pghs975uc
/
infer_clone
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

[cost] Simplify & optimize exit cost + threshold

Browse Source 
Summary:
- There is no need to use AI to compute a dot product: let's just fold over all nodes, but still do it in order (using the WTO) to report at the right place
- The previous version was computing a dot product on nodes for each node, which was quadratic, the new version is linear
- Report only once, the first time the threshold is reached (if in a loop, report at the loop head)

Reviewed By: ddino

Differential Revision: D14028171

fbshipit-source-id: b4a840c6e
master
Mehdi Bouaziz 6 years ago committed by Facebook Github Bot
parent 31a6b92902
commit 17fc4ca5cf
4 changed files with 124 additions and 369 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File

5
infer/src/absint/AbstractDomain.mli
Unescape View File

@ -97,9 +97,14 @@ module type FiniteSetS = sig
include WithBottom with type t := t
end
include
sig
[@@@warning "-60"]
(** Lift a PPSet to a powerset domain ordered by subset. The elements of the set should be drawn from
a *finite* collection of possible values, since the widening operator here is just union. *)
module FiniteSetOfPPSet (PPSet : PrettyPrintable.PPSet) : FiniteSetS with type elt = PPSet.elt
end
(** Lift a set to a powerset domain ordered by subset. The elements of the set should be drawn from
a *finite* collection of possible values, since the widening operator here is just union. *)

184
infer/src/checkers/cost.ml
Unescape View File

@ -614,10 +614,8 @@ module ConstraintSolver = struct
Option.value_exn set |> ControlFlowCost.Set.cost
end
module ReportedOnNodes = AbstractDomain.FiniteSetOfPPSet (Node.IdSet)
type extras_TransferFunctionsWCET =
{ basic_cost_map: AnalyzerNodesBasicCost.invariant_map
type extras_WCET =
{ basic_cost_map: NodesBasicCostDomain.t
; get_node_nb_exec: Node.id -> BasicCost.t
; summary: Summary.t }
@ -626,27 +624,12 @@ let compute_errlog_extras cost =
; cost_degree= BasicCost.degree cost |> Option.map ~f:Polynomials.Degree.encode_to_int }
(* Calculate the final Worst Case Execution Time predicted for each node. *)
module TransferFunctionsWCET = struct
module CFG = InstrCFG
module Domain = AbstractDomain.Pair (CostDomain.VariantCostMap) (ReportedOnNodes)
type extras = extras_TransferFunctionsWCET
let should_report_on_instr = function
| Sil.Call _ | Load _ | Prune _ | Store _ ->
true
| Sil.Abstract _ | Nullify _ | ExitScope _ ->
false
(* We don't report when the cost is Top as it corresponds to subsequent 'don't know's.
Instead, we report Top cost only at the top level per function when `report_infinity` is set to true *)
let should_report_cost cost =
Config.use_cost_threshold
&& (not (BasicCost.is_top cost))
&& not (BasicCost.( <= ) ~lhs:cost ~rhs:expensive_threshold)
(*
Calculate the final Worst Case Execution Time predicted for each WTO component.
It is the dot product of basic_cost_map and get_node_nb_exec.
*)
module WCET = struct
type astate = {current_cost: BasicCost.t; report_on_threshold: bool}
let do_report summary loc cost =
let degree_str =
@ -670,78 +653,63 @@ module TransferFunctionsWCET = struct
IssueType.expensive_execution_time_call message
(* get a list of nodes and check if we have already reported for at
least one of them. In that case no need to report again. *)
let should_report_on_node preds reported_so_far =
List.for_all
~f:(fun node ->
let nid = Procdesc.Node.get_id node in
not (ReportedOnNodes.mem nid reported_so_far) )
preds
(*
We don't report when the cost is Top as it corresponds to subsequent 'don't know's.
Instead, we report Top cost only at the top level per function when `report_infinity` is set to true
*)
let should_report_cost cost =
(not (BasicCost.is_top cost)) && not (BasicCost.( <= ) ~lhs:cost ~rhs:expensive_threshold)
let map_operation_cost get_node_nb_exec m : BasicCost.t =
CostDomain.NodeInstructionToCostMap.fold
(fun ((node_id, _) as instr_node_id) c_record acc ->
let c = CostDomain.get_operation_cost c_record in
let t = get_node_nb_exec node_id in
let c_node = BasicCost.mult c t in
let c_node' = BasicCost.plus acc c_node in
L.(debug Analysis Medium)
"@\n [AnalyzerWCET] Adding cost: (%a) --> c =%a t = %a @\n" InstrCFG.Node.pp_id
instr_node_id BasicCost.pp c BasicCost.pp t ;
L.(debug Analysis Medium)
"@\n [AnalyzerWCET] Adding cost: (%a) --> c_node=%a cost = %a @\n" InstrCFG.Node.pp_id
instr_node_id BasicCost.pp c_node BasicCost.pp c_node' ;
c_node' )
m BasicCost.zero
let exec_instr ((_, reported_so_far) : Domain.t) {ProcData.extras} (node : CFG.Node.t) instr :
Domain.t =
let {basic_cost_map= invariant_map_cost; get_node_nb_exec; summary} = extras in
let cost_node =
let instr_node_id = CFG.Node.id node in
match AnalyzerNodesBasicCost.extract_post instr_node_id invariant_map_cost with
| Some node_map ->
L.(debug Analysis Medium)
"@\n [AnalyzerWCET] Final map for node: %a @\n" CFG.Node.pp_id instr_node_id ;
map_operation_cost get_node_nb_exec node_map
| _ ->
assert false
in
L.(debug Analysis Medium)
"@\n[>>>AnalyzerWCET] Instr: %a Cost: %a@\n"
(Sil.pp_instr ~print_types:false Pp.text)
instr BasicCost.pp cost_node ;
let astate' =
let und_node = CFG.Node.underlying_node node in
let preds = Procdesc.Node.get_preds und_node in
let reported_so_far =
if
should_report_on_instr instr
&& should_report_on_node (und_node :: preds) reported_so_far
&& should_report_cost cost_node
then (
do_report summary (Sil.instr_get_loc instr) cost_node ;
let nid = Procdesc.Node.get_id und_node in
ReportedOnNodes.add nid reported_so_far )
else reported_so_far
in
let cost_map =
CostDomain.mk_cost_record ~operation_cost:cost_node ~allocation_cost:BasicCost.zero
let exec_node {current_cost; report_on_threshold} {basic_cost_map; get_node_nb_exec; summary}
instr_node =
let node_cost =
match NodesBasicCostDomain.find_opt (InstrCFG.Node.id instr_node) basic_cost_map with
| None ->
BasicCost.zero
| Some instr_cost_record ->
let instr_cost = CostDomain.get_operation_cost instr_cost_record in
let node_id = InstrCFG.Node.underlying_node instr_node |> Node.id in
let nb_exec = get_node_nb_exec node_id in
BasicCost.mult instr_cost nb_exec
in
let current_cost = BasicCost.plus current_cost node_cost in
let report_on_threshold =
if report_on_threshold && should_report_cost current_cost then (
do_report summary (InstrCFG.Node.loc instr_node) current_cost ;
false )
else report_on_threshold
in
{current_cost; report_on_threshold}
let rec exec_partition astate extras
(partition : InstrCFG.Node.t WeakTopologicalOrder.Partition.t) =
match partition with
| Empty ->
astate
| Node {node; next} ->
let astate = exec_node astate extras node in
exec_partition astate extras next
| Component {head; rest; next} ->
let {current_cost; report_on_threshold} = astate in
let {current_cost} =
exec_partition {current_cost; report_on_threshold= false} extras rest
in
(* Execute head after the loop body to always report at loop head *)
let astate = exec_node {current_cost; report_on_threshold} extras head in
exec_partition astate extras next
let compute pdata =
let ProcData.({pdesc; extras}) = pdata in
let cfg = InstrCFG.from_pdesc pdesc in
let initial = {current_cost= BasicCost.zero; report_on_threshold= Config.use_cost_threshold} in
let {current_cost} = exec_partition initial extras (InstrCFG.wto cfg) in
CostDomain.mk_cost_record ~operation_cost:current_cost ~allocation_cost:BasicCost.zero
~io_cost:BasicCost.zero
in
(cost_map, reported_so_far)
in
astate'
let pp_session_name _node fmt = F.pp_print_string fmt "cost(wcet)"
end
module AnalyzerWCET = AbstractInterpreter.MakeRPO (TransferFunctionsWCET)
let check_and_report_top_and_bottom cost_record proc_desc summary =
let cost = CostDomain.get_operation_cost cost_record in
let report issue suffix =
@ -761,10 +729,20 @@ let checker {Callbacks.tenv; proc_desc; integer_type_widths; summary} : Summary.
let inferbo_invariant_map =
BufferOverrunAnalysis.cached_compute_invariant_map proc_desc tenv integer_type_widths
in
let basic_cost_map_opt =
let proc_data =
ProcData.make proc_desc tenv
TransferFunctionsNodesBasicCost.{inferbo_invariant_map; integer_type_widths}
in
(*compute_WCET cfg invariant_map min_trees in *)
AnalyzerNodesBasicCost.compute_post proc_data ~initial:NodesBasicCostDomain.empty
in
match basic_cost_map_opt with
| Some basic_cost_map ->
let node_cfg = NodeCFG.from_pdesc proc_desc in
let proc_data = ProcData.make_default proc_desc tenv in
(* computes reaching defs: node -> (var -> node set) *)
let reaching_defs_invariant_map =
let proc_data = ProcData.make_default proc_desc tenv in
ReachingDefs.Analyzer.exec_cfg node_cfg proc_data
~initial:(ReachingDefs.init_reaching_defs_with_formals proc_desc)
in
@ -775,15 +753,6 @@ let checker {Callbacks.tenv; proc_desc; integer_type_widths; summary} : Summary.
let proc_data = ProcData.make proc_desc tenv control_maps in
Control.ControlDepAnalyzer.exec_cfg node_cfg proc_data ~initial:Control.ControlDepSet.empty
in
let instr_cfg = InstrCFG.from_pdesc proc_desc in
let invariant_map_NodesBasicCost =
let proc_data =
ProcData.make proc_desc tenv
TransferFunctionsNodesBasicCost.{inferbo_invariant_map; integer_type_widths}
in
(*compute_WCET cfg invariant_map min_trees in *)
AnalyzerNodesBasicCost.exec_cfg instr_cfg proc_data ~initial:NodesBasicCostDomain.empty
in
(* compute loop invariant map for control var analysis *)
let loop_inv_map =
LoopInvariant.get_loop_inv_var_map tenv reaching_defs_invariant_map loop_head_to_loop_nodes
@ -811,13 +780,10 @@ let checker {Callbacks.tenv; proc_desc; integer_type_widths; summary} : Summary.
if Config.write_html then NodePrinter.finish_session start_node ;
ConstraintSolver.get_node_nb_exec equalities
in
let initWCET = (CostDomain.zero_record, ReportedOnNodes.empty) in
match
AnalyzerWCET.compute_post ~initial:initWCET
(ProcData.make proc_desc tenv
{basic_cost_map= invariant_map_NodesBasicCost; get_node_nb_exec; summary})
with
| Some (exit_cost_record, _) ->
let exit_cost_record =
let proc_data = ProcData.make proc_desc tenv {basic_cost_map; get_node_nb_exec; summary} in
WCET.compute proc_data
in
L.(debug Analysis Verbose)
"@\n[COST ANALYSIS] PROCEDURE '%a' |CFG| = %i FINAL COST = %a @\n" Typ.Procname.pp
(Procdesc.get_proc_name proc_desc)

133
infer/tests/codetoanalyze/c/performance/issues.exp
Unescape View File

@ -1,190 +1,69 @@
codetoanalyze/c/performance/break.c, break_constant, 0, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 8 + 5 ⋅ p + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, p)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/break.c, break_loop, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 5 ⋅ p + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, p)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/break.c, break_loop, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 5 ⋅ p + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, p)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/break.c, break_loop, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 5 ⋅ p + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, p)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/break.c, break_loop, 7, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 6 + 5 ⋅ p + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, p)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/break.c, break_loop_with_t, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 5 ⋅ p + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, p)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/break.c, break_loop_with_t, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 5 ⋅ p + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, p)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/break.c, break_loop_with_t, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 5 ⋅ p + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, p)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/break.c, break_loop_with_t, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 5 + 5 ⋅ p + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, p)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, compound_while, 3, CONDITION_ALWAYS_TRUE, no_bucket, WARNING, [Here]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, compound_while, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 6 + 3 ⋅ m + 4 ⋅ (1+max(0, m)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, compound_while, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 6 + 3 ⋅ m + 4 ⋅ (1+max(0, m)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, compound_while, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 6 + 3 ⋅ m + 4 ⋅ (1+max(0, m)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, compound_while, 6, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 8 + 3 ⋅ m + 4 ⋅ (1+max(0, m)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, nested_while_and_or, 3, CONDITION_ALWAYS_TRUE, no_bucket, WARNING, [Here]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, nested_while_and_or, 3, CONDITION_ALWAYS_TRUE, no_bucket, WARNING, [Here]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, nested_while_and_or, 4, CONDITION_ALWAYS_TRUE, no_bucket, WARNING, [Here]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, nested_while_and_or, 4, CONDITION_ALWAYS_TRUE, no_bucket, WARNING, [Here]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, simplified_simulated_while_with_and, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 604, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, simplified_simulated_while_with_and, 5, CONDITION_ALWAYS_TRUE, no_bucket, WARNING, [Here]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, simplified_simulated_while_with_and, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 605, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, simplified_simulated_while_with_and, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 604, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, simplified_simulated_while_with_and, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 604, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, simplified_simulated_while_with_and, 8, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 606, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, simulated_nested_loop_with_and, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3530, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, simplified_simulated_while_with_and, 6, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 604, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, simulated_nested_loop_with_and, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3530, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, simulated_nested_loop_with_and, 6, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3530, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, simulated_nested_loop_with_and, 7, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([0, +oo] + 1):signed32]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, simulated_nested_loop_with_and, 8, CONDITION_ALWAYS_TRUE, no_bucket, WARNING, [Here]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, simulated_nested_loop_with_and, 8, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3530, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, simulated_nested_loop_with_and, 8, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3530, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, simulated_nested_loop_with_and, 12, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3532, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, simulated_while_shortcut, 5, CONDITION_ALWAYS_FALSE, no_bucket, WARNING, [Here]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, simulated_while_with_and, 4, CONDITION_ALWAYS_TRUE, no_bucket, WARNING, [Here]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, simulated_while_with_and, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 5 + 3 ⋅ p + 4 ⋅ (1+max(0, p)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, simulated_while_with_and, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 5 + 3 ⋅ p + 4 ⋅ (1+max(0, p)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, simulated_while_with_and, 10, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 5 + 3 ⋅ p + 4 ⋅ (1+max(0, p)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, simulated_while_with_and, 13, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 7 + 3 ⋅ p + 4 ⋅ (1+max(0, p)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, simulated_while_with_and, 11, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 5 + 3 ⋅ p + 4 ⋅ (1+max(0, p)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, while_and_or, 0, INFINITE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, []
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, while_and_or, 2, CONDITION_ALWAYS_TRUE, no_bucket, WARNING, [Here]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/compound_loop_guard.c, while_and_or, 3, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([0, +oo] + 1):signed32]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test.c, alias_OK, 5, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [Binary operation: ([-oo, +oo] + 1):signed32]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test.c, call_while_upto20_minus100_bad, 0, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 726, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test.c, loop0_bad, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1104, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test.c, loop0_bad, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1104, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test.c, loop0_bad, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1106, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test.c, loop1_bad, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1207, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test.c, loop1_bad, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1207, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test.c, loop1_bad, 6, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1209, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test.c, loop2_bad, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 10 ⋅ k + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, k)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test.c, loop2_bad, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 10 ⋅ k + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, k)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test.c, loop2_bad, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 5 + 10 ⋅ k + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, k)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test.c, main_bad, 8, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 214, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test.c, while_upto20_bad, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + 6 ⋅ (-m + 20), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test.c, while_upto20_bad, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + 6 ⋅ (-m + 20), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test.c, while_upto20_bad, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 4 + 6 ⋅ (-m + 20), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, if_bad_loop, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 235, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, if_bad_loop, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 235, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, if_bad_loop, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 235, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, if_bad_loop, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 235, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, if_bad_loop, 4, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([3, +oo] + 1):signed32]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, if_bad_loop, 6, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 235, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, if_bad_loop, 7, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 235, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, if_bad_loop, 8, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 235, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, if_bad_loop, 12, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 237, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, loop_despite_inferbo, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1307, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, loop_despite_inferbo, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1307, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, loop_despite_inferbo, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1307, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, loop_despite_inferbo, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1307, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, loop_despite_inferbo, 9, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1309, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, loop_no_dep1, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 609, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, loop_no_dep1, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 609, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, loop_no_dep1, 4, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([0, +oo] + 1):signed32]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, loop_no_dep1, 6, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 611, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, loop_no_dep2, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 614, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, loop_no_dep2, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 614, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, loop_no_dep2, 4, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([0, +oo] + 1):signed32]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, loop_no_dep2, 6, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 616, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, nested_loop, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2551, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, nested_loop, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2551, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, nested_loop, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2551, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, nested_loop, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2551, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, nested_loop, 6, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2551, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, nested_loop, 9, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2553, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, real_while, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 217, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, real_while, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 217, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, real_while, 4, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Assignment,<RHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([0, +oo] + [0, 29]):signed32]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, real_while, 7, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 219, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, simulated_nested_loop, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2530, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, simulated_nested_loop, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2530, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, simulated_nested_loop, 6, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2530, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, simulated_nested_loop, 7, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([0, +oo] + 1):signed32]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, simulated_nested_loop, 8, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2530, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, simulated_nested_loop, 11, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2532, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, simulated_nested_loop_cond_in_goto, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3535, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, simulated_nested_loop_cond_in_goto, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3535, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, simulated_nested_loop_cond_in_goto, 6, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3535, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, simulated_nested_loop_cond_in_goto, 7, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3535, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, simulated_nested_loop_cond_in_goto, 9, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3535, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, simulated_nested_loop_cond_in_goto, 11, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3535, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, simulated_nested_loop_cond_in_goto, 12, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3535, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, simulated_nested_loop_cond_in_goto, 18, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3537, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, simulated_nested_loop_more_expensive, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2535, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, simulated_nested_loop_more_expensive, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2535, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, simulated_nested_loop_more_expensive, 6, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2535, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, simulated_nested_loop_more_expensive, 8, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2535, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, simulated_nested_loop_more_expensive, 11, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2535, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, simulated_nested_loop_more_expensive, 14, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2537, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, simulated_while, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 217, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, simulated_while, 10, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 217, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, simulated_while, 10, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Assignment,<RHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([0, +oo] + [0, 29]):signed32]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, simulated_while, 14, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 219, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, simulated_while, 12, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 217, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, two_loops, 5, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([3, +oo] + 1):signed32]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, two_loops, 7, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 551, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, two_loops, 8, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 551, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/cost_test_deps.c, two_loops, 10, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 553, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/instantiate.c, do_2K_times_Bad, 0, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 16007, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/instantiate.c, do_half_m2_times, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 6 ⋅ (m - 1) × m + 8 ⋅ m + 2 ⋅ m × (max(1, m)) + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, m)), degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/instantiate.c, do_half_m2_times, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 6 ⋅ (m - 1) × m + 8 ⋅ m + 2 ⋅ m × (max(1, m)) + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, m)), degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/instantiate.c, do_m2_times, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 8 ⋅ m + 6 ⋅ m² + 2 ⋅ m × (1+max(0, m)) + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, m)), degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/instantiate.c, do_m2_times, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 8 ⋅ m + 6 ⋅ m² + 2 ⋅ m × (1+max(0, m)) + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, m)), degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/instantiate.c, do_n_times, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 6 ⋅ n + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, n)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/instantiate.c, do_n_times, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 6 ⋅ n + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, n)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/invariant.c, do_k_times, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 6 + 3 ⋅ n + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, n)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/invariant.c, do_k_times, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 6 + 3 ⋅ n + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, n)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/invariant.c, do_k_times_array, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 6 + 6 ⋅ n + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, n)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/invariant.c, do_k_times_array, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 6 + 6 ⋅ n + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, n)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/invariant.c, do_n_m_times_nested, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 9 + 6 ⋅ n + 3 ⋅ n × m + 2 ⋅ n × (1+max(0, m)) + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, n)), degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/invariant.c, do_n_m_times_nested, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 9 + 6 ⋅ n + 3 ⋅ n × m + 2 ⋅ n × (1+max(0, m)) + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, n)), degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/invariant.c, do_n_m_times_nested, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 9 + 6 ⋅ n + 3 ⋅ n × m + 2 ⋅ n × (1+max(0, m)) + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, n)), degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/invariant.c, do_n_m_times_nested, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 9 + 6 ⋅ n + 3 ⋅ n × m + 2 ⋅ n × (1+max(0, m)) + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, n)), degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/invariant.c, do_n_m_times_nested, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 9 + 6 ⋅ n + 3 ⋅ n × m + 2 ⋅ n × (1+max(0, m)) + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, n)), degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/invariant.c, two_loops_nested_invariant, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 8 + 24 ⋅ p + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, p)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/invariant.c, two_loops_nested_invariant, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 8 + 24 ⋅ p + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, p)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/invariant.c, two_loops_nested_invariant, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 8 + 24 ⋅ p + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, p)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/invariant.c, two_loops_nested_invariant, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 8 + 24 ⋅ p + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, p)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/invariant.c, two_loops_nested_invariant, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 8 + 24 ⋅ p + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, p)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/invariant.c, while_infinite_FN, 2, CONDITION_ALWAYS_TRUE, no_bucket, WARNING, [Here]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/jump_inside_loop.c, jump_inside_loop, 7, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2004, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/jump_inside_loop.c, jump_inside_loop, 9, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2004, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/jump_inside_loop.c, jump_inside_loop, 11, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2006, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/loops.c, do_while_independent_of_p, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 227, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/loops.c, do_while_independent_of_p, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 227, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/loops.c, do_while_independent_of_p, 6, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 227, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/loops.c, do_while_independent_of_p, 7, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 227, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/loops.c, do_while_independent_of_p, 7, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 228, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/loops.c, if_in_loop, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 379, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/jump_inside_loop.c, jump_inside_loop, 8, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2004, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/loops.c, do_while_independent_of_p, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 227, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/loops.c, if_in_loop, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 379, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/loops.c, if_in_loop, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 379, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/loops.c, if_in_loop, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 379, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/loops.c, if_in_loop, 5, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([0, +oo] + 1):signed32]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/loops.c, if_in_loop, 7, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 379, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/loops.c, if_in_loop, 8, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 379, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/loops.c, if_in_loop, 9, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 379, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/loops.c, if_in_loop, 13, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 381, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/loops.c, if_out_loop, 7, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 612, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/loops.c, if_out_loop, 8, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 612, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/loops.c, if_out_loop, 11, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 617, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/loops.c, if_out_loop, 7, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 615, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/loops.c, larger_state_FN, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1006, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/loops.c, larger_state_FN, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1006, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/loops.c, larger_state_FN, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1006, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/loops.c, larger_state_FN, 7, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1006, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/loops.c, loop_use_global_vars, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 4 ⋅ x + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, x)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/loops.c, loop_use_global_vars, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 4 ⋅ x + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, x)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/loops.c, loop_use_global_vars, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 4 + 4 ⋅ x + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, x)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/purity.c, loop, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 7006, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/purity.c, loop, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 7006, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/purity.c, loop, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 7006, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/purity.c, loop, 6, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 7008, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/switch_continue.c, test_switch, 3, CONDITION_ALWAYS_TRUE, no_bucket, WARNING, [Here]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/switch_continue.c, test_switch, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 602, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/switch_continue.c, test_switch, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 602, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/switch_continue.c, test_switch, 11, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 602, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/switch_continue.c, test_switch, 17, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 602, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/switch_continue.c, test_switch, 19, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 602, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/switch_continue.c, unroll_loop_FP, 0, INFINITE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, []
codetoanalyze/c/performance/switch_continue.c, unroll_loop_FP, 6, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([0, +oo] + 1):signed32]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/switch_continue.c, unroll_loop_FP, 9, CONDITION_ALWAYS_TRUE, no_bucket, WARNING, [Here]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/two_loops_symbolic.c, two_loops_symb, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 5 + 6 ⋅ m + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, m)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/two_loops_symbolic.c, two_loops_symb, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 5 + 6 ⋅ m + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, m)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/two_loops_symbolic.c, two_loops_symb, 6, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 7 + 6 ⋅ m + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, m)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/two_loops_symbolic.c, two_loops_symb, 6, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 8 + 12 ⋅ m + 4 ⋅ (1+max(0, m)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/two_loops_symbolic.c, two_loops_symb, 7, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 8 + 12 ⋅ m + 4 ⋅ (1+max(0, m)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/two_loops_symbolic.c, two_loops_symb, 9, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 10 + 12 ⋅ m + 4 ⋅ (1+max(0, m)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/two_loops_symbolic.c, two_loops_symb_diff, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 5 + 6 ⋅ m + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, m)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/two_loops_symbolic.c, two_loops_symb_diff, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 5 + 6 ⋅ m + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, m)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/two_loops_symbolic.c, two_loops_symb_diff, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 7 + 6 ⋅ m + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, m)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/two_loops_symbolic.c, two_loops_symb_diff, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 8 + 6 ⋅ k + 6 ⋅ m + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, k)) + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, m)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/two_loops_symbolic.c, two_loops_symb_diff, 6, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 8 + 6 ⋅ k + 6 ⋅ m + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, k)) + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, m)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/c/performance/two_loops_symbolic.c, two_loops_symb_diff, 8, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 10 + 6 ⋅ k + 6 ⋅ m + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, k)) + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, m)), degree = 1]

101
infer/tests/codetoanalyze/java/performance/issues.exp
Unescape View File

@ -1,18 +1,11 @@
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Array.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Array.array_access_overrun_bad():void, 4, BUFFER_OVERRUN_L2, no_bucket, ERROR, [<Offset trace>,Assignment,<Length trace>,Array declaration,Assignment,Array access: Offset: [2, 8] Size: 8]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Array.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Array.array_access_weird_ok(long[],int):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + 15 ⋅ length, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Array.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Array.array_access_weird_ok(long[],int):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 15 ⋅ length, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Array.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Array.array_access_weird_ok(long[],int):void, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + 15 ⋅ length, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayCost.java, ArrayCost.ArrayCost(int[]):void, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 7 + 5 ⋅ mag.length, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayCost.java, ArrayCost.ArrayCost(int[]):void, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 6 + 5 ⋅ mag.length, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayCost.java, ArrayCost.isPowOfTwo_FP(int):boolean, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 883, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayCost.java, ArrayCost.isPowOfTwo_FP(int):boolean, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 884, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayCost.java, ArrayCost.isPowOfTwo_FP(int):boolean, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 883, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayCost.java, ArrayCost.isPowOfTwo_FP(int):boolean, 12, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 890, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.arraylist_add3_overrun_bad():void, 5, BUFFER_OVERRUN_L1, no_bucket, ERROR, [<Length trace>,Array declaration,Through,Through,Through,Array access: Offset added: 4 Size: 3]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.arraylist_addAll_bad():void, 10, BUFFER_OVERRUN_L1, no_bucket, ERROR, [<Length trace>,Array declaration,Through,Through,Through,Array access: Offset added: 5 Size: 4]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.arraylist_add_in_loop_FP():void, 0, INFINITE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, []
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.arraylist_add_in_loop_FP():void, 5, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([0, +oo] + 1):signed32]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.arraylist_add_in_loop_ok():void, 19, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 202, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.arraylist_add_in_loop_ok():void, 19, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 201, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.arraylist_empty_overrun_bad():void, 2, BUFFER_OVERRUN_L1, no_bucket, ERROR, [<Length trace>,Array declaration,Array access: Offset added: 1 Size: 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.arraylist_empty_underrun_bad():void, 2, BUFFER_OVERRUN_L1, no_bucket, ERROR, [<Length trace>,Array declaration,Array access: Offset added: -1 Size: 0]
@ -27,35 +20,18 @@ codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.arraylist_set_o
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.arraylist_set_underrun_bad():void, 2, BUFFER_OVERRUN_L1, no_bucket, ERROR, [<Length trace>,Array declaration,Array access: Offset: 0 Size: 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.call_sortArrayList(java.util.ArrayList):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 4 + list.length × log(list.length), degree = 1 + 1⋅log]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.iterate_over_arraylist(java.util.ArrayList):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 6 + 5 ⋅ list.length, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.iterate_over_arraylist(java.util.ArrayList):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 7 + 5 ⋅ list.length, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.iterate_over_arraylist_shortcut_FP(java.util.ArrayList):boolean, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 5 + 13 ⋅ (list.length - 1) + 2 ⋅ (list.length - 1) × (-Integer.intValue().lb + 11) + 4 ⋅ list.length × (-Integer.intValue().lb + 11), degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.iterate_over_arraylist_shortcut_FP(java.util.ArrayList):boolean, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 6 + 13 ⋅ (list.length - 1) + 2 ⋅ (list.length - 1) × (-Integer.intValue().lb + 11) + 4 ⋅ list.length × (-Integer.intValue().lb + 11), degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.iterate_over_arraylist_shortcut_FP(java.util.ArrayList):boolean, 2, BUFFER_OVERRUN_U5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<Length trace>,Unknown value from: __cast,Assignment,Array access: Offset: [-oo, +oo] Size: [0, +oo]]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.iterate_over_arraylist_shortcut_FP(java.util.ArrayList):boolean, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 5 + 13 ⋅ (list.length - 1) + 2 ⋅ (list.length - 1) × (-Integer.intValue().lb + 11) + 4 ⋅ list.length × (-Integer.intValue().lb + 11), degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.iterate_over_arraylist_shortcut_FP(java.util.ArrayList):boolean, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 6 + 13 ⋅ (list.length - 1) + 2 ⋅ (list.length - 1) × (-Integer.intValue().lb + 11) + 4 ⋅ list.length × (-Integer.intValue().lb + 11), degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.iterate_over_arraylist_with_inner(java.util.ArrayList):void, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 8 + 13 ⋅ (list1.length - 1) + 4 ⋅ list1.length, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.iterate_over_arraylist_with_inner(java.util.ArrayList):void, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 9 + 13 ⋅ (list1.length - 1) + 4 ⋅ list1.length, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.iterate_over_local_arraylist(java.util.ArrayList):void, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 8 + 5 ⋅ list.length, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.iterate_over_local_arraylist(java.util.ArrayList):void, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 9 + 5 ⋅ list.length, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.iterate_while_has_next(java.util.ArrayList):void, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 5 + 12 ⋅ (list.length - 1) + 4 ⋅ list.length, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.iterate_while_has_next(java.util.ArrayList):void, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 6 + 12 ⋅ (list.length - 1) + 4 ⋅ list.length, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.iterate_while_has_next(java.util.ArrayList):void, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 5 + 12 ⋅ (list.length - 1) + 4 ⋅ list.length, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.iterate_with_iterator(java.util.ArrayList):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 5 + 9 ⋅ (list.length - 1) + 4 ⋅ list.length, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.iterate_with_iterator(java.util.ArrayList):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 6 + 9 ⋅ (list.length - 1) + 4 ⋅ list.length, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.remove_string_from_list(java.lang.String):boolean, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 6 + 14 ⋅ (this.list.length - 1) + 4 ⋅ this.list.length, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.remove_string_from_list(java.lang.String):boolean, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 7 + 14 ⋅ (this.list.length - 1) + 4 ⋅ this.list.length, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.remove_string_from_list(java.lang.String):boolean, 3, BUFFER_OVERRUN_U5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<Length trace>,Unknown value from: __cast,Array access: Offset: [-oo, +oo] Size: [0, +oo]]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.remove_string_from_list(java.lang.String):boolean, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 6 + 14 ⋅ (this.list.length - 1) + 4 ⋅ this.list.length, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.remove_string_from_list(java.lang.String):boolean, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 7 + 14 ⋅ (this.list.length - 1) + 4 ⋅ this.list.length, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.remove_string_from_list(java.lang.String):boolean, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 12 + 14 ⋅ (this.list.length - 1) + 4 ⋅ this.list.length, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.sortArrayList(java.util.ArrayList):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + list.length × log(list.length), degree = 1 + 1⋅log]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Break.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Break.break_constant(int):int, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 10 + 7 ⋅ p, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Break.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Break.break_loop(int,int):int, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + 7 ⋅ p, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Break.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Break.break_loop(int,int):int, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 7 ⋅ p, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Break.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Break.break_outer_loop_MaybeInfinite(int,int):void, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 4 ⋅ maxI + 3 ⋅ maxI × (min(12, maxJ)) + 5 ⋅ maxI × (12-max(0, maxJ)) + 5 ⋅ (min(11, maxI)) × (min(11, maxJ)), degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Break.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Break.break_outer_loop_MaybeInfinite(int,int):void, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + 4 ⋅ maxI + 3 ⋅ maxI × (min(12, maxJ)) + 5 ⋅ maxI × (12-max(0, maxJ)) + 5 ⋅ (min(11, maxI)) × (min(11, maxJ)), degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Break.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Break.break_outer_loop_MaybeInfinite(int,int):void, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + 4 ⋅ maxI + 3 ⋅ maxI × (min(12, maxJ)) + 5 ⋅ maxI × (12-max(0, maxJ)) + 5 ⋅ (min(11, maxI)) × (min(11, maxJ)), degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Break.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Break.break_outer_loop_MaybeInfinite(int,int):void, 7, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + 4 ⋅ maxI + 3 ⋅ maxI × (min(12, maxJ)) + 5 ⋅ maxI × (12-max(0, maxJ)) + 5 ⋅ (min(11, maxI)) × (min(11, maxJ)), degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/CantHandle.java, CantHandle.quadratic_FP(int):void, 0, INFINITE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, []
codetoanalyze/java/performance/CantHandle.java, CantHandle.quadratic_FP(int):void, 1, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Parameter `x`,<RHS trace>,Parameter `x`,Binary operation: (x × x):signed32]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/CantHandle.java, CantHandle.quadratic_FP(int):void, 1, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([0, +oo] + 1):signed32]
@ -66,22 +42,13 @@ codetoanalyze/java/performance/CantHandle.java, CantHandle.square_root_variant_F
codetoanalyze/java/performance/CantHandle.java, CantHandle.square_root_variant_FP(int):void, 3, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([0, +oo] + 1):signed32]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/CollectionTest.java, CollectionTest.ensure_call(CollectionTest$MyCollection):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 13 + 5 ⋅ list.length, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/CollectionTest.java, CollectionTest.iterate_over_call_quad(int,CollectionTest$MyCollection):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 5 + 21 ⋅ (list.length - 1) + 5 ⋅ (list.length - 1) × list.length + 4 ⋅ list.length, degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/CollectionTest.java, CollectionTest.iterate_over_call_quad(int,CollectionTest$MyCollection):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 6 + 21 ⋅ (list.length - 1) + 5 ⋅ (list.length - 1) × list.length + 4 ⋅ list.length, degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/CollectionTest.java, CollectionTest.iterate_over_mycollection(CollectionTest$MyCollection):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 7 + 5 ⋅ list.length, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/CollectionTest.java, CollectionTest.iterate_over_mycollection(CollectionTest$MyCollection):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 6 + 5 ⋅ list.length, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/CollectionTest.java, CollectionTest.iterate_over_mycollection_quad_FN(java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentLinkedQueue):void, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 6 + 21 ⋅ (mSubscribers.length - 1) + 4 ⋅ mSubscribers.length, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/CollectionTest.java, CollectionTest.iterate_over_mycollection_quad_FN(java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentLinkedQueue):void, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 5 + 21 ⋅ (mSubscribers.length - 1) + 4 ⋅ mSubscribers.length, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/CollectionTest.java, CollectionTest.iterate_over_some_java_collection(java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentLinkedQueue):void, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 5 + 9 ⋅ (mSubscribers.length - 1) + 4 ⋅ mSubscribers.length, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/CollectionTest.java, CollectionTest.iterate_over_some_java_collection(java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentLinkedQueue):void, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 6 + 9 ⋅ (mSubscribers.length - 1) + 4 ⋅ mSubscribers.length, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/CollectionTest.java, CollectionTest.loop_over_call(int,CollectionTest$MyCollection):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 17 ⋅ size + 5 ⋅ size × list.length, degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/CollectionTest.java, CollectionTest.loop_over_call(int,CollectionTest$MyCollection):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + 17 ⋅ size + 5 ⋅ size × list.length, degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/CollectionTest.java, CollectionTest.nested_iterator_qubic(int,CollectionTest$MyCollection,CollectionTest$MyCollection):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 5 + 15 ⋅ (list1.length - 1) + 33 ⋅ (list1.length - 1) × (list2.length - 1) + 10 ⋅ (list1.length - 1) × (list2.length - 1) × list1.length + 4 ⋅ (list1.length - 1) × list2.length + 4 ⋅ list1.length, degree = 3]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/CollectionTest.java, CollectionTest.nested_iterator_qubic(int,CollectionTest$MyCollection,CollectionTest$MyCollection):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 6 + 15 ⋅ (list1.length - 1) + 33 ⋅ (list1.length - 1) × (list2.length - 1) + 10 ⋅ (list1.length - 1) × (list2.length - 1) × list1.length + 4 ⋅ (list1.length - 1) × list2.length + 4 ⋅ list1.length, degree = 3]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/CollectionTest.java, CollectionTest.nested_iterator_qubic(int,CollectionTest$MyCollection,CollectionTest$MyCollection):void, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 5 + 15 ⋅ (list1.length - 1) + 33 ⋅ (list1.length - 1) × (list2.length - 1) + 10 ⋅ (list1.length - 1) × (list2.length - 1) × list1.length + 4 ⋅ (list1.length - 1) × list2.length + 4 ⋅ list1.length, degree = 3]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/CollectionTest.java, CollectionTest.nested_iterator_qubic(int,CollectionTest$MyCollection,CollectionTest$MyCollection):void, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 5 + 15 ⋅ (list1.length - 1) + 33 ⋅ (list1.length - 1) × (list2.length - 1) + 10 ⋅ (list1.length - 1) × (list2.length - 1) × list1.length + 4 ⋅ (list1.length - 1) × list2.length + 4 ⋅ list1.length, degree = 3]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Compound_loop.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Compound_loop.compound_while(int):int, 3, CONDITION_ALWAYS_TRUE, no_bucket, WARNING, [Here]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Compound_loop.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Compound_loop.compound_while(int):int, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 4 + 5 ⋅ m + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, m)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Compound_loop.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Compound_loop.compound_while(int):int, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 4 + 5 ⋅ m + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, m)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Compound_loop.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Compound_loop.nested_while_and_or(int):int, 3, CONDITION_ALWAYS_TRUE, no_bucket, WARNING, [Here]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Compound_loop.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Compound_loop.nested_while_and_or(int):int, 3, CONDITION_ALWAYS_TRUE, no_bucket, WARNING, [Here]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Compound_loop.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Compound_loop.nested_while_and_or(int):int, 4, CONDITION_ALWAYS_TRUE, no_bucket, WARNING, [Here]
@ -89,124 +56,62 @@ codetoanalyze/java/performance/Compound_loop.java, codetoanalyze.java.performanc
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Compound_loop.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Compound_loop.while_and_or(int):void, 0, INFINITE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, []
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Compound_loop.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Compound_loop.while_and_or(int):void, 2, CONDITION_ALWAYS_TRUE, no_bucket, WARNING, [Here]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Compound_loop.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Compound_loop.while_and_or(int):void, 3, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([0, +oo] + 1):signed32]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Continue.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Continue.continue_outer_loop():int, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 7963050, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Continue.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Continue.continue_outer_loop():int, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 7963049, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Continue.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Continue.continue_outer_loop():int, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 7963049, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Continue.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Continue.continue_outer_loop():int, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 7963049, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test.FN_loop2(int):int, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 13 ⋅ k, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test.FN_loop2(int):int, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + 13 ⋅ k, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test.loop0_bad():int, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1202, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test.loop0_bad():int, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1203, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test.loop1_bad():int, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1303, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test.loop1_bad():int, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1304, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test.loop3(int):int, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 238, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test.loop3(int):int, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 237, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test.main_bad():int, 7, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 205, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test.main_bad():int, 8, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 265, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test.main_bad():int, 8, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 229, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test.main_bad():int, 9, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 271, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.if_bad(int):void, 6, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 608, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.if_bad(int):void, 6, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 609, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.if_bad(int):void, 6, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 613, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.if_bad_loop():int, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 201, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.if_bad_loop():int, 4, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([3, +oo] + 1):signed32]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.loop_despite_inferbo(int):int, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1304, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.loop_despite_inferbo(int):int, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1303, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.loop_despite_inferbo(int):int, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1303, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.loop_no_dep1(int):int, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 606, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.loop_no_dep1(int):int, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 605, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.loop_no_dep1(int):int, 4, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([0, +oo] + 1):signed32]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.loop_no_dep2(int):int, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 611, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.loop_no_dep2(int):int, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 610, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.loop_no_dep2(int):int, 4, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([0, +oo] + 1):signed32]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.nested_loop():int, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2544, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.nested_loop():int, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2543, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.nested_loop():int, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2543, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.real_while():int, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 215, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.real_while():int, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 214, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.real_while():int, 4, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Assignment,<RHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([0, +oo] + [0, 29]):signed32]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.real_while():int, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 214, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.two_loops():int, 5, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([3, +oo] + 1):signed32]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.two_loops():int, 7, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 545, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.two_loops():int, 7, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 546, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/EvilCfg.java, EvilCfg.foo(int,int,boolean):void, 0, INFINITE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, []
codetoanalyze/java/performance/FieldAccess.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.FieldAccess.iterate_upto_field_size(codetoanalyze.java.performance.FieldAccess$Test):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + 6 ⋅ test.a, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/FieldAccess.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.FieldAccess.iterate_upto_field_size(codetoanalyze.java.performance.FieldAccess$Test):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 6 ⋅ test.a, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Invariant.java, Invariant.do_while_invariant(int,int):void, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + 3 ⋅ (k - 1) + 4 ⋅ (max(1, k)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Invariant.java, Invariant.do_while_invariant(int,int):void, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + 3 ⋅ (k - 1) + 4 ⋅ (max(1, k)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Invariant.java, Invariant.do_while_invariant(int,int):void, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 3 ⋅ (k - 1) + 4 ⋅ (max(1, k)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Invariant.java, Invariant.formal_not_invariant_FP(int,int):void, 0, INFINITE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, []
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Invariant.java, Invariant.formal_not_invariant_FP(int,int):void, 2, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Parameter `size`,<RHS trace>,Parameter `x`,Binary operation: (size + [-oo, +oo]):signed32]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Invariant.java, Invariant.formal_not_invariant_FP(int,int):void, 6, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([0, +oo] + 1):signed32]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Invariant.java, Invariant.list_size_invariant(java.util.List):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + 5 ⋅ items.length + 4 ⋅ (items.length + 1), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Invariant.java, Invariant.list_size_invariant(java.util.List):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 5 ⋅ items.length + 4 ⋅ (items.length + 1), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Invariant.java, Invariant.local_not_invariant_FP(int):void, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 4 + 12 ⋅ (size + 5) + 7 ⋅ (size + 5) × (5+min(1, size)) + 4 ⋅ (5+min(0, size)), degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Invariant.java, Invariant.local_not_invariant_FP(int):void, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 12 ⋅ (size + 5) + 7 ⋅ (size + 5) × (5+min(1, size)) + 4 ⋅ (5+min(0, size)), degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Invariant.java, Invariant.local_not_invariant_FP(int):void, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 12 ⋅ (size + 5) + 7 ⋅ (size + 5) × (5+min(1, size)) + 4 ⋅ (5+min(0, size)), degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Invariant.java, Invariant.x_is_invariant_ok(int):void, 7, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 9 + 6 ⋅ (size + 20), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Invariant.java, Invariant.x_is_invariant_ok(int):void, 7, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 8 + 6 ⋅ (size + 20), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/IteratorTest.java, IteratorTest.appendTo(java.util.Iterator):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + 12 ⋅ (parts.length - 1) + 4 ⋅ parts.length, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/IteratorTest.java, IteratorTest.appendTo(java.util.Iterator):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1 + 12 ⋅ (parts.length - 1) + 4 ⋅ parts.length, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/IteratorTest.java, IteratorTest.appendTo(java.util.Iterator):void, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1 + 12 ⋅ (parts.length - 1) + 4 ⋅ parts.length, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/JsonArray.java, libraries.marauder.analytics.utils.json.JsonArray.addStringEntry(java.lang.String):void, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 52 + 74 ⋅ String.toCharArray().length.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/JsonMap.java, libraries.marauder.analytics.utils.json.JsonMap.addEntry(java.lang.String,boolean):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 60 + 74 ⋅ String.toCharArray().length.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/JsonMap.java, libraries.marauder.analytics.utils.json.JsonMap.addEntry(java.lang.String,boolean):void, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 64 + 74 ⋅ String.toCharArray().length.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/JsonMap.java, libraries.marauder.analytics.utils.json.JsonMap.addEntry(java.lang.String,double):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 60 + 74 ⋅ String.toCharArray().length.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/JsonMap.java, libraries.marauder.analytics.utils.json.JsonMap.addEntry(java.lang.String,double):void, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 64 + 74 ⋅ String.toCharArray().length.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/JsonMap.java, libraries.marauder.analytics.utils.json.JsonMap.addEntry(java.lang.String,java.lang.Object):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 60 + 74 ⋅ String.toCharArray().length.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/JsonMap.java, libraries.marauder.analytics.utils.json.JsonMap.addEntry(java.lang.String,java.lang.Object):void, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 64 + 74 ⋅ String.toCharArray().length.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/JsonMap.java, libraries.marauder.analytics.utils.json.JsonMap.addEntry(java.lang.String,java.lang.String):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 60 + 74 ⋅ String.toCharArray().length.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/JsonMap.java, libraries.marauder.analytics.utils.json.JsonMap.addEntry(java.lang.String,java.lang.String):void, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 64 + 74 ⋅ String.toCharArray().length.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/JsonMap.java, libraries.marauder.analytics.utils.json.JsonMap.addEntry(java.lang.String,libraries.marauder.analytics.utils.json.JsonType):void, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 87 + 74 ⋅ String.toCharArray().length.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/JsonMap.java, libraries.marauder.analytics.utils.json.JsonMap.addEntry(java.lang.String,libraries.marauder.analytics.utils.json.JsonType):void, 6, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 91 + 74 ⋅ String.toCharArray().length.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/JsonMap.java, libraries.marauder.analytics.utils.json.JsonMap.addEntry(java.lang.String,long):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 60 + 74 ⋅ String.toCharArray().length.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/JsonMap.java, libraries.marauder.analytics.utils.json.JsonMap.addEntry(java.lang.String,long):void, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 64 + 74 ⋅ String.toCharArray().length.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/JsonMap.java, libraries.marauder.analytics.utils.json.JsonMap.addKeyToMap(java.lang.String):void, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 52 + 74 ⋅ String.toCharArray().length.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/JsonString.java, libraries.marauder.analytics.utils.json.JsonString.<init>(java.lang.String), 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 44 + 74 ⋅ String.toCharArray().length.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/JsonString.java, libraries.marauder.analytics.utils.json.JsonString.<init>(java.lang.String), 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 50 + 74 ⋅ String.toCharArray().length.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/JsonUtils.java, libraries.marauder.analytics.utils.json.JsonUtils.escape(java.lang.StringBuilder,java.lang.String):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 11 + 74 ⋅ String.toCharArray().length.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/JsonUtils.java, libraries.marauder.analytics.utils.json.JsonUtils.escape(java.lang.StringBuilder,java.lang.String):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 10 + 74 ⋅ String.toCharArray().length.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/JsonUtils.java, libraries.marauder.analytics.utils.json.JsonUtils.escape(java.lang.StringBuilder,java.lang.String):void, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 10 + 74 ⋅ String.toCharArray().length.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/JsonUtils.java, libraries.marauder.analytics.utils.json.JsonUtils.escape(java.lang.StringBuilder,java.lang.String):void, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 10 + 74 ⋅ String.toCharArray().length.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/JsonUtils.java, libraries.marauder.analytics.utils.json.JsonUtils.escape(java.lang.StringBuilder,java.lang.String):void, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 10 + 74 ⋅ String.toCharArray().length.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/JsonUtils.java, libraries.marauder.analytics.utils.json.JsonUtils.escape(java.lang.StringBuilder,java.lang.String):void, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 10 + 74 ⋅ String.toCharArray().length.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/JsonUtils.java, libraries.marauder.analytics.utils.json.JsonUtils.serialize(java.lang.String):java.lang.StringBuilder, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 38 + 74 ⋅ String.toCharArray().length.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/JsonUtils.java, libraries.marauder.analytics.utils.json.JsonUtils.serialize(java.lang.StringBuilder,java.lang.String):void, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 22 + 74 ⋅ String.toCharArray().length.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/JsonUtils.java, libraries.marauder.analytics.utils.json.JsonUtils.serialize(java.lang.StringBuilder,java.lang.String):void, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 28 + 74 ⋅ String.toCharArray().length.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.do_while_independent_of_p(int):int, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 250, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.do_while_independent_of_p(int):int, 7, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 251, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.do_while_independent_of_p(int):int, 7, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 250, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.dumb0(long[],int):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 29 ⋅ (length - 1), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.dumb0(long[],int):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + 29 ⋅ (length - 1), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.dumb0(long[],int):void, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + 29 ⋅ (length - 1), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.dumbSort(long[],long[],int):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 4 + 71 ⋅ (length - 1)² + 8 ⋅ length, degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.dumbSort(long[],long[],int):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 71 ⋅ (length - 1)² + 8 ⋅ length, degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.dumbSort(long[],long[],int):void, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 71 ⋅ (length - 1)² + 8 ⋅ length, degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.dumbSort(long[],long[],int):void, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 71 ⋅ (length - 1)² + 8 ⋅ length, degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.dumbSort(long[],long[],int):void, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 71 ⋅ (length - 1)² + 8 ⋅ length, degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.dumbSort(long[],long[],int):void, 7, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 71 ⋅ (length - 1)² + 8 ⋅ length, degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.dumbSort(long[],long[],int):void, 9, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 71 ⋅ (length - 1)² + 8 ⋅ length, degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.nested_do_while_FP(int):void, 0, INFINITE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, []
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.nested_do_while_FP(int):void, 8, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([0, +oo] + 1):signed32]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.similar(codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops$C[],codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops$C[]):boolean, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 14 + 33 ⋅ x.length, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.similar(codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops$C[],codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops$C[]):boolean, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 13 + 33 ⋅ x.length, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.similar(codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops$C[],codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops$C[]):boolean, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 14 + 33 ⋅ x.length, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.similar(codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops$C[],codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops$C[]):boolean, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 13 + 33 ⋅ x.length, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.similar(codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops$C[],codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops$C[]):boolean, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 20 + 33 ⋅ x.length, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Switch.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Switch.test_switch():int, 3, CONDITION_ALWAYS_TRUE, no_bucket, WARNING, [Here]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Switch.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Switch.test_switch():int, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 798, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Switch.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Switch.test_switch():int, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 798, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Switch.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Switch.test_switch():int, 13, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 798, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Switch.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Switch.vanilla_switch(int):void, 2, CONDITION_ALWAYS_TRUE, no_bucket, WARNING, [Here]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/UnknownCallsTest.java, UnknownCallsTest.call_loop_over_charArray(java.lang.StringBuilder,java.lang.String):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 16 + 13 ⋅ String.toCharArray().length.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/UnknownCallsTest.java, UnknownCallsTest.jsonArray_linear(org.json.JSONArray):void, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 6 + 5 ⋅ JSONArray.length().ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/UnknownCallsTest.java, UnknownCallsTest.jsonArray_linear(org.json.JSONArray):void, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 7 + 5 ⋅ JSONArray.length().ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/UnknownCallsTest.java, UnknownCallsTest.jsonArray_quadratic(org.json.JSONArray):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + 5 ⋅ JSONArray.length().ub² + 4 ⋅ (1+max(0, JSONArray.length().ub)), degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/UnknownCallsTest.java, UnknownCallsTest.jsonArray_quadratic(org.json.JSONArray):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 5 ⋅ JSONArray.length().ub² + 4 ⋅ (1+max(0, JSONArray.length().ub)), degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/UnknownCallsTest.java, UnknownCallsTest.loop_over_charArray(java.lang.StringBuilder,java.lang.String):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 11 + 13 ⋅ String.toCharArray().length.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/UnknownCallsTest.java, UnknownCallsTest.loop_over_charArray(java.lang.StringBuilder,java.lang.String):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 10 + 13 ⋅ String.toCharArray().length.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/UnknownCallsTest.java, UnknownCallsTest.read_max_cost(java.io.InputStream,byte[],int,int,java.util.ArrayList):int, 0, INFINITE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, []
codetoanalyze/java/performance/UnknownCallsTest.java, UnknownCallsTest.read_max_cost(java.io.InputStream,byte[],int,int,java.util.ArrayList):int, 9, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([0, +oo] + 1):signed32]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/UnknownCallsTest.java, UnknownCallsTest.read_sum_cost(java.io.InputStream,byte[],int,int,java.util.ArrayList):int, 6, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 17 + 6 ⋅ (Math.min(...).ub + InputStream.read(...).ub), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/UnknownCallsTest.java, UnknownCallsTest.read_sum_cost(java.io.InputStream,byte[],int,int,java.util.ArrayList):int, 6, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 16 + 6 ⋅ (Math.min(...).ub + InputStream.read(...).ub), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/UnknownCallsTest.java, UnknownCallsTest.unmodeled_impure_linear(java.util.ArrayList):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 15 ⋅ list.length + 4 ⋅ (list.length + 1), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/UnknownCallsTest.java, UnknownCallsTest.unmodeled_impure_linear(java.util.ArrayList):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + 15 ⋅ list.length + 4 ⋅ (list.length + 1), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/UnknownCallsTest.java, UnknownCallsTest.unmodeled_impure_linear(java.util.ArrayList):void, 2, BUFFER_OVERRUN_U5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<Length trace>,Unknown value from: __cast,Array access: Offset: [-oo, +oo] Size: [0, +oo]]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/UnknownCallsTest.java, UnknownCallsTest.unmodeled_impure_linear(java.util.ArrayList):void, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + 15 ⋅ list.length + 4 ⋅ (list.length + 1), degree = 1]

Write Preview
Loading…
Cancel
Save