Summary:
When assign to the special `return` variable, check that the result is
not the address of a local variable, otherwise report.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D13466896
fbshipit-source-id: 465da7f13
Summary: Naming it `FP_` was a mistake in the original commit that copied the tests over as pulse has never reported on that method.
Reviewed By: da319
Differential Revision: D13465324
fbshipit-source-id: f8b24ebda
Summary:
In order to avoid FPs due to lack of relational info, we apply a heuristic: proof obligations has a latest pruned values,
then it is instantiated at Call statements. If there is a bottom value in the instantiated pruned values, we can say the
program point where the proof obligation is introduced is unreachable with the given parameters of the function.
Depends on D13414441
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D13414483
fbshipit-source-id: 61bd34ebb
Summary:
It's ok to take an address of a field / array access of an invalid object.
This diff calculates the inner most dereference for an access expression starting with `&` and does not report on the dereference even if the address is invalid.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D13450758
fbshipit-source-id: 18c038701
Summary:
When we create Dereference edge, we also create TakeAddress back edge. This causes false positives for stack variables. When we write to a stack variable and then take its address, the resulting address is the one from the back edge of the written value. See example `push_back_value_ok`. To solve this issue, this diff changes stack to denote a map from address of variables rather than from variables.
We still have issue for fields, see example, FP_push_back_value_field_ok. To solve this, we probably need to remove back edges.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D13432415
fbshipit-source-id: 9254a1a6d
Summary:
Avoid sandboxing issues and mark the incompatibility with javalib 3.0.
Also remove workaround for opam bug that has been fixed and that was
causing portability issues on osx where `realpath` isn't always
available.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D13450029
fbshipit-source-id: ea33b06d8
Summary: Mostly a revert of D13190876 once the disjunctive domain is in place.
Reviewed By: da319
Differential Revision: D13432488
fbshipit-source-id: f1e98ef0d
Summary:
Change join/widen policies to more interesting ones and play around to
find a good tradeoff.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D13432492
fbshipit-source-id: 2c3e498dd
Summary:
Introduce machinery to do disjunctive HIL domains and use it for pulse,
but only in a mode that preserves the existing behaviour.
The disjunctive domain is a functor that turns any (HIL for now)
transfer function module into one operating on sets of elements of the
original domain. The behaviour of joins (and widenings, which are equal
to joins) can be chosen when instantiating the functor among 3
behaviours:
- `` `JoinAfter n`: when the set of disjuncts gets bigger than `n` the
underlying domain's join is called to collapse them into one state
- `` `UnderApproximateAfter n`: when the sest of disjuncts gets bigger
than `n` then just stop adding new states to it, drop any further states
on the floor. This corresponds to an under-approximation/bounded
approach.
- `` `NeverJoin`
The widening is always of the form ``
`UnderApproximateAfterNumIterations max_iter` for now since the only
user is pulse and I'm not sure what else would be useful.
Picking `` `JoinAfter 0` gives the same results as the non-disjunctive
domain since the underlying `join` will always be called. Make pulse use
this mode for now, and tune it in a next diff.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D13431375
fbshipit-source-id: b93aa50e7
Summary:
This will be useful to make the analysis more precise. In particular, it
allows a disjunctive version of pulse to deal will deleting vector
elements in a loop: without this, deleting an array element in one
iteration will make the analysis think that the next array element is
invalid too since they are all the same. By keep track of the index, we
can detect when we are sure that two elements are the same and only
report in that case.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D13431374
fbshipit-source-id: dae82deeb
Summary:
A lot of functors that take a `Make{SIL,HIL}` can take a `{SIL,HIL}`
directly instead. This makes my head hurt a bit less.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D13416967
fbshipit-source-id: eb0b33bc4
Summary:
When a lambda gets created, record the abstract addresses it captures, then
complain if we see some of them be invalidated before it is called.
Add a notion of "allocator" for reporting better messages. The messages are
still a bit sucky, will need to improve them more generally at some point.
```
jul lambda ~ infer 1 infer -g --pulse-only -- clang -std=c++11 -c infer/tests/codetoanalyze/cpp/pulse/closures.cpp
Logs in /home/jul/infer.fb/infer-out/logs
Capturing in make/cc mode...
Found 1 source file to analyze in /home/jul/infer.fb/infer-out
Found 2 issues
infer/tests/codetoanalyze/cpp/pulse/closures.cpp:21: error: USE_AFTER_DESTRUCTOR
`&(f)` accesses address `s` captured by `&(f)` as `s` invalidated by destructor call `S_~S(s)` at line 20, column 3 past its lifetime (debug: 5).
19. f = [&s] { return s.f; };
20. } // destructor for s called here
21. > return f(); // s used here
22. }
23.
infer/tests/codetoanalyze/cpp/pulse/closures.cpp:30: error: USE_AFTER_DESTRUCTOR
`&(f)` accesses address `s` captured by `&(f)` as `s` invalidated by destructor call `S_~S(s)` at line 29, column 3 past its lifetime (debug: 8).
28. f = [&] { return s.f; };
29. }
30. > return f();
31. }
32.
Summary of the reports
USE_AFTER_DESTRUCTOR: 2
```
Reviewed By: da319
Differential Revision: D13400074
fbshipit-source-id: 3c68ff4ea
Summary: Model more `std::vector` functions that can potentially invalidate references to vector's elements (https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/container/vector).
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D13399161
fbshipit-source-id: 95cf2cae6
Summary:
Some code calls `this->~Obj()` then proceeds to use fields in the current
object, which previously we would report as invalid uses. Assume people know
what they are doing and ignore destructor calls to `this`.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D13401145
fbshipit-source-id: f6b0fb6ec
Jules Villard
Jeremy Dubreil
Sungkeun Cho
Mehdi Bouaziz
Nikos Gorogiannis
Ezgi Çiçek
Daiva Naudziuniene
Fabio Milano
David Lively