Summary: StarvationModels depended on StarvationDomain which is the wrong way around, and forbids using *Models from *Domain.
Reviewed By: mityal
Differential Revision: D17809431
fbshipit-source-id: 5aa369e7c
Summary: The type hierarchy was traversed multiple times when searching for annotations: once for methods/overrides annotated and once for superclasses. This can be done in one pass.
Reviewed By: dulmarod
Differential Revision: D17787172
fbshipit-source-id: 248dd4c27
Summary:
The old domain keeps two sets:
- `events` are things (including lock acquisitions) which eventually happen during the execution of a procedure.
- `order` are pairs of `(lock, event)` such that there is a trace through the procedure which at some point acquires `lock` and before releasing it performs `event`.
A deadlock would be reported if for two procedures, `(lock1,lock2)` is in `order` of procedure 1 and `(lock2,lock1)` is in `order` of procedure 2. This condition/domain allowed for the false positive fixed in the tests, as well as was unwieldy, because it required translating between the two sets.
The new domain has only one set of "critical pairs" `(locks, event)` such that there is a trace where `event` occurs, and *right before it occurs* the locks held are exactly `locks` (no over/under approximation). This allows keeping all information in one set, simplifies the procedure call handling and eliminates the known false positive.
Reviewed By: mityal
Differential Revision: D17686944
fbshipit-source-id: 3c68bb957
Summary:
Previously deduplication was always on which is not great for testing.
Also split tests so that we can still test deduplication separately.
Reviewed By: mityal
Differential Revision: D17686877
fbshipit-source-id: 280d91473
Summary:
Summary.ml defines both a bunch of types and how to use them and a
mechanism to save and store summaries on disk while maintaining a
complex in-memory cache of what's on disk. Make the distinction clear.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D16358869
fbshipit-source-id: 9d4c6cb77
Summary:
The fields `tenv` and `integer_type_widths` can be obtained from the `exe_env` field of `proc_callback_args`
This commit removes the redundant fields
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D16149520
fbshipit-source-id: d37526fd4
Summary:
Cluster checkers call `SummaryPayload.read` but set the `caller_summary` to correspond to the same summary as gives the `callee_pname`
This change introduces a new method `read_toplevel_procedure` that does not require a `caller_summary`, to be used by the cluster checkers
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D16131660
fbshipit-source-id: 12caa1000
Summary:
Change the datatype `ProcData` to include a field of type `Summary.t` instead of a field of type `Procdesc.t`
This will enable a later commit to supply a summary to `Ondemand.analyze_proc_desc` and `Ondemand.analyze_proc_name`
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D16121405
fbshipit-source-id: 342374121
Summary:
The record `proc_callback_args` (defined in `callbacks.ml`) contains the fields `proc_desc` and `summary`.
The field `proc_desc` is redundant because it can be obtained from `summary`.
This diff removes `proc_desc` and uses the summary to obtain it where needed.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D16090783
fbshipit-source-id: 5632d1f4a
Summary:
Bundle all non-semantic-bearing instructions into a `Metadata _`
instruction in SIL.
- On a documentation level this makes clearer the distinction between
instructions that encode the semantics of the program and those that are
just hints for the various backend analysis.
- This makes it easier to add more of these auxiliary instructions in
the future. For example, the next diff introduces a new `Skip` auxiliary
instruction to replace the hacky `ExitScope([], Location.dummy)`.
- It also makes it easier to surface all current and future such
auxiliary instructions to HIL as the datatype for these syntactic hints
can be shared between SIL and HIL. This diff brings `Nullify` and
`Abstract` to HIL for free.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D14827674
fbshipit-source-id: f68fe2110
Summary:
A lot of functors that take a `Make{SIL,HIL}` can take a `{SIL,HIL}`
directly instead. This makes my head hurt a bit less.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D13416967
fbshipit-source-id: eb0b33bc4
Summary:
`AccessExpression.t` and `HilExp.t` are about to become mutually
recursive, this will help distinguish the actual changes from the moving
of code around.
This deletes the file left around in the previous commit to preserve
callers of `AccessExpression`.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D13377645
fbshipit-source-id: 71338d1f3
Summary:
Currently, if there are several reports on the same line, the most important one is reported together with a message containing how many reports were suppressed.
This is sometimes causing the bug hash we use believe that a report is introduced (eg if the number of suppressed reports changes).
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D13067306
fbshipit-source-id: 1cc0c6d3a
Summary:
An order constraint (A,B) means we take lock A and before releasing it we perform B (whatever that is).
Previously if a method call crossed class boundaries, we removed the callee's order constraints before integrating the callee's summary to that of the caller. The reasoning was that this may lead to reports blaming a caller for something they are very far from, plus a proliferation of reports with the same bad endpoint.
The first reason still applies, but this is a general problem. It may be better to report and let developers deal with it.
The second reason is moot, since in differential mode most of these reports are hidden.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D10173200
fbshipit-source-id: 9afbf292c
Summary:
Make distinct reports on strict mode violations.
For now, restrict to direct violations (UI threads calls transitively a violating method).
Will assess impact and enable indirect reports later (via locks).
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D10126780
fbshipit-source-id: 9c75930bc
Summary:
The method matcher is now used sufficiently it warrants refactoring out into its own module.
Also, kill dev-android-strict-mode and leave starvation-strict-mode as the stronger option.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D9990753
fbshipit-source-id: 626a70a19
Summary: Sometimes it's very confusing to see why infer believes a method is running on the UI thread. Make a trace out of all the relevant info.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D9781212
fbshipit-source-id: 6d018e400
Summary:
First step in writing an analyzer that is meant to run only on Android core library implementation.
This will, when finished, compute the library entrypoints that may lead to a strict mode violation.
The normal analyzer will use those to statically flag strict mode violations in app code.
Strict Mode is an Android debug mode, where doing certain things (like disk read/write or network activity) on the UI thread will raise an exception. We want to statically catch these, as well as indirect versions (the UI thread takes a lock and another thread holding that lock calls a method that would be a strict mode violation).
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D9634407
fbshipit-source-id: c30bcedb3
Summary:
- changes the `Ondemand` callbacks to take the execution environment instead of a `get_proc_desc` function.
- removes all the cases passing `get_proc_desc` as parameter to use `Ondemand.get_proc_desc` instead.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D9200583
fbshipit-source-id: d16c218b5
Summary:
Guava subclasses Future in ways that make .get() calls safe from the UI thread.
Treat such methods as skip.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D9013475
fbshipit-source-id: 38373aa5f
Summary:
The execution environment is really just a cache. It happens to point to a
particular source file which is where the analysis was started from, but that
is not relevant, and in fact is confusing because it suggests that it is
somewhat tied to that file. In reality, exe_env caches information about any
procedure and source file encountered by the analysis.
This will make it easier to make further changes but I think it also brings a
bit more clarity to the code.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D8513735
fbshipit-source-id: f4b38ce
Summary: Code auto generated by annotation processors or by the compiler is creating non-actionable reports, so skip it for now.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D8395781
fbshipit-source-id: 9832814
Summary:
We need to report on non-private methods (the opposite even leads to FPs sometimes on deadlocks). To do this, the domain needs to change so that the interpretation of an order pair `a,b` is no longer "lock `a` is taken in the *current method* and held until lock `b` is taken". Instead the meaning is now "lock `a` is taken in some method *of the same class with the current method* and is held until `b` is taken".
These changes are quite drastic because the previous implementation optimised extensively around the previous use case.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D8395351
fbshipit-source-id: a2bd22b
Summary:
The deadlock reports (the actual string) were too low level, in order to avoid bug hash clashes. Now that we deduplicate this is less of an issue, so it's an opportunity to improve readability.
```
Potential deadlock.
Trace 1 (starts at `void Interproc.interproc1Bad(InterprocA)`) first locks `this` in class `Interproc*` (line 9 in `void Interproc.interproc1Bad(InterprocA)`) and then locks `b` in class `InterprocA*` (line 14 in `void Interproc.interproc2Bad(InterprocA)`).
Trace 2 (starts at `void InterprocA.interproc1Bad(Interproc)`), first locks `this` in class `InterprocA*` (line 37 in `void InterprocA.interproc1Bad(Interproc)`) and then locks `d` in class `Interproc*` (line 42 in `void InterprocA.interproc2Bad(Interproc)`).
```
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D8394978
fbshipit-source-id: 671ccb0
Summary:
The deadlock reports (the actual string) were too low level, in order to avoid bug hash clashes. Now that we deduplicate this is less of an issue, so it's an opportunity to improve readability.
```
Potential deadlock.
Trace 1 (starts at `void Interproc.interproc1Bad(InterprocA)`) first locks `this` in class `Interproc*` (line 9 in `void Interproc.interproc1Bad(InterprocA)`) and then locks `b` in class `InterprocA*` (line 14 in `void Interproc.interproc2Bad(InterprocA)`).
Trace 2 (starts at `void InterprocA.interproc1Bad(Interproc)`), first locks `this` in class `InterprocA*` (line 37 in `void InterprocA.interproc1Bad(Interproc)`) and then locks `d` in class `Interproc*` (line 42 in `void InterprocA.interproc2Bad(Interproc)`).
```
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D8379328
fbshipit-source-id: bc33983
Nikos Gorogiannis
Jules Villard
Phoebe Nichols
Josh Berdine
Mehdi Bouaziz
Nikos Gorogiannis
Jeremy Dubreil