Summary:
Fix a bug where the actual return variable was not scoped correctly in
cases where its name clashed with a local or formal of the
callee. Also comment and simplify to attempt to make more
understandable.
Reviewed By: bennostein
Differential Revision: D17801944
fbshipit-source-id: 286739241
Summary:
Some code that is otherwise benignly scalar still uses the
ExtractElement and InsertElement vector operations, so translate them
as if they were array operations.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D17801949
fbshipit-source-id: 89f3666bd
Summary:
Previously, the LLVM semantics could be stuck where the LLAIR semantics
was not yet stuck, but would become stuck (at the same place) after
taking a step. This was due to LLVM using the traditional definition of
stuck states: any state from which there are no transitions. However,
LLAIR cannot do that because it might get stuck in the middle of a block
that contains several visible stores. We don't want to consider the
whole block stuck, nor can we finish it. Thus, the LLAIR definition of
stuckness is when the state has the stuck flag set which happens when
stopping in the middle of a block after encountering a stuck
instruction. Now LLVM takes the same approach.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D17855085
fbshipit-source-id: a094d25d5
Summary:
Add an argument to the Exit instruction. Update the LLVM semantics to
execute the Exit instruction and store the result in an "exited"
component of the state. (Previously it just noticed that it was stuck
about to do an Exit.)
With exiting treated uniformly, now in the proof that for every LLVM
trace, there is a llair trace that simulates it, all of the cheats
except for 1 are just cases that I haven't got to yet. However, the last
cheat is for the situation where the LLVM program gets stuck and the
llair program doesn't. For example, the following two line LLVM program
gets stuck because r2 is not assigned (ignoring for the moment the static
restriction that LLVM is in SSA form).
r1 := r2
Exit(0)
The compilation to llair omits the assignment and so we get a llair
program that doesn't get stuck:
Exit(0)
The key question is whether the static restrictions are sufficient to
ensure that no expression that might be omitted can get stuck.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D17737589
fbshipit-source-id: bc6c01a1b
Summary:
If the LLVM to llair translation keeps a mapping from register r to
expression e, then for each register r' mentioned in e, there must be an
assignment to r' that dominates the entire live range of r. Thus, where
ever r might be replaced by e, the value of r' will be the same as it
was when the initial assignment to r occurred. Maintaining this
invariant relies on the LLVM being in SSA form.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D17710288
fbshipit-source-id: fd3eaa57d
Summary:
This is work in progress; many of the cheats aren't true. In particular,
the definition of stuck/complete/partial traces in LLVM and llair don't
quite match up and need some modification. Also, the state relation
isn't strong enough; it will need to include information about registers
used in the expressions of the LLVM register to llair expression
mapping. But the overall shape of the proof is ok and so it can be
used to poke at various local aspects of the translation, such as
individual instructions.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D17631604
fbshipit-source-id: 743b5d64d
Summary:
This will avoid printing stuff like
"0$?%__sil_tmpSIL_materialize_temp__n$2 declared" to the poor
unsuspecting user. The non-verbose stuff is used only by pulse so far as
far I can tell so hopefully this doesn't break anything.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D17908943
fbshipit-source-id: 8ef4f1a8f
Summary:
Instead of a string argument named `~str` pass `Formal | Global` and let
`add_to_errlog` figure out how to print it.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D17907657
fbshipit-source-id: ed09aab72
Summary:
When we make the decision to go into a branch "v = N" where some
abstract value is compared to a constant, remember the corresponding
equality. This allows to prune simple infeasible paths
intra-procedurally.
Further work is needed to make this useful interprocedurally, for
instance either or both of these ideas could be explored:
- abduce v=N in the precondition and do not apply summaries when the
equalities in the pre are not satisfied
- prune post-conditions that lead to unsat states where a value has to
be equal to several different constants
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D17906166
fbshipit-source-id: 5cc84abc2
Summary:
When we know "x = 3" and we have a condition "x != 3" we know we can
prune the corresponding path.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D17665472
fbshipit-source-id: 988958ea6
Summary:
First step in having a value domain: record concrete values. We record
them as equalities to abstract values using a new attribute `Constant`.
In a way, attributes are already our "pure" part in the "formulas" that
are pulse abstract domains, so this is reminiscent of existing
separation logic implementations. Trying to add values directly in the
"heap" part proved very cumbersome whereas this approach is very simple,
allowing us to ignore values most of the time except when we actually
care.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D17665473
fbshipit-source-id: b8033ad9c
Summary:
It's annoying to see `sexp_list` everywhere instead of `list`, eg in
merlin.
See also D17907938.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D17927994
fbshipit-source-id: 84599e8bc
Summary:
Let's add basic Java support to impurity checker. Since impurity checker relies on pulse, we need to add Java with Pulse callback as well. Pulse doesn't officially support Java yet, but we can enable it for impurity checker for now.
Many Java primitives/operations are not yet modeled (such as creation of new objects, support for collections etc.). Still, it is good to run impurity checker on the existing tests of the purity checker. Also, it is nice to see that we can identify most of the impure functions correctly in the purity dir. There are a lot of FNs though.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D17906237
fbshipit-source-id: 15308d285
Summary:
By some unfortunate logic, OCaml often decides to use
`sexp_list`/`sexp_option` instead of just `list`/`option`. Sometimes
these get copy/pasted in interface files.
It would be good to tell OCaml not to do that in the first place but in
the meantime: this diff.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D17907938
fbshipit-source-id: 7546834a2
Summary:
This diff introduces inequality for the iterator alias target, as we
did for the size target before.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D17879208
fbshipit-source-id: cc2f6a723
Summary:
For test scripting purposes, when the analysis finishes successfully,
report the number of alarms.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D17801947
fbshipit-source-id: 1660866df
Summary:
In a spec, it currently may be that foot.us does not contain xs. So
exec_specs needs to extend the vocabulary of foot before existentially
quantifying out xs.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D17801933
fbshipit-source-id: 7b4b9262a
Summary:
Previously it was added to the locals before calling Dom.call, but
this results in the scope of freturn ending too early.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D17801939
fbshipit-source-id: 739ec8981
Summary:
Some globals have 'appending' linkage, where linking modules results
in appending the arrays from each module. These can appear even when
empty, leading to useless and somewhat troublesome 0-length arrays. So
drop them.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D17801927
fbshipit-source-id: d2dc180d7
Summary: If we have no pulse summary (most likely caused by pulse finding a legit issue with the code), let's consider the function as impure.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D17906016
fbshipit-source-id: 671d3e0ba
Summary:
Describe what the --report-*-* options actually do instead of their
outdated documentation from the time where this was
`--checkers-blacklist-regex`, `--infer-blacklist-regex` and the like.
Reviewed By: dulmarod, mityal
Differential Revision: D17906015
fbshipit-source-id: 204349e9e
Summary:
This diff revises the semantics of hasNext model to add the lengths of
arrays, rather than join them to top.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D17882388
fbshipit-source-id: f5edaedb3
Summary:
While BitCasts are the identity function on the bitwise
representation, they are not necessarily so in the semantics or the
logical representation. So be more conservative about eliding them in
the Exp language. Those that are actually semantic identities are
still omitted in the Term language.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D17801950
fbshipit-source-id: bf9ae57b5
Summary:
The analyzer (currently) hard-codes some assumptions about sizes of
basic types such as Typ.bool, Typ.siz, etc. Check that these
assumptions are satisfied by the input llvm datalayout, and give
reasonable error messages otherwise.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D17801941
fbshipit-source-id: 4fe484ee0
Summary:
Now that expression types and type sizes can be computed, it is not
necessary to store the sizes of globals separately.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D17801932
fbshipit-source-id: f746e506b
Summary:
- The `Llvm_target.DataLayout.size_in_bits` needs to be used for checking casts
e.g. it is ok to `bitcast <16 x i1> to i16`: they both have 16 bits, but they have sizes 16 vs 2 bytes
- The `Llvm_target.DataLayout.abi_size` needs to be used for the size of memory blocks containing values
e.g. for the size of memory segments containing the initial values of globals
- The example above shows that we can't compute the byte size from the bit size without knowing the target specific datalayout
- So we need both in each sized type
- Also add checks that Convert exps and terms are not no-ops
- Simplifications of size manipulating code
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D17801928
fbshipit-source-id: 8c8ce6128
Summary: Not used feature and with no obvious roadmap anymore.
Reviewed By: jberdine, jvillard
Differential Revision: D17855860
fbshipit-source-id: fd75b9d62
Josh Berdine
Scott Owens
Sungkeun Cho
Ezgi Çiçek
Jules Villard
Dulma Churchill
Nikos Gorogiannis