Summary:
There are two types of anonymous classes (not user defined classes):
- classic anonymous classes (defined as $<int> suffixes)
- lambda classes (corresponding to lambda expressions). Experimentally,
they all have form `$Lambda$_<int>_<int>`, but the code just uses
`$Lambda$` as a heuristic so it is potentially more robust.
# Problem this diff solves
When generate meta-issues for nullsafe, we are interested only in
user-defined classes, so we merge all nested anonymous stuff to
corresponding user-defined classes and hence aggregate the issues.
Without this diff, for each lambda in the code, we would report this as
a separate meta-issue, which would both screw up stats and be confusing
for the user (when we start reporting mode promo suggestions!).
Reviewed By: artempyanykh
Differential Revision: D21042928
fbshipit-source-id: a7be266af
master
Mitya Lyubarskiy5 years agocommitted byFacebook GitHub Bot
codetoanalyze/java/nullsafe-default/PropagatesNullable.java, codetoanalyze.java.nullsafe_default.TestPropagatesNullable$TestSecondParameter.test(java.lang.String,java.lang.String):void, 7, ERADICATE_NULLABLE_DEREFERENCE, no_bucket, WARNING, [`nullable(...)` is nullable and is not locally checked for null when calling `length()`.]
codetoanalyze/java/nullsafe-default/PropagatesNullable.java, codetoanalyze.java.nullsafe_default.TestPropagatesNullable$TestSecondParameter.test(java.lang.String,java.lang.String):void, 7, ERADICATE_NULLABLE_DEREFERENCE, no_bucket, WARNING, [`nullable(...)` is nullable and is not locally checked for null when calling `length()`.]
codetoanalyze/java/nullsafe-default/PropagatesNullable.java, codetoanalyze.java.nullsafe_default.TestPropagatesNullable$TestSecondParameter.test(java.lang.String,java.lang.String):void, 11, ERADICATE_NULLABLE_DEREFERENCE, no_bucket, WARNING, [`nullable(...)` is nullable and is not locally checked for null when calling `length()`.]
codetoanalyze/java/nullsafe-default/PropagatesNullable.java, codetoanalyze.java.nullsafe_default.TestPropagatesNullable$TestSecondParameter.test(java.lang.String,java.lang.String):void, 11, ERADICATE_NULLABLE_DEREFERENCE, no_bucket, WARNING, [`nullable(...)` is nullable and is not locally checked for null when calling `length()`.]
codetoanalyze/java/nullsafe-default/PropagatesNullable.java, codetoanalyze.java.nullsafe_default.TestPropagatesNullable$TestSecondParameter.test(java.lang.String,java.lang.String):void, 15, ERADICATE_NULLABLE_DEREFERENCE, no_bucket, WARNING, [`nullable(...)` is nullable and is not locally checked for null when calling `length()`.]
codetoanalyze/java/nullsafe-default/PropagatesNullable.java, codetoanalyze.java.nullsafe_default.TestPropagatesNullable$TestSecondParameter.test(java.lang.String,java.lang.String):void, 15, ERADICATE_NULLABLE_DEREFERENCE, no_bucket, WARNING, [`nullable(...)` is nullable and is not locally checked for null when calling `length()`.]
codetoanalyze/java/nullsafe-default/ReturnNotNullable.java, Linters_dummy_method, 1, ERADICATE_META_CLASS_CAN_BE_NULLSAFE, no_bucket, ADVICE, [Congrats! Class codetoanalyze.java.nullsafe_default.ReturnNotNullable$Lambda$_9_1 is free of nullability issues. Mark it `@Nullsafe(Nullsafe.Mode.Local)` to prevent regressions.], ReturnNotNullable$Lambda$_9_1, codetoanalyze.java.nullsafe_default, issues: 0, curr_mode: "Default", promote_mode: "LocalTrustAll"