|
|
|
@ -939,7 +939,7 @@ let check_inconsistency_pi tenv pi =
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(** {2 Abduction prover} *)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
type subst2 = Sil.subst * Sil.subst
|
|
|
|
|
type subst2 = Sil.exp_subst * Sil.exp_subst
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
type exc_body =
|
|
|
|
|
| EXC_FALSE
|
|
|
|
@ -1089,7 +1089,7 @@ end = struct
|
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let d_missing sub = (* optional print of missing: if print something, prepend with newline *)
|
|
|
|
|
if !missing_pi <> [] || !missing_sigma <> [] || !missing_fld <> [] || !missing_typ <> [] || Sil.sub_to_list sub <> [] then
|
|
|
|
|
if !missing_pi <> [] || !missing_sigma <> [] || !missing_fld <> [] || !missing_typ <> [] || not (Sil.is_sub_empty sub) then
|
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
|
|
|
L.d_ln ();
|
|
|
|
|
L.d_str "[";
|
|
|
|
@ -1153,21 +1153,23 @@ end = struct
|
|
|
|
|
L.d_ln ()
|
|
|
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let d_impl = ProverState.d_implication
|
|
|
|
|
let d_impl_err = ProverState.d_implication_error
|
|
|
|
|
let d_impl (s1, s2) = ProverState.d_implication (`Exp s1, `Exp s2)
|
|
|
|
|
let d_impl_err (arg1, (s1, s2), arg3) =
|
|
|
|
|
ProverState.d_implication_error (arg1, (`Exp s1, `Exp s2), arg3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(** extend a substitution *)
|
|
|
|
|
let extend_sub sub v e =
|
|
|
|
|
let new_sub = Sil.sub_of_list [v, e] in
|
|
|
|
|
Sil.sub_join new_sub (Sil.sub_range_map (Sil.exp_sub new_sub) sub)
|
|
|
|
|
let new_exp_sub = Sil.exp_subst_of_list [v, e] in
|
|
|
|
|
let new_sub = `Exp new_exp_sub in
|
|
|
|
|
Sil.sub_join new_exp_sub (Sil.sub_range_map (Sil.exp_sub new_sub) sub)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(** Extend [sub1] and [sub2] to witnesses that each instance of
|
|
|
|
|
[e1[sub1]] is an instance of [e2[sub2]]. Raise IMPL_FALSE if not
|
|
|
|
|
possible. *)
|
|
|
|
|
let exp_imply tenv calc_missing subs e1_in e2_in : subst2 =
|
|
|
|
|
let e1 = Prop.exp_normalize_noabs tenv (fst subs) e1_in in
|
|
|
|
|
let e2 = Prop.exp_normalize_noabs tenv (snd subs) e2_in in
|
|
|
|
|
let var_imply subs v1 v2 : subst2 =
|
|
|
|
|
let exp_imply tenv calc_missing (subs : subst2) e1_in e2_in : subst2 =
|
|
|
|
|
let e1 = Prop.exp_normalize_noabs tenv (`Exp (fst subs)) e1_in in
|
|
|
|
|
let e2 = Prop.exp_normalize_noabs tenv (`Exp (snd subs)) e2_in in
|
|
|
|
|
let var_imply (subs : subst2) v1 v2 : subst2 =
|
|
|
|
|
match Ident.is_primed v1, Ident.is_primed v2 with
|
|
|
|
|
| false, false ->
|
|
|
|
|
if Ident.equal v1 v2 then subs
|
|
|
|
@ -1178,7 +1180,7 @@ let exp_imply tenv calc_missing subs e1_in e2_in : subst2 =
|
|
|
|
|
else raise (IMPL_EXC ("exps", subs, (EXC_FALSE_EXPS (e1, e2))))
|
|
|
|
|
| true, false -> raise (IMPL_EXC ("exps", subs, (EXC_FALSE_EXPS (e1, e2))))
|
|
|
|
|
| false, true ->
|
|
|
|
|
let sub2' = extend_sub (snd subs) v2 (Sil.exp_sub (fst subs) (Exp.Var v1)) in
|
|
|
|
|
let sub2' = extend_sub (snd subs) v2 (Sil.exp_sub (`Exp (fst subs)) (Exp.Var v1)) in
|
|
|
|
|
(fst subs, sub2')
|
|
|
|
|
| true, true ->
|
|
|
|
|
let v1' = Ident.create_fresh Ident.knormal in
|
|
|
|
@ -1328,7 +1330,7 @@ let rec sexp_imply tenv source calc_index_frame calc_missing subs se1 se2 typ2 :
|
|
|
|
|
subs', fld_frame_opt, fld_missing_opt
|
|
|
|
|
| Sil.Estruct _, Sil.Eexp (e2, _) ->
|
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
|
|
|
let e2' = Sil.exp_sub (snd subs) e2 in
|
|
|
|
|
let e2' = Sil.exp_sub (`Exp (snd subs)) e2 in
|
|
|
|
|
match e2' with
|
|
|
|
|
| Exp.Var id2 when Ident.is_primed id2 ->
|
|
|
|
|
let id2' = Ident.create_fresh Ident.knormal in
|
|
|
|
@ -1418,8 +1420,8 @@ and array_imply tenv source calc_index_frame calc_missing subs esel1 esel2 typ2
|
|
|
|
|
match esel1, esel2 with
|
|
|
|
|
| _,[] -> subs, esel1, []
|
|
|
|
|
| (e1, se1) :: esel1', (e2, se2) :: esel2' ->
|
|
|
|
|
let e1n = Prop.exp_normalize_noabs tenv (fst subs) e1 in
|
|
|
|
|
let e2n = Prop.exp_normalize_noabs tenv (snd subs) e2 in
|
|
|
|
|
let e1n = Prop.exp_normalize_noabs tenv (`Exp (fst subs)) e1 in
|
|
|
|
|
let e2n = Prop.exp_normalize_noabs tenv (`Exp (snd subs)) e2 in
|
|
|
|
|
let n = Exp.compare e1n e2n in
|
|
|
|
|
if n < 0 then array_imply tenv source calc_index_frame calc_missing subs esel1' esel2 typ2
|
|
|
|
|
else if n > 0 then array_imply tenv source calc_index_frame calc_missing subs esel1 esel2' typ2
|
|
|
|
@ -1433,10 +1435,10 @@ and array_imply tenv source calc_index_frame calc_missing subs esel1 esel2 typ2
|
|
|
|
|
let index_missing' = (e2, se2) :: index_missing in
|
|
|
|
|
subs'', index_frame, index_missing'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and sexp_imply_nolhs tenv source calc_missing subs se2 typ2 =
|
|
|
|
|
and sexp_imply_nolhs tenv source calc_missing (subs : subst2) se2 typ2 =
|
|
|
|
|
match se2 with
|
|
|
|
|
| Sil.Eexp (_e2, _) ->
|
|
|
|
|
let e2 = Sil.exp_sub (snd subs) _e2 in
|
|
|
|
|
let e2 = Sil.exp_sub (`Exp (snd subs)) _e2 in
|
|
|
|
|
begin
|
|
|
|
|
match e2 with
|
|
|
|
|
| Exp.Var v2 when Ident.is_primed v2 ->
|
|
|
|
@ -1476,7 +1478,7 @@ let filter_ne_lhs sub e0 = function
|
|
|
|
|
else None
|
|
|
|
|
| _ -> None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let filter_hpred sub hpred2 hpred1 = match (Sil.hpred_sub sub hpred1), hpred2 with
|
|
|
|
|
let filter_hpred sub hpred2 hpred1 = match (Sil.hpred_sub (`Exp sub) hpred1), hpred2 with
|
|
|
|
|
| Sil.Hlseg(Sil.Lseg_NE, hpara1, e1, f1, el1), Sil.Hlseg(Sil.Lseg_PE, _, _, _, _) ->
|
|
|
|
|
if Sil.equal_hpred (Sil.Hlseg(Sil.Lseg_PE, hpara1, e1, f1, el1)) hpred2 then Some false else None
|
|
|
|
|
| Sil.Hlseg(Sil.Lseg_PE, hpara1, e1, f1, el1), Sil.Hlseg(Sil.Lseg_NE, _, _, _, _) ->
|
|
|
|
@ -1507,9 +1509,9 @@ let hpred_has_primed_lhs sub hpred =
|
|
|
|
|
let move_primed_lhs_from_front subs sigma = match sigma with
|
|
|
|
|
| [] -> sigma
|
|
|
|
|
| hpred:: _ ->
|
|
|
|
|
if hpred_has_primed_lhs (snd subs) hpred then
|
|
|
|
|
if hpred_has_primed_lhs (`Exp (snd subs)) hpred then
|
|
|
|
|
let (sigma_primed, sigma_unprimed) =
|
|
|
|
|
List.partition_tf ~f:(hpred_has_primed_lhs (snd subs)) sigma
|
|
|
|
|
List.partition_tf ~f:(hpred_has_primed_lhs (`Exp (snd subs))) sigma
|
|
|
|
|
in match sigma_unprimed with
|
|
|
|
|
| [] -> raise (IMPL_EXC ("every hpred has primed lhs, cannot proceed", subs, (EXC_FALSE_SIGMA sigma)))
|
|
|
|
|
| _:: _ -> sigma_unprimed @ sigma_primed
|
|
|
|
@ -1799,7 +1801,7 @@ let handle_parameter_subtype tenv prop1 sigma2 subs (e1, se1, texp1) (se2, texp2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let rec hpred_imply tenv calc_index_frame calc_missing subs prop1 sigma2 hpred2 : subst2 * Prop.normal Prop.t = match hpred2 with
|
|
|
|
|
| Sil.Hpointsto (_e2, se2, texp2) ->
|
|
|
|
|
let e2 = Sil.exp_sub (snd subs) _e2 in
|
|
|
|
|
let e2 = Sil.exp_sub (`Exp (snd subs)) _e2 in
|
|
|
|
|
let _ = match e2 with
|
|
|
|
|
| Exp.Lvar _ -> ()
|
|
|
|
|
| Exp.Var v -> if Ident.is_primed v then
|
|
|
|
@ -1809,7 +1811,7 @@ let rec hpred_imply tenv calc_index_frame calc_missing subs prop1 sigma2 hpred2
|
|
|
|
|
(match Prop.prop_iter_create prop1 with
|
|
|
|
|
| None -> raise (IMPL_EXC ("lhs is empty", subs, EXC_FALSE))
|
|
|
|
|
| Some iter1 ->
|
|
|
|
|
(match Prop.prop_iter_find iter1 (filter_ne_lhs (fst subs) e2) with
|
|
|
|
|
(match Prop.prop_iter_find iter1 (filter_ne_lhs (`Exp (fst subs)) e2) with
|
|
|
|
|
| None -> raise (IMPL_EXC ("lhs does not have e|->", subs, (EXC_FALSE_HPRED hpred2)))
|
|
|
|
|
| Some iter1' ->
|
|
|
|
|
(match Prop.prop_iter_current tenv iter1' with
|
|
|
|
@ -1856,7 +1858,7 @@ let rec hpred_imply tenv calc_index_frame calc_missing subs prop1 sigma2 hpred2
|
|
|
|
|
L.d_decrease_indent 1;
|
|
|
|
|
res
|
|
|
|
|
| Sil.Hdllseg (Sil.Lseg_NE, para1, iF1, oB1, oF1, iB1, elist1), _
|
|
|
|
|
when Exp.equal (Sil.exp_sub (fst subs) iF1) e2 -> (* Unroll dllseg forward *)
|
|
|
|
|
when Exp.equal (Sil.exp_sub (`Exp (fst subs)) iF1) e2 -> (* Unroll dllseg forward *)
|
|
|
|
|
let n' = Exp.Var (Ident.create_fresh Ident.kprimed) in
|
|
|
|
|
let (_, para_inst1) = Sil.hpara_dll_instantiate para1 iF1 oB1 n' elist1 in
|
|
|
|
|
let hpred_list1 = para_inst1@[Prop.mk_dllseg tenv Sil.Lseg_PE para1 n' iF1 oF1 iB1 elist1] in
|
|
|
|
@ -1868,7 +1870,7 @@ let rec hpred_imply tenv calc_index_frame calc_missing subs prop1 sigma2 hpred2
|
|
|
|
|
L.d_decrease_indent 1;
|
|
|
|
|
res
|
|
|
|
|
| Sil.Hdllseg (Sil.Lseg_NE, para1, iF1, oB1, oF1, iB1, elist1), _
|
|
|
|
|
when Exp.equal (Sil.exp_sub (fst subs) iB1) e2 -> (* Unroll dllseg backward *)
|
|
|
|
|
when Exp.equal (Sil.exp_sub (`Exp (fst subs)) iB1) e2 -> (* Unroll dllseg backward *)
|
|
|
|
|
let n' = Exp.Var (Ident.create_fresh Ident.kprimed) in
|
|
|
|
|
let (_, para_inst1) = Sil.hpara_dll_instantiate para1 iB1 n' oF1 elist1 in
|
|
|
|
|
let hpred_list1 = para_inst1@[Prop.mk_dllseg tenv Sil.Lseg_PE para1 iF1 oB1 iB1 n' elist1] in
|
|
|
|
@ -1884,7 +1886,7 @@ let rec hpred_imply tenv calc_index_frame calc_missing subs prop1 sigma2 hpred2
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
| Sil.Hlseg (k, para2, _e2, _f2, _elist2) -> (* for now ignore implications between PE and NE *)
|
|
|
|
|
let e2, f2 = Sil.exp_sub (snd subs) _e2, Sil.exp_sub (snd subs) _f2 in
|
|
|
|
|
let e2, f2 = Sil.exp_sub (`Exp (snd subs)) _e2, Sil.exp_sub (`Exp (snd subs)) _f2 in
|
|
|
|
|
let _ = match e2 with
|
|
|
|
|
| Exp.Lvar _ -> ()
|
|
|
|
|
| Exp.Var v -> if Ident.is_primed v then
|
|
|
|
@ -1897,9 +1899,9 @@ let rec hpred_imply tenv calc_index_frame calc_missing subs prop1 sigma2 hpred2
|
|
|
|
|
(match Prop.prop_iter_create prop1 with
|
|
|
|
|
| None -> raise (IMPL_EXC ("lhs is empty", subs, EXC_FALSE))
|
|
|
|
|
| Some iter1 ->
|
|
|
|
|
(match Prop.prop_iter_find iter1 (filter_hpred (fst subs) (Sil.hpred_sub (snd subs) hpred2)) with
|
|
|
|
|
(match Prop.prop_iter_find iter1 (filter_hpred (fst subs) (Sil.hpred_sub (`Exp (snd subs)) hpred2)) with
|
|
|
|
|
| None ->
|
|
|
|
|
let elist2 = List.map ~f:(fun e -> Sil.exp_sub (snd subs) e) _elist2 in
|
|
|
|
|
let elist2 = List.map ~f:(fun e -> Sil.exp_sub (`Exp (snd subs)) e) _elist2 in
|
|
|
|
|
let _, para_inst2 = Sil.hpara_instantiate para2 e2 f2 elist2 in
|
|
|
|
|
L.d_increase_indent 1;
|
|
|
|
|
let res =
|
|
|
|
@ -1909,7 +1911,7 @@ let rec hpred_imply tenv calc_index_frame calc_missing subs prop1 sigma2 hpred2
|
|
|
|
|
L.d_decrease_indent 1;
|
|
|
|
|
res
|
|
|
|
|
| Some iter1' ->
|
|
|
|
|
let elist2 = List.map ~f:(fun e -> Sil.exp_sub (snd subs) e) _elist2 in
|
|
|
|
|
let elist2 = List.map ~f:(fun e -> Sil.exp_sub (`Exp (snd subs)) e) _elist2 in
|
|
|
|
|
(* force instantiation of existentials *)
|
|
|
|
|
let subs' = exp_list_imply tenv calc_missing subs (f2:: elist2) (f2:: elist2) in
|
|
|
|
|
let prop1' = Prop.prop_iter_remove_curr_then_to_prop tenv iter1' in
|
|
|
|
@ -1944,8 +1946,8 @@ let rec hpred_imply tenv calc_index_frame calc_missing subs prop1 sigma2 hpred2
|
|
|
|
|
raise (Exceptions.Abduction_case_not_implemented __POS__))
|
|
|
|
|
| Sil.Hdllseg (_, para2, iF2, oB2, oF2, iB2, elist2) ->
|
|
|
|
|
(* for now ignore implications between PE and NE *)
|
|
|
|
|
let iF2, oF2 = Sil.exp_sub (snd subs) iF2, Sil.exp_sub (snd subs) oF2 in
|
|
|
|
|
let iB2, oB2 = Sil.exp_sub (snd subs) iB2, Sil.exp_sub (snd subs) oB2 in
|
|
|
|
|
let iF2, oF2 = Sil.exp_sub (`Exp (snd subs)) iF2, Sil.exp_sub (`Exp (snd subs)) oF2 in
|
|
|
|
|
let iB2, oB2 = Sil.exp_sub (`Exp (snd subs)) iB2, Sil.exp_sub (`Exp (snd subs)) oB2 in
|
|
|
|
|
let _ = match oF2 with
|
|
|
|
|
| Exp.Lvar _ -> ()
|
|
|
|
|
| Exp.Var v -> if Ident.is_primed v then
|
|
|
|
@ -1963,9 +1965,9 @@ let rec hpred_imply tenv calc_index_frame calc_missing subs prop1 sigma2 hpred2
|
|
|
|
|
(match Prop.prop_iter_create prop1 with
|
|
|
|
|
| None -> raise (IMPL_EXC ("lhs is empty", subs, EXC_FALSE))
|
|
|
|
|
| Some iter1 ->
|
|
|
|
|
(match Prop.prop_iter_find iter1 (filter_hpred (fst subs) (Sil.hpred_sub (snd subs) hpred2)) with
|
|
|
|
|
(match Prop.prop_iter_find iter1 (filter_hpred (fst subs) (Sil.hpred_sub (`Exp (snd subs)) hpred2)) with
|
|
|
|
|
| None ->
|
|
|
|
|
let elist2 = List.map ~f:(fun e -> Sil.exp_sub (snd subs) e) elist2 in
|
|
|
|
|
let elist2 = List.map ~f:(fun e -> Sil.exp_sub (`Exp (snd subs)) e) elist2 in
|
|
|
|
|
let _, para_inst2 =
|
|
|
|
|
if Exp.equal iF2 iB2 then
|
|
|
|
|
Sil.hpara_dll_instantiate para2 iF2 oB2 oF2 elist2
|
|
|
|
@ -1978,7 +1980,7 @@ let rec hpred_imply tenv calc_index_frame calc_missing subs prop1 sigma2 hpred2
|
|
|
|
|
L.d_decrease_indent 1;
|
|
|
|
|
res
|
|
|
|
|
| Some iter1' -> (* Only consider implications between identical listsegs for now *)
|
|
|
|
|
let elist2 = List.map ~f:(fun e -> Sil.exp_sub (snd subs) e) elist2 in
|
|
|
|
|
let elist2 = List.map ~f:(fun e -> Sil.exp_sub (`Exp (snd subs)) e) elist2 in
|
|
|
|
|
(* force instantiation of existentials *)
|
|
|
|
|
let subs' =
|
|
|
|
|
exp_list_imply tenv calc_missing subs
|
|
|
|
@ -1995,7 +1997,7 @@ let rec hpred_imply tenv calc_index_frame calc_missing subs prop1 sigma2 hpred2
|
|
|
|
|
and sigma_imply tenv calc_index_frame calc_missing subs prop1 sigma2 : (subst2 * Prop.normal Prop.t) =
|
|
|
|
|
let is_constant_string_class subs = function (* if the hpred represents a constant string, return the string *)
|
|
|
|
|
| Sil.Hpointsto (_e2, _, _) ->
|
|
|
|
|
let e2 = Sil.exp_sub (snd subs) _e2 in
|
|
|
|
|
let e2 = Sil.exp_sub (`Exp (snd subs)) _e2 in
|
|
|
|
|
(match e2 with
|
|
|
|
|
| Exp.Const (Const.Cstr s) -> Some (s, true)
|
|
|
|
|
| Exp.Const (Const.Cclass c) -> Some (Ident.name_to_string c, false)
|
|
|
|
@ -2087,7 +2089,7 @@ and sigma_imply tenv calc_index_frame calc_missing subs prop1 sigma2 : (subst2 *
|
|
|
|
|
res in
|
|
|
|
|
(match hpred2 with
|
|
|
|
|
| Sil.Hpointsto(_e2, se2, t) ->
|
|
|
|
|
let changed, calc_index_frame', hpred2' = expand_hpred_pointer tenv calc_index_frame (Sil.Hpointsto (Prop.exp_normalize_noabs tenv (snd subs) _e2, se2, t)) in
|
|
|
|
|
let changed, calc_index_frame', hpred2' = expand_hpred_pointer tenv calc_index_frame (Sil.Hpointsto (Prop.exp_normalize_noabs tenv (`Exp (snd subs)) _e2, se2, t)) in
|
|
|
|
|
if changed
|
|
|
|
|
then sigma_imply tenv calc_index_frame' calc_missing subs prop1 (hpred2' :: sigma2') (* calc_index_frame=true *)
|
|
|
|
|
else normal_case hpred2'
|
|
|
|
@ -2099,14 +2101,14 @@ and sigma_imply tenv calc_index_frame calc_missing subs prop1 sigma2 : (subst2 *
|
|
|
|
|
subs, prop1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let prepare_prop_for_implication tenv (_, sub2) pi1 sigma1 =
|
|
|
|
|
let pi1' = (Prop.pi_sub sub2 (ProverState.get_missing_pi ())) @ pi1 in
|
|
|
|
|
let sigma1' = (Prop.sigma_sub sub2 (ProverState.get_missing_sigma ())) @ sigma1 in
|
|
|
|
|
let pi1' = (Prop.pi_sub (`Exp sub2) (ProverState.get_missing_pi ())) @ pi1 in
|
|
|
|
|
let sigma1' = (Prop.sigma_sub (`Exp sub2) (ProverState.get_missing_sigma ())) @ sigma1 in
|
|
|
|
|
let ep = Prop.set Prop.prop_emp ~sub:sub2 ~sigma:sigma1' ~pi:pi1' in
|
|
|
|
|
Prop.normalize tenv ep
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let imply_pi tenv calc_missing (sub1, sub2) prop pi2 =
|
|
|
|
|
let do_atom a =
|
|
|
|
|
let a' = Sil.atom_sub sub2 a in
|
|
|
|
|
let a' = Sil.atom_sub (`Exp sub2) a in
|
|
|
|
|
try
|
|
|
|
|
if not (check_atom tenv prop a')
|
|
|
|
|
then raise (IMPL_EXC ("rhs atom missing in lhs", (sub1, sub2), (EXC_FALSE_ATOM a')))
|
|
|
|
@ -2122,11 +2124,11 @@ let imply_atom tenv calc_missing (sub1, sub2) prop a =
|
|
|
|
|
(** Check pure implications before looking at the spatial part. Add
|
|
|
|
|
necessary instantiations for equalities and check that instantiations
|
|
|
|
|
are possible for disequalities. *)
|
|
|
|
|
let rec pre_check_pure_implication tenv calc_missing subs pi1 pi2 =
|
|
|
|
|
let rec pre_check_pure_implication tenv calc_missing (subs : subst2) pi1 pi2 =
|
|
|
|
|
match pi2 with
|
|
|
|
|
| [] -> subs
|
|
|
|
|
| (Sil.Aeq (e2_in, f2_in) as a) :: pi2' when not (Prop.atom_is_inequality a) ->
|
|
|
|
|
let e2, f2 = Sil.exp_sub (snd subs) e2_in, Sil.exp_sub (snd subs) f2_in in
|
|
|
|
|
let e2, f2 = Sil.exp_sub (`Exp (snd subs)) e2_in, Sil.exp_sub (`Exp (snd subs)) f2_in in
|
|
|
|
|
if Exp.equal e2 f2 then pre_check_pure_implication tenv calc_missing subs pi1 pi2'
|
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
|
(match e2, f2 with
|
|
|
|
@ -2141,7 +2143,7 @@ let rec pre_check_pure_implication tenv calc_missing subs pi1 pi2 =
|
|
|
|
|
let sub2' = extend_sub (snd subs) v2 e2 in
|
|
|
|
|
pre_check_pure_implication tenv calc_missing (fst subs, sub2') pi1 pi2'
|
|
|
|
|
| _ ->
|
|
|
|
|
let pi1' = Prop.pi_sub (fst subs) pi1 in
|
|
|
|
|
let pi1' = Prop.pi_sub (`Exp (fst subs)) pi1 in
|
|
|
|
|
let prop_for_impl = prepare_prop_for_implication tenv subs pi1' [] in
|
|
|
|
|
imply_atom tenv calc_missing subs prop_for_impl (Sil.Aeq (e2_in, f2_in));
|
|
|
|
|
pre_check_pure_implication tenv calc_missing subs pi1 pi2'
|
|
|
|
@ -2149,7 +2151,7 @@ let rec pre_check_pure_implication tenv calc_missing subs pi1 pi2 =
|
|
|
|
|
| (Sil.Aneq (e, _) | Apred (_, e :: _) | Anpred (_, e :: _)) :: _
|
|
|
|
|
when not calc_missing && (match e with Var v -> not (Ident.is_primed v) | _ -> true) ->
|
|
|
|
|
raise (IMPL_EXC ("ineq e2=f2 in rhs with e2 not primed var",
|
|
|
|
|
(Sil.sub_empty, Sil.sub_empty), EXC_FALSE))
|
|
|
|
|
(Sil.exp_sub_empty, Sil.exp_sub_empty), EXC_FALSE))
|
|
|
|
|
| (Sil.Aeq _ | Aneq _ | Apred _ | Anpred _) :: pi2' ->
|
|
|
|
|
pre_check_pure_implication tenv calc_missing subs pi1 pi2'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@ -2167,15 +2169,15 @@ let check_array_bounds tenv (sub1, sub2) prop =
|
|
|
|
|
if check_atom tenv prop lt_ineq then check_failed lt_ineq in
|
|
|
|
|
let check_bound = function
|
|
|
|
|
| ProverState.BClen_imply (len1_, len2_, _indices2) ->
|
|
|
|
|
let len1 = Sil.exp_sub sub1 len1_ in
|
|
|
|
|
let len2 = Sil.exp_sub sub2 len2_ in
|
|
|
|
|
let len1 = Sil.exp_sub (`Exp sub1) len1_ in
|
|
|
|
|
let len2 = Sil.exp_sub (`Exp sub2) len2_ in
|
|
|
|
|
(* L.d_strln_color Orange "check_bound ";
|
|
|
|
|
Sil.d_exp len1; L.d_str " "; Sil.d_exp len2; L.d_ln(); *)
|
|
|
|
|
let indices_to_check = match len2 with
|
|
|
|
|
| _ -> [Exp.BinOp(Binop.PlusA, len2, Exp.minus_one)] (* only check len *) in
|
|
|
|
|
List.iter ~f:(fail_if_le len1) indices_to_check
|
|
|
|
|
| ProverState.BCfrom_pre _atom ->
|
|
|
|
|
let atom_neg = atom_negate tenv (Sil.atom_sub sub2 _atom) in
|
|
|
|
|
let atom_neg = atom_negate tenv (Sil.atom_sub (`Exp sub2) _atom) in
|
|
|
|
|
(* L.d_strln_color Orange "BCFrom_pre"; Sil.d_atom atom_neg; L.d_ln (); *)
|
|
|
|
|
if check_atom tenv prop atom_neg then check_failed atom_neg in
|
|
|
|
|
List.iter ~f:check_bound (ProverState.get_bounds_checks ())
|
|
|
|
@ -2204,12 +2206,12 @@ let check_implication_base pname tenv check_frame_empty calc_missing prop1 prop2
|
|
|
|
|
then (L.d_str "pi2 bounds checks: "; Prop.d_pi pi2_bcheck; L.d_ln ());
|
|
|
|
|
L.d_strln "returns";
|
|
|
|
|
L.d_strln "sub1: ";
|
|
|
|
|
L.d_increase_indent 1; Prop.d_sub (fst subs); L.d_decrease_indent 1; L.d_ln ();
|
|
|
|
|
L.d_increase_indent 1; Prop.d_sub (`Exp (fst subs)); L.d_decrease_indent 1; L.d_ln ();
|
|
|
|
|
L.d_strln "sub2: ";
|
|
|
|
|
L.d_increase_indent 1; Prop.d_sub (snd subs); L.d_decrease_indent 1; L.d_ln ();
|
|
|
|
|
L.d_increase_indent 1; Prop.d_sub (`Exp (snd subs)); L.d_decrease_indent 1; L.d_ln ();
|
|
|
|
|
let (sub1, sub2), frame_prop = sigma_imply tenv false calc_missing subs prop1 sigma2 in
|
|
|
|
|
let pi1' = Prop.pi_sub sub1 pi1 in
|
|
|
|
|
let sigma1' = Prop.sigma_sub sub1 sigma1 in
|
|
|
|
|
let pi1' = Prop.pi_sub (`Exp sub1) pi1 in
|
|
|
|
|
let sigma1' = Prop.sigma_sub (`Exp sub1) sigma1 in
|
|
|
|
|
L.d_ln ();
|
|
|
|
|
let prop_for_impl = prepare_prop_for_implication tenv (sub1, sub2) pi1' sigma1' in
|
|
|
|
|
(* only deal with pi2 without bound checks *)
|
|
|
|
@ -2235,7 +2237,7 @@ let check_implication_base pname tenv check_frame_empty calc_missing prop1 prop2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
type implication_result =
|
|
|
|
|
| ImplOK of
|
|
|
|
|
(check list * Sil.subst * Sil.subst * Sil.hpred list * (Sil.atom list) * (Sil.hpred list) *
|
|
|
|
|
(check list * Sil.exp_subst * Sil.exp_subst * Sil.hpred list * (Sil.atom list) * (Sil.hpred list) *
|
|
|
|
|
(Sil.hpred list) * (Sil.hpred list) * ((Exp.t * Exp.t) list) * ((Exp.t * Exp.t) list))
|
|
|
|
|
| ImplFail of check list
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|