[sledge] Strengthen Solver's treatment of existentials using Equality

Summary:
Equality.solve_for_var_contexts can produce solution substitutions
that witness existentials in more cases than the
single-existential-occurrence heuristic, and is more conservative in
cases where the latter is incomplete.

Reviewed By: ngorogiannis

Differential Revision: D19282634

fbshipit-source-id: f86f0a9cb
master
Josh Berdine 5 years ago committed by Facebook Github Bot
parent 200091fc78
commit 65cff68ae8

@ -66,6 +66,12 @@ val fold_terms : t -> init:'a -> f:('a -> Term.t -> 'a) -> 'a
(** Solution Substitutions *) (** Solution Substitutions *)
module Subst : sig module Subst : sig
type t [@@deriving compare, equal, sexp] type t [@@deriving compare, equal, sexp]
val pp : t pp
val is_empty : t -> bool
val fold : t -> init:'a -> f:(key:Term.t -> data:Term.t -> 'a -> 'a) -> 'a
val norm : t -> Term.t -> Term.t
val trim : bound:Var.Set.t -> Var.Set.t -> t -> t
end end
val solve_for_vars : Var.Set.t list -> t -> Subst.t val solve_for_vars : Var.Set.t list -> t -> Subst.t

@ -576,3 +576,12 @@ let dnf q =
fold_dnf ~conj ~disj q (Var.Set.empty, []) [] fold_dnf ~conj ~disj q (Var.Set.empty, []) []
|> |>
[%Trace.retn fun {pf} -> pf "%a" pp_djn] [%Trace.retn fun {pf} -> pf "%a" pp_djn]
(** Simplify *)
let rec norm s q =
[%Trace.call fun {pf} -> pf "@[%a@]@ %a" Equality.Subst.pp s pp q]
;
map q ~f_sjn:(norm s) ~f_cong:Fn.id ~f_trm:(Equality.Subst.norm s)
|>
[%Trace.retn fun {pf} q' -> pf "%a" pp q' ; invariant q']

@ -79,6 +79,10 @@ val rem_seg : seg -> t -> t
val filter_heap : f:(seg -> bool) -> t -> t val filter_heap : f:(seg -> bool) -> t -> t
(** [filter_heap q f] Remove all segments in [q] for which [f] returns false *) (** [filter_heap q f] Remove all segments in [q] for which [f] returns false *)
val norm : Equality.Subst.t -> t -> t
(** [norm s q] is [q] where subterms have been normalized with a
substitution. *)
(** Quantification and Vocabulary *) (** Quantification and Vocabulary *)
val exists : Var.Set.t -> t -> t val exists : Var.Set.t -> t -> t

@ -44,40 +44,48 @@ let fresh_var name vs zs ~wrt =
let excise k = [%Trace.infok k] let excise k = [%Trace.infok k]
let trace k = [%Trace.infok k] let trace k = [%Trace.infok k]
type occurrences = Zero | One of Var.t | Many let excise_exists goal =
trace (fun {pf} -> pf "@[<2>excise_exists@ %a@]" pp goal) ;
let single_existential_occurrence xs term = if Set.is_empty goal.xs then goal
let exception Multiple_existential_occurrences in else
try let solutions_for_xs =
Term.fold_vars term ~init:Zero ~f:(fun seen var -> Equality.solve_for_vars [goal.us; goal.xs] goal.sub.cong
if not (Set.mem xs var) then seen in
else if Equality.Subst.is_empty solutions_for_xs then goal
match seen with else
| Zero -> One var let sub = Sh.norm solutions_for_xs goal.sub in
| _ -> raise Multiple_existential_occurrences ) let removed, survived = Set.diff_inter goal.xs (Sh.fv sub) in
with Multiple_existential_occurrences -> Many if Set.is_empty removed then goal
else
let witnesses =
Equality.Subst.trim ~bound:goal.xs survived solutions_for_xs
in
if Equality.Subst.is_empty witnesses then goal
else (
excise (fun {pf} ->
pf "@[<2>excise_exists @[%a%a@]@]" Var.Set.pp_xs removed
Equality.Subst.pp witnesses ) ;
let us = Set.union goal.us removed in
let xs = survived in
let min =
Equality.Subst.fold
~f:(fun ~key ~data -> Sh.and_ (Term.eq key data))
witnesses ~init:goal.min
in
{goal with us; min; xs; sub; pgs= true} )
let special_cases xs = function let special_cases xs = function
| Term.Ap2 (Eq, Var _, Var _) as e -> | Term.Ap2 (Eq, Var _, Var _) as e ->
if Set.is_subset (Term.fv e) ~of_:xs then Term.true_ else e if Set.is_subset (Term.fv e) ~of_:xs then Term.true_ else e
| e -> e | e -> e
let excise_term ({us; min; xs} as goal) pure term = let excise_term ({min; xs} as goal) pure term =
let term' = Equality.normalize min.cong term in let term' = Equality.normalize min.cong term in
let term' = special_cases xs term' in let term' = special_cases xs term' in
if Term.is_true term' then Some ({goal with pgs= true}, pure) if Term.is_true term' then (
else excise (fun {pf} -> pf "excise_pure %a" Term.pp term) ;
match single_existential_occurrence xs term' with Some ({goal with pgs= true}, pure) )
| Zero -> None else Some (goal, term' :: pure)
| One x ->
Some
( { goal with
us= Set.add us x
; min= Sh.and_ term' min
; xs= Set.remove xs x
; pgs= true }
, pure )
| Many -> Some (goal, term' :: pure)
let excise_pure ({sub} as goal) = let excise_pure ({sub} as goal) =
trace (fun {pf} -> pf "@[<2>excise_pure@ %a@]" pp goal) ; trace (fun {pf} -> pf "@[<2>excise_pure@ %a@]" pp goal) ;
@ -546,7 +554,8 @@ let rec excise ({min; xs; sub; zs; pgs} as goal) =
else if Sh.is_emp sub then Some (Sh.exists zs (Sh.extend_us xs min)) else if Sh.is_emp sub then Some (Sh.exists zs (Sh.extend_us xs min))
else if Sh.is_false sub then None else if Sh.is_false sub then None
else if pgs then else if pgs then
{goal with pgs= false} |> excise_pure >>= excise_heap >>= excise {goal with pgs= false} |> excise_exists |> excise_pure >>= excise_heap
>>= excise
else None $> fun _ -> [%Trace.info "@[<2>excise fail@ %a@]" pp goal] else None $> fun _ -> [%Trace.info "@[<2>excise fail@ %a@]" pp goal]
let excise_dnf : Sh.t -> Var.Set.t -> Sh.t -> Sh.t option = let excise_dnf : Sh.t -> Var.Set.t -> Sh.t -> Sh.t option =

@ -267,5 +267,9 @@ let%test_module _ =
* %l_6 -[ %l_6, 16 )-> (8 × %n_9),%a_2 * %l_6 -[ %l_6, 16 )-> (8 × %n_9),%a_2
\- %a_1, %m_8 . \- %a_1, %m_8 .
%l_6 -[ %l_6, %m_8 )-> %m_8,%a_1 %l_6 -[ %l_6, %m_8 )-> %m_8,%a_1
) infer_frame: |}] ) infer_frame:
%a_1 = %a_2
2 = %n_9
16 = %m_8
(%l_6 + 16) -[ %l_6, 16 )-> 0,%a_3 |}]
end ) end )

Loading…
Cancel
Save