@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
open HolKernel boolLib bossLib Parse ;
open HolKernel boolLib bossLib Parse ;
open pairTheory listTheory rich_listTheory arithmeticTheory wordsTheory ;
open pairTheory listTheory rich_listTheory arithmeticTheory wordsTheory ;
open pred_setTheory finite_mapTheory ;
open logrootTheory numposrepTheory ;
open logrootTheory numposrepTheory ;
open settingsTheory llvmTheory ;
open settingsTheory llvmTheory ;
@ -76,13 +77,21 @@ Proof
Induct >> rw [ ] >> Cases_on ` l2 ` >> fs [ ]
Induct >> rw [ ] >> Cases_on ` l2 ` >> fs [ ]
QED
QED
Theorem flookup_fdiff :
∀m s k.
flookup ( fdiff m s ) k =
if k ∈ s then None else flookup m k
Proof
rw [ FDIFF_def , FLOOKUP_DRESTRICT ] >> fs [ ]
QED
(* - - - - - T h e o r e m s a b o u t l o g - - - - - *)
(* - - - - - T h e o r e m s a b o u t l o g - - - - - *)
(* C o u l d b e u p s t r e a m e d t o H O L *)
(* C o u l d b e u p s t r e a m e d t o H O L *)
Theorem mul_div_bound :
Theorem mul_div_bound :
∀m n. n ≠ 0 ⇒ m - ( n - 1 ) ≤ n * ( m DIV n ) ∧ n * ( m DIV n ) ≤ m
∀m n. n ≠ 0 ⇒ m - ( n - 1 ) ≤ n * ( m DIV n ) ∧ n * ( m DIV n ) ≤ m
Proof
Proof
rw [ ] >>
rw [ ] >>
` 0 < n ` by decide_tac >>
` 0 < n ` by decide_tac >>
drule DIVISION >> disch_then ( qspec_then ` m ` mp_tac ) >>
drule DIVISION >> disch_then ( qspec_then ` m ` mp_tac ) >>
decide_tac
decide_tac
@ -194,7 +203,7 @@ Theorem b2v_size:
∃vs. read_str ts bs = ( vs , drop ( sum ( map sizeof ts ) ) bs ) )
∃vs. read_str ts bs = ( vs , drop ( sum ( map sizeof ts ) ) bs ) )
Proof
Proof
ho_match_mp_tac bytes_to_value_ind >>
ho_match_mp_tac bytes_to_value_ind >>
rw [ sizeof_def , bytes_to_value_def , le_read_w_def ] >>
rw [ sizeof_def , bytes_to_value_def , le_read_w_def ] >>
fs [ first_class_type_def ]
fs [ first_class_type_def ]
>- ( simp [ PAIR_MAP ] >> metis_tac [ SND ] )
>- ( simp [ PAIR_MAP ] >> metis_tac [ SND ] )
>- (
>- (
@ -220,22 +229,22 @@ Theorem b2v_append:
∃vs. read_str ts ( bs ++ bs' ) = ( I ## ( λx. x ++ bs' ) ) ( read_str ts bs ) )
∃vs. read_str ts ( bs ++ bs' ) = ( I ## ( λx. x ++ bs' ) ) ( read_str ts bs ) )
Proof
Proof
ho_match_mp_tac bytes_to_value_ind >>
ho_match_mp_tac bytes_to_value_ind >>
rw [ sizeof_def , bytes_to_value_def , le_read_w_def ] >>
rw [ sizeof_def , bytes_to_value_def , le_read_w_def ] >>
fs [ first_class_type_def , TAKE_APPEND , DROP_APPEND ,
fs [ first_class_type_def , TAKE_APPEND , DROP_APPEND ,
DECIDE ``! x y. x ≤ y ⇒ x - y = 0 n `` , ETA_THM ]
DECIDE ``! x y. x ≤ y ⇒ x - y = 0 n `` , ETA_THM ]
>- ( simp [ PAIR_MAP ] >> metis_tac [ SND ] )
>- ( simp [ PAIR_MAP ] >> metis_tac [ SND ] )
>- ( simp [ PAIR_MAP ] >> metis_tac [ SND ] )
>- ( simp [ PAIR_MAP ] >> metis_tac [ SND ] )
>- (
>- (
rpt ( pairarg_tac >> simp [ ] ) >> fs [ ADD1 ] >>
rpt ( pairarg_tac >> simp [ ] ) >> fs [ ADD1 ] >>
BasicProvers. VAR_EQ_TAC >> fs [ LEFT_ADD_DISTRIB ] >>
BasicProvers. VAR_EQ_TAC >> fs [ LEFT_ADD_DISTRIB ] >>
first_x_assum irule >>
first_x_assum irule >>
` sizeof t ≤ length bs ` by decide_tac >>
` sizeof t ≤ length bs ` by decide_tac >>
imp_res_tac b2v_smaller >> rfs [ ] )
imp_res_tac b2v_smaller >> rfs [ ] )
>- (
>- (
rpt ( pairarg_tac >> simp [ ] ) >> fs [ ADD1 ] >>
rpt ( pairarg_tac >> simp [ ] ) >> fs [ ADD1 ] >>
BasicProvers. VAR_EQ_TAC >> fs [ LEFT_ADD_DISTRIB ] >>
BasicProvers. VAR_EQ_TAC >> fs [ LEFT_ADD_DISTRIB ] >>
first_x_assum irule >>
first_x_assum irule >>
` sizeof t ≤ length bs ` by decide_tac >>
` sizeof t ≤ length bs ` by decide_tac >>
imp_res_tac b2v_smaller >> rfs [ ] )
imp_res_tac b2v_smaller >> rfs [ ] )
QED
QED
@ -323,7 +332,7 @@ Proof
simp [ TAKE_TAKE_MIN ] >>
simp [ TAKE_TAKE_MIN ] >>
` length l = n ` by simp [ Abbr ` l ` ] >>
` length l = n ` by simp [ Abbr ` l ` ] >>
` length ( dropWhile ( $= 0 ) ( reverse l ) ) ≤ n `
` length ( dropWhile ( $= 0 ) ( reverse l ) ) ≤ n `
by metis_tac [ LESS_EQ_TRANS , LENGTH_dropWhile_LESS_EQ , LENGTH_REVERSE ] >>
by metis_tac [ LESS_EQ_TRANS , LENGTH_dropWhile_LESS_EQ , LENGTH_REVERSE ] >>
rw [ MIN_DEF ] >> fs [ ]
rw [ MIN_DEF ] >> fs [ ]
>- (
>- (
simp [ TAKE_APPEND , TAKE_TAKE_MIN , MIN_DEF , take_replicate ] >>
simp [ TAKE_APPEND , TAKE_TAKE_MIN , MIN_DEF , take_replicate ] >>
@ -345,7 +354,7 @@ Proof
REWRITE_TAC [ GSYM w2n_11 , word_0_n2w ] >>
REWRITE_TAC [ GSYM w2n_11 , word_0_n2w ] >>
simp [ ] )
simp [ ] )
>- rw [ TAKE_APPEND , TAKE_TAKE ]
>- rw [ TAKE_APPEND , TAKE_TAKE ]
QED
QED
Theorem b2v_v2b :
Theorem b2v_v2b :
∀v t bs. value_type t v ⇒ bytes_to_value t ( value_to_bytes v ++ bs ) = ( v , bs )
∀v t bs. value_type t v ⇒ bytes_to_value t ( value_to_bytes v ++ bs ) = ( v , bs )
@ -427,7 +436,7 @@ Theorem extract_insertvalue:
insert_value v1 v2 indices = Some v3
insert_value v1 v2 indices = Some v3
⇒
⇒
extract_value v3 indices = Some v2
extract_value v3 indices = Some v2
Proof
Proof
recInduct insert_value_ind >> rw [ insert_value_def , extract_value_def ] >>
recInduct insert_value_ind >> rw [ insert_value_def , extract_value_def ] >>
pop_assum mp_tac >> CASE_TAC >> fs [ ] >> rfs [ ] >>
pop_assum mp_tac >> CASE_TAC >> fs [ ] >> rfs [ ] >>
rw [ ] >> simp [ extract_value_def , EL_LUPDATE ]
rw [ ] >> simp [ extract_value_def , EL_LUPDATE ]
@ -439,7 +448,7 @@ Theorem extract_insertvalue_other:
¬(indices1 ≼ indices2 ) ∧ ¬(indices2 ≼ indices1 )
¬(indices1 ≼ indices2 ) ∧ ¬(indices2 ≼ indices1 )
⇒
⇒
extract_value v3 indices2 = extract_value v1 indices2
extract_value v3 indices2 = extract_value v1 indices2
Proof
Proof
recInduct insert_value_ind >> rw [ insert_value_def , extract_value_def ] >>
recInduct insert_value_ind >> rw [ insert_value_def , extract_value_def ] >>
qpat_x_assum ` _ = SOME _ ` mp_tac >> CASE_TAC >> rw [ ] >> rfs [ ] >>
qpat_x_assum ` _ = SOME _ ` mp_tac >> CASE_TAC >> rw [ ] >> rfs [ ] >>
qpat_x_assum ` ¬case _ of [ ] => F | h :: t => P h t ` mp_tac >>
qpat_x_assum ` ¬case _ of [ ] => F | h :: t => P h t ` mp_tac >>
@ -452,7 +461,7 @@ Theorem insert_extractvalue:
extract_value v1 indices = Some v2
extract_value v1 indices = Some v2
⇒
⇒
insert_value v1 v2 indices = Some v1
insert_value v1 v2 indices = Some v1
Proof
Proof
recInduct extract_value_ind >> rw [ insert_value_def , extract_value_def ] >> fs [ ] >>
recInduct extract_value_ind >> rw [ insert_value_def , extract_value_def ] >> fs [ ] >>
rw [ LUPDATE_SAME ]
rw [ LUPDATE_SAME ]
QED
QED
@ -476,7 +485,7 @@ Definition extract_type_def:
( extract_type ( StrT ts ) ( i :: idx ) =
( extract_type ( StrT ts ) ( i :: idx ) =
if i < length ts then
if i < length ts then
extract_type ( el i ts ) idx
extract_type ( el i ts ) idx
else
else
None ) ∧
None ) ∧
( extract_type _ _ = None )
( extract_type _ _ = None )
End
End
@ -621,11 +630,87 @@ Proof
globals_ok_def , stack_ok_def , heap_ok_def , EVERY_EL , frame_ok_def ]
globals_ok_def , stack_ok_def , heap_ok_def , EVERY_EL , frame_ok_def ]
QED
QED
Theorem flookup_set_bytes :
∀poison bytes n h n'.
flookup ( set_bytes poison bytes n h ) ( A n' ) =
if n ≤ n' ∧ n' < n + length bytes then
Some ( poison , el ( n' - n ) bytes )
else
flookup h ( A n' )
Proof
Induct_on ` bytes ` >> rw [ set_bytes_def , EL_CONS , PRE_SUB1 ] >>
fs [ ADD1 , FLOOKUP_UPDATE ] >>
` n = n' ` by decide_tac >>
rw [ ]
QED
Theorem allocate_invariant :
∀p s1 v1 t v2 s2.
state_invariant p s1 ∧ allocate s1 v1 t ( v2 , s2 ) ⇒ state_invariant p s2
Proof
rw [ allocate_cases , state_invariant_def , ip_ok_def , heap_ok_def ,
globals_ok_def , stack_ok_def ] >>
rw [ ] >> fs [ ]
>- (
fs [ allocations_ok_def ] >> rpt gen_tac >> disch_tac >> fs [ is_free_def ] >> rw [ ] >>
metis_tac [ INTER_COMM ] )
>- (
rw [ flookup_set_bytes ]
>- rw [ RIGHT_AND_OVER_OR , EXISTS_OR_THM , interval_to_set_def ] >>
eq_tac >> rw [ ] >> fs [ interval_to_set_def ] >>
metis_tac [ ] )
>- ( fs [ is_allocated_def ] >> metis_tac [ ] )
>- ( fs [ EVERY_EL , frame_ok_def ] >> rw [ ] >> metis_tac [ ] )
QED
Theorem set_bytes_invariant :
∀s poison bytes n prog b.
state_invariant prog s ∧ is_allocated ( b , n , n + length bytes ) s. allocations
⇒
state_invariant prog ( s with heap := set_bytes poison bytes n s. heap )
Proof
rw [ state_invariant_def ]
>- ( fs [ allocations_ok_def ] >> rw [ ] >> metis_tac [ ] )
>- (
fs [ heap_ok_def , flookup_set_bytes ] >> rw [ ] >>
fs [ is_allocated_def , interval_to_set_def , SUBSET_DEF ] >>
metis_tac [ LESS_EQ_REFL , DECIDE ``! x y. x < x + SUC y `` ] )
>- ( fs [ globals_ok_def ] >> metis_tac [ ] )
>- ( fs [ stack_ok_def , EVERY_EL , frame_ok_def ] )
QED
Theorem step_instr_invariant :
Theorem step_instr_invariant :
∀i s2. step_instr p s1 i s2 ⇒ prog_ok p ∧ next_instr p s1 i ∧ state_invariant p s1 ⇒ state_invariant p s2
∀i s2.
step_instr p s1 i s2 ⇒ prog_ok p ∧ next_instr p s1 i ∧ state_invariant p s1
⇒
state_invariant p s2
Proof
Proof
ho_match_mp_tac step_instr_ind >> rw [ ]
ho_match_mp_tac step_instr_ind >> rw [ ]
>- cheat
>- (
rw [ update_invariant ] >> fs [ state_invariant_def ] >> rw [ ]
>- (
fs [ stack_ok_def ] >> rfs [ EVERY_EL , frame_ok_def ] >>
first_x_assum ( qspec_then ` 0 ` mp_tac ) >> simp [ ] )
>- ( fs [ deallocate_def , allocations_ok_def ] >> rw [ ] >> metis_tac [ ] )
>- (
fs [ deallocate_def , heap_ok_def ] >> rw [ flookup_fdiff ] >>
eq_tac >> rw [ ]
>- metis_tac [ optionTheory. NOT_IS_SOME_EQ_NONE ]
>- metis_tac [ optionTheory. NOT_IS_SOME_EQ_NONE ] >>
fs [ allocations_ok_def , stack_ok_def , EXTENSION ] >> metis_tac [ ] )
>- (
fs [ globals_ok_def , deallocate_def ] >> rw [ ] >>
first_x_assum drule >> rw [ ] >> fs [ is_allocated_def ] >>
qexists_tac ` b2 ` >> rw [ ] >> CCONTR_TAC >> fs [ ] )
>- (
fs [ stack_ok_def , EVERY_MEM , frame_ok_def , deallocate_def ] >> rfs [ ] >>
rw [ ]
>- (
res_tac >> rw [ ] >> qexists_tac ` stop ` >> rw [ ] >>
fs [ ALL_DISTINCT_APPEND , MEM_FLAT , MEM_MAP ] >>
metis_tac [ ] )
>- (
fs [ ALL_DISTINCT_APPEND ] ) ) )
>- cheat
>- cheat
>- cheat
>- cheat
>- (
>- (
@ -640,7 +725,7 @@ Proof
>- (
>- (
(* A l l o c a t i o n *)
(* A l l o c a t i o n *)
irule inc_pc_invariant >> rw [ next_instr_update , update_invariant ]
irule inc_pc_invariant >> rw [ next_instr_update , update_invariant ]
>- cheat
>- metis_tac [ allocate_invariant ]
>- ( fs [ next_instr_cases , allocate_cases ] >> metis_tac [ terminator_def ] ) )
>- ( fs [ next_instr_cases , allocate_cases ] >> metis_tac [ terminator_def ] ) )
>- (
>- (
irule inc_pc_invariant >> rw [ next_instr_update , update_invariant ] >>
irule inc_pc_invariant >> rw [ next_instr_update , update_invariant ] >>
@ -649,7 +734,7 @@ Proof
>- (
>- (
(* S t o r e *)
(* S t o r e *)
irule inc_pc_invariant >> rw [ next_instr_update , update_invariant ]
irule inc_pc_invariant >> rw [ next_instr_update , update_invariant ]
>- cheat
>- ( irule set_bytes_invariant >> rw [ ] >> metis_tac [ ] )
>- ( fs [ next_instr_cases ] >> metis_tac [ terminator_def ] ) )
>- ( fs [ next_instr_cases ] >> metis_tac [ terminator_def ] ) )
>- (
>- (
irule inc_pc_invariant >> rw [ next_instr_update , update_invariant ] >>
irule inc_pc_invariant >> rw [ next_instr_update , update_invariant ] >>