Summary: public This diff changes the way we treat enums in Infer.
1. The semantics of the translation is now correct, it was a bit incorrect before.
2. We don't add the enum types to the tenv anymore, which saves a lot of disk space
and avoids errors in the backend dealing with the enum type.
Reviewed By: akotulski
Differential Revision: D2641903
fb-gh-sync-id: 6295e5f
Summary: public
This adds the following subtyping rules:
- methods that are not annotated with Expensive cannot be overwritten by a method annotated with Expensive
- methods annotated with PerformanceCritical must be overwitten by method annotated with PerformanceCritical
Reviewed By: cristianoc
Differential Revision: D2636076
fb-gh-sync-id: eb616c9
Summary: public
Just works by running the analysis bottom-up and promoting any method as virtually annotated with `Expensive` whenever one of its callee is annotated with `Expensive`
Reviewed By: cristianoc
Differential Revision: D2635242
fb-gh-sync-id: 4401be6
Summary: public
C++ allows to have one variable declared+initialized as a condition statement.
Handle these cases properly for `if` and `while` statements.
Reviewed By: dulmarod
Differential Revision: D2625774
fb-gh-sync-id: bac95b8
Summary: public
This is an initial version of the Expensive checker which only report violations on direct calls. The main objective is to setup all the files for this new checker.
The next steps are:
1) run the checker in interprocedural mode
2) Save in the summary of a method foo() the annotation attribute Expensive if a direct callee of foo is annotated with Expensive
3) Check that Expensive is enforced by subtyping, i.e. check that non-expensive method cannot be overwritten by a method annotated with Expensive
Reviewed By: cristianoc
Differential Revision: D2629947
fb-gh-sync-id: 0e06f85
Summary: public
Translate CXXConstructExpr that are parts of variable initialization.
Reviewed By: dulmarod
Differential Revision: D2570750
fb-gh-sync-id: 708a457
Summary: public
The context leaks were reported multiple times. If a leaks was found on method `f()` and `g()` calls `f()`, then the same leak was report both in `f()` and in `g()`.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D2598110
fb-gh-sync-id: ca90b57
Summary: public
Extends the current activity leak checker to all sort of context leaks.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D2572548
fb-gh-sync-id: 9da18e4
Summary: public This diff fixes incorrect mangling of captured variables in blocks. Because they are formals,
they shouldn't be mangled, but this case was not taken into account. This caused an assert false in the
example infer/tests/codetoanalyze/objc/frontend/block/block.m which wasn't caught before because there
wasn't an endtoend test for it.
Reviewed By: akotulski
Differential Revision: D2560379
fb-gh-sync-id: db500b6
Summary: public
C++ assignment operation result is lvalue, while in C it was rvalue.
This leads to different AST produced by clang for then same code!
Use language information from clang (`-x` flag) to distinguish these cases.
More specifically, let's look at following code:
int r;
int f = (r = 3);
// type of (r = 3) expression:
// C/objC -> int rvalue
// C++/objC++ -> int lvalue
Existing code did extra dereference because it was rvalue in C and there was no cast afterwards
in C++ there will be extra LValueToRvalue cast when neccesary so we don't have to do extra dereference manually
Reference:
http://en.cppreference.com/w/c/language/value_category (search for 'assignment and compound assignment operators')
NOTE: AST output doesn't change when something is hidden behind `extern "C"`, so we should use global language information
Reviewed By: ddino
Differential Revision: D2549866
fb-gh-sync-id: b193b11
Summary: public
Dictionary literals are normally implemented using
`+dictionaryWithObjects:forKeys:count:` but were modeled as
`+dictionaryWithObjectsAndKeys:`
In particular, `@{@"aaa": nil}` would trigger a sentinel error instead of an NPE.
This models dictionary literals as a special infer builtin that the backend
interprets so as to give NPEs when passed nil objects or keys.
Reviewed By: dulmarod
Differential Revision: D2550039
fb-gh-sync-id: 1a10656
Summary: @public
This diff changes following things:
1. expression_info.type_ptr has type than decl_ref_info.type_ptr for reference types. Use type from decl_ref_info as a source of truth
2. reference types need to have one extra dereference that is not in AST. Add handling for this.
3. [small refactor] create function that creates temporary variable from res_trans expression and returns new res_trans.
Some caveats:
1. types are not quite right yet (see .dot files).
2. decl_ref_info might not be set for DeclRefExpr, make frontend crash in that case to catch when this happens
This is high risk change since it changes behavior of every translation on very widely used expr.
Reviewed By: @dulmarod
Differential Revision: D2540632
fb-gh-sync-id: aa28936
Summary: @public Add some basic tests to make sure that there is no
regression afterwards
Reviewed By: @dulmarod
Differential Revision: D2521887
fb-gh-sync-id: 1b8a15c
Summary: @public Infer previously did not work correctly when a function returns the result of a skip function:
```
retUndef() {
x = undefined();
return x;
}
derefUndef() {
y = retUndef();
y.doSomething(); // Symexec_memory_error here, prevents spec inference
}
```
The problem is that angelic mode did not know to add the return value of `retUndef()` to the footprint.
This diff fixes the problem by adding return values marked with the `Aundef` attribute to the footprint.
This is done lazily (e.g., a value only gets added to the footprint when you try to deref it).
Reviewed By: @jvillard
Differential Revision: D2444929
Summary:
In the new clang the parameters to these functions have notnull annotations, because of that infer tests fail. More concretely, the tests say there would be a memory leak. In the symbolic execution of those functions though, an inconsistency is created, because the parameter was nil, and the constraint argument should not be nil was also there, which leads to an error in the execution and no object is created, hence, no memory leak.
Summary:
Added two annotations @TrueOnNull and @FalseOnNull to be used for boolean functions to specify what value is returned when the argument is null.
Added model for TextUtils.isEmpty, which corresponds to the annotation
@TrueOnNull
static boolean isEmpty(@Nullable java.lang.CharSequence s)
Summary:
System.getProperty can return null when the property is not found, and expects a non-null argument.
Add models for Infer and Eradicate to reflect that.
Summary:
Errors arising from overriding methods defined in other files were not reported, because during parallel analysis the clusters did not have access to overridden methods, so could not load their annotation.
Changed cluster generation to add location information for the methods overridden by the procedures defined in the current cluster.
Summary:
When someone runs --changed-only mode, there is a risk of corrupting the results
for future analyses. The problem is that changed-only mode does not analyze the callers of changed
procedures. If a subsequent analysis relies on the specs of one of these callers, they will be stale
and may give the wrong results. To be concrete, let's say we know `Parent.foo()` calls `Child.bar()` and we do the following rounds of analysis:
Analysis round 1: Analyze all files, including `Parent` and `Child`
Analysis round 2: Analyze `Child.bar()` only with `--changed-only flag`. `Parent.foo()` is now stale.
Analysis round 3: Add procedure `Parent.baz()` that calls `Parent.foo()`, analyze in (any) incremental mode.
The analysis will only analyze `Parent.baz()`. However, the specs for `Parent.foo()` are stale and may give us bad results for `Parent.baz()`. We want the analysis to re-analyze `Parent.baz()`, but before this diff it will not.
This diff fixes this problem by adding a `STALE` status bit to procedure summaries. In `--changed-only` mode,
the callers of a changed procedures are not re-analyzed, but their summaries are marked as stale. For both
`--changed-only` and regular incremental mode, callees of changed procedures that are marked as stale are
re-analyzed even if they have not changed. This is better than a more obvious solution like deleting stale
procedure summaries, since that would force the next analysis to re-analyze all stale procedures even if it
does not need the results for whatever analysis it is doing. This scheme implemented in this diff ensures
that each analysis only does the work that it needs to compute reliable results for its changed procedures.
Summary: Handler.postDelayed keeps a persistent reference to its Runnable argument that may cause a memory leak if an Activity is reachable from the Runnable.
Summary: The Nullable checker reported FP's when a Nullable field/param was reassigned to a non-Nullable value in the footprint. This diff fixes the problem.
Summary:
This test was actually testing: "at least one Field not initialized error is found" where we actualy want to test "exactly one Field not initialized error is found". The case of @Inject was also missing from the tests.
Summary:
When detecting a resource leak, Infer used to raise an Leak exception and then prevent the specs to be computed for the paths containing a leak. This diff prevents resource leak to stop the analysis.
Summary:
Creating a persistent reference to an Activity leads to a nasty form of memory leaks (see http://android-developers.blogspot.com/2009/01/avoiding-memory-leaks.html, https://corner.squareup.com/2015/05/leak-canary.html). There are many ways to create a bad persistent reference to an Activity, but the most obvious one is via a static field.
This diff implements a very simple form of Activity leak checking by inspecting postconditions to see if a subtype of Activity is reachable from a static field (and it reports an error if so). This is a very simple and limited form of leak checking that does not understand the Android lifecycle at all. In particular, if one creates a persistent reference to an Activity and then nulls it out in `onDestroy` (a reasonably common pattern), this approach will wrongly report a bug.
Summary:
The methods in objc can have the same name in the same class, but one be instance and the other class,
so that we need to take the instance flag into account when defining unique names for ObjC methods.
Summary:
The symbolic execution was not stopping in case an unitialized dangling pointer was
passed to a function and then dereferenced inside the callee.
What would happen is that a wrong footprint would be added to the unititialized pointer
at the end of the function call in the caller proposition.
This checks that if we do:
frame * new_footprint
checks that we do not add heap predicates to the frame into uninitialized local variables.
If we can identify the variable then we raise a danglind pointer dereference. If instead
we cannot give a good explanation we give an internal error.
The latter case should be temporary. We should find a general way to raise dangling pointer
deref instead of the internal error.
I also fixed the model of getc that was the way I found the problem.
Summary:
This adds a sentinel check every time a function carrying a sentinel attribute
is called, regardless of whether we have a definition for that function or not.
Josh Berdine
Dulma Rodriguez
jrm
Andrzej Kotulski
Dino Distefano
Jules Villard
Sam Blackshear
Cristiano Calcagno