Summary:
For more deduplications of issues, this diff loosens the condition of
similar bounds. The previous condition of similar bounds was too
strict, so [0,0] and [0,+oo] were not similar.
Depends on D10851762
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D10866127
fbshipit-source-id: 4ba912a88
Summary:
This diff preserves values of offset and index separately, rather than
one value of their addition, because premature addition results in
imprecise FPs by the limited expressiveness of the domain.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D10851393
fbshipit-source-id: 1685ead36
Summary:
It avoids checking integer overflow when it definitely cannot happen.
For example, it does not check integer overflow of addition when one
of parameters is a negative number, or underflow of subtraction when
its first parameter is a positive number.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D10446161
fbshipit-source-id: b8c86e1b2
Summary: This diff changes pp of binary operation condition in order to avoid a `make test` failure. For the same `uint64_t` type, it is translated to `unsigned long long` in 64bit mac, but `unsigned long` in 64bit linux, which made a `make test` failure.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D10459466
fbshipit-source-id: 449ab548e
Summary:
Goal of the stack: deprecate the `--analyzer` option in favour of turning
individual features on and off. This option is a mess: some of the options are
now subcommands (compile, capture), others are aliases (infer and checkers),
and they can all be replicated using some straightforward combination of other
options.
This diff: stop using `--analyzer` in tests. It's mostly `checkers` everywhere,
which is already the default. `linters` becomes `--no-capture --linters-only`.
`infer` is supposed to be `checkers` already. `crashcontext` is
`--crashcontext-only`.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D9942689
fbshipit-source-id: 048281761
Summary: The `procedure` field in the final report should use the non-ambiguous fully qualified name containing the Java package declaration and the list of parameter types.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D9237522
fbshipit-source-id: e9b0ff664
Summary:
I realized that control variable analysis was broken when we had multiple back-edges for the same loop. This is often the case when we have a switch statement combined with continue in a loop (see `test_switch` in `switch_continue.c`) or when we have disjunctive guards in do-while loops.
This diff fixes that by
- defining a loop by its loophead (the target of its backedges) rather than its back-edges. Then it converts back-edge list to a map from loop_head to sources of the loop's back-edges.
- collecting multiple guard nodes that come from potentially multiple exit nodes per loop head
In addition, it also removes the wrong assumption that an exit node belongs to a single loop head.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D8398061
fbshipit-source-id: abaf288
Mehdi Bouaziz
Sungkeun Cho
Ezgi Çiçek
Dino Distefano
Jules Villard
Martino Luca
Jeremy Dubreil