Summary:
The disjunctive domain shouldn't really be a set in the first place as
comparing abstract states for equality is expensive to do naively
(walking the whole maps representing the abstract heap). Moreover in
practice these sets have a small max size (currently 50 for pulse, the
only client), so switching them to plain lists makes sense.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D14258489
fbshipit-source-id: c512169eb
Summary:
It's useful to keep the size of states down, especially when humans are
trying to read it. It will also help keep the size of summaries down in
the inter-procedural pulse.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D14258486
fbshipit-source-id: 45ebcac67
Summary:
You can only take the address of variables, field accesses, and array
accesses, the rest doesn't make sense.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D14258484
fbshipit-source-id: 8ddcfe810
Summary: Spent some time staring at empty HTML output instead of seeing `<Some ...>` because I'm dumb. Now it's dumb proof.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D14258492
fbshipit-source-id: d1368d212
Summary: After a redeclaration of a global constant, it is not parsed as ICE(integral constant expression), which results in FN.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D14299288
fbshipit-source-id: 394afd595
Summary:
It assigns symbolic values for global variables in the load commands. However, it does not instantiate the symbols for the global variables yet, which will be addressed in another diff.
Depends on D14208643
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D14257619
fbshipit-source-id: f9113c8a3
Summary:
the predicate to check that a decl is const was not working for VarDecl.
This diff fixes this
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D14106798
fbshipit-source-id: 1f6c24113
Summary:
- docstrings
- mli
- split `get_control_maps`: `get_loop_head_to_source_nodes` is used both by Cost and Hoisting. If using both analyzers, it is called twice whereas it could be shared (which is done later in the stack of diffs).
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D14258372
fbshipit-source-id: 29addddb7
Summary:
:
Since traces are attached to symbols, currently it will make no difference.
Calling `subst` on `Top` or on constant is constant-time.
But I need this to record `Call` trace elements for `Top`.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D14249265
fbshipit-source-id: d3aa4ac9e
Summary:
This diff differentiates proof obligations by allocsites. Sizes and
offsets of arrays were joined when making proof obligations.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D14163149
fbshipit-source-id: cb6608c16
Summary:
The Eradicate backend is reporting nullable type errors, that are not always necessarily leading to null pointer exceptions.
For example, the analysis is designed to be consistent with the Java type system and report on the following code:
String foo(boolean test) {
Object object = test ? new Object() : null;
if (test) {
return object.toString(); // the analysis reports here
}
}
even though the code will not crash.
In order to make this aspect clear, this diff renames the warnings `Null Method Call` and `Null Field Access` into `Nullable Dereference`
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D14001979
fbshipit-source-id: ff1285283
Summary:
`Utils.with_intermediate_temp_file_out` is conceptually simpler. Plus,
this removes a dependency on Unix.flock, which is not portable under
Windows.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/infer/pull/1066
Differential Revision: D14208138
Pulled By: jvillard
fbshipit-source-id: 7587007e5
Summary:
This diff adds a constant to the set of widening thresholds if the
constant is compared to an abstract value in condition expressions.
Each abstract value has its own set of thresholds.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D14147150
fbshipit-source-id: ca0db34d4
Summary: We don't want to use Cost analysis results when `Config.hoisting_report_only_expensive` is false
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D14124555
fbshipit-source-id: e809bb80a
Summary:
In this diff, it avoids a precision-losing pruning, which was needed
to keep effects of assume commands.
```
unsigned int c = a + b; // (1)
if (c > 0) { // (2)
char result[c];
result[c - 1] = 0; // (4)
}
```
For example, in the example, `c` is assigned by `[a+b,a+b]` at (1),
then it tried to prune the lower bound of `c` to 1 at (2) while losing
precision, in order to say `c - 1` at (4) is safe in terms of integer
underflow. Instead, it could not say that `c - 1` is smaller than `c`
in the buffer access, because the former is analyzed to `[0,a+b-1]` and
the latter `[1,a+b]` at (4).
Now, the situation has changed. By adopting conditional proof
obligation (D13749914), the FP of integer overflow can be suppressed
without the precision-losing pruning.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D14122770
fbshipit-source-id: 634744e99
Jeremy Dubreil
Nikos Gorogiannis
Jules Villard
Mehdi Bouaziz
Sungkeun Cho
Ezgi Çiçek
Dino Distefano
Boris Yakobowski