Summary:
This was causing a crash, because when trying to create a procname from a block at that point we don't have the block return type, which is needed for the name. I don't understand why BlockDecl doesn't contain the type, but I looked again and it doesn't (also in clang). So in general we need to pass it from the context, but that's not possible in this case.
Also, one could argue that such a block is not a method from the struct, since it's just a block that is assigned to a field as initialization.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D17575197
fbshipit-source-id: 3974ead3f
Summary: When we have an annotation like `Prop(varArg = X)` or ` ThreadSafe(enableChecks = true)`, we were not able to pick up the names of the parameters like `varArg` or `enableChecks`. This diff fixes that.
Reviewed By: skcho, ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D17571377
fbshipit-source-id: 5293b5810
Summary:
Events can be many things, including lock acquisitions. Lock state keeps a set of events, all of which must be lock acquisitions.
Enforce this via the type checker by specialising the types so that lock state satisfies this by construction.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D17571428
fbshipit-source-id: 2f5a33b98
Summary:
Instead of polluting the signature of trace endpoints, have
the call printer be a module argument to the functors
producing trace elements.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D17550111
fbshipit-source-id: ab5af94c6
Summary:
This proceed the work of getting rid of Annot.Item.t.
This diff:
- Moves "check assignment rule" to recently supported NullsafeRules
- Implements their own "check overannotated" (defers consolidating this
check into NullsafeRule for the future diffs).
Note that we don't need PropagatesNullable logic anymore because it is
already ported to NullsafeType (return value will be marked as Nullable
in NullsafeType)!
implicit_nullable (a.k.a. Void types) will require a follow up diff to
model.
Reviewed By: artempyanykh
Differential Revision: D17499246
fbshipit-source-id: 14b473f29
Summary:
In nutshell, Nullsafe is driven by relatively simple set of rules.
It is currently not well reflected in code: we are duplicating the same logic in different places, which is:
- error prone (we need to adjust ensure all places are addressed if a new feature is introduced)
- complicates understanding of nullsafe
Consolidating checks will simplify introducing Unknown Nullability and
strict/partial check modes.
## this diff
This diff does it for one particular check.
See follow up diffs re that proceed consolidation.
## future diffs
Future diffs will:
- consolidate other checks that use 'assignment rule'
- introduce other rules, most notably 'dereference rule' and
'inheritance rule'
Reviewed By: artempyanykh
Differential Revision: D17498630
fbshipit-source-id: 079d36518
Summary:
Now, after series of modifications with TypeAnnotation, we are ready to
rename it to reflect what it means in the code.
See the documentation in the class for details.
Also:
- renamed methods for clarity
- added some documentation
- renamed local variables around the usages
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D17480799
fbshipit-source-id: d4408887a
Summary:
This continues work for eliminating Annot.Item.t from Nullsafe low-level
code.
The introduced function `from_nullsafe_type` is called when we infer
initial type of the equation based on the function or field formal signature.
Before that, we did it via reading the annotation directly, which
complicates the logic and making introducing Unknown nullability tricky.
## Clarifying the semantics of PropagatesNullable
This diff also clarifies (and changes) the behavior of PropagatesNullable params.
Previously, if the return value of a function that has PropagatesNullable params was
annotated as Nullable, nullsafe was effectively ignoring PropagatesNullable effect.
This is especially bad because one can add Nullable annotation based on the logic "if the function can return `null`, it should be annotated with Nullable`.
In the new design, there is no possibility for such a misuse: the code that
applies the rule "any param is PropagatesNullable hence the return
value is nullable even if not explicitly annotated" lives in NullsafeType.ml, so
this will be automatically taken into account.
Meaning that now we implicitly deduce Nullable annotation for the return value, and providing it explicitly as an alternative that does not change the effect.
In the future, we might consider annotating the return value with `Nullable` explicit.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D17479157
fbshipit-source-id: 66c2c8777
Summary:
In the cost checker, the range of selected control variables are used to estimate the number of loop iteration. However, sometimes the ranges of control variables are not related to how many times the loop iteration. This diff strengthens the condition for them as:
1. integers from `size` models
2. integers constructed from `+` or `-`
3. integers constructed from `*`
For the last one, the loop iteration is likely to be log scale of the range of the control variable:
```
while (i < c) {
i *= 2;
}
```
We will address this in the future.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D17365796
fbshipit-source-id: c1e709ae8
Summary: Our annotation parameter parsing is too primitive to identify `resType` and before we only assumed that all Prop's can be set by any of the two suffixes: `Attr` and `Res`. After talking to Litho team, there is 3 more additions to these suffixes: `Dip`, `Sip`, and `Px`.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D17528482
fbshipit-source-id: 8d7f49130
Summary: Before, we were mistakenly checking any annotation that ends with Prop such as TreeProp. This was wrong. Instead, we should only check Prop as adviced by the Litho team.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D17527769
fbshipit-source-id: b753dd87a
Summary:
Introduce a new experimental checker (`--impurity`) that detects
impurity information, tracking which parameters and global variables
of a function are modified. The checker relies on Pulse to detect how
the state changes: it traverses the pre and post pairs starting from
the parameter/global variable and finds where the pre and post heaps
diverge. At diversion points, we expect to see WrittenTo/Invalid attributes
containing a trace of how the address was modified. We use these to
construct the trace of impurity.
This checker is a complement to the purity checker that exists mainly
for Java (and used for cost and loop-hoisting analyses). The aim of
this new experimental checker is to rely on Pulse's precise
memory treatment and come up with a more precise im(purity)
analysis. To distinguish the two checkers, we introduce a new issue
type `IMPURE_FUNCTION` that reports when a function is impure, rather
than when it is pure (as in the purity checker).
TODO:
- improve the analysis to rely on impurity information of external
library calls. Currently, all library calls are assumed to be nops,
hence pure.
- de-entangle Pulse reporting from analysis.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D17051567
fbshipit-source-id: 5e10afb4f
Summary:
As per previous diff, attempt to allocate fewer strings. This doesn't
seem to affect perf although allocating less might reduce memory
pressure.
Reviewed By: mityal
Differential Revision: D17423973
fbshipit-source-id: e2e37b071
Summary:
My spidey senses were tingling. Next diff uses the `pp` functions
everywhere it was kind of obvious how to change the code to do so. It
doesn't improve perf but is less clowny that way. It might lessen memory
pressure since allocating strings is expensive and this code was doing a
lot of it.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D17450324
fbshipit-source-id: 632cee584
Summary:
The code was already trying to do that but failing. Now it works.
This revealed a slight bug where the progress bar would always stop at
N-1/N 99% jobs. Fixed by moving the progress bar updates *after* the
operation that might decrease the number of jobs left.
Reviewed By: mityal
Differential Revision: D17423978
fbshipit-source-id: fc32db5f3
Summary:
Previously we would incorrectly report the time for the whole process
and this could include capture time too.
Reviewed By: mityal
Differential Revision: D17423977
fbshipit-source-id: b3ed754b3
Summary: We should be able to run this processing ast steps without running linters or capture. This also adds a new module ProcessAST to do the processing, Capture.ml should not know anything else than calling the respective modules for capture, linting or processing.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D17501453
fbshipit-source-id: 30adba5b1
Summary:
`ModeledRange` represents how many times the interval value can be updated by modeled functions. This
domain is to support the case where there are mismatches between value of a control variable and
actual number of loop iterations. For example,
```
while((c = file_channel.read(buf)) != -1) { ... }
```
the loop will iterates as the file size, but the control variable `c` does not have that value. In
these cases, it assigns a symbolic value of the file size to the modeled range of `c`, then which
is used when calculating the overall cost.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D17476621
fbshipit-source-id: 9a81376e8
Summary:
1/ Nikos Gorogiannis pointed out that
- for highly reused public types, records (especially when >= 3 params) are generally more readable than tuples.
- Records simplify code modifications, especially adding new fields. And we are going to add some, namely param flags, in the future.
2/ Let's make the fact that annotated signature is deprecated more
visible; it will also simplify searching for usages when we will be
getting rid of them.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D17475033
fbshipit-source-id: 7740c979b
Summary:
- Instead of merging one target DB into the main DB at a time, merge all target DBs into an in-memory DB (thus, no writing) and then dump it into the main DB at the end. This makes merging faster.
- When using the sqlite write daemon, there is no reason to drive the merge process from the master, sending each individual target to merge down the socket and doing one DB merge at a time. Here we move all the DB merging logic in the daemon, and expose a single function that does it all.
- Refactor some common functionality (notably the `iter_infer_deps` function is now in `Utils`) and remove dead files.
This can be also done using a temporary DB (which is not limited to memory) but this showed worse perf in tests than the in-memory solution as well as the current state of things (! possibly Sqlite-version related?).
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D17182862
fbshipit-source-id: a6f81937d
Summary:
`get_field_annotation` is (together with
`get_modelled_annotated_signature`) an entry point when Nullsafe fetches
annotation information.
In follow up diffs we are going to utilize added information; see also
TODO in the code
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D17475034
fbshipit-source-id: dab77bc7b
Summary:
"Unannotated" is misleading and ambiguous concept, it can have different
meanings depending on agreements.
The current logic treats them as Nonnull, which is exactly what we want
to preserve.
(If we need to partially model some functions where we don't have
opinion on some of types in the signature, we can explicitly model
unknown nullability later on).
Note that I am not aiming for substantial refactoring of
modelsTables.ml; the scope of this diff is merely to clarify things.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D17449347
fbshipit-source-id: 43c798ce7
Summary:
This function is the main entry point for getting annotated signature
for nullsafe.
We will modify it and its callees in follow up diffs to migrate other
features of Annot.items to specialized types.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D17448082
fbshipit-source-id: be00b4737
Summary:
This is a central abstraction for coming future unknown nullability support.
# Context
Annot.ml is a low-level module:
- it contains lists of raw (string) annotations
- no algebraic datatypes for annotations
- it mixes annotations that Nullsafe should be aware of with all sorts of other annotations
- some annotations make sense for return values, some make sense for params, and some make sense for methods.
But, most importantly, it does not contain information about source of an annotation, making it hard to distinct things like "Nonnull as default" vs "Nonnull as explicitly annotated" vs "Nonnull as modelled". Ditto for nullable.
Because of this, it is tricky to introduce unknown nullability in an elegant way.
Let's get rid of using Annot.Item.t in nullsafe code in the following way:
- Move nullability information associated with the Java type to a dedicated algebraic DT.
- Split other annotations that are important for nullsafe into param flags, ret value flags, and method flags, and introduce corresponding datatypes.
# This diff
This diff introduces NullsafeType and adds this to AnnotatedSignature.
It is not used yet, hence the diff is a no-op.
In future diffs, we are going to (see also TODOs in the code):
- actually use this information instead of accessing Annot.item
- add more information to AnnotatedSignature
- remove Annot.item from AnnnotatedSignature
- when this is done, introduce notion of unknown nullability.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D17420595
fbshipit-source-id: b30706d9b
Summary:
This diff extends the `Simple` alias domain to address Java's
temporary variables better. It now has an additional field to denote
an alias temporary variable.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D17421907
fbshipit-source-id: 8b8b47461
Summary:
We historically had Model.Inference, which was an attempt to enhance
models with additional abilities to get the annotation.
This feature got removed in D9805110, including removing of the key
condition Models.Inference.field_is_marked.
This code also is not executed: `Config.eradicate` condition
was an old artefact of migrating Eradicate to callback infrastructure:
D1508451. We run eradicate only as a callback as of now, so this flag is
always true.
In follow up diffs we refactor AnnotationSignature module, and this
cleanup simplifies the refactoring.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D17419173
fbshipit-source-id: 1b30555de
Summary:
CONDITION_REDUNDANT_NONNULL was an attempt to reduce number of false
positives for condition redundant. (It is the most popular check as of
now).
The root case for most of false positives is that a lot of code is
simply not annotated (but should have been), so blaming developers for defense programming is
not actionable.
In attempt to solve the problem, a special issue type (for case when the
code is explicitly annotated with Nonnull) was introduced.
In follow up diffs we are going to introduce a generic way of doing the
same, not limited to this particular check only.
Namely, we will introduce notion of unknown nullability, so it will be
possible to distinguish not annotated yet (hence no warnings) and already
annotated (hence warnings) parts of code.
This piece of logic is incompatible with the aforementioned work, hence
we need to remove it.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D17398768
fbshipit-source-id: 8bddf10e5
Summary:
D17397144 adds dedicated tests for condition redundant.
We also have tests for overannotated methods.
This makes these test cases redundant. Let's not pollute the results.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D17398757
fbshipit-source-id: 10f6beeca
Summary:
This will simplify modifying functionality around this type of error.
Also rename the file for clarity.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D17397144
fbshipit-source-id: 552215243
Summary:
This diff simplifies two similar alias targets: AliasTarget.Simple and
AliasTarget.SimplePlusA. Since the latter is simply extended version
of the former, they are better to have a common constructor.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D17421416
fbshipit-source-id: e0946a73b
Summary:
This diff revises widening functions of bounds that have a linear form and a min/max form.
For example, for lower bounds,
* 3 ▽ (1+min(2, x)) = (1+min(2, x))
* 3+x ▽ (3+min(2, x)) = (3+min(2, x))
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D17420786
fbshipit-source-id: ff9eebed3
Summary: This diff ignores field's type in their comparisons. They should be distinguished by their names and struct types.
Reviewed By: dulmarod
Differential Revision: D17284621
fbshipit-source-id: ae8a33083
Summary:
This diff addresses collection adds in loop. For example,
```
ArrayList<...> a = new ArrayList<>();
for (int i = 0; i < size; i++) {
a.add(...);
}
// we want to know the size of `a` here!
```
This is a common pattern on initializing a collection in Java.
How we did: Instead of adopting general (but complicated) solutions such as relational domain, we
extended the current alias domain of inferbo, to be able to handle this specific case:
* An array `a` should have size 0, at the entry of the loop.
* The iterating variable `i` should start with 0.
* `add` should be called once inside the loop.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D17319350
fbshipit-source-id: 99b6acae1
Summary:
In D17156724, we forked nullsafe tests, which was a strategy to
introduce nullsafe-gradual mode back then.
The reason was "gradual" mode is a pretty big change in a way Infer
handles annotations, so we wanted to tests both scenarios: gradual and
non-gradual mode.
The plan was to deprecate "non-gradual" tests at some point, hence we
decided to go with duplication.
Now we have a better approach to ensure "gradual" features are well
covered. The approach is the following.
1. [Mostly finished] Improve existings tests so that they cover negative and positive
cases. With this, we can safely add something like
--non-annotated-default UNKNOWN_NULLABILITY to the test config and be sure tests still make
sense (i.e. don't pass simply because annotations don't make sense
anymore)
2. [In progress]. Refactor nullsafe code so that instead of using of Annot.ml everywhere we use a special abstraction telling if the class is annotated with Nullable, Nonnull, or not annotated. With this change, we essenstially have a single place we need to test, which removes the need to have 2 pair of tests for each feature.
3. [To be done]. Introduce Uknown nullability and add small number of tests specifically
for that feature (together with existing tests).
NOTE: I did not rename `nullsafe-default` back to `nullsafe` to not
pollute blame without need.
Reviewed By: artempyanykh
Differential Revision: D17395743
fbshipit-source-id: 3d3e062f6
Summary:
Sqlite versions set their own default page and cache size. Old versions use crazy-non-optimal settings.
Allow setting both from command line and set up reasonable defaults. See, e.g.,
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Performance/Avoid_SQLite_In_Your_Next_Firefox_Feature
for page size notes.
The defaults will cost a maximum of 64Mb in cache per Infer process. These improve merging times significantly.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D17364643
fbshipit-source-id: b9abab10f
Summary:
At some point, there was a custom equality function that deliberately ignored some fields in err_instance. It was deleted in D4232422, so having a custom hash function does not serve any purpose anymore.
Since 2016 there was no known problems with the change in D4232422.
If we decide that we need similar behavior that was before D4232422, it will be easier to reimplement the functionality again.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D17313660
fbshipit-source-id: 5c6c29a0b
Summary:
We want to allow following declaration
```
CK::UIContext t(foo);
```
In this case t is only part of the scope and we don't want to check that is never mutated.
Reviewed By: kfirapps
Differential Revision: D17367040
fbshipit-source-id: 5312a1249
Summary: Adding a test to the top level makefile that I forgot to add (ooops)
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D17366065
fbshipit-source-id: 8111ccf7a
Summary: This calls the method `delete_capture_and_analysis_data` introduced in D17184424 once the appropriate specs files for incremental analysis have been deleted. This fixes two bugs that I observed in incremental analysis that were arising because of stale state left in the results directory.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D17184424
fbshipit-source-id: d63f59db9
Summary:
I observed a bug in incremental analysis for thread safety analysis, where a thread safety violation was not being reported because the folder `racerd` was not being cleaned. This meant that the violation was determined to be a preexisting issue when it was actually an introduced issue.
This method can be used to fix this problem by cleaning the `racerd` folder. It also cleans the `captured` folder, I've done this following the original version of the method (see D16602417).
I'm not sure if the `captured` folder is used; it wasn't used in the tests I did. Thoughts about this?
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D17261504
fbshipit-source-id: 8fea23e98
Summary:
There is currently a bug in incremental analysis because the capture data is not reset once the specs files have been invalidated. This has caused a problem where cost issues that should be reported are not spotted. I'm introducing this method so I can use it to fix incremental analysis.
This method is resurrected from D16602417
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D17184401
fbshipit-source-id: e84925324
Dulma Churchill
Ezgi Çiçek
Nikos Gorogiannis
Mitya Lyubarskiy
Sungkeun Cho
Jules Villard
Taras Tsugrii
Fabio Milano
Phoebe Nichols