Summary:
Currently, if there are several reports on the same line, the most important one is reported together with a message containing how many reports were suppressed.
This is sometimes causing the bug hash we use believe that a report is introduced (eg if the number of suppressed reports changes).
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D13067306
fbshipit-source-id: 1cc0c6d3a
Summary:
Messages emitted by cost-analysis now look like the following:
Complexity of this function has **increased** from `O(1)` to `O(n)`.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D13058008
fbshipit-source-id: 119037703
Summary:
Update clang plugin which now gives names to variables captured by lambdas that were empty before.
update-submodule: facebook-clang-plugins
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D12979015
fbshipit-source-id: 0b092fb24
Summary:
It turns out keeping attributes (such as invalidation facts) separate
from the memory is a bad idea and leads to loss of precision and false
positives, as seen in the new test (which previously generated a
report).
Allow me to illustrate on this example, which is a stylised version of
the issue in the added test: previously we'd have:
```
state1 = { x = 1; invalids={} }
state2 = { x = 2; invalids ={1} }
join(state1, state2) = { x = {1, 2}; invalids={{1, 2}} }
```
So even though none of the states said that `x` pointed to an invalid
location, the join state says it does because `1` and `2` have been
glommed together. The fact `x=1` from `state1` and the fact "1 is
invalid" from `state2` conspire together and `x` is now invalid even
though it shouldn't.
Instead, if we record attributes as part of the memory we get that `x`
is still valid after the join:
```
state1 = { x = (1, {}) }
state2 = { x = (2, {}) }
join(state1, state2) = { x = ({1, 2}, {}) }
```
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D12958130
fbshipit-source-id: 53dc81cc7
Summary:
I hear that this scheduler is better. I want the best scheduler
possible. Also pulse's join is a bit complex so it might matter one day.
whydididothis
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D12958131
fbshipit-source-id: 3bd77ccba
Summary: There is a bug on the instantiation of function parameters.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D12973691
fbshipit-source-id: ca7fbc4e6
Summary: The aligned width of bool should be 1-byte, while the range of bool [0,1].
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D12932394
fbshipit-source-id: be1a5d6d1
Summary: For a general case of `operator=` we want to create a fresh location for the first parameter as `operator=` behaves as copy assignment.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D12940635
fbshipit-source-id: 89c6e530d
Summary:
Whenever `vec.reserve(n)` is called, remember that the vector is
"reserved". When doing `vec.push_back(x)` on a reserved vector, assume
enough size has been reserved in advance and do not invalidate the
underlying array.
This gets rid of false positives.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D12939837
fbshipit-source-id: ce6354fc5
Summary:
Instead of keeping at most one invalidation fact for each address, keep
a set of them and call them "attributes". Keeping a set of invalidation
facts is redundant since we always only want the smallest one, but
makes the implementation simpler, especially once we add more kinds of
attributes (used for modelling, see next diffs).
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D12939839
fbshipit-source-id: 4a54c2132
Summary:
Copied on the ownership checker logic: return the initial value of the
domain as return. This can probably be improved.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D12888102
fbshipit-source-id: 9e2dac7fc
Summary:
When initialising a variable via semi-exotic means, the frontend loses
the information that the variable was initialised. For instance, it
translates:
```
struct Foo { int i; };
...
Foo s = {42};
```
as:
```
s.i := 42
```
This can be confusing for backends that need to know that `s` actually
got initialised, eg pulse.
The solution implemented here is to insert of dummy call to
`__variable_initiazition`:
```
__variable_initialization(&s);
s.i := 42;
```
Then checkers can recognise that this builtin function does what its
name says.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D12887122
fbshipit-source-id: 6e7214438
Summary:
Now that arrays are dealt with separately (see previous diff), we can
turn the join back into an over-approximation as far as invalid
locations are concerned.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D12881989
fbshipit-source-id: fd85e49c0
Summary:
Arrays are the main source of false positives that prevent us from
having a better (less under-approximate) join in general. The next diff
improves join and I split this off to make it easier to review.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D12881986
fbshipit-source-id: 5f52dea27
Summary:
This prevents the join from wrongly assuming that we haven't seen a
variable on one side of the join.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D12881987
fbshipit-source-id: 42a776adb
Summary:
Smaller numbers are easier to read and abstract addresses should never
be shared across functions anyway.
Reviewed By: da319
Differential Revision: D12881988
fbshipit-source-id: f9bcfa343
Mehdi Bouaziz
Nikos Gorogiannis
Dino Distefano
Martino Luca
Jules Villard
Ezgi Çiçek
Sungkeun Cho
Daiva Naudziuniene
Martin Trojer