Summary: Since we only care about reachability, drop the interpreter and just fold over all instructions in the procdesc.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D10461783
fbshipit-source-id: 3e0b42a48
Summary: We don't need the machinery of HIL, or its complexity for this analysis.
Reviewed By: ddino
Differential Revision: D10461641
fbshipit-source-id: 2e7d3ab8e
Summary: First version of an analyzer collecting classes transitively touched.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D10448025
fbshipit-source-id: 0ddfefd46
Summary: Even though we recognize the lock/unlock methods of various classes in C++, to report we insist that the class must have a `mutex` member. Equalize the two sets of types recognized.
Reviewed By: da319
Differential Revision: D10446527
fbshipit-source-id: f42ae1a35
Summary:
It avoids checking integer overflow when it definitely cannot happen.
For example, it does not check integer overflow of addition when one
of parameters is a negative number, or underflow of subtraction when
its first parameter is a positive number.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D10446161
fbshipit-source-id: b8c86e1b2
Summary: We assume multiplication of 1 is safe. It happens sometimes by multiplying `sizeof(char)`.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D10444680
fbshipit-source-id: 2f33be280
Summary: This diff changes pp of binary operation condition in order to avoid a `make test` failure. For the same `uint64_t` type, it is translated to `unsigned long long` in 64bit mac, but `unsigned long` in 64bit linux, which made a `make test` failure.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D10459466
fbshipit-source-id: 449ab548e
Summary:
`Location` was clashing with the `Location` module, so use `Address`
instead.
When invalidating an address, remember the "actor" of its invalidation,
i.e. the access expression leading to the address and the source
location of the corresponding instruction.
When checking accesses, also pass the actor responsible for the access,
so that when we raise an error we know:
1. when and why a location was invalidated
2. when and why we tried to read it after that
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D10446282
fbshipit-source-id: 3ca4fb3d4
Summary:
Model `x[y]` and `x.push_back(i)` to catch the classic bug of "take
reference inside vector, invalidate, then use again".
Reviewed By: da319
Differential Revision: D10445824
fbshipit-source-id: 21ffd9677
Summary:
Do the intersection of the heap and stack domains, and the union of the
invalid location sets. This forgets invalid locations that appear only
in one heap, unfortunately. We can start with this and improve later.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D10445825
fbshipit-source-id: cc24460af
Summary:
It gets built-in integer type widths of C from the clang plugin. For Java, it uses fixed widths.
The controller you requested could not be found.: facebook-clang-plugins
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D10397409
fbshipit-source-id: 73958742e
Summary:
Store the correct version of the proc desc into the DB when specialising
it. This doesn't seem to be used but is useful for investigating after
the fact (eg, if we could print individual cfgs).
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D10380708
fbshipit-source-id: fd72dbfc2
Summary:
New analysis in foetal form to detect invalid use of C++ objects after their
lifetime has ended. For now it has:
- A domain consisting of a graph of abstract locations representing the heap, a map from program variables to abstract locations representing the stack, and a set of locations known to be invalid (their lifetime has ended)
- The heap graph is unfolded lazily when we resolve accesses to the heap down to an abstract location. When we traverse a memory location we check that it's not known to be invalid.
- A simple transfer function reads and updates the stack and heap in a rudimentary way for now
- C++ `delete` is modeled as adding the location that its argument resolves to to the set of invalid locations
- Also, the domain has a really crappy join and widening for now (see comments in the code)
With this we already pass most of the "use after delete" tests from the
Ownership checker. The ones we don't pass are only because we are missing
models.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D10383249
fbshipit-source-id: f414664cb
Summary:
In some error paths we may end up querying the state for the instruction
being executed, but that is only populated by biabduction. Now it's
populated by AI checkers too.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D10381068
fbshipit-source-id: dca1325d7
Summary:
When the backend crashes we print which instruction/file/... we were analysing,
but because of recursion we can end up repeating that information all
the way to the toplevel call.
This makes sure we only print the innermost one, we don't care about the
calling context because the analysis is compositional.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D10381141
fbshipit-source-id: 1c92bb861
Summary:
Trace events would crash when infer subprocesses were spawned by the build
system because they didn't detect if the file was already initialised
correctly.
Also trace the clang capture.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D10380745
fbshipit-source-id: 76e1d4d7e
Summary:
It avoids raising an exception when unexpected arguments are given to
placement new. We will revert this after fixing the frontend to parse
user defined `new` correctly in the future.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D10378136
fbshipit-source-id: d494f781b
Summary:
Use same code for deciding whether two accesses conflict across java/clang, by adapting that of the clang version.
Eliminate/simplify some code.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz, jberdine
Differential Revision: D10217383
fbshipit-source-id: dc0986d05
Sungkeun Cho
Mehdi Bouaziz
Nikos Gorogiannis
Jules Villard
Martin Trojer
Dino Distefano
Ezgi Çiçek
Josh Berdine