Summary: It fixes the conditions of the `check` function to address `is_collection_add` cases correctly.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D13081281
fbshipit-source-id: 39ae5ef03
Summary: Experimental feature: Use memcached for summaries as a look-aside cache during analysis.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D12939311
fbshipit-source-id: 9f78994e2
Summary:
Currently, if there are several reports on the same line, the most important one is reported together with a message containing how many reports were suppressed.
This is sometimes causing the bug hash we use believe that a report is introduced (eg if the number of suppressed reports changes).
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D13067306
fbshipit-source-id: 1cc0c6d3a
Summary:
Messages emitted by cost-analysis now look like the following:
Complexity of this function has **increased** from `O(1)` to `O(n)`.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D13058008
fbshipit-source-id: 119037703
Summary:
Update clang plugin which now gives names to variables captured by lambdas that were empty before.
update-submodule: facebook-clang-plugins
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D12979015
fbshipit-source-id: 0b092fb24
Summary:
It turns out keeping attributes (such as invalidation facts) separate
from the memory is a bad idea and leads to loss of precision and false
positives, as seen in the new test (which previously generated a
report).
Allow me to illustrate on this example, which is a stylised version of
the issue in the added test: previously we'd have:
```
state1 = { x = 1; invalids={} }
state2 = { x = 2; invalids ={1} }
join(state1, state2) = { x = {1, 2}; invalids={{1, 2}} }
```
So even though none of the states said that `x` pointed to an invalid
location, the join state says it does because `1` and `2` have been
glommed together. The fact `x=1` from `state1` and the fact "1 is
invalid" from `state2` conspire together and `x` is now invalid even
though it shouldn't.
Instead, if we record attributes as part of the memory we get that `x`
is still valid after the join:
```
state1 = { x = (1, {}) }
state2 = { x = (2, {}) }
join(state1, state2) = { x = ({1, 2}, {}) }
```
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D12958130
fbshipit-source-id: 53dc81cc7
Summary:
I hear that this scheduler is better. I want the best scheduler
possible. Also pulse's join is a bit complex so it might matter one day.
whydididothis
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D12958131
fbshipit-source-id: 3bd77ccba
Summary: There is a bug on the instantiation of function parameters.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D12973691
fbshipit-source-id: ca7fbc4e6
Sungkeun Cho
Mehdi Bouaziz
Martino Luca
Nikos Gorogiannis
Ezgi Çiçek
Dino Distefano
Jules Villard
Daiva Naudziuniene
Martin Trojer