Summary:
Developers will sometimes write GuardedBy("T.f") with the intended semantics: "guarded by the field f of the object with type T in the current state".
We want to support this to avoid false positives.
Reviewed By: peterogithub
Differential Revision: D4197476
fbshipit-source-id: acd00d9
Summary:
The way interfaces are dealt with led to a false positive,
where tryLock() works OK for a Lock but not for a ReentrantLock.
The solution is just to provide the model.
While I am at it I am adding some more standard tests for Lock and ReentrantLock, which were not present.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D4204551
fbshipit-source-id: 9b6de28
Summary: We want to skip readwrite locks for now, maybe report on their misuses later.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D4110998
fbshipit-source-id: 986f77e
Summary: Doing `sychronized(A.class)` where `A` is an inner class was not previously recognized by the `GuardedBy` checker.
Reviewed By: peterogithub
Differential Revision: D4095094
fbshipit-source-id: c832f9e
Summary:
This changes the algorithm for pure join to keep the constraints that,
after normalization, occur in both arguments. Previously pure join
would normalize, filter, and then union the constraints of the
arguments.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D3970394
fbshipit-source-id: 3dc1672
Summary:
Add a test case for a problem peterogithub uncovered with join of
attributes. The expected result is currently incorrect, to be fixed
later.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D3970363
fbshipit-source-id: 077705d