[threadsafety] Fix make-excluder uses which potentially incorrectly assume a lock is held.

Reviewed By: sblackshear

Differential Revision: D5931811

fbshipit-source-id: d51dd6b
master
Kyriakos Nikolaos Gkorogiannis 7 years ago committed by Facebook Github Bot
parent 3924d25a25
commit a64034fbf9

@ -21,14 +21,6 @@ module Summary = Summary.Make (struct
let read_payload (summary: Specs.summary) = summary.payload.threadsafety
end)
(*Bit of redundancy with code in is_unprotected, might alter later *)
let make_excluder locks thread =
let is_main_thread = ThreadSafetyDomain.ThreadsDomain.is_any_but_self thread in
if locks && not is_main_thread then ThreadSafetyDomain.Excluder.Lock
else if not locks && is_main_thread then ThreadSafetyDomain.Excluder.Thread
else if locks && is_main_thread then ThreadSafetyDomain.Excluder.Both
else L.(die InternalError) "called when neither lock nor thread known"
module TransferFunctions (CFG : ProcCfg.S) = struct
module CFG = CFG
module Domain = ThreadSafetyDomain
@ -306,10 +298,6 @@ module TransferFunctions (CFG : ProcCfg.S) = struct
let attribute_map' = AttributeMapDomain.add ret_access_path ret_attributes attribute_map in
(ownership', attribute_map')
let is_unprotected is_locked thread pdesc =
not is_locked && not (ThreadSafetyDomain.ThreadsDomain.is_any_but_self thread)
&& not (Procdesc.is_java_synchronized pdesc)
(** return true if this function is library code from the JDK core libraries or Android *)
let is_java_library = function
| Typ.Procname.Java java_pname -> (
@ -342,12 +330,7 @@ module TransferFunctions (CFG : ProcCfg.S) = struct
&& not (has_return_annot Annotations.ia_is_thread_safe pname)
then
let open Domain in
let pre =
if is_unprotected locks threads proc_data.pdesc then AccessPrecondition.TotallyUnprotected
else
AccessPrecondition.Protected
(make_excluder (locks || Procdesc.is_java_synchronized proc_data.pdesc) threads)
in
let pre = AccessPrecondition.make locks threads proc_data.pdesc in
AccessDomain.add_access pre (make_unannotated_call_access pname loc) attribute_map
else attribute_map
@ -390,7 +373,10 @@ module TransferFunctions (CFG : ProcCfg.S) = struct
if List.is_empty accesses || OwnershipDomain.is_owned base_access_path ownership then acc
else
let pre =
if is_unprotected locks threads proc_data.pdesc then
match AccessPrecondition.make locks threads proc_data.pdesc with
| AccessPrecondition.Protected _ as excluder
-> excluder
| _ ->
match OwnershipDomain.get_owned base_access_path ownership with
| OwnershipAbstractValue.OwnedIf formal_indexes
-> AccessPrecondition.Unprotected formal_indexes
@ -398,9 +384,6 @@ module TransferFunctions (CFG : ProcCfg.S) = struct
-> assert false
| OwnershipAbstractValue.Unowned
-> AccessPrecondition.TotallyUnprotected
else
AccessPrecondition.Protected
(make_excluder (locks || Procdesc.is_java_synchronized proc_data.pdesc) threads)
in
add_field_accesses pre base_access_path acc accesses
in
@ -720,7 +703,6 @@ module TransferFunctions (CFG : ProcCfg.S) = struct
| _
-> ThreadsDomain.join threads astate.threads
in
let unprotected = is_unprotected locks threads pdesc in
(* add [ownership_accesses] to the [accesses_acc] with a protected pre if
[exp] is owned, and an appropriate unprotected pre otherwise *)
let add_ownership_access ownership_accesses actual_exp accesses_acc =
@ -735,14 +717,18 @@ module TransferFunctions (CFG : ProcCfg.S) = struct
accesses_acc
else
let pre =
if unprotected then
let base = fst actual_access_path in
match AccessPrecondition.make locks threads pdesc with
| AccessPrecondition.Protected _ as excluder (* access protected *)
-> excluder
| _
-> let base = fst actual_access_path in
match OwnershipDomain.get_owned (base, []) astate.ownership with
| OwnershipAbstractValue.OwnedIf formal_indexes
-> (* the actual passed to the current callee is rooted in a
formal *)
AccessPrecondition.Unprotected formal_indexes
| OwnershipAbstractValue.Unowned | OwnershipAbstractValue.Owned ->
| OwnershipAbstractValue.Unowned | OwnershipAbstractValue.Owned
->
match
OwnershipDomain.get_owned actual_access_path astate.ownership
with
@ -756,9 +742,6 @@ module TransferFunctions (CFG : ProcCfg.S) = struct
-> (* access path not rooted in a formal and not conditionally
owned *)
AccessPrecondition.TotallyUnprotected
else
(* access protected by held lock *)
AccessPrecondition.Protected (make_excluder true threads)
in
update_caller_accesses pre ownership_accesses accesses_acc
| _
@ -772,10 +755,7 @@ module TransferFunctions (CFG : ProcCfg.S) = struct
| AccessPrecondition.Protected _
-> update_caller_accesses pre callee_accesses accesses_acc
| AccessPrecondition.TotallyUnprotected
-> let pre' =
if unprotected then pre
else AccessPrecondition.Protected (make_excluder true threads)
in
-> let pre' = AccessPrecondition.make locks threads pdesc in
update_caller_accesses pre' callee_accesses accesses_acc
| AccessPrecondition.Unprotected formal_indexes
-> IntSet.fold

@ -336,6 +336,14 @@ module AccessPrecondition = struct
| Unprotected indexes
-> F.fprintf fmt "Unprotected(%a)" (PrettyPrintable.pp_collection ~pp_item:Int.pp)
(IntSet.elements indexes)
let make locks thread pdesc =
let is_main_thread = ThreadsDomain.is_any_but_self thread in
let locked = locks || Procdesc.is_java_synchronized pdesc in
if not locked && not is_main_thread then TotallyUnprotected
else if locked && is_main_thread then Protected Excluder.Both
else if locked then Protected Excluder.Lock
else Protected Excluder.Thread
end
module AccessDomain = struct

@ -164,6 +164,8 @@ module AccessPrecondition : sig
[@@deriving compare]
val pp : F.formatter -> t -> unit
val make : LocksDomain.astate -> ThreadsDomain.astate -> Procdesc.t -> t
end
(** map of access precondition |-> set of accesses. the map should hold all accesses to a

Loading…
Cancel
Save