Summary: Trying to convert a large int literal to an OCaml int raises an exception. The use case here actually needed a float anyway, so add an API for that.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D8550410
fbshipit-source-id: 382495b
Summary:
We inline the .ml and the .mli together using the .cmi rule (for reasons
explained in the Makefile of deadcode). This relies on the fact that rules will
start from the .cmx, which in turns depends on the .cmi as the last dependency
and so all the dependencies of the .cmx are satisfied by the time we hit the
.cmi. But that doesn't always work.
For some reason, making the .cmi depend on its .cmx works, even though it's
supposed to include a circular dependency (`make` should complain but doesn't).
Oh, well...
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D8548032
fbshipit-source-id: 0dc9335
Summary:
Replace the previous outputting of "." and "F" with an actual progress bar and
a multiline display of what procedure each process is currently busy analysing.
Observe:
```lang=text
Found 19 source files to analyze in /home/jul/code/openssl-1.1.0d/infer-out
7/19 [######################......................................] 36%
⊢ [ 1.14s] crypto/mem.c: CRYPTO_malloc
⊢ [ 1.68s] crypto/o_time.c: julian_adj
⊢ [ 0.50s] crypto/mem.c: CRYPTO_zalloc
⊢ [ 1.80s] crypto/o_str.c: OPENSSL_strlcpy
```
This works by setting up a worker pool (as before) that waits to receive jobs
(not as before: we used to fork for each new job). Unix pipes are used for
communication.
The new worker pool can be used to experiment with other concurrency models,
such as reviving per-procedure-parallelism, or making sure each procedure is
analysed only once.
Perf tests indicate that this version is no slower than the previous one,
either on laptops or devserver: about 3% worse user time but ~40% better system time.
This new version forks <jobs> processes whereas the previous version would
fork `O(number of source files)` times.
`infer -j 1` shows a progress bar that doesn't update timing info (because it
would need a second process to do that).
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D8517507
fbshipit-source-id: c8ca104
Summary:
The execution environment is really just a cache. It happens to point to a
particular source file which is where the analysis was started from, but that
is not relevant, and in fact is confusing because it suggests that it is
somewhat tied to that file. In reality, exe_env caches information about any
procedure and source file encountered by the analysis.
This will make it easier to make further changes but I think it also brings a
bit more clarity to the code.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D8513735
fbshipit-source-id: f4b38ce
Summary: Record that it is not supported: https://github.com/facebook/infer/issues/8
Reviewed By: mbouaziz, dulmarod
Differential Revision: D8442762
fbshipit-source-id: fa271cb
Summary: This makes more sense and avoids printing a pointless backtrace. Give the user some advice while we're at it.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D8442711
fbshipit-source-id: 65a8939
Summary: It's been deprecated for a while now. Use `infer analyze` instead.
Reviewed By: dulmarod
Differential Revision: D8442682
fbshipit-source-id: 0b8c590
Summary:
I realized that control variable analysis was broken when we had multiple back-edges for the same loop. This is often the case when we have a switch statement combined with continue in a loop (see `test_switch` in `switch_continue.c`) or when we have disjunctive guards in do-while loops.
This diff fixes that by
- defining a loop by its loophead (the target of its backedges) rather than its back-edges. Then it converts back-edge list to a map from loop_head to sources of the loop's back-edges.
- collecting multiple guard nodes that come from potentially multiple exit nodes per loop head
In addition, it also removes the wrong assumption that an exit node belongs to a single loop head.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D8398061
fbshipit-source-id: abaf288
Summary: Code auto generated by annotation processors or by the compiler is creating non-actionable reports, so skip it for now.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D8395781
fbshipit-source-id: 9832814
Summary:
The deadlock reports (the actual string) were too low level, in order to avoid bug hash clashes. Now that we deduplicate this is less of an issue, so it's an opportunity to improve readability.
```
Potential deadlock.
Trace 1 (starts at `void Interproc.interproc1Bad(InterprocA)`) first locks `this` in class `Interproc*` (line 9 in `void Interproc.interproc1Bad(InterprocA)`) and then locks `b` in class `InterprocA*` (line 14 in `void Interproc.interproc2Bad(InterprocA)`).
Trace 2 (starts at `void InterprocA.interproc1Bad(Interproc)`), first locks `this` in class `InterprocA*` (line 37 in `void InterprocA.interproc1Bad(Interproc)`) and then locks `d` in class `Interproc*` (line 42 in `void InterprocA.interproc2Bad(Interproc)`).
```
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D8395399
fbshipit-source-id: b4bb48c
Summary:
We need to report on non-private methods (the opposite even leads to FPs sometimes on deadlocks). To do this, the domain needs to change so that the interpretation of an order pair `a,b` is no longer "lock `a` is taken in the *current method* and held until lock `b` is taken". Instead the meaning is now "lock `a` is taken in some method *of the same class with the current method* and is held until `b` is taken".
These changes are quite drastic because the previous implementation optimised extensively around the previous use case.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D8395351
fbshipit-source-id: a2bd22b
Summary:
The deadlock reports (the actual string) were too low level, in order to avoid bug hash clashes. Now that we deduplicate this is less of an issue, so it's an opportunity to improve readability.
```
Potential deadlock.
Trace 1 (starts at `void Interproc.interproc1Bad(InterprocA)`) first locks `this` in class `Interproc*` (line 9 in `void Interproc.interproc1Bad(InterprocA)`) and then locks `b` in class `InterprocA*` (line 14 in `void Interproc.interproc2Bad(InterprocA)`).
Trace 2 (starts at `void InterprocA.interproc1Bad(Interproc)`), first locks `this` in class `InterprocA*` (line 37 in `void InterprocA.interproc1Bad(Interproc)`) and then locks `d` in class `Interproc*` (line 42 in `void InterprocA.interproc2Bad(Interproc)`).
```
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D8394978
fbshipit-source-id: 671ccb0
Summary:
The deadlock reports (the actual string) were too low level, in order to avoid bug hash clashes. Now that we deduplicate this is less of an issue, so it's an opportunity to improve readability.
```
Potential deadlock.
Trace 1 (starts at `void Interproc.interproc1Bad(InterprocA)`) first locks `this` in class `Interproc*` (line 9 in `void Interproc.interproc1Bad(InterprocA)`) and then locks `b` in class `InterprocA*` (line 14 in `void Interproc.interproc2Bad(InterprocA)`).
Trace 2 (starts at `void InterprocA.interproc1Bad(Interproc)`), first locks `this` in class `InterprocA*` (line 37 in `void InterprocA.interproc1Bad(Interproc)`) and then locks `d` in class `Interproc*` (line 42 in `void InterprocA.interproc2Bad(Interproc)`).
```
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D8379328
fbshipit-source-id: bc33983
Summary: Deadlocks can be very noisy, so dedup reports on same line by showing only the one with the shortest trace and a count of the suppressed ones.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D8351148
fbshipit-source-id: 8913db2
Summary: We were missing reads of `a` if it was used in void cast, i.e. `(void) a;` This caused dead store false positives: we were not using `exp` that was the result of translating `a`. This diff creates a call to built-in skip function with `exp` as its argument, which causes the analyses to see reads of `exp`.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D8332092
fbshipit-source-id: f3b0e10
Summary: Removing an internal error in SIL to HIL translation which I had added before to log how often the particular case was happening. It happens quite often, and I have a task to investigate the issue. Removing it as it spams the analysis output a lot.
Reviewed By: dulmarod
Differential Revision: D8316822
fbshipit-source-id: 4047cbe
Summary: Introduce an annotation that forces the summary of a method to be free of blocking events, without suppressing other reports.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D8276787
fbshipit-source-id: be9eed8
Summary: I don't understand what this function is for. Let's remove it.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D8320839
fbshipit-source-id: eeb14f7
Summary: The case of nullable properties was already working but there was no test for it.
Reviewed By: dulmarod
Differential Revision: D8266468
fbshipit-source-id: c074d69
Nikos Gorogiannis
Jules Villard
Jeremy Dubreil
Ezgi Çiçek
Sungkeun Cho
Martino Luca
Dulma Churchill
Mehdi Bouaziz
Daiva Naudziuniene
Dino Distefano