Summary:
To emulate the `ThreadSafe` contract in C++/ObjC, reporting was gated behind a check that ensured a C++/ObjC class has a `std::mutex` member (plus other filters). This is reasonable, but it has some drawbacks
- other locks may be used, and therefore must be added to the member check;
- locking mechanisms that use the object itself as a monitor cannot be modelled (`synchronized` in ObjC)
RacerD already has `ThreadsDomain` which models our guess on whether a method is expected to run in a concurrent context, and which in C++/ObjC boils down to whether the method non-transitively acquires a lock. This should be a good enough indicator that the class should be checked regardless of whether the locks are member fields. This diff gates the C++/ObjC check on that abstract property.
Reviewed By: dulmarod
Differential Revision: D19558355
fbshipit-source-id: 229d7ff82
Summary:
This diff enables parsing and auto-formatting documentation
comments (aka docstrings).
I have looked at this entire diff and manually made some changes to
improve the formatting. In some cases it looked like it would take too
much time, or benefit from someone more familiar with the code doing
it, and I instead disabled auto-formatting docstrings in those files.
Also, there are some source files where the docstrings are invalid,
and some where the structure detected by the parser appears not to
match what was intended. Auto-formatting has been disabled for these
files.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D18755888
fbshipit-source-id: 68d72465d
Summary:
Add precision to analysis by elaborating the thread-status domain. This is done by having unknown (bottom), UI, BG or Any (both/top) elements in the lattice. This way, when we branch on thread-identity (if I am on UI thread do this, otherwise do that), we know that in one branch we are on UI thread and on the other we are *not* on the UI thread (BG thread), where previously the other branch would just go to top.
With this knowledge we can throw away pairs that come from callees which run on a thread that is impossible, given the current caller thread identity. This can happen when annotations are used incorrectly, and since this is the purview of annot-reachability, we just drop those pairs entirely.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D18202175
fbshipit-source-id: be604054e
Summary:
Steal a page from RacerD (and improve interface of) on using certain calls to assert
execution on a particular thread. Reduces FPs and FNs too.
Reviewed By: dulmarod
Differential Revision: D18199843
fbshipit-source-id: 5bdff0dfe
Summary:
Starvation analysis keeps a trace documenting why a method is seen as on the UI thread (many reasons possible, often confusing). This was a call-stack plus string, for keeping the explanation of why the last callee is on the UI thread. This is bad, because it takes too much memory/storage (each string is custom-made to the classes/method involved), and is effectively untyped.
Switch to a proper type for explaining this, so the cost is just a few pointers plus shared procnames/types, and then convert to string only when reporting. This will also allow to push the UI trace inside each element of the starvation domain, so as to allow path sensitivity etc, without blowing up summary size.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek, artempyanykh
Differential Revision: D17810007
fbshipit-source-id: cdd743975
Summary: The type hierarchy was traversed multiple times when searching for annotations: once for methods/overrides annotated and once for superclasses. This can be done in one pass.
Reviewed By: dulmarod
Differential Revision: D17787172
fbshipit-source-id: 248dd4c27
Summary:
At some point it was thought that we can assume that any annotation starting with "On" means the method is on the UI thread.
That's too imprecise and has led to false positives and negatives. Restrict to a well-known safe set.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D17769376
fbshipit-source-id: 0f8fee059
Summary: Even though we recognize the lock/unlock methods of various classes in C++, to report we insist that the class must have a `mutex` member. Equalize the two sets of types recognized.
Reviewed By: da319
Differential Revision: D10446527
fbshipit-source-id: f42ae1a35
Summary: Option is not needed, just set `default` record to agree with function default arguments.
Reviewed By: da319
Differential Revision: D10050463
fbshipit-source-id: e7d13bbd5
Summary:
The 2nd iteration of analysis of the Android core implementation did not yield actionable models, so delete those.
Turn on strict-mode reporting by default, when doing starvation analysis (which is disabled by default).
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D9991448
fbshipit-source-id: 67504591d
Summary:
The method matcher is now used sufficiently it warrants refactoring out into its own module.
Also, kill dev-android-strict-mode and leave starvation-strict-mode as the stronger option.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D9990753
fbshipit-source-id: 626a70a19
Summary:
First step in writing an analyzer that is meant to run only on Android core library implementation.
This will, when finished, compute the library entrypoints that may lead to a strict mode violation.
The normal analyzer will use those to statically flag strict mode violations in app code.
Strict Mode is an Android debug mode, where doing certain things (like disk read/write or network activity) on the UI thread will raise an exception. We want to statically catch these, as well as indirect versions (the UI thread takes a lock and another thread holding that lock calls a method that would be a strict mode violation).
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D9634407
fbshipit-source-id: c30bcedb3
Nikos Gorogiannis
Josh Berdine
Jeremy Dubreil
Nikos Gorogiannis