Summary: There are no plans currently to track which lock protects each access, so reduce to the functional equivalent of having a singleton lock domain.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D20595013
fbshipit-source-id: d5100ac49
Summary:
As exemplified by added tests, pulse computes an empty summary (with 0 disjuncts) whenever it discovers a contradiction which might be caused by:
- discovering aliasing in memory
- widening limited number of times in loops and concluding that loop exit conditions are never taken
However, AFAIU, it is not possible to have a function with 0 disjunct apart from such anomalities. Even a function which does nothing like `void foo(){}` has 1 disjuncts:
```
Pulse: 1 pre/post(s)
#0: PRE:
{ roots={ };
mem ={ };
attrs={ };}
POST:
{ roots={ };
mem ={ };
attrs={ };}
SKIPPED_CALLS: { }
```
The aim of this diff is to consider functions with 0 disjuncts as **impure** because most often such cases are impure, rather than actually pure.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D20619504
fbshipit-source-id: 3a8502c90
Summary:
Although try-with-resource is supported by nullsafe this code pattern
throws it off and make nullsafe report on a virtual **b**yte-**c**ode
variable.
Check out debug output from `TryWithResource` (or attached
visualisation of CFG):
0. node14: $bcvar2=null (on entry to try-with-resource).
1. node16: n$14=$bcvar2, but **also** PRUNE(!(n$14 == null), true). Then we go to
2. node18: do something here and in case of exception go to
3. node25->node23->node19->node20: and here we do
$bcvar2->addSuppressed(...).
Because on step 1 we refined nullability of n$14, but didn't refine
nullability of $bcvar20, on step 3 we are sure that $bcvar is null and
therefore issue an error.
Reviewed By: mityal
Differential Revision: D20558343
fbshipit-source-id: 520505039
Summary:
This is likely not the final refinement, rather one step forward.
We classify all classes by 3 categories:
- Nullsafe and 0 issues
- can add Nullsafe and will be 0 issues
- the rest (class needs improvement)
Each class will fall into exactly one category.
Error messaging is WIP, they are not intended to be surfaced to the user
just yet.
Note how this diff uses the result of the previous refactoring.
Reviewed By: artempyanykh
Differential Revision: D20512999
fbshipit-source-id: 7f462d29d
Summary: Add a flag `is-inclusive-cost` (`true` by default) which computes inclusive cost for each function. Setting the flag to `false` computes exclusive cost of the function where the cost of the callees are assumed to be `0`.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D20558275
fbshipit-source-id: 6b5798916
Summary:
This function is used to adapt the callee summary at a call site. It did two things for every domain element in the callee summary:
- A linear search through the list of actuals.
- For each such actual, it would (repeatedly) compute its ownership (!).
For large summaries this can be substantial. The right way is to precompute the ownership for all actuals once and then simply retrieve it (via an array).
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D20564447
fbshipit-source-id: 1ca3121c2
Summary: The attribute types present are exclusive, so sets are not needed for the attribute map domain. This changes `Attribute` to a flat domain and removes the set on top of that.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D20560240
fbshipit-source-id: 83e59d73e
Summary:
Both modules define properties the analysis maps to addresses, there is no reason to have two modules for this.
Also remove an instance of `Caml.Not_found` usage.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D20558683
fbshipit-source-id: eacafd780
Summary:
# Problem
Consider
```
some_method(Object a) { a.deref(); }
```
What is nullability of `a` when we dereference it?
Logically, things like "LocallyCheckedNonnull" etc are not applicable
here.
This would be applicable if we called some_method() outside! But not
inside. Inside the function, it can freely treat params as non-null, as
long they are declared as non-nullable.
The best we can capture it is via StrictNonnull nullability.
Reviewed By: artempyanykh
Differential Revision: D20536586
fbshipit-source-id: 5c2ba7f0d
Summary:
# Problem
Yes, nullsafe is not null-safe, such an irony.
ErrorRenderingUtils overuses `option` and `let+` constructions. Most of
internal functions can return `None` when "something is wrong".
On top of this, "default" pattern match is overused either.
Because of this, `ErrorRenderingUtils.mk_nullsafe_special_issue` returns
optional type. In practice, this result can be None for many unclear
reasons, and it is super tricky to even understand them all.
This in turn forced AssignmentRule and DereferenceRule to process this
None is defensive way. The rules have some theory why None was returned,
and have assertions along the way.
Turns out those theories might be wrong. This diff will make triaging wrong assumptions easier.
Reviewed By: artempyanykh
Differential Revision: D20535720
fbshipit-source-id: 2b81e25b7
Summary: When we have clashing args to bug (for instance -j and -Xbuck --num-threads) CLI passed -Xbuck args should win.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D20557060
fbshipit-source-id: 726fc501a
Summary:
`make test` failed in some test directories, because we were getting warnings
```
Foo.java uses unchecked or unsafe operations.
```
This diff fixes or suppresses these warnings.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D20557572
fbshipit-source-id: 63ecd3dfa
Summary:
First version of a new memory leak check based on Pulse. The idea is to examine unreachable cells in the heap and check that the "Allocated" attribute is available but the "Invalid CFree" isn't. This is done when we remove variables from the state.
Currently it only works for malloc, we can extend it to other allocation functions later.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D20444097
fbshipit-source-id: 33b6b25a2
Summary:
- Add more naive pulse models for:
- `System.arraycopy`
- `StringBuilder.setLength`
- `StringBuilder.delete`
- Model the following as pure
- `SparseArrayCompat.valueAt`
- `File.get...`
- Add a nice test
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D20513397
fbshipit-source-id: 6d412d13a
Summary:
`to_reportable_violation` is responsible for identifying if the
violation is reportable in this mode or not.
This logic is higly coupled with other functions in
`ReportableViolation`, such as `get_description`: You can not have
sensible description on the violation that is NOT reportable in a given
mode.
So from logical perpsective, creation of `ReportableViolation.t` should
belong to this module itself, not to the parent `Rule` module.
This change will make design clearer.
Reviewed By: artempyanykh
Differential Revision: D20511756
fbshipit-source-id: ef27b5057
Summary:
This diff finishes work in D20491716.
We removed dependency on nullsafe mode for field initialization in
D20491716, so this diff just formalizes it.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D20493164
fbshipit-source-id: 6ac612e78
Summary:
This diff continues work in D20491716.
This time for Inheritance Rule.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D20492889
fbshipit-source-id: c4dfd95c3
Summary:
This diff continues work in D20491716.
This time for Dereference Rule.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D20492296
fbshipit-source-id: ff7f824f9
Summary:
# Problem
In current design, Rules (assignment rule, dereference rule, inheritance
rule) decide, depending on the mode, wether the issue is legit or not.
If the issue is not actionable for the given mode, it won't be created
and registered.
For meta-issues, we want to be able to do smart things like:
- Identify if we can raise strictness of the mode without
introducing new issues
- Classify classes on "clean" vs "broken", taking into account issues
that are currently invisible.
# Solution
In the new design:
1. Rules are issuing violations independently of mode. This makes sense
semantically. Mode is "level of trust we have for suspicious things",
but the thing does not cease to be suspicious in any mode.
2. Each Rule decides if it is reportable or not in a given mode.
3. `nullsafe_mode` is passed to the function `register_error`, that 1)
adds error so it can be recorded in summary for file-level analysis
phase 2) reports some of them to the user.
# This diff
This diff converts only AssignmentRule, follow up will include
conversion of other rules, so no issue encapsutes the mode.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D20491716
fbshipit-source-id: af17dd66d
Summary:
`make deadcode` is failing on master but our CI jobs didn't catch it :(
Let's fix existing deadcode for now.
Reviewed By: martintrojer
Differential Revision: D20510062
fbshipit-source-id: 4a5e5f849
Summary:
Previously, at each function call, we added a `WrittenTo` attribute for applying the address of the actuals. However, this results in mistakenly considering each function application that inspects its argument as impure. Instead, we should only propagate `WrittenTo` if the actuals have already `WrittenTo` attributes.
For instance, for the following functions
```
public static boolean is_null(Byte a) {
return a == null;
}
public static boolean call_is_null(Byte a) {
return is_null(a);
}
```
We used to get the following pulse summary for `call_is_null` (showing only one of the disjuncts):
```
#0: PRE:
{ roots={ &a=v1 };
mem ={ v1 -> { * -> v2 } };
attrs={ v1 -> { MustBeValid },
v2 -> { Arith =null, BoItv ([max(0, v2), min(0, v2)]) } };}
POST:
{ roots={ &a=v1, &return=v8 };
mem ={ v1 -> { * -> v2 }, v8 -> { * -> v4 } };
attrs={ v2 -> { Arith =null,
BoItv ([max(0, v2), min(0, v2)]),
WrittenTo-----------WRONG },
v4 -> { Arith =1,
BoItv (1),
Invalid ConstantDereference(is the constant 1),
WrittenTo-----------WRONG },
v8 -> { WrittenTo } };}
SKIPPED_CALLS: { }
```
where we mistakenly recorded a `WrittenTo` for `v2` (what `a` points to). As a result, we considered `call_is_null` as impure :( This diff fixes that since the callee `is_null` doesn't have any `WrittenTo` attributes for its parameter `a`. So, we don't propagate `WrittenTo` and get the following summary
```
#0: PRE:
{ roots={ &a=v1 };
mem ={ v1 -> { * -> v2 } };
attrs={ v1 -> { MustBeValid },
v2 -> { Arith =null, BoItv ([max(0, v2), min(0, v2)]) } };}
POST:
{ roots={ &a=v1, &return=v8 };
mem ={ v1 -> { * -> v2 }, v8 -> { * -> v4 } };
attrs={ v2 -> { Arith =null, BoItv ([max(0, v2), min(0, v2)]) },
v4 -> { Arith =1,
BoItv (1),
Invalid ConstantDereference(is the constant 1) },
v8 -> { WrittenTo } };}
SKIPPED_CALLS: { }
```
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D20490102
fbshipit-source-id: 253d8ef64
Summary:
Make all arguments named and move function from `Procname.Java` to `Procname`, and making it return a `Procname.t` as opposed to `Procname.Java.t` (all callers want a `Procname` eventually).
Various other small fixes in the callers.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D20492305
fbshipit-source-id: e646cc799
Summary: These tests fail when seemingly unrelated changes are made to infer. In particular, it seems timeout limits have to be increased by 10x or more to make them succeed again. Disabling until we have a more stable replacement.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D20489647
fbshipit-source-id: 9706b0807
Summary:
This diff naively models the following as `StdVector.push_back`:
- `StringBuilder.append`
- `String.replace`
- `Queue.poll`
It also adds a FN test for `Iterator.next`.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D20469786
fbshipit-source-id: 2d8e8d117
Summary:
This diff is doing three things:
1. Finishes work paved in D20115024, and applies it to nullsafe. In that diff, we hardened API for
file level analysis. Here we use this API in nullsafe, so now we can
analyze things on file-level, not only in proc-level like it was before!
2. Introduces a class-level analysis. For Nullsafe purposes, file is not
an interesting granularity, but we want to analyze a lot of things on
file level. Interesting part here is anonymous classes and how we link
them to their corresponding user-defined classes.
3. Introduces a first (yet to be improved) implementation of class-level
analysis. Namely it is "meta-issues" that tell what is going with class
on high level. For now these are two primitive issues, and we will
refine them in follow up diffs. They are disabled by default.
Follow ups include:
1. Refining semantics of meta-issues.
2. Adding other issues that we could not analyze before or analyzed not
user friendly. Most importantly, we will use it to improve reporting for
FIELD NOT INITIALIZED, which is not very user friendly exactly because
of lack of class-level aggregation.
Reviewed By: artempyanykh
Differential Revision: D20417841
fbshipit-source-id: 59ba7d2e3
Summary: The `FN_loop2` was not actually FN because infer analyzes its complexity as degree 1 correctly.
Reviewed By: dulmarod
Differential Revision: D20468367
fbshipit-source-id: 9e4c19415
Summary: The `iterate_over_mycollection_quad_FN` was not actually FN because infer analyzes its complexity as degree 2 correctly. So, this diff removed `_FN` from there.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D20467398
fbshipit-source-id: b10340612
Summary: There has never been a sufficient formal basis for soundness nor completeness of reports on locals. This diff changes the domain to effectively concern only expressions rooted at formals or globals.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D19769201
fbshipit-source-id: 36ae04d8c
Summary: `Object.clone` modeled as pure until the analysis can distinguish returning a fresh object vs. having no side-effects.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D20439998
fbshipit-source-id: 421054cfb
Summary:
As ngorogiannis pointed out, we never expect whitespaces in classname, so
stripping makes no sense here in best case, and hides a bug under rug in
worst case.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D20417033
fbshipit-source-id: bc7449171
Summary: Let's also print skipped calls in `pp` to ease debugging both for summary and intermediate steps.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D20417852
fbshipit-source-id: 7da03ae81
Summary:
There is a module and a module type in the file PulseAbductiveDomain.ml
with the same name. This is confusing and it's better to keep separate names.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D20388769
fbshipit-source-id: bcfed436e
Summary:
Be a bit more careful about the difference between PrePost.t and
AbductiveDomain.t. It's needed in another diff where the types will be
different.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D20393927
fbshipit-source-id: beaf80c90
Summary: In preparation for PulseArithmetic to be something else.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D20393928
fbshipit-source-id: d93131e12
Summary:
`JavaSplitName` is used to represent Java types (in `Procname` in particular). The type itself is a pair of string (an optional package qualifier) and a "type name" (the quotes are there because it may contain array qualifiers).
For example `java.lang.Object[][]` should be represented as
```
{package=Some "java.lang"; typename="Object[][]"}
```
The constructor `make` was misused to construct instead types such as
```
{package=None; typename="java.lang.Object[][]"}`
```
This is evident when we print the return type of a `Procname` non-verbosely (the default), but we still see the package qualifier.
Obviously this is not just a pretty-printing bug, the values were themselves wrong.
The fix is to use the `of_string` constructor which will parse the package and separate it correctly. Another bug (in response to this one) had to be fixed in `Procname.is_vararg` to maintain behaviour in Nullsafe and Quandary.
Reviewed By: mityal
Differential Revision: D20394146
fbshipit-source-id: 4633902eb
Summary:
We will use it in follow up diffs.
From many perspectives, if the function belongs to an anonymous class,
it is useful to know the original user-defined class.
This function makes this distinction clear.
Thanks to ngorogiannis, whos work on refactoring `Typ.name` made this module
easy enough so we can introduce unit tests!
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D20389311
fbshipit-source-id: 408d95660
Summary: `Procname.Java.get_return_typ` is buggy because whenever faced with an array of objects, it returns a type that implies the object is stored by value in the array (this is correct behaviour only when the element type is primitive, not when it's an object type).
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D20384403
fbshipit-source-id: d91322d3a
Summary:
We try to consolidate Java-specific stuff in JavaClassName.
Let's introduce the function in JavaClassName and make it clear that
its analog in Typ.Name.Java one throws if called on a wrong type.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D20386357
fbshipit-source-id: a1577ef8b
Sungkeun Cho
Nikos Gorogiannis
Ezgi Çiçek
Mitya Lyubarskiy
Artem Pianykh
Martin Trojer
Dulma Churchill
Jules Villard