Summary: Just to make the source and destination types of the conversion more clear.
Reviewed By: da319
Differential Revision: D24746239
fbshipit-source-id: 592c7d0f1
Summary:
Since Context treats only equality directly, formulas involving other
literals can normalize to false when the context is not unsat. This
diff changes Sh.star to check this case, and return the canonical
false symbolic heap.
Reviewed By: da319
Differential Revision: D24746227
fbshipit-source-id: 50a51b8a6
Summary:
When exceptions are used due to the lack of goto, use `raise_notrace`
instead of `raise` to avoid the overhead of populating the backtrace.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D24630525
fbshipit-source-id: c5051d9c4
Summary:
The implementation in Context, in terms of Fol.Term and Fol.Formula,
can now be used instead of Ses.Equality, implemented using
Ses.Term. The Ses modules can now be removed.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D24532362
fbshipit-source-id: cee9791b7
Summary:
Adapt the solver implementation from Ses.Equality to Context, and use
the interface of Fol.Context.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D24532348
fbshipit-source-id: 2c6d41669
Summary:
Apply normalization to conditional terms similar to conditional
formulas: evaluate terms with literal conditions, equal branches, and
ensure the condition is not negative.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D24532344
fbshipit-source-id: 7818dc496
Summary:
Operations over the core representation are more useful in the core
representation modules.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D24532340
fbshipit-source-id: f1eab822d
Summary:
The Fol.Term and Fol.Formula provide an interface which supports
if-then-else terms and formulas, while the underlying representation
in Trm does not and Fml only supports if-then-else over formulas, not
terms. The implementation of the rest of the first-order solver needs
to use the underlying, normalized, representation. This diff exports
Trm and Fml to separate modules for this purpose. Later, they will be
packed into a library for the first-order solver, and only used from
within.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D24532351
fbshipit-source-id: 7310827da
Summary:
And add Monad.Make to implement the full interface from return and
bind.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D24532341
fbshipit-source-id: 5740ba1c2
Summary:
The iterator is simpler to define and all the traversals are then
available through Iter.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D24401743
fbshipit-source-id: 81f0653d9
Summary:
It is redundant to include the unit of conjunction in conjunction
formulas (resp., disjunction).
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D24371084
fbshipit-source-id: 6edc151e5
Summary: Simplify output of arithmetic terms, and omit trivial pure part of Sh.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D24371082
fbshipit-source-id: 91f2117d3
Summary:
Normalization of literal formulas is determined by their term
arguments. Logically, this is part of the theories, so move this code
out of the Propositional module which is theory-independent and into
Fol, which is theory-sensitive.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D24371081
fbshipit-source-id: f80a19ab8
Summary:
Change the type of `fold` functions to enable them to compose
better. The guiding reasoning behind using types such as:
```
val fold : 'a t -> 's -> f:('a -> 's -> 's) -> 's
```
is:
1. The function argument should be labeled. This is so that it can be
reordered relative to the others, since it is often a multi-line
`fun` expression.
2. The function argument should come last. This enables its
arguments (which are often polymorphic) to benefit from type-based
disambiguation information determined by the types of the other
arguments at the call sites.
3. The function argument's type should produce an
accumulator-transformer when partially-applied. That is,
`f x : 's -> 's`. This composes well with other functions designed
to produce transformers/endofunctions when partially applied, and
in particular improves the common case of composing folds into
"state-passing style" code.
4. The fold function itself should produce an accumulator-transformer
when partially applied. So `'a t -> 's -> f:_ -> 's` rather than
`'s -> 'a t -> f:_ -> 's` or `'a t -> init:'s -> f:_ -> 's` etc.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D24306063
fbshipit-source-id: 13bd8bbee
Summary:
The changes in set_intf.ml dictate the rest. The previous API
minimized changes when changing the backing implementation. But that
API is hostile toward composition, partial application, and
state-passing style code.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D24306089
fbshipit-source-id: 00a09f486
Summary:
Preceding commit reversed Map.to_iter to match the previous behavior
of to_list.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D24306051
fbshipit-source-id: aad12e434
Summary:
The changes in map_intf.ml dictate the rest. The previous API
minimized changes when changing the backing implementation. But that
API is hostile toward composition, partial application, and
state-passing style code.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D24306050
fbshipit-source-id: 71e286d4e
Summary:
The usage of equal_or_opposite boils down to evaluating formulas on
propositional constants, which seems clearer.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D24306104
fbshipit-source-id: df5d07628
Josh Berdine