better unit tests for procCfg

Reviewed By: jberdine

Differential Revision: D3470096

fbshipit-source-id: 331e54c
master
Sam Blackshear 9 years ago committed by Facebook Github Bot 1
parent cf5871e76f
commit b9fefe9d9b

@ -11,7 +11,9 @@ open! Utils
module F = Format
module InstrCfg = ProcCfg.OneInstrPerNode (ProcCfg.Exceptional)
module BackwardCfg = ProcCfg.Backward (ProcCfg.Normal)
module InstrCfg = ProcCfg.OneInstrPerNode (ProcCfg.Normal)
module BackwardInstrCfg = ProcCfg.Backward (InstrCfg)
let tests =
let cfg = Cfg.Node.create_cfg () in
@ -41,6 +43,8 @@ let tests =
let normal_proc_cfg = ProcCfg.Normal.from_pdesc test_pdesc in
let exceptional_proc_cfg = ProcCfg.Exceptional.from_pdesc test_pdesc in
let backward_proc_cfg = BackwardCfg.from_pdesc test_pdesc in
let backward_instr_proc_cfg = BackwardInstrCfg.from_pdesc test_pdesc in
let open OUnit2 in
let cmp l1 l2 =
@ -52,20 +56,87 @@ let tests =
F.fprintf fmt "Expected output %a but got %a" pp_node_list expected pp_node_list actual in
let create_test input expected _ =
assert_equal ~cmp ~pp_diff input expected in
let normal_exceptional_tests = [
(* test the succs of the normal cfg *)
let instr_test =
let instr_test_ _ =
begin
match ProcCfg.Normal.instrs n1 with
| [instr1; instr2] ->
assert_bool "First instr should be dummy_instr1" (instr1 == dummy_instr1);
assert_bool "Second instr should be dummy_instr2" (instr2 == dummy_instr2);
| _ -> assert_failure "Expected exactly two instructions"
end;
begin
match BackwardCfg.instrs n1 with
| [instr1; instr2] ->
assert_bool "First instr should be dummy_instr2" (instr1 == dummy_instr2);
assert_bool "Second instr should be dummy_instr1" (instr2 == dummy_instr1);
| _ -> assert_failure "Expected exactly two instructions"
end;
begin
let node_id, _ = InstrCfg.id n1 in
match InstrCfg.instr_ids n1 with
| [ (instr1, Some (id1, ProcCfg.Instr_index 0));
(instr2, Some (id2, ProcCfg.Instr_index 1)); ] ->
assert_bool "First instr should be dummy_instr1" (instr1 == dummy_instr1);
assert_bool "Second instr should be dummy_instr2" (instr2 == dummy_instr2);
assert_bool "id1 should be id of underlying node" (id1 == node_id);
assert_bool "id2 should be id of underlying node" (id2 == node_id);
| _ -> assert_failure "Expected exactly two instructions with correct indices"
end;
let backward_node_id, _ = BackwardInstrCfg.id n1 in
match BackwardInstrCfg.instr_ids n1 with
| [ (instr1, Some (id1, ProcCfg.Instr_index 1));
(instr2, Some (id2, ProcCfg.Instr_index 0)); ] ->
assert_bool "First instr should be dummy_instr2" (instr1 == dummy_instr2);
assert_bool "Second instr should be dummy_instr1" (instr2 == dummy_instr1);
assert_bool "id1 should be id of underlying node" (id1 == backward_node_id);
assert_bool "id2 should be id of underlying node" (id2 == backward_node_id);
| _ -> assert_failure "Expected exactly two instructions with correct indices" in
"instr_test">::instr_test_ in
let graph_tests = [
(* test the succs of the normal cfg. forward... *)
("succs_n1", ProcCfg.Normal.succs normal_proc_cfg n1, [n2]);
("normal_succs_n1", ProcCfg.Normal.normal_succs normal_proc_cfg n1, [n2]);
("succs_n2", ProcCfg.Normal.succs normal_proc_cfg n2, [n4]);
("normal_succs_n2", ProcCfg.Normal.normal_succs normal_proc_cfg n2, [n4]);
("succs_n3", ProcCfg.Normal.succs normal_proc_cfg n3, [n4]);
("normal_succs_n3", ProcCfg.Normal.normal_succs normal_proc_cfg n3, [n4]);
(* test the preds of the normal cfg *)
(* ... and backward... *)
("succs_n1_bw", BackwardCfg.preds backward_proc_cfg n1, [n2]);
("normal_succs_n1_bw", BackwardCfg.normal_preds backward_proc_cfg n1, [n2]);
("succs_n2_bw", BackwardCfg.preds backward_proc_cfg n2, [n4]);
("normal_succs_n2_bw", BackwardCfg.normal_preds backward_proc_cfg n2, [n4]);
("succs_n3_bw", BackwardCfg.preds backward_proc_cfg n3, [n4]);
("normal_succs_n3_bw", BackwardCfg.normal_preds backward_proc_cfg n3, [n4]);
(* ...and make sure it all works when using backward + instr cfg *)
("succs_n1_bw_instrcfg", BackwardInstrCfg.preds backward_instr_proc_cfg n1, [n2]);
("normal_succs_n1_bw_instrcfg", BackwardInstrCfg.normal_preds backward_instr_proc_cfg n1, [n2]);
("succs_n2_bw_instrcfg", BackwardInstrCfg.preds backward_instr_proc_cfg n2, [n4]);
("normal_succs_n2_bw_instrcfg", BackwardInstrCfg.normal_preds backward_instr_proc_cfg n2, [n4]);
("succs_n3_bw_instrcfg", BackwardInstrCfg.preds backward_instr_proc_cfg n3, [n4]);
("normal_succs_n3_bw_instrcfg", BackwardInstrCfg.normal_preds backward_instr_proc_cfg n3, [n4]);
(* test the preds of the normal cfg... *)
("preds_n2", ProcCfg.Normal.normal_preds normal_proc_cfg n2, [n1]);
("normal_preds_n2", ProcCfg.Normal.normal_preds normal_proc_cfg n2, [n1]);
(* ...and the backward cfg... *)
("preds_n2_bw", BackwardCfg.normal_succs backward_proc_cfg n2, [n1]);
("normal_preds_n2_bw", BackwardCfg.normal_succs backward_proc_cfg n2, [n1]);
(* ...and again make sure it works with backward + instr cfg *)
("preds_n2_bw_instr", BackwardInstrCfg.normal_succs backward_instr_proc_cfg n2, [n1]);
("normal_preds_n2_bw_instr", BackwardInstrCfg.normal_succs backward_instr_proc_cfg n2, [n1]);
(* we shouldn't see any exn succs or preds even though we added them *)
("no_exn_succs_n1", ProcCfg.Normal.exceptional_succs normal_proc_cfg n1, []);
("no_exn_preds_n3", ProcCfg.Normal.exceptional_preds normal_proc_cfg n3, []);
(* same in the backward cfg *)
("no_exn_succs_n1_bw", BackwardCfg.exceptional_preds backward_proc_cfg n1, []);
("no_exn_preds_n3_bw", BackwardCfg.exceptional_succs backward_proc_cfg n3, []);
(* same in backward + instr cfg *)
("no_exn_succs_n1_bw_instr", BackwardInstrCfg.exceptional_preds backward_instr_proc_cfg n1, []);
("no_exn_preds_n3_bw_instr", BackwardInstrCfg.exceptional_succs backward_instr_proc_cfg n3, []);
(* now, test the exceptional succs in the exceptional cfg. *)
("exn_succs_n1", ProcCfg.Exceptional.exceptional_succs exceptional_proc_cfg n1, [n3]);
@ -85,5 +156,5 @@ let tests =
("exn_normal_preds_n2", ProcCfg.Exceptional.normal_preds exceptional_proc_cfg n2, [n1]);
]
|> IList.map (fun (name, test, expected) -> name>::create_test test expected) in
let tests = normal_exceptional_tests in
let tests = instr_test :: graph_tests in
"procCfgSuite">:::tests

Loading…
Cancel
Save