|
|
|
"created_at": "2025-11-25T15:00:33.014523",
|
|
|
"updated_at": "2025-11-25T15:01:18.290365",
|
|
|
"completed_at": null
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
] |
