Summary:
When a single field struct is initialized with "type x{v}" form, the translated result is not straightforward. For example,
```
struct t {
int val_;
};
void foo(t x) {
t y{x};
}
```
calls the copy constructor with `x`. This is good.
```
void foo(int n) {
t y{n};
}
```
assigns the integer `n` to `y.val_`. This is good.
```
t get_v();
void foo() {
t y{get_v()};
}
```
assigns return value of `get_v` to `y.val_`, rather than calling the copy constructor. This is not
good, but doesn't matter for actual running; `&y.val_` is the same to `&y` and `t` value is the same
to `int` value.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D26146578
fbshipit-source-id: 8a81bb1db
Sungkeun Cho