Summary:
Before: to report an issue type, wrap it in an exception type then pass
that around and translate it back to an issue type at some point.
After: no. Except biabduction, which was built like this and uses
raising of exceptions to stop the analysis too.
Reviewed By: dulmarod
Differential Revision: D21904589
fbshipit-source-id: cb8446f38
Summary:
See previous diff: issues are always reported with the same severity so
recognise that and just use their default severity in "modern" checkers.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D21904591
fbshipit-source-id: fb5387e35
Summary:
By and large issues of a given type (eg NULL_DEREFERENCE) are always
reported with the same severity (eg ERROR), but that severity is hard to
tease out from the code. This makes it more explicit by favouring the
default in `IssueType.t` in many cases without changing infer's
behaviour. The checkers typically use `Reporting.log_{error,warning}`;
these are taken care of in the next diff.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D21904590
fbshipit-source-id: 47c76cd4c
Summary:
- "visibility" (whether an issue to report is something to show the user
or something that is only used for debugging or for detecting other
issues) is an intrinsic property of an issue type and thus belongs in
`IssueType.t`.
- "severity" (warning/error/...) is something that each issue should
have a default for ("a memory leak is by default an ERROR", a
"condition always true is by default a warning"), but can also be
overriden at run-time. Right now only nullsafe uses that capability:
when in "strict mode", some warnings become errors. We can imagine
extending this to other issue types, or even providing config flags to
turn warnings into errors, like compilers often have.
To guess the default severity (since it's dynamic it can be hard to know
for sure!), I tried to find places where it was reported as the source
of truth, but also later diffs test these defaults against our tests (by
removing most of the dynamic changes in severity).
With this diff there are 3 places where severity is set:
1. The default severity in IssueType.t: this is unused for now.
2. The severity from `Exceptions.recognize_exception`: this is
semi-statically determined and, if set, takes precedence over number 3 (which looks wrong to me!)
3. The severity passed to `Errlog.log_issue` when we actually add an
issue to the error log: this is used only when (2) is unset.
The next diffs will make 1 the default, delete 2, and make 3 optional
but override 1 when passed.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D21904538
fbshipit-source-id: a674b42d8
Summary:
The Java frontend translates java field accesses on an object reference as field (`.`) followed by dereference (`*`) exactly like the arrow operator in C. However, when the field is static, it generates just a field access `.`. This is a bug.
This diff mitigates its effects for printing locks in starvation.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D21882875
fbshipit-source-id: 79846d826
Summary:
Rather than compute the size of the llair type of the llair
initializer expression, compute the size of the llvm initializer
directly.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D21720982
fbshipit-source-id: 4364baf38
Summary:
Rather than translate an llvm type to a llair one and then compute the
size of the llair type, obtain the size of the llvm type directly.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D21720968
fbshipit-source-id: ad98112a7
Summary:
This diff implements part of the memory management for Objective-C classes in ARC, namely that `dealloc` is called when the objects become unreachable. In reality the semantics of ARC says that this happens when their reference count becomes 0, but we are not modelling this yet in Pulse. However, we could in the future.
This fixes false positives memory leaks when the memory is freed in dealloc.
`dealloc` is often implicit in Objective-C, it also calls the dealloc of instance variables and superclass. None of this is implemented yet, and will be done in a future diff. This will be added in the frontend probably, similarly to how it's done for C++ destructors.
This is an important part of modelling Objective-C semantics in Infer, I looked at whether this should be a preanalysis to be used by all analyses but this needs Pulse. So the idea is that any analysis that needs to understand Objective-C memory model well, should have Pulse as a preanalysis.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D21762292
fbshipit-source-id: ced014324
Summary:
Adding a new attribute for dynamic type. It is set in the models of constructors, currently only in `alloc` in Objective-C. We use it in the following diff to figure out which `dealloc` method to call. However it could be useful for other things, such as dynamic dispatch.
#skipdeadcode
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D21739928
fbshipit-source-id: 9276c0a4d
Summary:
Since Java8, interfaces mays contain implementations
(default methods). We modify the resolve algorith in the Java frontend
to take care of that.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D21785182
fbshipit-source-id: ffab8124c
Summary:
Closes https://github.com/facebook/infer/issues/1270
Attempt to switch from Travis to Github Actions.
Please see [CONTRIBUTING.md](./CONTRIBUTING.md) for how to set up your development environment and run tests.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/infer/pull/1271
Reviewed By: mityal
Differential Revision: D21881443
Pulled By: jvillard
fbshipit-source-id: f711bbf27
Summary:
We stopped relying on an arbitrary threshold. Hence,
- we don't need all the machinery for reporting at a specific node for a threshold
- we can remove
- the issue type `EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME`
- the config option `--use-cost-threshold`.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D21859815
fbshipit-source-id: b73a2372d
Summary: We do not use an arbitrary threshold to test cost results anymore but instead rely on `cost-issues` which do not have any trace attached. This diff adds traces to `costs-report.json` so that we can test cost issues with traces.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D21858846
fbshipit-source-id: e73321a92
Summary:
Now that we have a way to write cost issues, let's not rely on some arbitrary threshold (and also get rid of `EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME` issues in tests).
One consequence of this is that we will loose the cost traces in tests since `costs-report.json` doesn't have any traces. Next diff fixes that.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D21837574
fbshipit-source-id: 86b4d028d
Summary:
The model returns an array the length of which is the same to that of enum entries.
It takes the length of enum entries from the summary of `Enum.values` because it is not written in `tenv`. In order to do that, the model semantics should be able to request the summary of the function with `get_summary`, so I extended `model_env` to include the functionality.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D21843319
fbshipit-source-id: d6f10eb91
Summary:
The model returns an array the length of which is the number of known
fields in `tenv`.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D21840375
fbshipit-source-id: 891517c6e
Summary: D21816312 forgot to add the new cost testing mechanism to `fb-performance` and `performance-exlusive` directories. This diff fixes that.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D21837912
fbshipit-source-id: 407dafcd3
Summary: We were missing `performance-exclusive` and `fb-performance` tests in the list of cost analysis targets.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D21837972
fbshipit-source-id: 550d27918
Summary: The models were too naive before since they invalidated the underlying array completely (copying C++'s push_back model), causing spurious vector invalidation issues in Java. This diff adds more reasonable models.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D21787543
fbshipit-source-id: a5a59ff69
Summary:
In order to test cost analysis results, currently we rely on having an arbitrary cost threshold (200) and report issues that exceed this cost. For instance, a cost of 201 is considered expensive and reported as `EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME` issue in cost tests.
This means, if we change the cost analysis in a slight way that results in some constant cost increase under 200, we wouldn't able to detect it. I find this unsatisfactory and somewhat hacky.
This diff adds the ability to write the result of `costs-report.json` into a separate `cost-issues.exp` and then compare the actual costs (not only than relying on this arbitrary threshold reporting mechanism).
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D21816312
fbshipit-source-id: 93b531928
Summary: Add models for `View` methods that schedule on the UI thread.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D21767954
fbshipit-source-id: 015441ea7
Summary:
There were two problems: (1) `Signal.Expert.handle` does not call exit by itself; (2) it calls `flush` inside, which introduced deadlock, result in zombie processes.
This diff changes overall processes of the signal handler.
1. It uses `Caml.Sys.set_signal` instead of `Signal.Expert.handle`.
2. Inside the signal handler it raises an exception, then which is catched in `uncaught_exception_handler` of `Config.ml`. Epilogues are executed there.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D21769246
fbshipit-source-id: cecd998c6
Summary:
IR/ should contain modules pertaining to the core IR of infer, i.e. how
CFGs are represented (including SIL).
These categories of modules were moved:
- Access paths and HIL are an abstraction on top of SIL used by certain
analyses. Moving the corresponding modules to IR/ makes this clearer
as they are not really part of the IR (they are less fundamental than
SIL).
- Error reporting is also something for other analyses, not part of IR.
Moved a bunch of modules related to that to absint/.
- Same for ProcnameDispatcher
- biabduction-speficic modules: Objc_models, BiabductionModels
- test-determinator-specific modules: JProcname
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D21722368
fbshipit-source-id: b28e9bdac
Summary:
Android OS calls certain overridden class methods always on the UI thread. The function changed here attempted to build a list of all these methods, one by one. It's much more complete to simply consider a method as callable on the UI thread if it's an override of an Android library method, and it starts with "on". Only a single instance is known not to obey this pattern, so it's easier to blacklist than to whitelist.
Also clarify the name to `is_android_lifecycle_method`.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D21703365
fbshipit-source-id: 41ca3e998
Summary:
In inferbo's domain, `Loc.t` and `Symb.SymbolPath.partial` are defined with the same *field abstraction*. The depth of appended fields were limited in both of them exactly in the same way, e.g. `x.*.field`. Problem is that the implementation related
to the field abstraction are duplicated in their code, which had been synchronized manually. This diff avoids the duplication by adding a `BufferOverrunField.t`.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D21743728
fbshipit-source-id: 4b01d027c
Summary: This is more idiomatic in OCaml and hopefully a bit easier to read. Internally `lazy` will do pretty much the same thing but it also ensures the callback is called at most once.
Reviewed By: artempyanykh
Differential Revision: D21722522
fbshipit-source-id: 00897aaf1
Summary:
This is the same as Exceptions.Checkers. Eventual goal is to stop having
all issues going through the Exceptions layer.
Reviewed By: dulmarod
Differential Revision: D21686937
fbshipit-source-id: bd92fd0ff
Summary:
It seems these were put there even though there is no inter-dependency
with any of the other options.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D21686739
fbshipit-source-id: 6578f55c2
Summary:
I think `Analysis_stops` ought to achieve roughly the same thing (except
that weird filtering logic which I removed).
Reviewed By: dulmarod
Differential Revision: D21686562
fbshipit-source-id: 53d40729f
Summary:
The option was misleading as it only concerns the biabduction analysis.
Moreover, this is a developer option, and one can already see it by
removing filtering altogether. I think this option was added as the
result of a user request, let's see if anyone notices.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D21686526
fbshipit-source-id: ff383a0ca
Summary:
Don't assign different visibilities to the same issue type dynamically,
use different issue types with always static visibility instead. This is
to be able to document the visibility of each issue type.
Reviewed By: dulmarod
Differential Revision: D21686458
fbshipit-source-id: 876ab4157
Summary:
We allow some fields of issues to be defined dynamically, more precisely
when loading AL files. We don't want this to be abused and in particular
we don't want to miss an issue being declared once for a checker and
another time for another as this would be hard to debug.
Also, only register unknown issue types as coming from AL if they
haven't been registered already.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D21685879
fbshipit-source-id: 9e9438a75
Summary: Assigning `nullptr` to `std::function` was causing `NULLPTR_DEREFERENCE` as our model was expecting to get an object in the right hand side of the assignment (`std::function::operator=`) and was dereferencing that object. Assigning `nullptr` to `std::function` removes callable object from it. We model this special case by creating a fresh value.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D21685318
fbshipit-source-id: 2d4af1933
Summary:
- fix compilation errors due to bitrot
- ensure they don't happen again by adding dune files
- make a quick pass through the README
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D21684760
fbshipit-source-id: c541f9376
Summary:
It was unused except one place in JsonReports where we disabled
filtering for the Linters category. But, it seems the behaviour is the
same without that since the only filtering this does is for bucketting
for certain bug types, which doesn't include any linters bug types.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D21683723
fbshipit-source-id: d0555531b
Summary:
That was an interesting way to do things. But let's not. Also the logic
to fill in the CIssue.t should probably do something to check that each
field was provided instead of just filling them with default values but
that's a separate concern.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D21664619
fbshipit-source-id: d49b74458